• 0

Current trends for web development?


Question

Sup neowin and pals! Until 10 months ago I thought I had a grasp of Web Technology. Knowing whiz terms like Responsive Web Design, HTML 5, CSS3, jQuery and CMS I thought I had knowledge of what was going on. That's when a friend told me to try out something different than PHP and Drupal, and learn ASP.NET MVC for an upcoming project.

 

OMG. I've felt that I've been living under a rock. This forced me to understand different concepts, frameworks and platforms: In which we include: Dependency Injection (Inversion of Control), MVC (Which got popular thanks to Ruby on Rails), RESTful apps, RESS (Responsive Web Design + Server Side), Node.js (NPM, grunt, gulp) Angular, Backbone, Knockout, github, bootstrap, Web API, React.js, Animate CSS. Cross Site Script Forgery, Debugging sessions in Web Browsers, Agile Web Development, truthful understanding of OOP (I finally understood why was PHP never considered a truly OOP programming language) and many many many much more things.

 

Now that Microsoft has forked Node.js and applied the Chakra engine underneath it, Node.js will get full traction in the upcoming months.

 

So... I think I'm living under a rock. What is worse is that they are concepts that originated YEARS AGO!

 

I'm also on the brim of killing myself for all these tools. I just know little of them, but I also feel the responsibility of knowing how to work with them. My friend told me to take it easy and work with what I need now.

 

 

So I'm asking what are the current trends of web development that I'm also missing that they're very important?

 

Thanks!


I'm also fearing of going into an Analysis-Paralysis for the fear of not doing it "by the standards".

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1258918-current-trends-for-web-development/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I usually stick with HTML5/CSS3/Angular/jQuery.  However 99.9% of web development I do at work is ASP.NET

 

I'm still trying to learn jQuery. It hurts my brain. My current task is VB.Net. Using WPF instead of Microsoft's version of it.

 

I ordered a book, and I'm hoping to master it by the end of the year. I've got a lot of programs I want to code, just don't have a good teacher to help me.

  • 0

The project I work on is an ASP.NET MVC application.  Our new application will also be an MVC application as well.  It also has some fairly heavy jquery as well along with using bootstrap, SQL Server, Entity Framework and RavenDB.  It's become my favorite platform, especially over classic asp.net.  Like sbauer said, it varies from location to location.  Here around Memphis, it's a big .NET market here along with Java.  Those are probably the 2 biggest areas recruiters look for people in.  If you have mobile experience (iOS or Android) that would help too.  I hardly ever see any ruby/php/whatever's trendy right now projects in corporate environments though (maybe php, but the others, not so much).

  • 0

My current task is VB.Net. Using WPF instead of Microsoft's version of it.

 

So not web at all then?

 

 

I hardly ever see any ruby/php/whatever's trendy right now projects in corporate environments though (maybe php, but the others, not so much).

 

Agreed. I have just started seeing some NodeJs come in now but it's nowhere near ready for primetime - maybe just POC's.

 

It's difficult for any new platform to come in really. We have so many tools and libraries for Java/.Net that it doesn't make a lot of sense to move away.

  • 0

The project I work on is an ASP.NET MVC application.  Our new application will also be an MVC application as well.  It also has some fairly heavy jquery as well along with using bootstrap, SQL Server, Entity Framework and RavenDB.  It's become my favorite platform, especially over classic asp.net.  Like sbauer said, it varies from location to location.  Here around Memphis, it's a big .NET market here along with Java.  Those are probably the 2 biggest areas recruiters look for people in.  If you have mobile experience (iOS or Android) that would help too.  I hardly ever see any ruby/php/whatever's trendy right now projects in corporate environments though (maybe php, but the others, not so much).

We did a couple MVC Projects here.  Microsoft however has started phasing out MVC in favor of the Entity Framework which handles the entire model structure.  Controllers can then be written as code-behind and the views driven off that.  so while it's still "MVC" it's not an MVC Style project.

  • 0

I'm still trying to learn jQuery. It hurts my brain. My current task is VB.Net. Using WPF instead of Microsoft's version of it.

 

I ordered a book, and I'm hoping to master it by the end of the year. I've got a lot of programs I want to code, just don't have a good teacher to help me.

the way to think of jQuery is to think DOM manipulation.  It's great for making stuff that is already there.. change.  Like I find it is good for sticking html into an existing page, making a header bar correctly set the active page in it's list of pages (if using a master header), that sort of thing.  I am sure it has plenty more uses than that.. but that is what I use it for.

As much as people knock it as sloppy/slow/hard to learn I am really starting to like Angular as a replacement for 90% of what I do in jQuery and since it follows closer to a MVC style I find I can get a lot more power out of the sites than I do with straight jQuery.

  • 0

We did a couple MVC Projects here.  Microsoft however has started phasing out MVC in favor of the Entity Framework which handles the entire model structure.  Controllers can then be written as code-behind and the views driven off that.  so while it's still "MVC" it's not an MVC Style project.

Microsoft isn't phasing it out. The model part is just open to interpretation. Some look at it as a domain model, which EF would handle, while others think it means view models, which EF wouldn't handle. Quite frequently, it makes more sense to pass down view models than the actual entity models.

  • 0

the way to think of jQuery is to think DOM manipulation.  It's great for making stuff that is already there.. change.  Like I find it is good for sticking html into an existing page, making a header bar correctly set the active page in it's list of pages (if using a master header), that sort of thing.  I am sure it has plenty more uses than that.. but that is what I use it for.

As much as people knock it as sloppy/slow/hard to learn I am really starting to like Angular as a replacement for 90% of what I do in jQuery and since it follows closer to a MVC style I find I can get a lot more power out of the sites than I do with straight jQuery.

 

Agreed. I think the problem with jQuery is you can do so much with it. I have seen a lot of sites where jQuery is used and abused with tags created and moved and edited all over the place. You end up with a mess of event handlers with code all over the place which makes it very hard to maintain. I still use jQuery and it works very well, but people seem to be using for things it wasn't meant for - that's where something like Angular (or one of the million alternatives) should come in.

  • 0

We did a couple MVC Projects here.  Microsoft however has started phasing out MVC in favor of the Entity Framework which handles the entire model structure.  Controllers can then be written as code-behind and the views driven off that.  so while it's still "MVC" it's not an MVC Style project.

 

Microsoft isn't being phased it. The model part is just open to interpretation. Some look at it as a domain model, which EF would handle, while others think it means view models, which EF wouldn't handle. Quite frequently, it makes more sense to pass down view models than the actual entity models.

 

That's how I view it.  The "model" is being handled by EF now, but I still have another project that I use for ViewModels, which is usually what gets passed to the page (and also returned to the controller).  We use Telerik's Kendo UI controls, and if you have relational mappings in your model, things like the grid just do not like the model being passed in, so I have to use a ViewModel in order to get it to play nicely (this is another conversation though).  Overall, MVC is still "MVC", it's just that the "M" is handled by a different framework, but the concept is still the same overall.  Then there's MVVM (like what Silverlight used), which actually introduced me to the MVC like design pattern.  Overall it works very well though.  ASP.NET MVC has been really fun to work with (minus the growing pains of learning what keeps getting changed or added with each new version, like I "still" don't understand Areas yet).

  • 0

Having worked on a Node.js project it's fun but not stable enough for prime time, internal projects maybe but not public facing. Same with Docker and containerisation which seem to be very buzzy but not solid enough although love the idea of Heroku style deployments.

 

I know how you feel about .NET but I still prefer the classics. I'm a big fan on minimalist code that is well written and tidy that I can quickly understand and you control the interaction with.

 

Remember that learning anything is a gamble, my favourite framework is now no longer being supported but things like php will hopefully never go out of fashion.

  • 0

So not web at all then?

 

 
 

 

Agreed. I have just started seeing some NodeJs come in now but it's nowhere near ready for primetime - maybe just POC's.

 

It's difficult for any new platform to come in really. We have so many tools and libraries for Java/.Net that it doesn't make a lot of sense to move away.

 

No, I do, do web stuff. I just lack any motivational drive right now. I need a graphics artist to do a logo for me, but I don't know anyone. I can design the site, I just hate Illustrator for logos. Makes me want to stab someone consistently for hours.

 

I plan on combining SQL + PHP + VB .Net into a program for a friends Game Server he runs, and eventually building a C++ version for Linux/Windows.

I'm going to see if Raphael wants a auto-updater for his Dopamine project, and if he does, work towards that. Makes it easier for him to update things. :)

I have a desire to learn, but not having someone available to explain things, point you in the right direction, it's really hard. I need a C++/C# teacher.

the way to think of jQuery is to think DOM manipulation.  It's great for making stuff that is already there.. change.  Like I find it is good for sticking html into an existing page, making a header bar correctly set the active page in it's list of pages (if using a master header), that sort of thing.  I am sure it has plenty more uses than that.. but that is what I use it for.

As much as people knock it as sloppy/slow/hard to learn I am really starting to like Angular as a replacement for 90% of what I do in jQuery and since it follows closer to a MVC style I find I can get a lot more power out of the sites than I do with straight jQuery.

Yup. Totally lost at the DOM part.

  • 0

 

I have a desire to learn, but not having someone available to explain things, point you in the right direction, it's really hard. I need a C++/C# teacher.

 

Do yourself a favor and learn the C# syntax right now. You know VB.NET so you're literally, for the most part, just learning another syntax. 

 

If you're in this for the long haul, you need to work on the self teaching thing. That doesn't mean go out and read a book. You can read blogs, watch screencasts or conference videos. The problem is that you won't always have someone around to guide you. VB.NET to C# would be a nice opportunity for you to work on this.

  • 0

No, I do, do web stuff. I just lack any motivational drive right now. I need a graphics artist to do a logo for me, but I don't know anyone. I can design the site, I just hate Illustrator for logos. Makes me want to stab someone consistently for hours.

 

I plan on combining SQL + PHP + VB .Net into a program for a friends Game Server he runs, and eventually building a C++ version for Linux/Windows.

I'm going to see if Raphael wants a auto-updater for his Dopamine project, and if he does, work towards that. Makes it easier for him to update things. :)

I have a desire to learn, but not having someone available to explain things, point you in the right direction, it's really hard. I need a C++/C# teacher.

Yup. Totally lost at the DOM part.

The DOM is pretty much the page.  Your Div's,  your tags, whatever is rendered on the page itself.

  • 0

Hint: go mobile, design the next flappy bird and start milking the cash cow...

Hah. I'm actually accumulating ideas for a game I've been wanting to make since I was 9 years old. 17 years of thinking about it. The game was called Helbreath. I wanted to re-create it into a 3D Game. Have it PvP Oriented, hit all the ranges. Create content for the non-competitive players. Something that is still enjoyable but doesn't require too much time. But also create the hardcore raider style or pvp. I wanted to incorporate ideas from Conquer Online, World of Warcraft, EVE Online, Ragnarok Online, and Eudemons Online.

 

The DOM is pretty much the page.  Your Div's,  your tags, whatever is rendered on the page itself.

 

Ahhh. Funny, I've never heard the reference of "DOM" before. Whats it stand for?

Do yourself a favor and learn the C# syntax right now. You know VB.NET so you're literally, for the most part, just learning another syntax. 

 

If you're in this for the long haul, you need to work on the self teaching thing. That doesn't mean go out and read a book. You can read blogs, watch screencasts or conference videos. The problem is that you won't always have someone around to guide you. VB.NET to C# would be a nice opportunity for you to work on this.

 

I have classes available from Udemy, Cybrary, and a few other places. I just can't seem to remember things. I do have Short Term Memory Loss (STML), and that doesn't help at all. Got any resources you can send my way?

 

I just bought the WPF 4 Book from Amazon. I'm going to study through it, and then grab some C# books. I learn better when I have a physical copy in my hand. Sitting at a desk or staring at a screen drives me away from it. I sit on my arse for 8 hours a day, and staring at 3 - 5 monitors for work really puts a damper on things.

  • 0

Hah. I'm actually accumulating ideas for a game I've been wanting to make since I was 9 years old. 17 years of thinking about it. The game was called Helbreath. I wanted to re-create it into a 3D Game. Have it PvP Oriented, hit all the ranges. Create content for the non-competitive players. Something that is still enjoyable but doesn't require too much time. But also create the hardcore raider style or pvp. I wanted to incorporate ideas from Conquer Online, World of Warcraft, EVE Online, Ragnarok Online, and Eudemons Online.

 

 

Ahhh. Funny, I've never heard the reference of "DOM" before. Whats it stand for?

 

I have classes available from Udemy, Cybrary, and a few other places. I just can't seem to remember things. I do have Short Term Memory Loss (STML), and that doesn't help at all. Got any resources you can send my way?

 

I just bought the WPF 4 Book from Amazon. I'm going to study through it, and then grab some C# books. I learn better when I have a physical copy in my hand. Sitting at a desk or staring at a screen drives me away from it. I sit on my arse for 8 hours a day, and staring at 3 - 5 monitors for work really puts a damper on things.

 

Since you have short memory, all you do is study over and over until you remember them very well.  So you don't need to study again unless you need to if you forget again in near future.  Udemy is good.. You are able to study anytime so you can remember them again.

 

Even with the practices over and over so you will be able to code quick enough in short time whatever you have in your mind that help you speed up. If not, you can always go back to Udemy to study again or look up at your saved code notebook you wrote for references.

  • 0

Since you have short memory, all you do is study over and over until you remember them very well.  So you don't need to study again unless you need to if you forget again in near future.  Udemy is good.. You are able to study anytime so you can remember them again.

 

Even with the practices over and over so you will be able to code quick enough in short time whatever you have in your mind that help you speed up. If not, you can always go back to Udemy to study again or look up at your saved code notebook you wrote for references.

 

That's generally what I do for generic subjects like Math, Science, etc.. I find programming to be a fair bit harder to do, but I'll take it one step at a time. Raphael, Dopamine creator, is helping me with WPF and learning that end. Something that'll be nifty for when I learn another language!

  • 0

That's generally what I do for generic subjects like Math, Science, etc.. I find programming to be a fair bit harder to do, but I'll take it one step at a time. Raphael, Dopamine creator, is helping me with WPF and learning that end. Something that'll be nifty for when I learn another language!

Good luck.

  • 0

Hah. I'm actually accumulating ideas for a game I've been wanting to make since I was 9 years old. 17 years of thinking about it. The game was called Helbreath. I wanted to re-create it into a 3D Game. Have it PvP Oriented, hit all the ranges. Create content for the non-competitive players. Something that is still enjoyable but doesn't require too much time. But also create the hardcore raider style or pvp. I wanted to incorporate ideas from Conquer Online, World of Warcraft, EVE Online, Ragnarok Online, and Eudemons Online.

Helbreath was the ######.  I played the crap out of that game when I was like 12-15.  HB-Int I was in some sick guilds... hell I even remember some of the players (Wolfie).  I also used to run my own private server too.   I totally have had the same want as you for a good while now.  Less focus on the PVP but still it being a main part more on the idea of crafting and such.

  • 0

Helbreath was the ######.  I played the crap out of that game when I was like 12-15.  HB-Int I was in some sick guilds... hell I even remember some of the players (Wolfie).  I also used to run my own private server too.   I totally have had the same want as you for a good while now.  Less focus on the PVP but still it being a main part more on the idea of crafting and such.

 

Good to see another player still have the desire to see an exceptional game be made. My other thought for it was to have it educational as well. Take parts from History, Myths, Legends, and make them into Quest Lines, Bosses, Raids, etc.. The game world would be based off of Earth, and it's geography. Every time I come up with a bad ### idea, I write it down.

 

We've gotten a bit off topic though, haha.

  • 0
On 9/22/2016 at 8:32 AM, BarneyJ said:

Try to look here http://djangostars.com/blog/ . These guys've got a lot of interesting stuff, u might 've missed smth.
Good luck!)

Nice. This is an old post. What I'm doing right now is that I subscribed to lots of YouTube channels (O'Reilly Media, Google Chrome Developers, JSConf, Thoughtworks) and I'm visiting infoq.com, asp.net blog, and I feel that I'm less behind than before!

 

Thanks for sharing!.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!