Pray vs Doctor to save your life


  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. if you have to choose between praying vs seeing a doctor to save you from death.

    • praying to god
      9
    • seeing a doctor
      137


Recommended Posts

A lot of people believe in the power of pray when in time of need. Some believe praying to god to save them can work. Even when they are about to die. We hear a lot of stories where parents dont believe in doctors and think praying to god can save there kids lives. At the need if they choose there religion over science then the kid will die or at least that's how the story ends. A lot of people do both pray to heel and go to see a doctor but what if you have to choose.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1254020-pray-vs-doctor-to-save-your-life/
Share on other sites

My personal choice aside, there is nothing wrong with believing in the power of prayer *and* getting medical attention. As the saying goes, maybe it is in god's plan for you to have a broken arm, but also in it for you to treat it.

My personal choice aside, there is nothing wrong with believing in the power of prayer *and* getting medical attention. As the saying goes, maybe it is in god's plan for you to have a broken arm, but also in it for you to treat it.

Well it would not be a fun poll to do if you can do both. Trying to see what's more important to people.

Praying the God will use the Dr's and also Beliveing in Prayer

So there shuld be a Both Vote Option.

No because it comes down to what is more important to save your life. Praying to a god or seeing a doctor when your life is on the line. Most people do both but why do a poll when people will choose both. Not a good poll to do.

No because it comes down to what is more important to save your life. Praying to a god or seeing a doctor when your life is on the line. Most people do both but why do a poll when people will choose both. Not a good poll to do. 

 

Not a good poll to do when you're deliberately trying to steer your answer to prove a point we already know.

Pray are there for emotional support and perhaps somekind of placebo effect, last resort when you short of money for the Doctor fee.

aye, the mind is powerful and if praying triggers some sort of mind/emotional/healing, then i'm all for it.  Me, personally, on the other hand, meh.

If "your god" is all powerful, nothing happens outside your gods will, so the reason for your aliment is within his plan and indeed intentional. Why would you want to mess with "your gods" will? If he didn't want you in pain, he wouldn't have made you experience pain in the first place.     ;)

There really should be an option for both in this poll. Either way I am going to play Devils Advocate here often times Dr's are wrong which in turn make it appear that God is right. The other thing with this is when a person does pray their belief causes changes in the body that does heal them. The human body is an amazing thing its awsome how the body can heal itself when all odds are against it. Whether you believe in something personally its irrelevant, you can't deny some of the amazing things that people can do just because they believe in something. For instance look at all the amazing things the shaolin monks knows how to do. Its all because they believe not whether what they believe in is real or not.

No offense, but I don't think OP's intentions were "good."  I think he knew exactly what types of answers he would get and just wanted a poll to confirm it.  I doubt most people believe that prayer alone is better than seeking help.  There are a fringe group of Christians that do believe that but it's far from a lot. I would classify myself as a Christian and know many "non-atheist" people and have yet to meet one that would refuse to go to the doctor and only pray instead.

 

So back to the OP, there are obviously other responses that people agree with, accept it.  Sometimes the answer is not black or white.

  • Like 2

No offense, but I don't think OP's intentions were "good." I think he knew exactly what types of answers he would get and just wanted a poll to confirm it. I doubt most people believe that prayer alone is better than seeking help. There are a fringe group of Christians that do believe that but it's far from a lot. I would classify myself as a Christian and know many "non-atheist" people and have yet to meet one that would refuse to go to the doctor and only pray instead.

So back to the OP, there are obviously other responses that people agree with, accept it. Sometimes the answer is not black or white.

The poll forces people to choose what's more I portant when it comes to life and death. I could pit a third option for both but most would pick that. What I wanted to see if if religious people would pick science over faith. If they were truthful then it would serve my point and get the religious people to think more about if they truthly believe in there faith.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!