iOS 9 & OS X 10.11 to bring


Recommended Posts

Sounds good to me. Would be happy to see a more polished OS on my iPhone 6. Also excited to see Swift reaching ABI stability. Makes it a lot more valuable language to learn instead of Obj-C (which I shudder each time I try to even read)...

Good, it's just what iOS and OS X need.

 

I hope "smaller apps" translates to a complete rebuild of iTunes. Strip it down to music playback only. Move podcast support, video support and app support into either new apps or other existing apps. I also still have terrible luck with iTunes in the Cloud, it's still almost completely broken for me (and many others). If there truly is a focus on stability in iOS 9/OS X 10.11, this would be a great time to really fix all the annoyances that presently exist with Apple products.

OSX really needs this.  After trying a new MBP 13" Retina, and seeing the huge amounts of UI lag and such from the i7 ver with 16GB ram, I ended up returning it.  

 

With so many developers dropping Snow Leopard support I finally moved to Mavericks a few months back. Despite having fairly beefy hardware it doesn't run anywhere near as smoothly as Snow Leopard did. So I'd really like to see them work on the performance.

OSX really needs this.  After trying a new MBP 13" Retina, and seeing the huge amounts of UI lag and such from the i7 ver with 16GB ram, I ended up returning it.  

 

Really !!! because I run on a 4 year old with 4GB and never noticed UI lag ever. Maybe you were using it wrong.

Good.

I've been using an iPhone for about two weeks in "phone mode": no apps, 1 hour of 2G calls, some SMS texting, contact handling and that's it.

There some crashes already due to exceptions, and the battery lasts about 2 days and 10--17 hours. I don't find this acceptable.

"Rootless" sounds a lot like UAC in some ways.  Very interested to hear more about how it works under the hood!

Except OS X (and most if not all Unixes) by design had UAC before windows had UAC (all it is, is elevating to Root privileges).

 

Hence why when you try to edit a system file it requires your initial user's password on Mac OS X.

Except OS X (and most if not all Unixes) by design had UAC before windows had UAC (all it is, is elevating to Root privileges).

 

Hence why when you try to edit a system file it requires your initial user's password on Mac OS X.

Which is why I always found it amusing when people used to (and may still) say they were going to OS X and GNU/Linux because of UAC disrupting their computer usage.

It's admitted less invasive on Unixes, on windows UAC blocks you from doing anything else, while a good thing (the window doesn't get lost to the fodder) it's annoying as hell.

 

Also you really don't see/notice the Elevation prompt much on OS X.

It's admitted less invasive on Unixes, on windows UAC blocks you from doing anything else, while a good thing (the window doesn't get lost to the fodder) it's annoying as hell.

 

Also you really don't see/notice the Elevation prompt much on OS X.

I see it about as often as I see UAC on Windows.

You don't get the prompts much on OS X because they weaken the security to let average users install applications (Something that normally require root on *NIX installations)

For a home computer that's fine, for a corporate install they'd want that locked down.

Not sure if dumb or sarcastic.  Its a known issue though with the Retina macs.  My Air works flawlessly right now..

Really? Are you sure it affects the 15" rMBP?? I gave my old 2012 to my wife and it's still running great (no lag at all) and I'm typing this from a late 2013 15" rMBP which also has absolutely no lag running at the highest possible resolution (while my wife runs it at the default resolution)

  • 2 weeks later...

Which is why I always found it amusing when people used to (and may still) say they were going to OS X and GNU/Linux because of UAC disrupting their computer usage.

 

The problem is that these end users blame Microsoft when what they should be doing is blaming lazy developers who wrote their software assuming that it was running in administrator mode all the time resulting in the mess that exists today. Unfortunately that is due in part with Microsoft failing to enforce good security standards 20 years ago all for the sake of 'ease of use' and 'backwards compatibility'.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!