Right Choice? Purchasing a Dell Optiplex 790 Core i3 2120 USFF

By sloanb
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Apprentice

sloanb

Posted
Posted

Hi Team,

 

A few questions

 

Interested in purchasing a Dell Optiplex 790 Core i3 2120 USFF particularly for its size. I don't need a powerful machine however I do need this little thing to pack a punch... Would anyone know if I could upgrade the CPU to an i5... a 64-bit at that?? I believe the socket is 1155 but my other concern is could the motherboard handle it? ...of course the Ram is an easy upgrade... I'd like to be able to do some LIGHT home video editing using Sony Vegas Pro 12 (kids sports)...

 

Thoughts?

Grand Master

sc302 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Look at an asus vivo pc. They start at around 500 but are tiny. Decently powered. If you want a bit more power and something thin look to a asus gr8. We were looking for small and quiet which we bought one of each for testing. The smaller vivo worked fine for our needs, but we did install more memory and update the drive to an ssd, which put both in the same price range.

Proficient

_BeanZ_

Posted
Posted

To answer your actual question, no, the CPU and sometimes even the RAM in laptops are soldered on and not replaceable, best option is to get a decent laptop with in i5 from the get go 

 

OP is talking about a small form desktop rather than a laptop though.

 

The CPU in the Optiplex 790 will be replaceable. The 790 was available with an i5, so there's no reason why you wouldn't be able to swap it - that said; I believe the chipset only supports Sandy Bridge CPUs.

 

Unless you're working to a very limited budget that means you're stuck looking at discounted, refurbished kit, I would recommend looking for something newer; the 790 was released in 2011.

  • xendrome and MorganX
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Intersect

Posted
Posted

To answer your actual question, no, the CPU and sometimes even the RAM in laptops are soldered on and not replaceable, best option is to get a decent laptop with in i5 from the get go 

That only seems to be the case with those "ultra books"

Contributor

iogbrideau

Posted
Posted

OP is talking about a small form desktop rather than a laptop though.

 

The CPU in the Optiplex 790 will be replaceable. The 790 was available with an i5, so there's no reason why you wouldn't be able to swap it - that said; I believe the chipset only supports Sandy Bridge CPUs.

 

Unless you're working to a very limited budget that means you're stuck looking at discounted, refurbished kit, I would recommend looking for something newer; the 790 was released in 2011.

 

Dell computers are very sensitive to changes, I would take this with a grain of salt. I would look into other brands with small form factor such as the Asus gr8 that was already suggested in this topic.

Collaborator

ThePhoenix

Posted
Posted

Might be worth looking at a Intel NUC, we've sold a couple recently to clients and they are pretty powerful, at least the model we sold, and only rougly the size of a apple tv and about twice the thickness, roughly anyway  :rofl:

Grand Master

+Warwagon MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

The best pack you can punch in a small form factor is an Brix Pro i7-4770r

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1240720-my-christmas-present-to-myself-gigabyte-brix-pro-i7-4770r/

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
Posted

Dell computers are very sensitive to changes, I would take this with a grain of salt. I would look into other brands with small form factor such as the Asus gr8 that was already suggested in this topic.

 

False.

 

Sensitive to change? How so? If you are speaking of the Windows activation then what does that have to do with Dell? Secondly, 100% of the time I've done only a CPU upgrade, it has never broken activation.

Contributor

iogbrideau

Posted
Posted

False.

 

Sensitive to change? How so? If you are speaking of the Windows activation then what does that have to do with Dell? Secondly, 100% of the time I've done only a CPU upgrade, it has never broken activation.

I'm not talking about activation. The computer will stop working or tell you a part is failing (often another part). Such is the case mainly with some workstation models such as the T3600 and the T3610. This has happened mostly when upgrading the RAM (that we made absolutely sure that it was compatible but still caused some errors about other parts failing), and videocard upgrades.

 

I do agree though that a CPU upgrade shouldn't change anything.

Grand Master

Jose_49

Posted
Posted

Hw about this one?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00K0HMRH2/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

If you're going t purchase a PC, be it as future proof as possible. That processor is heading for its 5th year release.

You should look at least at a core i3 4xxx series

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
Posted

Hw about this one?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00K0HMRH2/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

If you're going t purchase a PC, be it as future proof as possible. That processor is heading for its 5th year release.

You should look at least at a core i3 4xxx series

 

That's pretty large compared to the USFF Dell or Intel NUC

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2

      By Copernic · Posted

      Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026

      By Aditya Tiwari · Posted

      Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • What should AI detector tools show before users copy or export a report?

      By Barney T. · Posted

      Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Michal H. · Posted

      not in taskbar search
    • What should AI detector tools show before users copy or export a report?

      By sumytbe · Posted

      I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!