• 0

Java repeated else logic help


Question

Sorry for the bad title, I had no idea how to title this. So I have a checkbox that enables a textfield. I have an if statement setup to check the contents of the textfield versus a regex statement, if it matches, run logic, if it doesnt match, pop up message letting user know whats wrong. The problem is that after I uncheck the box and check it again and put in some bad text in the text field. The pop up message pops up, but it pops up twice now.... If I uncheck and check again and put some bad text in the text field, it now pops up the message three times... As you can see there's a pattern. Some how its saving the previous pop up and everytime I uncheck and check the box, it adds another error message pop up to this invisible queue.

 

I know I had this working like I wanted to, but somewhere along the line, my code changed a lot, and it broke. I checked my commits and found the one where I made major changes, but cant find where I screwed up the code so much that it loops the pop up messages. It could be that I didnt think it would loop so I just checked box, entered bad text, saw pop up and said "its ok working great", but I dont think thats what happened. I havent had time to work on this program much from when I started so I have spurts where I code straight for 4-8 hours and then I wont have time to go back to it for a few days, and I usually document, comment and commit every change thats worthy, but this is the one time I just kept writing and didnt pay attention.

 

Any help or advice is appreciated!

 

Thanks

Sikh

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1253088-java-repeated-else-logic-help/
Share on other sites

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Without having the code infront of me.. it sounds like you are attaching to the event multiple times. Like you are telling it:  Whenever you are checked.. then attach the textbox to the event.

I can't remember the logic in java.. but it would be the equivellant of:

checkbox.change() 
{
   if (checkbox.checked) {
      texbox.onchange += checkVal;
   }
}

checkval() 
{
   alert('hi');
}   

By attaching multiple times, you are basically creating a queue of events to run when something happens.  So the more times to attach to that event the more times it will execute it.

  • 0

Here is the code. Its running inside of the actionPerformed of the actionListener for the checkbox.

if (exclude.matches("^$|^[a-zA-Z0-9\\s,*. ]+$")){
									
	// logic for if text was entered correctly
									
}else{

	// Pop up a message explaining text was entered incorrectly
	JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,"Text was entered incorrectly","Please enter text in correctly. Instructions in Readme.txt",JOptionPane.WARNING_MESSAGE);
	
} // end invalid text check	
  • 0

But how could that be? I only have one control. Also, if that was the case and say I had 4 checkboxes set up, wouldnt it pop up the messages 4 times everytime instead of 1, 2, 3, 4. So thats why Im thinking something else is off

No.. because each checkbox is its' own entity.  So each one has it's own queue of events.  They can all point to the same event.. but the list of events is unique.

  • 0

have you heard problem is between chair and keyboard - that is your problem. be humble and listen.

you are definitely doing something wrong- people here are kind enough to help you but you need to post all your code for us to help - or you can just say what you have said in the last few responses and not post all your code.... :/  

  • 0

have you heard problem is between chair and keyboard - that is your problem. be humble and listen.

you are definitely doing something wrong- people here are kind enough to help you but you need to post all your code for us to help - or you can just say what you have said in the last few responses and not post all your code.... :/

 

I understand and I am listening. I am going to post the code below. I was just explaining why I didn't think it was the issue. There's a reason I posted on here, because Im stuck and I know many neowinians are coders and can help me. Its the reason I pick this forum over a Java specific forum.

 

-----------------

 

Everyone, here is the checkbox code. I have 4-6 checkboxes on the window. So I found a bit of code on stack overflow that helped me get the checkboxes working correctly. I left enough of the code so you have an idea what I'm doing and where the code above goes. Thanks for all of the help so far.

// actionHandler class for check box triggers
	class ActionHandler implements ActionListener {
		
		public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent event){
			
			/*
			 * universal checkbox created to check
			 * which checkbox was triggered
			 */
			JCheckBox chkbxUniversal = (JCheckBox) event.getSource();
			
			if (chkbxUniversal.isSelected()){
				if (checkbox == chckbxOne){
					//logic if checkbox is selected
				}else if (checkbox == chkbxTwo){
					txtFldTest.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
						public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae){
							
							exclude = txtFldTest.getText();
							
							if (exclude.matches("^$|^[a-zA-Z0-9\\s,*. ]+$")){
									
							// logic for if text was entered correctly
									
							}else{

							// Pop up a message explaining text was entered incorrectly
							JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,"Text was entered incorrectly","Please enter text in correctly. Instructions in Readme.txt",JOptionPane.WARNING_MESSAGE);
	
							} // end invalid text check
				}
			}else{
				if (checkbox == chckbxOne){
					//logic if checkbox isnt selected
				}else if (checkbox == chkbxTwo){
					//logic if checkbox isnt selected
				}
			} // end chkbxUniversal.isSelected()
		} // end actionPerformed
	} // end ActionHandler
  • 0

It's exactly like I said.. you are attaching the event multiple times...

Every time you check the checkbox you are calling
 

txtFldTest.addActionListener(new ActionListener() { .... });

You should have that code once in your form initialization, and not inside anything to do with your checkbox.

  • 0

It's exactly like I said.. you are attaching the event multiple times...

Every time you check the checkbox you are calling

txtFldTest.addActionListener(new ActionListener() { .... });
You should have that code once in your form initialization, and not inside anything to do with your checkbox.
So how would I run the code inside the text field action listener if I can't call it when I check the checkbox. Should I put it in a method? Thank you for your help, you were right.
  • 0

I don't understand what the code is supposed to be doing to tell you how to fix it.

Is there one text box and it complains if you check the first checkbox when there is invalid data in the text box?

If you're trying to validate the text whenever any of the checkboxes are active you shouldn't need the listener in the middle of what you posted. Just add the same listener to all of the checkboxes and put the validation code in that handler.

check1.addListener(validateText);
check2.addListener(validateText);
check3.addListener(validateText);
  • 0

yeah, it hard to tell what you are doing  especially when you yourself dont really seem to know what you are doing... LOL!

- your reluctance to post all your code is strange as no one would ever want to copy such bad code lol!

 

 

 

why ActionHandler class? why not just add one inner actionlistener to the text field in the constructor of your controller class? 

the action listener can just check what check box is checked and perform appropriate validation....

ie

 

public constructor() {
chkbxUniversal = new JCheckBox();
txtFldTest = new JTextField();

txtFldTest.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
                        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae){
                                if (chkbxUniversal.isSelected()) {
                                    exclude = txtFldTest.getText();
                                    if (exclude.matches("^$|^[a-zA-Z0-9\\s,*. ]+$")){
                                    }
                                 }
});
}
  • 0

It's exactly like I said.. you are attaching the event multiple times...

Every time you check the checkbox you are calling

 

txtFldTest.addActionListener(new ActionListener() { .... });

You should have that code once in your form initialization, and not inside anything to do with your checkbox.

 

How would I add it into my form initialization and call actionPerformed? So the setup on the form is, there's about 4 check boxes with textfields right next to them. When you click the checkbox, the corresponding textfield is enabled and focus is set on it. The user types in some text and hits enter. When they hit enter, thats when my code up above checks the text. 

 

How would I execute my code above when I check the checkbox and add text in the corresponding textfield without being able to call actionPerformed within the checkbox selected code?

 

Thanks for all of your help, its much appreciated.

 

 

I don't understand what the code is supposed to be doing to tell you how to fix it.

Is there one text box and it complains if you check the first checkbox when there is invalid data in the text box?

If you're trying to validate the text whenever any of the checkboxes are active you shouldn't need the listener in the middle of what you posted. Just add the same listener to all of the checkboxes and put the validation code in that handler.

 

check1.addListener(validateText);
check2.addListener(validateText);
check3.addListener(validateText);

 

Thanks for your help. I have replied to fiery up above explaining what the setup looks like and whats suppose to happen. Let me know if you need anything else

  • 0

How would I add it into my form initialization and call actionPerformed? So the setup on the form is, there's about 4 check boxes with textfields right next to them. When you click the checkbox, the corresponding textfield is enabled and focus is set on it. The user types in some text and hits enter. When they hit enter, thats when my code up above checks the text. 

 

How would I execute my code above when I check the checkbox and add text in the corresponding textfield without being able to call actionPerformed within the checkbox selected code?

 

Thanks for all of your help, its much appreciated.

 

 

 

Thanks for your help. I have replied to fiery up above explaining what the setup looks like and whats suppose to happen. Let me know if you need anything else

Kane pretty much answered it.

In your constructor, you would bind the action listener to the textbox.  Inside your bound function have code that verifies that the checkbox is clicked then proceed on.  As for the checkbox, same deal just bind it how you do now.

  • 0

Kane pretty much answered it.

In your constructor, you would bind the action listener to the textbox.  Inside your bound function have code that verifies that the checkbox is clicked then proceed on.  As for the checkbox, same deal just bind it how you do now.

 

I missed his reply, derp.

 

You want two listeners, then. Connect one to the checkboxes that enables the textbox and the other to the textbox to handle the input validation when enter is pressed.

Just connect the listeners when the form is created in its constructor.

 

 

Thanks for your help guys. I hate the fact that I missed something so simple. I am all set.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple and Tesla trade secrets reportedly exposed following a Tata Electronics cyberattack by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com Tata Electronics has confirmed that it detected a cybersecurity incident in some of its systems. The Indian company is a manufacturing partner of both Apple and Tesla, and the incident may have exposed some trade secrets belonging to the two American companies. The World Leaks ransomware group is said to be behind the attack, and it has reportedly posted up to 200,000 files on the dark web, including component designs and specification documents related to Apple and Tesla products. Tata Electronics told Reuters that its response protocols were deployed immediately and that the “incident has had no impact on our operations across businesses, which remain unaffected.” The ransomware group reportedly sent a ransom demand to Tata Electronics, while Apple has launched an investigation into the incident. World Leaks claims it stole more than 200,000 files totaling over 630GB from Tata Electronics. Some database files on the ransomware group’s website are titled "com.apple.factorydata," which could refer to Apple’s iPhone production operations in India. Moreover, some documents reportedly contain material specifications and quality inspection standards for iPhone circuit board components. However, Apple is not the only affected company. A folder found in the World Leaks database is titled "NV36 Chargeport Controller - North America," which may refer to Tesla Model Y components. Additionally, other files in the database reportedly contain drawings related to Tesla’s Project Highland, the internal codename for the EV maker’s updated Model 3 sedan. To support the authenticity of the stolen files, World Leaks has published documents containing footers that read: "This document contains proprietary and confidential information of Apple Inc." and "information contained herein is deemed confidential, proprietary, and a trade secret of Tesla Inc." Cybersecurity researcher Rajshekhar Rajaharia told Reuters that the database also contains emails, event logs spanning several years, and passport copies of employees, including foreign nationals. Both Tesla and Apple have declined to comment on the scale of the incident.
    • Last time I used Pascal was in college about 40 yrs ago, programmed an inventory database for my exam.
    • If they don't sell enough of the 1st gen then there won't be a 2nd gen
    • Epic fail, should've added an eSata port on the back, also if the memory/NVME are soldered then they're hardly gonna sell any, first thing most people do with their Steamdeck is, or used to be, replacing the NVME with a 2TB one. At that price they should, possibly for the first time, offer an installments option, say 24 months, they may sell a lot if they do. I'm sure they would have no shortage of credit companies willing to partner.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      204
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      91
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!