Why are these USB drives a different capacity?


Recommended Posts

Ok, so these two drives you see in my screenshot from my PC are the same physical drives shown right below them. They also both have an exact clone of each other's data. They are also both 32GB models and from the same manufacturer, though clearly different models.

 

A39gB1X.jpg

 

Yet, both have a different capacity and amount of space left.

 

Now, if it was just the free space left and the capacity was the same, I would assume they were just formatted with different file cluster sizes. But even the total capacity is different, one has nearly a gig more than the other! What would cause this?

when there are bad sectors, the flash controller will mark these sectors as unusable, so capacity and amount of free space will be decreased. these could very well be the same exact chips, but one has bad sectors.

 

yeah, that what happened to my drive.  capacity went down, otherwise everything normal.

you did not check them against each other when they were new?   

 

or different formatting as people above already mentioned. 29.8 and 29 both would be rounded up to 32GB on the box.

 

also when a manufacturer says 32GB   it is not an exact number.  so could just be different.

Honestly, I don't think its possible to get exactly 32GB. I have 50ish 2GB - 32GB drives, not one of them has the full listed amount. Maybe BudMan can give you a specific reason as to why, but even my HDD or my SSD are 5 - 10GB off the stated amount.

Hell, my 1TB drive, NTFS or Linux format, is still missing 31GB of space. Not sure how or why, but it's whatever. I have 2 drives in sequential sequence, both are ~30GB from their true listed amount.

Honestly, I don't think its possible to get exactly 32GB. I have 50ish 2GB - 32GB drives, not one of them has the full listed amount. Maybe BudMan can give you a specific reason as to why, but even my HDD or my SSD are 5 - 10GB off the stated amount.

Hell, my 1TB drive, NTFS or Linux format, is still missing 31GB of space. Not sure how or why, but it's whatever. I have 2 drives in sequential sequence, both are ~30GB from their true listed amount.

 

 

It's because human math and computer math are not equal.

My guess is that one company measured the drive space before format and the other company measured after format.  Both companies used the base 10 measurement.

 

he did say it is from the same manufacturer, you know.   :rolleyes: 

 

 

still, could be an issue for different models.

when there are bad sectors, the flash controller will mark these sectors as unusable, so capacity and amount of free space will be decreased. these could very well be the same exact chips, but one has bad sectors.

yap, and both drives probably have memory chips from different manufactures, capacity can be slightly off.

when there are bad sectors, the flash controller will mark these sectors as unusable, so capacity and amount of free space will be decreased. these could very well be the same exact chips, but one has bad sectors.

The smaller one the right is brand new, I had just gotten it the very day I posted this and the first and only time I ever even plugged it in was what you see here to clone the old drive to the new one, so nearly a gig of bad sectors on a brand new flashdrive is pretty unlikely.

With the amount of information provided I can properly deduce that the answer to your question is 42.

 

This answer may change once more information is provided, but for now that is the best answer that can be given.  That also answers why grass has to be green but flowers can be multicolored and why tree bark is brown not purple.

 

There is no relevance that just because you have taken it out of the box to it being perfect...there have been drives that have contained bad sectors or that have been doa right out of the box.  It could be a manufacturing defect, it could be different file formats, it could be a number of different things.  It could be because the sun is yellow and you are a salmon colored (which has about as much relevance as you taking it out of the box and plugging it in and assuming everything is good). 

 

A novel idea would be to call the manufacturer and ask them what the issue is, they can correctly inform you as to what is going on...there could be a hidden partition on it (you have not sent us anything that would suggest not, nor have you done anything to help us with more information other than ask the question why.  So please see the first sentence in this post...questions with lack of information lead to speculation.   You will never get an educated, informed, or the correct answer).

My money is on allocation unit size.

Woulden't that affect only the free space/space the files take up though, not the actual capacity?

I guess OP doesn't want to post Disk Management or CHKDSK results for us to determine the exact cause.

I'm not home right now, I'll do it when im home.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!