Recommended Posts

Here's what I've put together so far. If you'd do anything differently I'd love to hear it. Thanks in advance.

Trying to keep costs down so went for cheapo mouse/keyboard/monitor for the time being.

Also, not interested in overclocking, but do want the possibility of SLI in the future.

 

 

Asus Z97-A/USB 3.1 Motherboard (Socket 1150, Z97, DDR3, S-ATA 600, ATX, USB 3.0, PCI Express 3.0, M.2 Socket)

 
Intel i5 4690 Quad Core CPU (3.50GHz, 6MB Cache, 84W, Graphics, Turbo Boost Technology 2.0, Socket 1150)
 
Fractal Design Define R4 PC Case - Black/Pearl
 
EVGA Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB Graphics Card
 
HyperX 16GB 1600MHz DDR3 Non-ECC CL9 DIMM Plug-and-Play Memory Module (Kit of 2)
 
Samsung 500 GB Solid State Drive 850 EVO M.2
 
Corsair CP-9020056-UK RM Series RM850 80 Plus Gold 850W ATX/EPS Fully Modular Power Supply Unit
 
Pioneer BDC-207DBK 8X Combo Bulk Blu-Ray Internal Drive
 
Samsung S27D390H PLS 27 inch LED HDMI Monitor
 
AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI Cable 9.8 Feet/ 3 meters Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
 
Microsoft Wired Desktop 600 Keyboard and Mouse Set - UK Layout
 
Logitech C920 HD Webcam
 
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1255450-gaming-pc-build-spec-recs/
Share on other sites

As an owner of the R4, I recommend the R5 for the following reasons:

  • Flexible door hinge means you can make the front case door open either way. R4 opens only to the left.
  • Truly modular storage
  • Much better SSD mounts on the back of the motherboard tray! This is a PITA on the R4 since you have to remove the motherboard to access the screws.
  • Front accessible fan filter, for bottom mounted fans (this slides out of the back on the R4)
  • Latch side panels. It's a PITA to put side panels back on the R4. 
  • Cable management loops

If the R4 is drastically cheaper, and you can forego the positives, go with the R4. 

  • Like 2

You can get a cheap BluRay writer for like 80 bucks AU. Much MUCH better than a DVD writer. And if you use that for installing games and the publishers put their games on BluRays - much better there too. 
Would probably look into swapping the monitor you have a 4K if you can find one for about the same price, if not, stick with the one you have listed.

Swap the Define R4 with the R5 and drop the BluRay player or swap with a DVD Writer (unless you really need the thing).

 

Why, the Blu-Ray drive he listed is a combo (writes DVD also)

 

OP...your system looks good.

As an owner of the R4, I recommend the R5 for the following reasons:

  • Flexible door hinge means you can make the front case door open either way. R4 opens only to the left.
  • Truly modular storage
  • Much better SSD mounts on the back of the motherboard tray! This is a PITA on the R4 since you have to remove the motherboard to access the screws.
  • Front accessible fan filter, for bottom mounted fans (this slides out of the back on the R4)
  • Latch side panels. It's a PITA to put side panels back on the R4. 
  • Cable management loops

If the R4 is drastically cheaper, and you can forego the positives, go with the R4. 

This all sounds sensible, thank you.

My one concern is that the R5 is considerably larger and I wanted to keep case as small as possible without going micro-ATX.

 

R4

46.4 x 23.2 x 52.3 cm
 
R5
61.5 x 32.7 x 54 cm

This all sounds sensible, thank you.

My one concern is that the R5 is considerably larger and I wanted to keep case as small as possible without going micro-ATX.

 

R4

46.4 x 23.2 x 52.3 cm
 
R5
61.5 x 32.7 x 54 cm

That size you have for the R5 is for the box it comes in. They're almost identical as far as size is concerned.

The monitor is garbage. Also, the brand HyperX, I've never heard of. I roll Crucial or G.Skill.

 

I had Kingston HyperX many times and they are good. Their SSD HyperX line is one of the best, in my opinion. Of all the different SSDs I had, those were the fastest ones I owned.

 

I agree with the monitor. IMO a Full HD resolution should not be bigger than 24'', bigger than that and it looks like crap. 27'' with 1080p is good for people with poor eye sight, otherwise everything just looks pixellated and bloated. If you go for a 27'', I'd recommend to go to the next resolution step and go 1440p.

Looks good, though I'm not fond of the M.2 you posted, but that's OK.

The monitor is garbage. Also, the brand HyperX, I've never heard of. I roll Crucial or G.Skill.

BinaryData, thanks for your thoughts.

Agree with you 100% on the monitor. I was trying to keep costs low but went a bit too much so on the monitor, with 27" being a requirement.

Have picked this one instead:

BenQ GW2765HT LED IPS 27 -inch W Monitor 16:9 2560 x 1440, 1000:1, 20M:1, 4 ms GTG, DVI/DP1.2/HDMI1.4/speakers

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00M913DVG/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE

 

Can you elaborate on why you have an issue with the 850 EVO M.2? It's very well reviewed.

HyperX is Kingston which are on a par with Crucial. No concerns there.

That size you have for the R5 is for the box it comes in. They're almost identical as far as size is concerned.

Thanks, very helpful indeed! Definitely going R5 then.

where is the software ? or are you running linux ?

 

Thanks T3X4S. Win 8.1 Pro for now.

Full HD resolution should not be bigger than 24'', bigger than that and it looks like crap. 27'' with 1080p is good for people with poor eye sight, otherwise everything just looks pixellated and bloated. If you go for a 27'', I'd recommend to go to the next resolution step and go 1440p.

 Odom, agree 100%. Thanks.

<..>

 

Have a look at this for RAM:

Kingston Hyper-X Beast 2400 DDR3 kit

http://www.amazon.co.uk/HyperX-Beast-16-2400-Non-ECC/dp/B00M7S8IAM

 

Great modules in my system in XMP mode.

 

As for the Logitech C920, I really wasn't impressed when we demoed them for video conferencing a year or two ago. Now they've come down to a more sensible price (~

Have a look at this for RAM:

Kingston Hyper-X Beast 2400 DDR3 kit

http://www.amazon.co.uk/HyperX-Beast-16-2400-Non-ECC/dp/B00M7S8IAM

 

Great modules in my system in XMP mode.

 

As for the Logitech C920, I really wasn't impressed when we demoed them for video conferencing a year or two ago. Now they've come down to a more sensible price (~

Thanks Aergan.

 

I've got to say that I'm not keen on large heatsinks on RAM. Also, the HyperX 'Genesis' I spec'ed runs at CL9 rather than CL11 which means the higher 2400 frequency benefit of the 'Beast' modules is virtually eliminated. Beast also runs hotter and at a higher voltage. I stand by my initial choice. ;)

 

As for the Logitech C920, I've not found anything better, at any price really. If you have any suggestions I'd be interested in hearing them.

The C920 is not very good for video conferencing, you're better off with the C930 for that, with wider view angle. The C920 is better suited to single user rather than a boardroom.

 

As for the freebies from nvidia, I had also read that, thanks! It may be a few weeks before Amazon's site catch up and list them on their product pages I think.

Thanks.

 

They will do CL9 at 1.5v @ 1600Mhz ;)

Heck, they seem to just about do 2400Mhz @ 1.5v / CL11 also do long as you don't enable any other memory timing tweaks. I highly suspect they are exactly the same base module.

 

Point taken, C930 didn't exist back when we were looking at them. We had a Cisco branded C920 prototype in black also (which I think actually looks better and I rarely give Cisco any aesthetic praise). Would have been for person to person conferencing.

 

Ebuyer are showing the promotion at the moment (both codes) on the majority of GTX 970 & higher (original listings / ex-display not eligible).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!