Using server 2003 as a workstation?


Recommended Posts

It plays games. (pause) ... :huh: What else matters if you want to play games? Gaming performance shouldn't be an issue on a server OS, if it is, don't spend over $1000 (or even a few hundred) on a new OS, get better hardware (Y)

lol - Who buys software these days? ;) I get all my hardware off the back of a lorry too. ;)

Seriously though, you know what i mean :) the people that try out say Photoshop will be able to give first hand experience on if there is any noticable improvement in performance or if a certain game runs better or runs at all... i dunno whatever. I dont see how someone who uses Server 2003, Active Directory and maybe clicks something on the machine once a week could know this... that was all i was saying. It's very well understanding the OS as a server, but why does that mean they automatically know how well it performs with Quake3? :D

lol - Who buys software these days? ;) I get all my hardware off the back of a lorry too. ;)

Seriously though, you know what i mean :) the people that try out say Photoshop will be able to give first hand experience on if there is any noticable improvement in performance or if a certain game runs better or runs at all... i dunno whatever. I dont see how someone who uses Server 2003, Active Directory and maybe clicks something on the machine once a week could know this... that was all i was saying. It's very well understanding the OS as a server, but why does that mean they automatically know how well it performs with Quake3?  :D

They don't only click Active Directory Server Admins are constantly monitoring the performace of the server either via perfom (built in) or third party apps as well as many other things on a daily basis.

Edited by Jason

Fair enough, but the servers in use ive seen were setup and then left without any maintenance. Infact some of them didnt even have monitors - only hooked it up if something went down which was not often (once a year maybe max). If they did check it, it was done remotley and not at the workstation itself.

Oh well :)

Fair enough, but the servers in use ive seen were setup and then left without any maintenance. Infact some of them didnt even have monitors - only hooked it up if something went down which was not often (once a year maybe max). If they did check it, it was done remotley and not at the workstation itself.

Oh well :)

Yes you normally "Term" as in Terminal Services in to them so you don't need a monitor on them.

There you go then :) the servers i saw though were not exactley mission critical either...

Oh well :) each to their own i guess

I partley agree with some of the comments about people who dont know what they are doing, and who just download it because it says 2003 in the title shouldnt be using it btw... when they come here asking the simplest of things or stupid stuff like "why wont xxx game work" or "why wont my gamepad work" - if they have to ask and cant discover it for themselves they shouldnt be using it, definatley NOT if their primary goal is games anyway - I mean if u spend most of ur time playing games then the OS really dont make much odd's your not exactley making full use of it that often. ;)

Lets see WinS2k3 in action!!!

Here is a list of everything I had running at the time I took the screenshot.

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, running PaintShop Pro 8

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Mandrake Linux 10, running Gimp

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Sound Forge 7, encoding an audio file into Wma file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Vegas 4, converting an mpeg file into a Divx file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Dreamweaver 2004 MX

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Photoshop 7 with a couple of images open

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Microsoft Office (Word) 2003

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running PaintShop Pro 8

+

A little eye candy for the guys :)

Click here to see the screenshot

When I was done with that I fired up Call of Duty :rofl:

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Lets see WinS2k3 in action!!!

Here is a list of everything I had running at the time I took the screenshot.

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, running PaintShop Pro 8

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Mandrake Linux 10, running Gimp

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Sound Forge 7, encoding an audio file into Wma file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Vegas 4, converting an mpeg file into a Divx file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Dreamweaver 2004 MX

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Photoshop 7 with a couple of images open

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Microsoft Office (Word) 2003

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running PaintShop Pro 8

+

A little eye candy for the guys :)

Click here to see the screenshot

When I was done with that I fired up Call of Duty :rofl:

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Wow... how much ram do you have to run that many programs at once?

Don't need much to have opened them and not really be using them. ;)

They were all being used. Dreamweaver had a 107k page open, Word had a 30k file open. Not to mention 3 operating systems running. You just can't see it all in one 1280x1024 screenshot. I was still surfing the web and switching between the progs/OS's with no problems whatsoever. When I took the screenshot I wanted the main cpu/ram hungry windows in the front. Ms Virtual PC makes taking a decent screenshot hard, if your not careful one of the guest OS's will capture the screenie.

Silly_walk is there anything specific you'd like to see?

This is what WinS2k3 looks like with many unused apps open.

Edited by sandman45654
  • 3 weeks later...

Heres another convertion page for all of you out there that want to run 2k3 as a Workstation..

http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/

;) i have been running 2k3 as a workstation for about 5 months now and i have not had any problems with compatibility... just to me i think its harded to get somethings to leave... such as Trojans and such... but there are scanners such as AVG and Norton 7.6 & 8.x Corprates that work perfectly fine on 2k3 server..

if there should be an alliance there should be one for the people who know that you can do anything that you want with what you have... and if you cant get it to work... try starting over and working around a problem in a diffrent way... i disagree with all of you people flaming out cause 2k3 is a server OS... well.. who cares... it is stable.. it is reliable... and it is convertable... so what is your beef... people can do what they want.. if microsoft did not want people to use 2k3 server as a workstation then they would have released a 2k3 workstation version... but since they know that they are droping something into a market where people are now smart enough to go about converting something themselves.. they didnt...

Heres another convertion page for all of you out there that want to run 2k3 as a Workstation..

<a href='http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/' target='_blank'>http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/</a>

;) i have been running 2k3 as a workstation for about 5 months now and i have not had any problems with compatibility... just to me i think its harded to get somethings to leave... such as Trojans and such... but there are scanners such as AVG and Norton 7.6 & 8.x Corprates that work perfectly fine on 2k3 server..

if there should be an alliance there should be one for the people who know that you can do anything that you want with what you have... and if you cant get it to work... try starting over and working around a problem in a diffrent way... i disagree with all of you people flaming out cause 2k3 is a server OS... well.. who cares... it is stable.. it is reliable... and it is convertable... so what is your beef... people can do what they want.. if microsoft did not want people to use 2k3 server as a workstation then they would have released a 2k3 workstation version... but since they know that they are droping something into a market where people are now smart enough to go about converting something themselves.. they didnt...

People can do what they want if they purchased it, did you purchase it ?

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Um - exactly what are you doing there, that can't be done using XP?? I have run a complete test network - 2k3 server, NT4 server running exchange - couple of work stations, 2k, NT, linux for migration to AD testing. All run on virtual machines, on a XP workstation.

I see nothing from your screen shot that can not be done using XP.

People can do what they want if they purchased it, did you purchase it ?

You mean that everyone didn't get a Promo NFR Premium Ed?

Why not? It wasn't hard, requirements weren't steep, M$ wants everyone to try it out, you know, ya'll pimp their product and turn some tricks.

Um - exactly what are you doing there, that can't be done using XP?? 

I see nothing from your screen shot that can not be done using XP.

Sure Xp can do these things, but WinS2k3 does them much better. Unfortunately, things like resource management do not show very well in screenshots.

The bottom line is that WinS2k3 is a better OS than Xp. If you haven't used Windows Server 2003 yet I recommend downloading the 180 trial version. Try the same things you've done on Xp on WinS2k3 and see if you can notice any difference.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003...al/evalkit.mspx

The bottom line is that WinS2k3 is a better OS than Xp. If you haven't used Windows Server 2003 yet I recommend downloading the 180 trial version. Try the same things you've done on Xp on WinS2k3 and see if you can notice any difference.

Have I used it yet? Um yeah - quite a few of my servers are 2k3, and as time permits - the remaining NT and 2K servers that are not retired will be migrated to 2k3.

But what possible use do I have for a $400+ Server OS on my desktop?? It adds no features I need on my desktop, but you say it has better resource management. SWEET, since I am not having any resource issues with my current paid for OS - let my go fork over a few hundred dollars for an OS I will not notice any difference in with the day to day use of my machine.

But man that trial for 180 days is tempting ;) Man how sweet would that be, I can wipe out my current system - spend a few days getting it set back up the way I want it. Spend some money on software - since some of my current tools like defrag, partition management and virus protection will not run on 2k3, etc.. Where do I go again for this trial???

Oh wait, I just remembered - guess what. My desktop is really my production machine - I do all my day to day email, surfing, work, gaming, etc.. etc.. on it - so yeah its a production type box -- and it says right there in the trial EULA;

---

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS

Not for Production Use. You may not demonstrate, test, examine, evaluate or otherwise use the Software in a live operating environment or with data that has not been sufficiently backed up.

---

Oh what the hell who reads those EULA things anyway!! I can spend the next 180 playing with windows 2k3, which is chock full of all kinds of features I have no use for and then what the hell blow off a car payment so I can be legal on my desktop OS - oh wait I was. Why am I doing this again -- Oh yeah, so I can run 5 virtual machines - with paintshop loaded in 1, another loaded with photoshop, etc.. etc... Oh wait I can do that now.

Why exactly am I doing this again?? ;) Other than to give MS more money - and what I will be in the 'in' geek crowd cuz I run a $400+ OS to surf the web and read email, play a games with, etc.. Which everyone will know I got though not so legit means, or think I'm a complete MORON - cuz who in their right mind would pay MS some $400+ dollars for a OS that provides no new features needed for the desktop user. And then use that OS as their desktop OS??

Yeah I know - just another rant, making noise about 2k3 being a server OS, not a desktop OS, yada yada yada - but I feel better ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
    • Look who's back!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!