• 0

[C#] Door animation script in Unity. IF statement issue.


Question

Hi guys,

 

Hoping someone here can help me with C# and Unity.

 

I'm working on a project and trying to animate a door I created in 3DS max. I've attached a script to a switch in the scene and press it. It isn't acting as I would expect.

 

Instead of playing the open animation, it just plays the close animation every time I interact with the switch.
Adding the Debug lines, shows that "First" is passed twice for every interaction and "Closed" and "Opened" are passed once each. I'm struggling to see why this is and hoping a fresh pair of eyes could spot the issue and suggest a solution.

using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;

public class DoorSwitch : MonoBehaviour 
{
	public GameObject door;
	public GameObject button;
	public bool isDoorOpen = false;

	private GameObject player;

	// Use this for initialization
	void Awake () 
	{
		player = GameObject.FindGameObjectWithTag(Tags.player);
	}

	void OnTriggerStay (Collider other) 
	{
		if(other.gameObject == player)
			if(Input.GetButtonDown("Switch"))
				DoorToggle();
	}

	void DoorToggle()
	{
		Debug.Log("First");
		if(isDoorOpen == true)
		{
			isDoorOpen = false;
			door.animation.Play("Closing");
			button.renderer.material.color = Color.red;
			Debug.Log("Closed");
		}
		else if(isDoorOpen == false)
		{
			isDoorOpen = true;
			door.animation.Play("Opening");
			button.renderer.material.color = Color.green;
			Debug.Log("Opened");
		}
	}
}

16 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If you just want to use a last used timer you only need a few lines:

 

        static readonly TimeSpan DoorDelay = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3);
        DateTime lastDoorToggle = DateTime.MinValue;

        public void DoorToggle()
        {
            DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
            if (now.Subtract(lastDoorToggle) < DoorDelay)
                return;

            lastDoorToggle = now;

            Debug.Log("Door animation runs");
            // rest of door logic
        }
This way you have no timers running that you don't need.
  • 0

Looks fine to me.  The only thing I can think of is that the switch is being triggered twice.  You could add in a timeout that if the switch is hit within 3 seconds (or something) of the last hit you ignore it.

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 18:22, Seabizkit said:

yeah looks fine but my guess is that your creating a new DoorSwitch each time... i would need to understand how this is consumed to ensure that there is only one instance and the same instance of the DoorSwitch

Yea, was thinking that after too.  That maybe you are binding two cases in case of on/off but without seeing how you bind, it's hard to say for sure.

  • 0

I've added these three screenshots.

 

The first shows the switch and the inspector, I've looked at all items in the hierarchy to make sure I haven't added the script to another object.

The second is the imported animations, not sure if there's any settings there that I should tweak. The same goes for the third screenshot of the door model in the hierarchy.
 

post-438852-0-67093800-1428949795.png

post-438852-0-43131100-1428949853.png

post-438852-0-48379000-1428949880.png

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 18:19, firey said:

Looks fine to me.  The only thing I can think of is that the switch is being triggered twice.  You could add in a timeout that if the switch is hit within 3 seconds (or something) of the last hit you ignore it.

 

Still finding my way around C# and Unity, any pointers to how I could make a timeout for the switch? I've tried reading up about Coroutines and IEnumerator, but I'm not sure how to implement it within the script.

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 19:06, DaveGreen93 said:

Still finding my way around C# and Unity, any pointers to how I could make a timeout for the switch? I've tried reading up about Coroutines and IEnumerator, but I'm not sure how to implement it within the script.

I'm not entirely sure how unity works.  You could do it a couple ways, the simplest approach is to do something like this:

 

bool ignoreSwitch = false;
timer tmrIgnore;

protected void initialize() 
{
   tmrIgnore = new timer();
   tmrIgnore.Interval = 3000;
   tmrIgnore.Tick += new tmrIgnore_tick();
   tmrIgnore.Enabled = false;
}

protected void tmrIgnore_tick() 
{
    ignoreSwitch = false;
    tmrIgnore.Enabled = false;
}

protected void toggleDoor()
{
   if (!ignoreSwitch) {
      //run your code
      ignoreSwitch = true;
      tmrIgnore.Enabled = true;
   }
}

It's a really rough concept and by no means the best.  I mean ideally unity would give you ticks that you could just keep track of (ticks since last call).  However it should give you an idea.

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 19:29, firey said:

I'm not entirely sure how unity works.  You could do it a couple ways, the simplest approach is to do something like this:

 

bool ignoreSwitch = false;
timer tmrIgnore;

protected void initialize() 
{
   tmrIgnore = new timer();
   tmrIgnore.Interval = 3000;
   tmrIgnore.Tick += new tmrIgnore_tick();
   tmrIgnore.Enabled = false;
}

protected void tmrIgnore_tick() 
{
    ignoreSwitch = false;
    tmrIgnore.Enabled = false;
}

protected void toggleDoor()
{
   if (!ignoreSwitch) {
      //run your code
      ignoreSwitch = true;
      tmrIgnore.Enabled = true;
   }
}

It's a really rough concept and by no means the best.  I mean ideally unity would give you ticks that you could just keep track of (ticks since last call).  However it should give you an idea.

 

Hmmm, timer isn't included in Unity. Guess I'll have to research Coroutines more. Hopefully my lecturer can get back to me asap.

 

Thank you for your time and ideas firey.

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 19:54, DaveGreen93 said:

Hmmm, timer isn't included in Unity. Guess I'll have to research Coroutines more. Hopefully my lecturer can get back to me asap.

 

Thank you for your time and ideas firey.

No problem, sorry I couldn't offer more assistance.  

  • 0
  On 13/04/2015 at 19:06, DaveGreen93 said:

Still finding my way around C# and Unity, any pointers to how I could make a timeout for the switch? I've tried reading up about Coroutines and IEnumerator, but I'm not sure how to implement it within the script.

 

I think a hint to the solution is in the documentation of your event:

 

  Quote

 

OnTriggerStay is called once per frame for every Collider other that is touching the trigger

 

keyword: Once per frame. You could try to add yield after the Call to your DoorToggle(), but I have not read up on how they work With events.  Or add a timestamp that cancels the Logic if the event is triggered within x milliseconds. 

  • 0
  On 14/04/2015 at 14:58, Eric said:

If you just want to use a last used timer you only need a few lines:

 

        static readonly TimeSpan DoorDelay = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3);
        DateTime lastDoorToggle = DateTime.MinValue;

        public void DoorToggle()
        {
            DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
            if (now.Subtract(lastDoorToggle) < DoorDelay)
                return;

            lastDoorToggle = now;

            Debug.Log("Door animation runs");
            // rest of door logic
        }
This way you have no timers running that you don't need.

 

 

Excellent, thank you Eric! After adding using System; it worked flawlessly. My lecturer was useless in helping.

 

Also, thank you everyone else for your suggestions.

  • 0

Hi DaveGreen93

 

Not that I care about unity but i do care about my understanding of c# logic.

 

Could you explain why this works and your original does not, as to me its in either one of two states..."open" or "closed".

 

If there is an instance of DoorSwitch per a door then i don't understand why the original logic doesn't work.

 

Could you explain how a timer fixes the issue.

 

Thanks

  • 0
  On 14/04/2015 at 17:09, Seabizkit said:

Hi DaveGreen93

 

Not that I care about unity but i do care about my understanding of c# logic.

 

Could you explain why this works and your original does not, as to me its in either one of two states..."open" or "closed".

 

If there is an instance of DoorSwitch

per a door then i don't understand why the original logic doesn't work.

 

Could you explain how a timer fixes the issue.

 

Thanks

Behavior scripts in Unity are trigged for as long as the input is active so even a quick click on a switch could result in the event firing multiple times. A time delay ensures that the door routine doesn't toggle open/closed repeatedly for one click. I used a static 3s delay in my example but I suppose you could probably retrieve the animation time from the engine and use that instead.

  • 0
  On 14/04/2015 at 23:00, Eric said:

Behavior scripts in Unity are trigged for as long as the input is active so even a quick click on a switch could result in the event firing multiple times. A time delay ensures that the door routine doesn't toggle open/closed repeatedly for one click. I used a static 3s delay in my example but I suppose you could probably retrieve the animation time from the engine and use that instead.

 

Thank you!!! now it kinda makes sense its odd tho,

 

Is all game programming like this?

 

Wouldn't this consume large amounts of pointless CPU cycles?

 

Is it considered normal to have events fire like this?

 

how long is your animation for the door?

 

have you scripted it to that as its opening and its half way (assume 3 secs) and you click it again, does it start closing from the correct animation point.

 

I would assume you would need to code extra code for this... so that its starts the animation from the correct point?

 

PS door looks cool

 

PS re-read it. OK i see the click itself can be fired multiple time while holding it down... now i see why the delay was introduced its not for the animation but for time between allowed clicks...?

  • 0

Well, it's DaveGreen's code, but yes to most of that. The "switch" just looks like a switch. In reality the engine is just detecting the player is colliding with the switch and generating a signal while they're touching. Using the time delay I posted will still cause it to generate the door event as long as you're touching the switch it just doesn't respond to it except every three seconds. It's similar to keyboard "debouncing."

Games do waste CPU cycles. The trick is to get it to a minimum so it runs smoothly. That's why I suggested the timestamp instead of a timer. The timer runs in the background. :)

  • 0
  On 15/04/2015 at 13:43, Eric said:

Well, it's DaveGreen's code, but yes to most of that. The "switch" just looks like a switch. In reality the engine is just detecting the player is colliding with the switch and generating a signal while they're touching. Using the time delay I posted will still cause it to generate the door event as long as you're touching the switch it just doesn't respond to it except every three seconds. It's similar to keyboard "debouncing."

Games do waste CPU cycles. The trick is to get it to a minimum so it runs smoothly. That's why I suggested the timestamp instead of a timer. The timer runs in the background. :)

 

Thanks Eric

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Use this dating app? Hackers may have leaked your name, ID, and private photos by David Uzondu Image via Tea A dating app has been going viral lately (you have probably seen it on X), it's called "Tea," and it lets women anonymously post pictures of men to share dating "red flags." The app's marketing claims this is all for "safety," and you can see it on the company's website, where it states its mission is "to create a safer dating environment for women." In case you're confused and need a visual explanation, the following image pretty much sums it up (click to enlarge): Image: Tea's Website Tea has been around since 2023, but the surrounding controversy helped its recent rise to the top of the app charts. Now the platform has suffered its first notable breach courtesy of users from 4chan. This breach stemmed from a classic, sloppy development mistake. The Tea developers left a backend database wide open on Google's Firebase platform. Firebase allows for quick development, but its default security settings can be disastrously permissive if they are not locked down before an app goes live. Data in Firebase is stored in things called "buckets," which are just cloud storage folders. The leaked bucket in Tea's case contained the exact verification data the app requires from its users: selfies and ID photos, which it needs to confirm that users are women. It did not take long for users on 4chan to find this open door and walk right in. One user claimed, "Yes, if you sent Tea App your face and driver's license, they doxxed you publicly!" Another user claimed they downloaded as many as 3000 images before they got rate-limited by the server. Image: 404Media They described the trove of personal information as being "raw and uncensored." As per the Terms of Use (via 404Media) before you sign up for Tea, apart from selfie and ID photos, you are required to submit your location and birth date. All of this was reportedly accessible. 404 Media says that for a while, anyone with the right URL could view a list of user files. That page has since been locked down and now returns a "Permission denied" error, likely because the developers finally became aware of the leak. Tea has stellar reviews on both the Play Store and the App Store from users who see it as a more secure version of the "Are We Dating the Same Guy?" Facebook groups.
    • I always use O&O tools, it's a German software company and they release bunch of cool free tools like O&O Shutup to disable Windows crap or O&O AppBuster that allows you to remove apps that Windows doesn't allow to remove. Really good and reliable tools.
    • Ergh all the additional admin crap is gonna kill smaller UK forums All to please the religious puritans that are too illiterate to set up parental controls
    • I assume all the UK readers here are using a VPN now? Seriously who the hell is submitting their ID or doing a face scan to watch porn?
    • If it's as good as the fallout show then I'm going to watch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Electronic Person earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CyberCeps666 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      d4l3d earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dedicated
      Stephen Leibowitz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      Snake Doc earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      604
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      234
    3. 3
      Xenon
      159
    4. 4
      neufuse
      131
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      124
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!