Re-enabled CSM and Disabled Secure Boot and PC wouldn't post.


Recommended Posts

So I decided to see what would happen if I had a UEFI install of Windows 8.1 and I re-enabled CSM and turned secure boot off and after saving the changes my PC restarted and then did not post until I popped out my Motherboard battery and reset everything.

 

So I was wondering why it did this and what I would need to do if I ever wanted to go back to a "Legacy" install of windows?

So it might of been that even though I disabled Secure Boot I did not remove the Secure Boot Keys. I don't know I just did exactly what I did again and this time the system posted.

So it might of been that even though I disabled Secure Boot I did not remove the Secure Boot Keys. I don't know I just did exactly what I did again and this time the system posted.

 

ya what a pain the ass. I miss the old days of the Windows 7 motherboards.

I just wanted to see what would happen if I turned it off. I don't know what wouldn't cause it to POST I changed the OS Type from Windows 8 back to other which is it default and I changed Boot Mode Selection to UEFI only with CSM on and my PC just didn't want to post as soon as I did that. 

 

I am assuming that UEFI is now the way forward and we won't ever be going back to BIOS again so I SHOULDN'T need to I just wanted to see how I would go back to BIOS if I ever needed to. Windows 7 and up can all be installed in UEFI mode so it isn't an issue.

 

Once I put the BIOS back to purely default settings it still booted off the UEFI install on my SSD until I changed the Boot Mode Selection to not include UEFI so it was only looking for old MBR installs.

 

Anywho I just wanted to know how to switch back. It seems that to enable UEFI and Secure boot you need to get the settings right of the computer has a fit.

Only way I can see enabling the CSM breaking things, is if it defaulted to the CSM to try booting the system. The CSM can't boot a UEFI install of Windows, so it probably thought you didn't have an OS. UEFI/CSM is a install time switch, you can't switch between after afterwards without reinstalling. CSM can't boot UEFI installs, and the UEFI can only boot a CSM install if it's enabled (Which it has no reason to be if all your hardware works under UEFI)

Also removing the Secure Boot keys is probably a bad thing, they don't lock the UEFI to a specific install, they just validate the install (People running Linux can sign their own kernel and insert the signing keys into the UEFI, etc.). Removing them and then enabling Secure Boot will probably just cause it to fail again (Unless the board is smart and re-adds them)

What I couldn't figure out was why my computer decided not to post after I messed with those settings and I had to take out the motherboard battery to reset everything for it to POST again.

 

I has literally been fine since no issues what so ever, I am guessing I mushed up the settings when I turned the settings back to what they where (or what I thought they where) to see out of pure curiosity what would happen if I tried to boot a UEFI Install of Windows 8.1 with CSM on.

 

Also with UEFI booting and whatnot enabled why can I not see my 3 other HDDs in the boot list when I press F12 to select what drive to boot off of like I could before I turned the settings on to enable UEFI installs.

 

All my hardware works under UEFI. Z78 Motherboard, 4670K etc and Windows 7 all the way to 10 can all be installed in UEFI mode so I shouldn't need to touch them, I just wasn't sure why it would not even post after I played with the CSM etc settings.

So I decided to see what would happen if I had a UEFI install of Windows 8.1 and I re-enabled CSM and turned secure boot off and after saving the changes my PC restarted and then did not post until I popped out my Motherboard battery and reset everything.

 

So I was wondering why it did this and what I would need to do if I ever wanted to go back to a "Legacy" install of windows?

 

So 1: You broke UEFI booting because Legacy looks for a partition table, and UEFI does not

And 2: You would need to reinstall Windows using a non-UEFI method

 

I'd personally stick to UEFI if your hardware supports it, faster boot times, resume, and device init.

I was running a UEFI board with the CSM enabled for a while (Thanks Nvidia), it worked fine because I had the UEFI bootloader first in the list, so it never relied on the CSM for booting anything. UEFI handles booting a hell of a lot differently to the CSM way, under UEFI the bootloader is "installed" into the UEFI, and it can actually see what OS you're running. The CSM method involves trying to read special sectors of drives and seeing if a bootloader was found. That's why the CSM lists every drive on the system as a boot device, while the UEFI doesn't, since it's smart enough to know you can't boot off them.

That does give one problem, if you have a UEFI install and the CSM enabled, but the boot order wrong, the CSM will see your main hard drive as bootable, but be unable to load the bootloader (Since it's in a different format), and try falling back to something else (And depending on how it's setup, it might not try UEFI booting at all, I know my board was originally configured like that)

So it might of been that even though I disabled Secure Boot I did not remove the Secure Boot Keys. I don't know I just did exactly what I did again and this time the system posted.

 

Odd

 

I have disabled secure boot on 8.1 before and it still booted fine. That is not the cause. Is it BSOD or will it not even PST?

So yeah I am guessing I broke my system because it decided to have a fit and tried to boot using CSM while I had it set up for UEFI which caused it not to post. Lesson learned do not mess with that unless I want to go back to an old style install. 

 

Thanks for the help. UEFI booting is pretty new to me as I only just realized it was a thing hence why I Swapped my install over to it.

 

Oh and a question I am dual booting Windows 8.1 and 10 and when I hit F12 to pick which drive to boot from it only shows my SSD still, this is because all the boot files and all that is on the SSD and not on the HDD with windows 10 as well right?

Yeah, Windows uses a single bootloader for everything (Similar to Grub under Linux), so even if you're dual booting 8 and 10, you'll only have one entry in the UEFI boot selection (Under the CSM you'll have the option for both drives, even though only one will boot, etc.)

In UEFI, you put EFI files on the EFI System Partition and create pointers to them in a piece of flash memory on the board. You don't boot the drive, you load a specific file. The first sector on a properly set up drive with GPT has a protective MBR that's not flagged as bootable.

 

Edit:

HINT!

Linux no longer needs middleware boot loaders on UEFI systems. Compile the kernel with an EFI stub and UEFI can load it directly. Use efibootmgr (dependency: lspci & efivars) to put it into the boot list.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!