Pray vs Doctor to save your life


  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. if you have to choose between praying vs seeing a doctor to save you from death.

    • praying to god
      9
    • seeing a doctor
      137


Recommended Posts

A lot of people believe in the power of pray when in time of need. Some believe praying to god to save them can work. Even when they are about to die. We hear a lot of stories where parents dont believe in doctors and think praying to god can save there kids lives. At the need if they choose there religion over science then the kid will die or at least that's how the story ends. A lot of people do both pray to heel and go to see a doctor but what if you have to choose.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1254020-pray-vs-doctor-to-save-your-life/
Share on other sites

My personal choice aside, there is nothing wrong with believing in the power of prayer *and* getting medical attention. As the saying goes, maybe it is in god's plan for you to have a broken arm, but also in it for you to treat it.

My personal choice aside, there is nothing wrong with believing in the power of prayer *and* getting medical attention. As the saying goes, maybe it is in god's plan for you to have a broken arm, but also in it for you to treat it.

Well it would not be a fun poll to do if you can do both. Trying to see what's more important to people.

Praying the God will use the Dr's and also Beliveing in Prayer

So there shuld be a Both Vote Option.

No because it comes down to what is more important to save your life. Praying to a god or seeing a doctor when your life is on the line. Most people do both but why do a poll when people will choose both. Not a good poll to do.

No because it comes down to what is more important to save your life. Praying to a god or seeing a doctor when your life is on the line. Most people do both but why do a poll when people will choose both. Not a good poll to do. 

 

Not a good poll to do when you're deliberately trying to steer your answer to prove a point we already know.

Pray are there for emotional support and perhaps somekind of placebo effect, last resort when you short of money for the Doctor fee.

aye, the mind is powerful and if praying triggers some sort of mind/emotional/healing, then i'm all for it.  Me, personally, on the other hand, meh.

If "your god" is all powerful, nothing happens outside your gods will, so the reason for your aliment is within his plan and indeed intentional. Why would you want to mess with "your gods" will? If he didn't want you in pain, he wouldn't have made you experience pain in the first place.     ;)

There really should be an option for both in this poll. Either way I am going to play Devils Advocate here often times Dr's are wrong which in turn make it appear that God is right. The other thing with this is when a person does pray their belief causes changes in the body that does heal them. The human body is an amazing thing its awsome how the body can heal itself when all odds are against it. Whether you believe in something personally its irrelevant, you can't deny some of the amazing things that people can do just because they believe in something. For instance look at all the amazing things the shaolin monks knows how to do. Its all because they believe not whether what they believe in is real or not.

No offense, but I don't think OP's intentions were "good."  I think he knew exactly what types of answers he would get and just wanted a poll to confirm it.  I doubt most people believe that prayer alone is better than seeking help.  There are a fringe group of Christians that do believe that but it's far from a lot. I would classify myself as a Christian and know many "non-atheist" people and have yet to meet one that would refuse to go to the doctor and only pray instead.

 

So back to the OP, there are obviously other responses that people agree with, accept it.  Sometimes the answer is not black or white.

  • Like 2

No offense, but I don't think OP's intentions were "good." I think he knew exactly what types of answers he would get and just wanted a poll to confirm it. I doubt most people believe that prayer alone is better than seeking help. There are a fringe group of Christians that do believe that but it's far from a lot. I would classify myself as a Christian and know many "non-atheist" people and have yet to meet one that would refuse to go to the doctor and only pray instead.

So back to the OP, there are obviously other responses that people agree with, accept it. Sometimes the answer is not black or white.

The poll forces people to choose what's more I portant when it comes to life and death. I could pit a third option for both but most would pick that. What I wanted to see if if religious people would pick science over faith. If they were truthful then it would serve my point and get the religious people to think more about if they truthly believe in there faith.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji The iPhone Fold is one of the most anticipated tech products expected to debut this fall. It will be Apple’s first foldable iPhone, ushering in a new product category for the company. While the first generation has yet to hit the shelves, a new leak suggests Apple has already begun work on its successor. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the second-generation iPhone Fold has already been confirmed, meaning Apple could launch a successor in fall 2027. The foldable iPhone is also reportedly referred to as the “iPhone Ultra,” though it remains unclear whether Apple will ultimately choose that branding, especially as Samsung is rumored to rename the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as the Galaxy Z Fold Ultra this year. The leaker also claims that the second-generation foldable will feature a wider folding display while reusing the same screen found in the first generation. Apple’s first foldable iPhone is expected to feature a 7.8-inch inner display and a 5.3-inch outer screen in a passport-style form factor. It has already been reported that Apple plans to change its iPhone release cycle in 2026 to spread launches throughout the year. Under this strategy, the iPhone Fold is expected to debut this fall alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. The standard iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2 are expected to arrive later in 2026 or in early 2027. Speaking of the iPhone Air, Digital Chat Station says Apple remains undecided about a third-generation model. The company is reportedly waiting to see how the iPhone Air 2 performs in the market, and if sales disappoint, a successor may never materialize. As we reported this week, the iPhone Air has not been scrapped from Apple’s plans. The second-generation model is reportedly scheduled for spring 2027 and could introduce upgrades such as an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography and improved battery life.
    • ahh yes the good old your opinion differs from mine so you are therefore insane lol destiny 1 had no agenda pushing and was a massive success of a game, if you clearly look online the team for some reason thought they had too many men on the team and went on a woman and dei recruitment drive and we all know how destiny 2 performed from then on in
    • The limited imaginations and business acumen of non-dominant players is simply that: the abject lack of creative business acumen. Businesses often want to operate in a financially-rewarding marketplace (free market economics) and/or exit/cash-out at maximal financial recompense. Money is their incentive; regulations are both their obstacles and their tools; politics is their means of influencing the marketplace. Google, in this story's example, is crying that AWS and Azure are "too dominant" -- cuz Google Cloud is not printing as much money as Alphabet wants (although it is still dramatically more than they actually need). The EU DMA should truly follow-the-money and treat the EU as its own sovereign nation in order to protect European market players: Domestic entities are exempt from market-influence regulations until absolute monopoly is achieved; Foreign (non-EU/non-Euro) entities are all regulated via stricter DMA measures whereby regulated partnership with independent domestic entity becomes the only way for foreign entities to 'tip the scale' for favorable financial remunerations. Basically create a dual-track aligning with China's foreign investment models. In my eyes, this is the only way to properly protect the European marketplace beyond the current dot-com/ai-bubble/social-media crazes.
    • I have a fire n ice theme w my bedroom laptops. one is a red lenovo gaming laptop (fire) and the precision is ice
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Vistor earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      401
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      131
    4. 4
      Xenon
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!