Using server 2003 as a workstation?


Recommended Posts

It plays games. (pause) ... :huh: What else matters if you want to play games? Gaming performance shouldn't be an issue on a server OS, if it is, don't spend over $1000 (or even a few hundred) on a new OS, get better hardware (Y)

lol - Who buys software these days? ;) I get all my hardware off the back of a lorry too. ;)

Seriously though, you know what i mean :) the people that try out say Photoshop will be able to give first hand experience on if there is any noticable improvement in performance or if a certain game runs better or runs at all... i dunno whatever. I dont see how someone who uses Server 2003, Active Directory and maybe clicks something on the machine once a week could know this... that was all i was saying. It's very well understanding the OS as a server, but why does that mean they automatically know how well it performs with Quake3? :D

lol - Who buys software these days? ;) I get all my hardware off the back of a lorry too. ;)

Seriously though, you know what i mean :) the people that try out say Photoshop will be able to give first hand experience on if there is any noticable improvement in performance or if a certain game runs better or runs at all... i dunno whatever. I dont see how someone who uses Server 2003, Active Directory and maybe clicks something on the machine once a week could know this... that was all i was saying. It's very well understanding the OS as a server, but why does that mean they automatically know how well it performs with Quake3?  :D

They don't only click Active Directory Server Admins are constantly monitoring the performace of the server either via perfom (built in) or third party apps as well as many other things on a daily basis.

Edited by Jason

Fair enough, but the servers in use ive seen were setup and then left without any maintenance. Infact some of them didnt even have monitors - only hooked it up if something went down which was not often (once a year maybe max). If they did check it, it was done remotley and not at the workstation itself.

Oh well :)

Fair enough, but the servers in use ive seen were setup and then left without any maintenance. Infact some of them didnt even have monitors - only hooked it up if something went down which was not often (once a year maybe max). If they did check it, it was done remotley and not at the workstation itself.

Oh well :)

Yes you normally "Term" as in Terminal Services in to them so you don't need a monitor on them.

There you go then :) the servers i saw though were not exactley mission critical either...

Oh well :) each to their own i guess

I partley agree with some of the comments about people who dont know what they are doing, and who just download it because it says 2003 in the title shouldnt be using it btw... when they come here asking the simplest of things or stupid stuff like "why wont xxx game work" or "why wont my gamepad work" - if they have to ask and cant discover it for themselves they shouldnt be using it, definatley NOT if their primary goal is games anyway - I mean if u spend most of ur time playing games then the OS really dont make much odd's your not exactley making full use of it that often. ;)

Lets see WinS2k3 in action!!!

Here is a list of everything I had running at the time I took the screenshot.

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, running PaintShop Pro 8

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Mandrake Linux 10, running Gimp

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Sound Forge 7, encoding an audio file into Wma file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Vegas 4, converting an mpeg file into a Divx file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Dreamweaver 2004 MX

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Photoshop 7 with a couple of images open

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Microsoft Office (Word) 2003

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running PaintShop Pro 8

+

A little eye candy for the guys :)

Click here to see the screenshot

When I was done with that I fired up Call of Duty :rofl:

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Lets see WinS2k3 in action!!!

Here is a list of everything I had running at the time I took the screenshot.

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, running PaintShop Pro 8

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Mandrake Linux 10, running Gimp

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Sound Forge 7, encoding an audio file into Wma file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Vegas 4, converting an mpeg file into a Divx file

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Dreamweaver 2004 MX

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Photoshop 7 with a couple of images open

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running Microsoft Office (Word) 2003

+

Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition running PaintShop Pro 8

+

A little eye candy for the guys :)

Click here to see the screenshot

When I was done with that I fired up Call of Duty :rofl:

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Wow... how much ram do you have to run that many programs at once?

Don't need much to have opened them and not really be using them. ;)

They were all being used. Dreamweaver had a 107k page open, Word had a 30k file open. Not to mention 3 operating systems running. You just can't see it all in one 1280x1024 screenshot. I was still surfing the web and switching between the progs/OS's with no problems whatsoever. When I took the screenshot I wanted the main cpu/ram hungry windows in the front. Ms Virtual PC makes taking a decent screenshot hard, if your not careful one of the guest OS's will capture the screenie.

Silly_walk is there anything specific you'd like to see?

This is what WinS2k3 looks like with many unused apps open.

Edited by sandman45654
  • 3 weeks later...

Heres another convertion page for all of you out there that want to run 2k3 as a Workstation..

http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/

;) i have been running 2k3 as a workstation for about 5 months now and i have not had any problems with compatibility... just to me i think its harded to get somethings to leave... such as Trojans and such... but there are scanners such as AVG and Norton 7.6 & 8.x Corprates that work perfectly fine on 2k3 server..

if there should be an alliance there should be one for the people who know that you can do anything that you want with what you have... and if you cant get it to work... try starting over and working around a problem in a diffrent way... i disagree with all of you people flaming out cause 2k3 is a server OS... well.. who cares... it is stable.. it is reliable... and it is convertable... so what is your beef... people can do what they want.. if microsoft did not want people to use 2k3 server as a workstation then they would have released a 2k3 workstation version... but since they know that they are droping something into a market where people are now smart enough to go about converting something themselves.. they didnt...

Heres another convertion page for all of you out there that want to run 2k3 as a Workstation..

<a href='http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/' target='_blank'>http://www.<< spam >>/win2k3/</a>

;) i have been running 2k3 as a workstation for about 5 months now and i have not had any problems with compatibility... just to me i think its harded to get somethings to leave... such as Trojans and such... but there are scanners such as AVG and Norton 7.6 & 8.x Corprates that work perfectly fine on 2k3 server..

if there should be an alliance there should be one for the people who know that you can do anything that you want with what you have... and if you cant get it to work... try starting over and working around a problem in a diffrent way... i disagree with all of you people flaming out cause 2k3 is a server OS... well.. who cares... it is stable.. it is reliable... and it is convertable... so what is your beef... people can do what they want.. if microsoft did not want people to use 2k3 server as a workstation then they would have released a 2k3 workstation version... but since they know that they are droping something into a market where people are now smart enough to go about converting something themselves.. they didnt...

People can do what they want if they purchased it, did you purchase it ?

Now why wouldn't you want an OS that can do all of this??

Um - exactly what are you doing there, that can't be done using XP?? I have run a complete test network - 2k3 server, NT4 server running exchange - couple of work stations, 2k, NT, linux for migration to AD testing. All run on virtual machines, on a XP workstation.

I see nothing from your screen shot that can not be done using XP.

People can do what they want if they purchased it, did you purchase it ?

You mean that everyone didn't get a Promo NFR Premium Ed?

Why not? It wasn't hard, requirements weren't steep, M$ wants everyone to try it out, you know, ya'll pimp their product and turn some tricks.

Um - exactly what are you doing there, that can't be done using XP?? 

I see nothing from your screen shot that can not be done using XP.

Sure Xp can do these things, but WinS2k3 does them much better. Unfortunately, things like resource management do not show very well in screenshots.

The bottom line is that WinS2k3 is a better OS than Xp. If you haven't used Windows Server 2003 yet I recommend downloading the 180 trial version. Try the same things you've done on Xp on WinS2k3 and see if you can notice any difference.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003...al/evalkit.mspx

The bottom line is that WinS2k3 is a better OS than Xp. If you haven't used Windows Server 2003 yet I recommend downloading the 180 trial version. Try the same things you've done on Xp on WinS2k3 and see if you can notice any difference.

Have I used it yet? Um yeah - quite a few of my servers are 2k3, and as time permits - the remaining NT and 2K servers that are not retired will be migrated to 2k3.

But what possible use do I have for a $400+ Server OS on my desktop?? It adds no features I need on my desktop, but you say it has better resource management. SWEET, since I am not having any resource issues with my current paid for OS - let my go fork over a few hundred dollars for an OS I will not notice any difference in with the day to day use of my machine.

But man that trial for 180 days is tempting ;) Man how sweet would that be, I can wipe out my current system - spend a few days getting it set back up the way I want it. Spend some money on software - since some of my current tools like defrag, partition management and virus protection will not run on 2k3, etc.. Where do I go again for this trial???

Oh wait, I just remembered - guess what. My desktop is really my production machine - I do all my day to day email, surfing, work, gaming, etc.. etc.. on it - so yeah its a production type box -- and it says right there in the trial EULA;

---

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS

Not for Production Use. You may not demonstrate, test, examine, evaluate or otherwise use the Software in a live operating environment or with data that has not been sufficiently backed up.

---

Oh what the hell who reads those EULA things anyway!! I can spend the next 180 playing with windows 2k3, which is chock full of all kinds of features I have no use for and then what the hell blow off a car payment so I can be legal on my desktop OS - oh wait I was. Why am I doing this again -- Oh yeah, so I can run 5 virtual machines - with paintshop loaded in 1, another loaded with photoshop, etc.. etc... Oh wait I can do that now.

Why exactly am I doing this again?? ;) Other than to give MS more money - and what I will be in the 'in' geek crowd cuz I run a $400+ OS to surf the web and read email, play a games with, etc.. Which everyone will know I got though not so legit means, or think I'm a complete MORON - cuz who in their right mind would pay MS some $400+ dollars for a OS that provides no new features needed for the desktop user. And then use that OS as their desktop OS??

Yeah I know - just another rant, making noise about 2k3 being a server OS, not a desktop OS, yada yada yada - but I feel better ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!