Official Transformers  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is your side of Transformers?



Recommended Posts

Then there's the issue of which franchise(s) you like. G1, G2, Beast Wars/Machines, RiD, etc.

 

For me it's pretty much everything except IDW, Dreamwave (the two most recent comic companies to have the license) and Kiss Players.

  • 2 weeks later...

G1, The movie, IDW/Dreamwave & High Moon Studios take on G1. Anything else is dead to me.

 

The War For Cybertron & Fall of Cybertron games? They're not technically G1 - they're officially "Aligned" - the same universe as the recent Transformers: Prime and Robots in Disguise shows.

 There's too much different from either the cartoon or comics for them to be G1 - too many characters in the games who shouldn't even exist yet if they were G1.

The War For Cybertron & Fall of Cybertron games? They're not technically G1 - they're officially "Aligned" - the same universe as the recent Transformers: Prime and Robots in Disguise shows.

 There's too much different from either the cartoon or comics for them to be G1 - too many characters in the games who shouldn't even exist yet if they were G1.

 

They can claim it but it doesn't hold water. Same as The War Within (which I forgot to mention). I see it as a re-imagining of G1, especially when the takara figure back story contradicts the marvel comics, which contradicts the 80's cartoon, the movie contradicts both and the further series post-movie contradict everything else. The amount of times Swoop/Divebomb has supposedly or actually died must be something of an on-going joke by now.

They can claim it but it doesn't hold water. Same as The War Within (which I forgot to mention). I see it as a re-imagining of G1, especially when the takara figure back story contradicts the marvel comics, which contradicts the 80's cartoon, the movie contradicts both and the further series post-movie contradict everything else. The amount of times Swoop/Divebomb has supposedly or actually died must be something of an on-going joke by now.

 

You may disagree, but that's the official line. Even the TFWiki pages for the games list them in the Aligned Continuity family

 

There's also the new, major concept of Dark Energon, started in FWC, and continued in Prime. It hasn't been included in any other timeline, just Aligned. Bumblebee is rendered mute in FOC, and remains so in Prime. No G1 Bumblebee has ever been unable to speak - that's a Movie/Aligned thing. The establishing shots of Cybertron in Prime are taken directly from WFC. Cliffjumper's head design in FOC is taken directly from his Prime design. Optimus Prime is a former librarian/data clerk, not a former dock/warehouse worker like in War Dawn. Trypticon is reformatted into the Nemesis, Megatron's ship in TF:Prime.

 

Meanwhile, the games feature:

the Aerialbots (born in late season 2 of the show/issue 21 of the comic)

Jetfire/Skyfire, who should either be frozen in Arctic ice at this point or won't be activated until issue 11

Trypticon and Metroplex, who won't show up until 2005 on the show

Dinobots, who either shouldn't exist yet or at least shouldn't have dinomech forms yet. Nor was Shockwave responsible for those forms.

 

 

Basically, the only thing IMO that points to the games being G1 is the character designs, and the same can largely be said of the other franchises. They're all reimaginings of G1 when you get right down to it - the same basic premise and similar characters, but they're each their own entity, rather than part of G1.

 

There's just too many differences for me to accept these games as G1. They're fun, with a great storyline, but they're the backstory for Transformers: Prime, not for G1.

 

The War Within was clearly a G1 prequel - down to giving a "flashforward" to the battle on Shermin Dam from MTMTE episode 2. Dreamwave was clearly set in between season 2 and the movie. I don't like Dreamwave, but they get points for trying to tie it into the original.

 

And IDW . . . well, let's not open that can of worms. Let's just say I don't like it, and don't consider it G1. The portrayals of the characters are just too different (wrong) for me.

Technically Jetfire was not inside the ark when it crashed into earth in FoC, he's quite possibly frozen in the artic circle at the end of the game (fitting in with G1).

 

They never covered where Metroplex came from in the G1 cartoon, other than it was hinted heavily that Metroplex became a part of Autobot City then was repaired after the battle into a functioning transformer again (this was the intention of the absorbed Scramble City arc originally IIRC). I think Highmoon did a good job of possibly tying up Trypticon's origin (being part of a crashed deception space ship which Megatron constructs in the G1 cartoon). Having the constructions conjuring up a city sized transformer was a bit weak and rushed just for Hasbro to introduce the Scramble City toy.

 

Being as the whole media franchise exists to sell toys, it's a walking mess of contradictions when it comes to what came in from where really.

Technically Jetfire was not inside the ark when it crashed into earth in FoC, he's quite possibly frozen in the artic circle at the end of the game (fitting in with G1).

 

They never covered where Metroplex came from in the G1 cartoon, other than it was hinted heavily that Metroplex became a part of Autobot City then was repaired after the battle into a functioning transformer again (this was the intention of the absorbed Scramble City arc originally IIRC). I think Highmoon did a good job of possibly tying up Trypticon's origin (being part of a crashed deception space ship which Megatron constructs in the G1 cartoon). Having the constructions conjuring up a city sized transformer was a bit weak and rushed just for Hasbro to introduce the Scramble City toy.

 

Being as the whole media franchise exists to sell toys, it's a walking mess of contradictions when it comes to what came in from where really.

 

Jetfire: Yes, but when he woke up he was unaware of the war, so he should have been in the ice during the games if they were G1.

 

Trypticon was explicitly shown being remade into the Nemesis! That ties directly into Prime, like I said. Prime even shows the ship becoming self-aware again and rebellious due to Megatron using Dark Energon on it (another link between the games and Prime. Nothing to do with G1 at all. And while Scramble City does show Metroplex & Trypticon active before 2005 (I'd guesstimate mid-90s), there's nothing in it to suggest that they existed prior to being built on Earth.

 

High Moon did originally conceive of WFC as G1, but ultimately it was placed in the Aligned franchise. And they may have said "making authenticity to the G1 cartoon series as high as possible to be [their] biggest priority", but apart from the character designs, there's very little tying the games to G1. Most of the similarities to G1 are also present in the other franchises as well, and there are too many major contradictions for it to be G1.  Meanwhile in FOC a concerted effort was made in the game to tie it explicitly to Transformers: Prime. So at this point even High Moon themselves consider the games set in the Aligned franchise.

 

You're right that there's a lot of contradiction within the TF franchises, but IMO that doesn't mean one should ignore the continuity that exists and that everything is interchangeable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
    • Thanks for the advice guys, I'll give my current GPU a clean and then run the benchmarks to see how similar it is. Hopefully a bit of a clean-out will help it last a bit longer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!