Xbox 360 emulation and the future


Recommended Posts

So, since this has been announced and we know that they sort of developed the Xbox OS off with some Hyper-V services configuration, do you think this 360 gaming is going to be a pure VM running alongside the One OS or is it going to be running off the One OS? Is the One OS going to be the host OS or is there something else that is currently the host for the One OS that will also host the 360 image?

If it turns out to be that the One OS is also a VM running off Hyper-V, then does that mean Microsoft is "streaming" the game to the computer, and I'm talking windows 10 here, by simply having the computer connect to a Hyper-V machine over the network? Or are they pulling an NVidia and actually streaming the data?

And, does anyone know about 360 emulation and streaming to PC? Are we going to be able to stream our 360 games as well?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1260888-xbox-360-emulation-and-the-future/
Share on other sites

If streaming to another device, like the PC, is just a video output then absolutely anything running on the Xbox One can be streamed. It would work similarly to a PS4 streaming to a Vita, Vita TV or an Xperia device. Anything the PS4 does is simply mirrored on the device streamed to. So yes is the answer to that question :p

Local streaming is really versatile. It's once you start streaming from a data center hundreds if not thousands of miles away that introduces more hurdles with things like lag.

You can stream your 360 games to a Windows 10 PC no problem, as for the code, it's a VM running it's own instance next to the other OS'.  In the dashboard it'll look just like any other game/app that's running, the UI doesn't let you tell the difference.   The Xbox One OS isn't a host OS in this case, it's just another VM running on the main Xbox One Hyper-v OS.

You can stream your 360 games to a Windows 10 PC no problem, as for the code, it's a VM running it's own instance next to the other OS'.  In the dashboard it'll look just like any other game/app that's running, the UI doesn't let you tell the difference.   The Xbox One OS isn't a host OS in this case, it's just another VM running on the main Xbox One Hyper-v OS.

 

So the 360OS runs side by side with the One OS, and lets the 2 run simultaneously.  As well as mingle with each other (Game DVR, Screenshots, etc)?

 

That is an engineering feat when you think about it.

  • Like 4

I think Microsoft is now truly in the process of transcending the Xbox Brand/Platform.  It seems that the Xbox Gaming Name/Brand will no longer be tied to a definitive box (a la: Xbox Music, Video), but almost any box.  Games (if publishers allow it) will follow the account/gamertag and not be confined to the box it was initially made for.

 

I know this is off topic but;  The other day I went to visit my brother and nephews, I had my WD 4TB external HDD with me.  I logged into my nephews Xbox One with my gamertag, hooked up the external drive.

And he was allowed to play all of my games (without having to download or install them) with his gamertag.  

 

Wow times have changed in my 36yrs of life...

  • Like 1

So the 360OS runs side by side with the One OS, and lets the 2 run simultaneously.  As well as mingle with each other (Game DVR, Screenshots, etc)?

 

That is an engineering feat when you think about it.

 

Not so much. Microsoft loves their Hyper-V stuff and everyone was a bit skeptical to see it merge its way into our gaming consoles, but when they announced the various features coming with the One, then it made more sense. As for engineering, Microsoft pumped the Xbox One with hardware a little ahead of what was needed for most console games. Think about the 360, the console that lasted 10 years with the same hardware. When they gave the One a TON more power, they were really giving it wiggle room for things like this 360 VM.

 

 

I think Microsoft is now truly in the process of transcending the Xbox Brand/Platform.  It seems that the Xbox Gaming Name/Brand will no longer be tied to a definitive box (a la: Xbox Music, Video), but almost any box.  Games (if publishers allow it) will follow the account/gamertag and not be confined to the box it was initially made for.

 

I know this is off topic but;  The other day I went to visit my brother and nephews, I had my WD 4TB external HDD with me.  I logged into my nephews Xbox One with my gamertag, hooked up the external drive.

And he was allowed to play all of my games (without having to download or install them) with his gamertag.  

 

Wow times have changed in my 36yrs of life...

 

I don't think they are trying to ditch the Xbox brand, but rather expand it. For years, devices have been separate and only intermingle with other devices on a short term bases. Microsoft is trying to remove these barriers between your devices and make it so any Microsoft product you have can talk and interact with any other Microsoft product you have. This includes merging Xbox Gaming with their Windows PCs. If you remember, back in the day games used to have this little sticker syaing if they were going to be Windows Live enabled. They ditched that a while ago, and I think it was because Microsoft has been planning to merge all their products for some time now. Making it so your Xbox can play to your PC or tablet, while you control it with your Windows Phone. Again, pushing universal-iality (?) is awesome imo and I can't wait to be running Windows 10 on my phone, Xbox, PC, and tablet.

Not so much. Microsoft loves their Hyper-V stuff and everyone was a bit skeptical to see it merge its way into our gaming consoles, but when they announced the various features coming with the One, then it made more sense. As for engineering, Microsoft pumped the Xbox One with hardware a little ahead of what was needed for most console games. Think about the 360, the console that lasted 10 years with the same hardware. When they gave the One a TON more power, they were really giving it wiggle room for things like this 360 VM.

I think there is no denying that Microsoft pulled off an impressive feat of engineering here.

  • Like 2

I think there is no denying that Microsoft pulled off an impressive feat of engineering here.

 

Its a specialized Hyper-V. Engineering wise, they may have redesigned the OS to run a bit more simply, but overall they are loading up a VM. My Desktop could run both VMs simultaneously if I had access to them. I guess overall I will say, congrats Microsoft for redesigning the 360 OS to be simply run for specialized uses, but its not something revolutionary that they have done. "Amazing feat of engineering" might be up-selling it, more like "about time they instituted this".

  • Like 1

Billaguana: I think you're underplaying the fact of the different processor architectures, this is more than standard Hyper-V. Hyper-V only allows the running of different OS's, they still have to be able to natively run on the hardware which isn't the case here. Xbox 360 is PowerPC. Xbox One is x86-64, completely different.

 

They seem to have re-engineered the Xbox 360 OS to run on Intel and without much of a performance impact which is absolutely a big deal as it's never been done before. Even if it transpires that games are being 'ported' individually rather than pure 'emulation' then it's still a major feat. (I believe the technical details are still a little ambiguous at the mo, hence this comment).

  • Like 1

I think you forgot about processor compatibility mode. Although this is from one Hyper-V on host CPU to another on different host, they could have imaged from a dev machine and allowed for the same CPU into a Hyper-V and then moved on to migrate to their current one.

 

 

Use the Processor Compatibility Mode only in cases where VMs will migrate from one Hyper-V-enabled processor type to another within the same vendor processor family. Note that, while the name of this feature may give the impression, Processor Compatibility Mode does not enable migrations between AMD- and Intel-based hosts.

 

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg299590.aspx

 

So you can't even migrate between vendors let alone architecture with that feature.

  • Like 1

The 360 is not exactly off the shelf hardware, so to emulate / virtualise a bespoke a triple core PowerPC Processor running at 3.2 GHz along with the bespoke graphics chip the 360 has is pretty impressive I think. It's not like the Xbox One / 360 even share the same processor architecture.

  • Like 1

I think you forgot about processor compatibility mode. Although this is from one Hyper-V on host CPU to another on different host, they could have imaged from a dev machine and allowed for the same CPU into a Hyper-V and then moved on to migrate to their current one.

Ok sir, you definitely proved you know nothing about the complexity involved in doing this. Downplaying the complexity of virtualization, and especially such special architecture as the Xbox 360 has, is pretty ignorant. Even competitors like Sony are praising Microsoft for the effort; so it's not up to you to claim here it's not something special :-)

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!