OEMs can't compete with the Surface and that may be bad.


Recommended Posts

In Q4, 2014, the Surface accounts for over a third of all the Windows tablets shipment.

 

Since the Surface 2 was previously discontinued, this means that the Surface Pro 3 accounts for over 1/3 of the shipment of Windows tablets.

 

This is particularly shocking since there are many sub-$100 Windows tablets on the market and the Surface Pro 3 starts at $799.

 

The Surface 3 which starts at $499 would likely push the shipment of the Surface even higher.

 

The problem is that with OEMs unable to compete, it's up to Microsoft to push forward Windows tablets.

 

If Microsoft stumbles, so will Windows tablets.

 

The problem I noticed with other OEMs that produce Windows tablets is that they have the "HTC's problem".  That is, they lack the vertical integration of Samsung.

 

Samsung can produce makes screens, memory, storage, chips, radios while other OEMs (except maybe LG and some Chinese OEMs) can't.

 

Most (if not all) of the OEMs that produce Windows tablets have been building those tablets from off-the-shelf parts.

 

Sure, Microsoft also doesn't the vertical integration of Samsung, but Microsoft has the necessary fund to order whatever custom parts it wants, but its OEMs doesn't.

I think that the real problem is that the platform (Windows on a tablet) is not selling enough to make a substantial investment in design.  That is why you are seeing these generic tablets.  Microsoft has a significant interest and capital to invest in designing and innovative product such as a surface.

  • Like 2

My problem with them is they are practically all 1280x800 or something lousy like that unless you spend $.  I can get a Nexus 7 or Kindle Fire HDX with better specs for cheap.

 

I'm no huge fan of Android, but that in itself is a big roadblock for me.  I assume I'm not the only one.

 

I don't know if it'll apply equally to the Win10 tabs but we'll have to see.

  • Like 2

me thinks Surface are the new 80's Apple computer.

meaning...?

I think that the real problem is that the platform (Windows on a tablet) is not selling enough to make a substantial investment in design.  

Neither apparently does android.

When you have no vested interest in making the tablet market succeed, and an interest in minimizing expenditures for shareholders, you end up with sub $100 tablets. This is, IMO, one of the reasons why Dell going private was such a good idea.

The Surface 3 has significantly improved the situation for Windows tablets. Before its release, there was nothing substantial at $499.

 

There were cheap Windows tablets and then there were those north of $799.

 

The market (of Windows tablets) right now is best characterized as a one-horse race.

  • Like 1

OEM can't compete because most are too busy bundling crapware instead of putting some thought in design, drivers and software.

 

This is probably a big part of it. With the Surface line, you're pretty much guaranteed a premium, junk-free experience. Although my mom is quite happy with her Signature Edition HP Stream 8, since it's also junk-free.

I wish Nokia were still in the game. The one Lumia tablet that they made had an almost absurdly bright screen and was of course on par with the striking design and good build quality of flagship Lumia phones. Unfortunately, it was hobbled by RT, and there was never an x86 successor. It's unfortunate that they couldn't stick around long enough to launch a competitor (or even beat Microsoft) to the Surface 3, which is a decent mid-range device that probably pulls off being a tablet better than the SP3.

I wish Nokia were still in the game. The one Lumia tablet that they made had an almost absurdly bright screen and was of course on par with the striking design and good build quality of flagship Lumia phones. Unfortunately, it was hobbled by RT, and there was never an x86 successor. It's unfortunate that they couldn't stick around long enough to launch a competitor (or even beat Microsoft) to the Surface 3, which is a decent mid-range device that probably pulls off being a tablet better than the SP3.

 

The division still exist as Microsoft Mobile Oy.

 

And yes, I do think it should release more tablets to give a least some pseudo competitions.

Lots of the cheap sub $200 tablets aren't worth it, lots of them get returned because they're so bad, and this isn't just Windows, most of them are crappy Android tablets.   While this is anecdotal evidence on my part, my cousin got a cheap android tablet as a gift for her son, one he didn't like, while he's crazy for her iPad.  She went back and returned it after the holidays to end up in a line with others who were all returning the same cheap android tablet. 

 

Why don't other OEMs do better? Because of a few factors, lower price alone doesn't cut it, they won't tell you what these return rates are on tablets but I'm sure you can all guess.  If you look at the top sellers of tablets, it's no surprise Apple is at the top, and they're iPad is not cheap at all.  Second it's Samsung, and the Galaxy tab isn't cheap either, unless you wait and get one of the older models.    The other factor here is that people don't treat tablets like they do cell phones, they do not have a high refresh cycle, no  one is buying a new tablet every year, they are treated more like traditional PCs and held on to longer.  It's no surprise the top OEMs, Apple most of all, are all losing share in the tablet space, only MS, Lenovo and maybe one other managed to gain share while Apple continues to drop quarter after quarter, and Samsung is no better off.

 

This is also why MS is in no rush to release a Surface Pro 4,  they're going to do it, just not quick because the buying cycle isn't that of phones, you don't need to have a new device out every 6-8 months.

 

Having cheap devices is nice, for those who don't have enough money, but we could use more $250-$300 tablets with some good specs, maybe OEMs will see more success that way.  It doesn't help that the new intel Core -M line costs so much either, $200 just for the CPU, yikes.

Seems like ASUS has brought out some damn good convertibles in the last year as well.  I don't know about the rest of the market, to be honest.  They seem to be playing catch up there but there is some good kit about.

 

Surface Pro 4 might even be ready and just waiting for Windows 10 for all we know.

  • Like 1

removable keyboard, can use as a writing tablet when keyboard is folded over or removed with the built in one note app on the pro 3.  pen is pretty nice.  hardware is pretty decent and priced similar to high end touch ultrabooks from lenovo (x1 carbon), hp (elitebook folio 1040 g1), etc.

I still don't get Windows on tablets.  If you can get an ultra book that is the same size, what is the point?

Access to Office docs, all major streaming platforms, all major browsers, software apps etc. With Apple you get access to their entire ecosystem. Windows tablets are even more expansive. Android tablets... you get access to Google Play.

 

My opinion, im entitled to it. :)

Access to Office docs, all major streaming platforms, all major browsers, software apps etc. With Apple you get access to their entire ecosystem. Windows tablets are even more expansive. Android tablets... you get access to Google Play.

 

My opinion, im entitled to it. :)

 

Both Windows tablets and Ultra Books can run the same stuff.  I was not comparing to Apple or Android.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!