• 0

Regex c# remove white space but not inside <pre> and </pre>


Question

Hi all

 

I am trying to write some regex to remove all white space from html.

 

but the regex i am currently using doesn't factor in that in the pre tags there maybe opening "<" and closing ">" tags

 

This matches everything inside the pre tags

 

(<)\s*?(pre\b[^>]*?)(>)([\s\S]*?)(<)\s*(/\s*?pre\s*?)(>)

 

e.g.

(009)156 (010) (0)<pre> <test> edehofo<w<dieoj >  ></pre>     yuui u    ji 

will match 

<pre> <test> edehofo<w<dieoj >  ></pre>

 

and 

(?<=\s)\s+(?![^<>]*</pre>)

 

eg will almost work but does not work if there is an "<" or ">" in the mark up.

 

space[     ]spaces <pre>[          ]spaces</pre>space[      ]spaces 

 

will result in 

space[ ]spaces <pre>[ ]spaces</pre>space[ ]spaces 

 

but if there is a "<" or ">" in the pre tags then it will not work.

 

Could anyone help me

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

A warning: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open-tags-except-xhtml-self-contained-tags

 

A solution: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8762993/remove-white-space-from-entire-html-but-inside-pre-with-regular-expressions (same as your regex)

 

Just be careful with regex and HTML, parsing it to a C# object and then outputting it without whitespace is probably a better way to do this (likely to be slower though).

 

You shouldn't include < or > in <pre>, they should be escaped to &lt; and &gt;

  • 0

Thanks, but I've already been to those sites and a lot of others trying to find an solution.

 

From that its highlighted that I maybe able to do it in to step then...

 

1. encode all html with in pre tags

2. then use (?<=\s)\s+(?![^<>]*</pre>) to remove white space.

 

I am finding it hard to now find regex which will encode html with in a pre tag.

I love cats and dogs but dogs > than cats

<spaces>       <spaces>
<pre>
    1 > 0  = ?

    <code>       dedw</code>
</pre>

should be 

I love cats and dogs but > than cats <spaces> <spaces>
<pre>
    1  &gt; 0 = ?
    &glt;code&gt;       dedw &gt;/code &gt;
</pre>

It would be easier if i had some regex which basically ignored everything between a given tag.

 

I am doing my own research and trying to find the answer... but thought i would clarify what I am trying to do.

 

Thanks if you can help me find a solution

  • 0

Hi Eric

 

I'm trying to do it for c#

 

Basically I can get what i want if I can strip out white-space but not between two sets of chars

 

e.g.  <pre> anything </pre> or <code> anything </code>

 

seems more challenging that i thought it would be.

 

 (?<=\s)\s+(?![^<>]*</pre>)  is awesome but if i could get it to basically ignore everything inside of a given tag

 

My understanding of how to get the right syntax for regex is limited.

 

Match everything but not between tag(pre or code) and remove white space.

 

any help with getting this to work would be so awesome.

  • 0

How about the following: http://snipd.net/parsing-xhtml-into-a-dom-tree-in-c

You avoid using regex as you simply parse then print the HTML instead.

 

 

You might also want to re-read my first link, which points out that you cannot parse arbitrary (X)HTML using a regex. It is not possible as regex is not powerful enough to parse (X)HTML. (Parsing a limited subset is possible)

  • 0

to anyone who is good with regex please help

 

(?<=\s)\s+(?![^[<p]+?[e>])

 

cant not get this to work but must be close?

 

to: Lant

 

Sorry but i don't need to parse the HTML... i am not trying to validate it or read it really... 

 

I am wanting to remove white space but only when outside of a given tag like say <pre> or <code>

 

It has been working fine with (?<=\s)\s+(?![^<>]*</pre>)  until i hit a new requirement which.... is that the <pre> tag can contain < or >

 

which this regex does not support. One suggestion was to replace < and > with their HTML versions &lt; and &gt;

 

but again i would need to have something which only applied this on html with in tag the <pre> tag and I would need to do it in c#

 

seems easier to just get the regex to ignore things between tags some how...

 

Thanks

  • 0

If you don't mind doing the replace in C#, you can use capture groups with this pattern.

(?:\<pre\>)(.*)(?:\<\/pre\>)

It should capture everything between the pre tags and the value of the capture can then be string.Replaced on. I am working on a Regex replace version so you can use RegexOptions.Compiled. This regex was tested with CaseInsensitive and SingleLine (despite it being multi-line, using that to adjust how it handles .*)

 

1cKDh7e.png

 

 

so for example:

 

private static Regex preBlockMatch = new Regex(@"(?:\<pre\>)(.*)(?:\<\/pre\>)", RegexOptions.Compiled | RegexOptions.Singleline | RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);

 

(code block)

string newValue = preBlockMatch.Captures[0].Value.Replace("<", "&lt;");

(code block)

 

obviously room for some enhancement but it gets you started

  • 0

Thought I would share what I got working......

 

Also thanks!!! to Squirrelington for the regex for the between stuff

 public class MinifiedStream : MemoryStream
        {
            private readonly Stream _output;
            public MinifiedStream(Stream stream)
            {
                _output = stream;
            }

            private static readonly Regex Whitespace = new Regex(@"(?<=\s)\s+(?![^<pre>]*</pre>)",RegexOptions.Compiled);

            private static readonly Regex PreBlockMatch = new Regex(@"(?:\<pre\>)(.*)(?:\<\/pre\>)", RegexOptions.Compiled | RegexOptions.Singleline | RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);

            Dictionary<string, string> result = new Dictionary<string, string>();

            public override void Write(byte[] buffer, int offset, int count)
            {
                var html = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(buffer);

                //------------------------------------
                var matches = PreBlockMatch.Matches(html);
                int loopcount = 1;
                foreach (Match match in matches)
                {
                    var token = Guid.NewGuid().ToString() + "_"+ loopcount;
                    html = html.Replace(match.Value, token);
                    result.Add(token, match.Value);
                    loopcount ++;
                }
                //------------------------------------



                html = Whitespace.Replace(html, string.Empty);
                html = html.Trim();

                //-----------------------------------
                foreach (var match in result)
                {
                    html = html.Replace(match.Key, match.Value);
                }

                //-----------------------------------

                _output.Write(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(html), offset, Encoding.UTF8.GetByteCount(html));
            }
        }

But still feels as if you should be able to create a straight regex version.

 

if anyone can help me improve that would be awesome

  • 0

I agree that there should be a way to get it exclusively in regex but I am only really good at matching things, I don't have a lot of experience in replacement syntax. I know you can do $1 for the first group, $2 for 2nd or ${name} for named groups but how to modify the contents of those groups in the replacement is beyond me atm. Maybe someone with more experience will be able to chime in. :) Glad it is working thus far though. \o/

 

btw the regex I gave you, I probably went a little too crazy with the non-capture groups. I think at the time I was trying some funky magic to try and capture parts of it for replacement purposes but ended up with that.

<pre>(.*)</pre>

would probably be fine as well. lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No, this is what Powertoys Run is aiming to be but is still only about a quarter of the way there. Tho with Raycast having a thriving third-party extensions store, don't think Powertoys Run will ever be able to catch up.
    • If you look at all RAID implementations that exist, you're going to find exceptions. However, all the modern consumer varieties tend to have some things in common (by default). I'll stick to describing those. When you add a disk to a RAID array, metadata is stored at the end of the disk. It records the array the disk is part of, which other disks are in the array, etc. This is called the RAID superblock. If you create a RAID 1 array, your operating system will see them all as a single disk that is very slightly smaller than a single disk (due to the superblock). Everything you write to the RAID disk gets written identically to each of its member disks by the storage controller. Technically, disks are read/written in blocks (each block is multiple sectors in size), but this is all transparent to the user. Every file you create or change or delete is created/changed/deleted on every member disk simultaneously. This is true whether you have 2 disks in the array or more than 2.  If one disk completely fails, you can still operate just fine off the remaining disk(s) (but see the caution below). If you remove one disk and attach it to another PC, it should work fine. The partition information and everything is all at the front of the disk, just as expected. The superblock will just appear as some extra junk at the very end of the disk, outside any partition. In some scenarios, where it is recognized as a RAID member disk from another PC, there might be an extra step before it will let you use it, but it's all very doable. Caution:  Blocks are read from the disks in a staggered fashion. For example, with 2 disks, all the odd blocks are read from one disk and all the even blocks are read from the other. By working together like this, read speeds can be practically doubled. But this comes with a huge drawback. If a disk doesn't fail completely, but instead develops bad sectors, you may not realize it. The bad sectors may happen to be in blocks that are never read on that disk. In some cases, people have had bad sectors develop on one disk, then had the other disk fail, and only then realized that the remaining disk has bad sectors and corrupt data. Every backup method has its pros and cons. Never trust just RAID, or just an external HDD, or just the cloud. Use multiple methods to backup important data.
    • Evidence that it affects "most" people negatively? Based on what? The fact that their are millions of users in fact show me the opposite, that "most" are quite happy.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Kavin25 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pcdoctorsnet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      537
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      169
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Som
      127
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!