Recommended Posts

i need to buy another charger, does anyone knows if the alternative chargers from ebay are good? are they safe? or should i get orignal charger?

if original where should i buy?

Alternative chargers (especially on eBay) are generally cheap chinese crap and is usually the cause of people's devices exploding when charging. If you are going to get one, get a quality one off Amazon.

I would get an alternative from amazon, after researching proper review from brand X.

 

As pointed by Xilo, cheap chinese knockoffs use subpar cable, soldering, etc. 

 

 

http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/apple/are-cheap-non-apple-iphone-chargers-safe-electrical-charging-safety-faqs-3460975/

 

For Phones, but you get the idea:

 

http://www.righto.com/2012/10/a-dozen-usb-chargers-in-lab-apple-is.html

 

 

Edit: 

 

For ipads:

 

http://www.imore.com/difference-between-apple-made-ipad-charger-and-cheap-knock

The same advice I always give as with batteries. ORIGINAL. Cheap knockoffs are made to virtually non existant safety standards, and are too risky. The Chinese underground don't give a crap about anything but money, they'll clone anything without a care for human life.

 

It's always safer to pay a little more for genuine accessories where high voltage power and chemical reactions are concerned, rather than risk wiping yourself or your device, or even your building out.

The same advice I always give as with batteries. ORIGINAL. Cheap knockoffs are made to virtually non existant safety standards, and are too risky. The Chinese underground don't give a crap about anything but money, they'll clone anything without a care for human life.

 

It's always safer to pay a little more for genuine accessories where high voltage power and chemical reactions are concerned, rather than risk wiping yourself or your device, or even your building out.

+1 there are cheaper and better alternatives, I just can't be assed to look for them atm. I recall from some website it there was a charger that provided cleaner and was more efficient with power.

Nope Id say both ebay and amazon seem to have plenty of counterfeit items sold as original and as you paid a lot for the system in the first place stick with manufacturer supplied parts

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!