Recommended Posts

I recently got a new graphics card, an EVGA GeForce GTX 960 SC. My motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H. With my old graphics card installed (an MSI GeForce 210), when I'd power on the computer, the BIOS splash screen would appear for about 10 seconds, and then Windows would boot, and the entire boot up process would take about 20-25 seconds until I was logged in.

 

Now with my new graphics card installed, the motherboard hangs on the BIOS splash screen for about a minute and a half before finally booting into Windows. I cannot access any of the motherboard's features (setup boot menu, etc) while the new card is installed, either. It seems to totally hang.

 

If I put the old card back in, the motherboard boots up in a few seconds again. I've tried the new graphics card in both PCI Express slots on the motherboard, and same behavior each time. If I enable the internal graphics on the motherboard with the new card installed, the motherboard hangs on a black screen with a flashing white cursor, whereas it behaves as expected, normal, with the old card in.

 

Once Windows boots up, everything seems fine. All drivers installed, the the device manager is clean. Not sure what the problem could be. I am also not sure if I have the latest version of my BIOS software installed, as Gigabyte's site appears to be severely broken.

 

Any ideas? Thanks.

Does the graphics card need it's own power supplied directly from the psu?

 

(My EVGA GTX 760 does) 

It might be an RMA but we'll have to do a little more troubleshooting first

Another possibility, and rather obvious, you did connect it to the correct pci slot? (sometimes it's so obvious it gets overlooked <if applicable, I'm having a little trouble with the gigabyte website right now>)

Does the graphics card need it's own power supplied directly from the psu?

 

(My EVGA GTX 760 does) 

It might be an RMA but we'll have to do a little more troubleshooting first

Another possibility, and rather obvious, you did connect it to the correct pci slot? (sometimes it's so obvious it gets overlooked <if applicable, I'm having a little trouble with the gigabyte website right now>)

The card does need it's own power supply. I have a modular Antec power supply, with a PCI-E power cord routed directly from the power supply to the card. I've tried the card in both PCI-E slots on the motherboard. Same result.

 

try clearing your cmos/bios settings and make sure that the new video card is installed in the first pci-e slot on the board.

I have tried that. Even tried pulling the motherboard battery and resetting the settings to default. Didn't seem to do anything differently.

Try BIOS upgrade, if same thing happened, just return the Graphic Card.

I'll look into that, but at the moment, Gigabyte's website is very broken, and I can't seem to find any up-to-date firmware for my motherboard.

Possibly Antec PCI- 12V rail is bad (its a stretch but)

Can you actually go into the BIOS and make changes with the new card in, or do you just see the POST image ?

If you are getting into BIOS, but it never gets to Windows - then you should reset your BIOS and start fresh.

If you are simply getting the POST image, but its not really "in" BIOS - then you should.... well.... reset your BIOS.


I would think it is a possibility:
BIOS Setting
power issue (bad PCI-Express cable, or bad 12V rail)

In BIOS, what do your voltages say ?

What wattage antec ?

Totally not surprised by Gigabyte's site being down - IMO an absolute crap company w/ less than avg products (i've had nothing but problems with Gigabyte products)


 

Possibly Antec PCI- 12V rail is bad (its a stretch but)

Tried with a few different rails on the power supply. Same result each time.

 

Can you actually go into the BIOS and make changes with the new card in, or do you just see the POST image ?

I cannot make any changes to the BIOS with the new card installed. It seems to totally hang for about 90-120 seconds with the card installed.

 

If you are getting into BIOS, but it never gets to Windows - then you should reset your BIOS and start fresh.

If you are simply getting the POST image, but its not really "in" BIOS - then you should.... well.... reset your BIOS.

I've already tried totally resetting the BIOS by pulling the battery. After reinserting the battery, I had to put the old graphics card in to confirm the reset, otherwise, with the new card in place, it just hung at a black screen after the reset.

 

I would think it is a possibility:

BIOS Setting

power issue (bad PCI-Express cable, or bad 12V rail)

In BIOS, what do your voltages say ?

I'll have to place the old card back in to check.

 

What wattage antec ?

550W.

 

Totally not surprised by Gigabyte's site being down - IMO an absolute crap company w/ less than avg products (i've had nothing but problems with Gigabyte products)

Never had a problem with them until now, but their website seems to be complete garbage.

550 might not be powerful enough (I'm not saying this as a definitive)

I should have asked in my first response, my 760 instruction manual recommends a minimum of 400 watts on the psu for the card, and as I'm an amd rig I went with an 800 watt platinum Silverstone unit.

 

There could be any number of reasons for your card not to be operating correctly, and to be honest with you, most of those 'issues' could very well be beyond my assistance capabilities, and I REALLY don't want to recommend a replacement for your psu, but somewhere in my mind, I'm leaning towards the psu just having enough power supply to your components to get them to start up, (or it's a bad card)

550 might not be powerful enough (I'm not saying this as a definitive)

I should have asked in my first response, my 760 instruction manual recommends a minimum of 400 watts on the psu for the card, and as I'm an amd rig I went with an 800 watt platinum Silverstone unit.

 

There could be any number of reasons for your card not to be operating correctly, and to be honest with you, most of those 'issues' could very well be beyond my assistance capabilities, and I REALLY don't want to recommend a replacement for your psu, but somewhere in my mind, I'm leaning towards the psu just having enough power supply to your components to get them to start up, (or it's a bad card)

From all the research I've done and people that I've talked to, 550 W should be more than enough to power the GTX 960.

  • Like 1

It may be worth using an online psu calculator so you can factor in age of psu and all your components  that you power on the machine, and if that CPU is OCed remember itll be pulling a shedload more W than the norm. you've gone from an old pci-e 2 budget card (drawing minimal watts) to a PCi-e 3 gaming card, it may be drawing more than the PSU can supply cleanly. That's the only thing that has changed. (also bare in mind, at best a psu will be 80-85% efficient at its stated rate for the first year, so a 550W may only push out 467W cleanly at full load (that's 85% efficiency) deduct approx. 5-10% per year for psu age.

 

also check that the AMd chip specifically supports pci-e 3 the motherboard manual and sales blurb all have a * with dependant on CPU & GPU capabilities, I know 2nd gen I series don't support pci-e 3. you may have to set bios to pci-e 2 with odl car, then fit new card.

 

Post draws almost as much power as game mode buddy. All components are on full power until drivers etc load. Your PSU is maybe struggling to cope with all demand at 100% and causing a brownout.

 

what is the Ampere rating on your 12v rails?

 

do you have a friend or relative close by with a machine you could try the new card in also?

 

the bios site is up atm, going by the model you posted these look like the files, just check against the motherboard itself, it will have a rev number on it to be double sure, wouldn't want you to flash the wrong bios, done that myself before years ago...ironically with a Gigabyte board! lol

 

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4315#bios

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!