Fix : Windows 10 accessing network drives : Password incorrect


Recommended Posts

I ran into an issue that was driving me nuts after installing Windows 10 on 2 computers. I could not access any of my network drives from either of those machines. It kept telling me my password was incorrect, but it wasn't. But I would go to a Windows 8 or Windows 7 machine, enter the username and password and it would connect first try.

Normally when you connect to a network drive it prompts you for your username and your password.

On windows 10 in the username box instead of entering just the username enter the computer name plus the username.

Example.

computername\owner  (Do not put \\computername ... that will not work so leave the \\ off)

Now enter the password and you should be able to access the network share just fine.

Hope this helps anyone else that was pulling their hair put.

Edited by warwagon

I have a different issues with windows 10 and networking.

 

I have windows 10 on one PC so far, and everything is fine as far as internet speed, but network transfers i'm getting about 100kb/s or less.

PC has a intel nic in it, so far wasn't able to figure out what the hell is going on.

This has always been this way, like on a domain for instance. DOMAINNAME\USERNAME for authentication and \\COMPUTERNAME\SHARE for UNC.

 

But on previous version of Windows, shared folder access just on the same workgroup specifying the computer name as the username was never required.

But on previous version of Windows, shared folder access just on the same workgroup specifying the computer name as the username was never required.

 

if anything if they're dropping relative workgroup based-assumptions for attempting to authenticate then that's a massive bonus. Or Windows HomeGroup support is broken. I'm happy either way.

with spending so much time in RDP/terminals i auto add the workgroup\domain in that format as it is, my Asus NAS requires authentication from its own ACL. Its the master browser for the workgroup "workgroup" which ironically matches my windows "workgroup" name. (diff un & pwd though)

 

W7 exhibits the same scenario though when working in a domain on a client/shares (*.int\username is entered, not \\*.int\username) especially as it is not your primary domain your authenticating against (e.g. 2 way transitive trusts between forests/domains.) in an admin capacity also uses this format without \\

 

I didnt yesterday on W10 and noticed the same issue :) if you're not used to the above situation, it could be very confusing.

  • 3 weeks later...

"same workgroup specifying the computer name as the username was never required."

 

Workgroups have NOTHING to do with authentication.. nothing..  They are place holder for where your computer goes in that stupid browse list, nothing more..

 

And you sure and the hell do not have to use workgroup name in authentication nor does it matter what domain\username you put when authenticating to a machine that is not a member of a domain.

 

post-14624-0-84051300-1437426476.png

 

Are you saying this is from win10 machine to a windows 7 machine - again nonsense and does not matter what domain you put when authing to a machines local users

 

post-14624-0-54007600-1437426891.png

 

Nor do you even have to put in a domain portion

 

post-14624-0-42465200-1437427097.png

 

edit:  Here is going to \\i5-w7 in explorer to get dialog box..  See the domain it has is the win10 box computer name -- which sure in the hell is not the domain or name of my i5-w7 box.. I have no idea what you were doing wrong or what your issue was.. But it has nothing do with domain names having to be in the username box..

 

post-14624-0-32089600-1437566998.png

 

  • 1 month later...

Not sure what your issue was andy bird, but As i have clearly shown with screen shots you don't need to put in the computername or workgroup name to access a share with username from that box..

Not sure what your issue was andy bird, but As i have clearly shown with screen shots you don't need to put in the computername or workgroup name to access a share with username from that box..

 

His issue was the exact same issue I had. Using the correct username and the correct password would not work.  All I know is that doing above works. So you are saying it doesn't matter what you type in before the username and that we can just type nonsense?

That being said, it did work on one of my machines, it accepted a username and the password to access the same exact network, share. So maybe it's a bug.

 

 

Edited by warwagon

not a bug its understanding how it works!!  Did you already have a session open with guest?  if a machine is member of workgroup not a member of domain then the domain name of the user account is completely meanless to that machine.. It can only look in its local database of users, does not care if the domain is whatever or something or its correct name..  It doesn't matter its just looking for username and password.

As you can see from screenshots I can send complete gibberish for domain/computer name and it still works

For all we know the use was putting in the wrong freaking password and then when saw this he typed it in correctly and WOW this works ;)  When it has NOTHING to do with it!!

edit:

So as you can see here my computer is called i5-w7, and that is what is listed as domain.  I did not put anything in username field and access it just fine

nocpudomused.thumb.png.dc299b7bb72f27f78

I then killed the session on the win10 machine who's name is win10 btw and my session on my machine and then tried again to connect and got prompted.  I then put in whatever as my domain\computer name and works just the same.

This is not part of the auth mech when authing to a machine that is not in a domain so what you send or don't send has nothing to do with the authing to the shares.

whateverworks2.thumb.png.b27884735f72264

So not sure what your issue was or is or what this new guys problem was, etc.. But you sure and the hell do not need to send the computer name workgroup or whatever to auth to a share if the machine is not part of a domain.

edit:  And just because I like to be complete in info.. That was from win7 to win10 machine.. This is from win10 to window7 machine - again.. nothing in the dialog for domain and just or can put in complete gibberish and still works..  Because it does not MATTER!!!

win10towin7.thumb.png.e2b7a05ca3375c21b8

Edited by BudMan

Budman, which build you're on win 10, and did you upgrade or install from iso?

I'm still having this issue where I could not connect to network drive,

I've tried warwagon solution, tried your's, tried AllowInsecureGuestAuth, disable PIN, use local Administrator account, use local account, use the same WORKGROUP, enable netbios, enable sharing & discovery, enable all services, reset, startup repair, map netdrive from explore, net use, powershell, and still none of them works (Access Denied, I'm dual booting this machine with windows 7 still can connect).

I'm on build 10240, seems that some people who upgrade to this build unable to use net drive, and I did upgrade from 8.1, shares we're working before upgrade.

I really wish I could find a solution without re-installing (reinstall might not work as well), I saw plenty of cummulative windows 10 update yesterday, but still downloading, hope they fix it.

I am on build 10240 which was install from iso from TP install with clean option.

While PIN stuff might be causing you issues.. So your authing to what exactly another windows 10 machine, windows 8, samba? some NAS.. What are you authing too?  Why don't you just sniff the traffic and see exactly what is going on.. What error do you get when you try and auth via cmd line?

Are you trying to just auth to IPC$  An actual share?  You sure you don't see any sessions open that are already denied with say guest?  You can not auth or have a session open to a machine that is denied or even allowed but not access to shares and then try and auth as a different account.

Simple sniff should show you exactly what is going on..

Sorry but from all the stuff you listed you have tried, sure seems like your just pointing and clicking at ###### without any basic understanding of what is actually going on or required to share files.  And the fact that it works from windows 7 is prob just pure dumb luck ;)

edit.. So for example.. Here is when I just run \\i5-w7 and get challenged to auth but machine sends current creds for that budman account.

failure.thumb.png.c9377693125c3f41c8e0c4

Then latter after I get prompted and actually send the correct password for the budman account on that machine i5-w7 I get accepted and then get share listing, etc..

auth.thumb.png.6a405badf4f8a8fbe5c9cff1d

If you post up a sniff we can take a look see to what is actually going on and why your being denied.

 

 

Edited by BudMan

The target is a windows 7 machine.

I've tried IPC$, tried browsing the target, tried connect the shared folder directly, and none of them works. I got "System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied." on the cmdline.

Yes, I just point and click that ######....:yes:, I'm not that tech savvy guys, I just knows things that most people don't have to know.

I did have high expectation on the upgrade, and I got pure dumb luck :(, perhaps I'll have to sniff it up indeed or
just hit it with a ((( BIG HAMMER ))) and shove an windows 10 iso in it to get it back on :D

thanks Budman, you show me the way to use ((( THE FORCE )))
see yaa ...

well what account are you using to auth with..  What is the exact cmd line your using?

So for example error 5 yes is a standard error you should get if your not authed and you try and browse it with net view

connectionstowin7fromwin10.thumb.png.317

so even though I am logged in with budman on the win10 machines its password is NOT the same as the budman account over on the win7 machine.. This is why fails when I try and just access it..  Now if I would set the password to match - then all the problems go away.

matchpasswords.thumb.png.221feb41b711019

 

 

 

LOL!! I'm sorry, but this isn't anything new.

For as long as I can remember, to access a share, the best practice way of doing it is domain or computer name\username.

And for the better part, yes having your machines in the correct workgroups helps. Did you ever use 3.11 for Workgroups, Budman? 

Edited by Jared-

yes I used 3.11 back in the day.. Workgroups have NOTHING to do with this issue.  Workgroups have nothing to do with auth and are only used to maintain browse list for machines in the same one.

While it might be good practice to send appropriate computer name when authing to it.  If the box is not member of a domain that your authing to it is of no use to that machine since it only has one place to look its own accounts.  Now if the box is a member of domain then yes you would want to tell it which account your authing to a local account or a domain account, etc.

I will agree users not understanding basics of file sharing and authing to a windows machine is nothing new that is for sure.. And then FUD that passes for a fix is also nothing new ;)

Fix: should be removed from this thread title that is for damn sure since what he posted is just nonsense and nothing to do with whatever his problem was.

If I had to guess he was sending the wrong password, then when he put in computername\username he sent the correct one -- oh that was the issue, when no it wasn't!!  Since it has nothing to do with the authing process.

  • 2 weeks later...

I ran into an issue that was driving me nuts after installing Windows 10 on 2 computers. I could not access any of my network drives from either of those machines. It kept telling me my password was incorrect, but it wasn't. But I would go to a Windows 8 or Windows 7 machine, enter the username and password and it would connect first try.

Normally when you connect to a network drive it prompts you for your username and your password.

On windows 10 in the username box instead of entering just the username enter the computer name plus the username.

Example.

computername\owner  (Do not put \\computername ... that will not work so leave the \\ off)

Now enter the password and you should be able to access the network share just fine.

Hope this helps anyone else that was pulling their hair put.

You, my friends, area  genius ... and I don't say that to many people.

I was trying everything in the book, and out of it, to get connection to my kids PC so I can swap files on and off with each other, (we don't talk much), and this windows OS is the only one that was annoying me. I did what you suggested, -- PCname\accountname -- and voilà, job done. 

If I could send you a bottle of red down your ethernet port I would, but I can't, so you'll have to have an imaginary drink on me.

Genius.

Specifying a logon domain for a network share has always been a feature, it's how Windows differentiates between a local logon and a network logon, this isn't a bug or unique to Windows 10.

And is NOT required if box your authing to is not a member of a domain..  As you clearly see from multiple examples sending BS as domain\computername still auths since the machine can only check its local account base.  Yes if your going to auth to a member of a AD machine, then you would have to specify which you want to use its account or domain account or you could run into problems.

Normally if your on AD, then your machines would both be members and you wouldn't have to get a popup since your domain account have been given permissions by the admin of the domain.

  • Like 1

^ Wrong. 

No matter if you're on a AD environment or workgroup, it's ALWAYS been best practice to specify computer name\user name. 

Just like when I connect to my NAS, I have to specify <nas name>\<nas user name>.

Either way, who f'ing cares...

^ Wrong. 

No matter if you're on a AD environment or workgroup, it's ALWAYS been best practice to specify computer name\user name. 

Just like when I connect to my NAS, I have to specify <nas name>\<nas user name>.

Either way, who f'ing cares...

 

In this case it fixes people problems. People even want to send me alcohol over Ethernet.

In actuality, I think this is an issue that sometimes arises when you have the same username on two computers and don't use certain features of the networking. then it will think you're using the local users instead of the remote and it fails. 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Weekend PC Game Deals: Steam Summer Sale 2026 Edition by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Weekend PC Game Deals is where the hottest gaming deals from all over the internet are gathered into one place every week for your consumption. So kick back, relax, and hold on to your wallets. The Epic Games Store's freebie offer brought two more games to keep this week too. What you can grab this time are copies of RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 Complete Edition and Voidwrought. Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 is an enhanced version of the classic title that comes with enhancements like widescreen and 1080p resolution support. Its two expansion packs are included here too. Meanwhile, Voidwrought is a 2D action-platformer with tight platforming and high-speed combat against cosmic horrors. The double giveaway is slated to last until July 2. On the same day, I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream and River City Girls 2 will take the same freebie spot. The Humble Store introduced a couple of new game bundles earlier this week. The Going Rogue collection begins with Rogue Legacy, UnderMine, and None Shall Intrude in the starting tier for $5. If you pay the $10 it's asking to complete the bundle, you also get copies of Brutal Orchestra, Moros Protocol, Nightmare Reaper, Home Behind 2, and Lynked: Banner of the Spark. If it's fighting games you're looking for, the new Arc System Works Evo bundle is carrying plenty. The three tiers of this bundle that go up to $20 carry games like Melty Blood Actress Again Current Code, GUILTY GEAR Xrd REV 2, KILL la KILL - IF, Blazblue Cross Tag Battle, Guilty Gear -STRIVE-, Blazblue CentralFiction, and more. Big Deals One of the biggest sale events of the year, the Steam Summer Sale, has just kicked off, and that means almost every PC game available is now featuring discounts. We have plenty of games for you to look over in our special hand-picked big deals list for the weekend below: Baldur's Gate 3 – $44.99 on Steam Anno 117: Pax Romana – $41.99 on Steam S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl – $41.99 on Steam Indiana Jones and the Great Circle – $41.99 on Steam NINJA GAIDEN 4 – $41.99 on Steam Dying Light: The Beast – $39.59 on Steam Ghost of Tsushima DIRECTOR'S CUT – $35.99 on Steam Battlefield 6 – $34.99 on Steam Cities: Skylines II – $34.99 on Steam The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered – $34.99 on Steam The Outer Worlds 2 – $34.99 on Steam Borderlands 4 – $34.99 on Steam Sid Meier's Civilization VII – $34.99 on Steam Mafia: The Old Country – $34.99 on Steam Split Fiction – $32.49 on Steam Assassin’s Creed Shadows – $31.49 on Steam HELLDIVERS 2 – $29.99 on Steam Diablo IV – $29.99 on Steam ARC Raiders – $29.99 on Steam Forza Horizon 5 – $29.99 on Steam Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice - GOTY Edition – $29.99 on Steam No Rest for the Wicked – $27.99 on Steam Metaphor: ReFantazio – $27.99 on Steam Ready or Not – $24.99 on Steam Kingdom Come: Deliverance II – $23.99 on Steam No Man's Sky – $23.99 on Steam Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered – $23.99 on Steam DOOM: The Dark Ages – $23.09 on Steam Mewgenics – $22.49 on Steam Persona 3 Reload – $20.99 on Steam Hades II – $20.99 on Steam Two Point Museum – $20.09 on Steam Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord – $19.99 on Steam God of War – $19.99 on Steam Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader – $19.99 on Steam Returnal – $19.79 on Steam Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 – $17.99 on Steam Cyberpunk 2077 – $17.99 on Steam Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora – $17.99 on Steam Star Wars Outlaws – $17.49 on Steam REPLACED – $15.99 on Steam Days Gone – $15.99 on Steam Age of Mythology: Retold – $14.99 on Steam Crusader Kings III – $14.99 on Steam Red Dead Redemption 2 – $14.99 on Steam Half-Life: Alyx – $14.99 on Steam Grand Theft Auto V Enhanced – $14.99 on Steam EA SPORTS FC 26 – $13.99 on Steam The Crew Motorfest – $13.99 on Steam Sea of Thieves: 2026 Edition – $13.99 on Steam Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition – $13.99 on Steam Dead Cells – $12.49 on Steam Schedule I – $11.99 on Steam BioShock: The Collection – $11.99 on Steam Fable Anniversary – $11.54 on Steam Hearts of Iron IV – $9.99 on Steam Kerbal Space Program – $9.99 on Steam Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands – $9.99 on Steam The Riftbreaker – $8.99 on Steam Stardew Valley – $8.99 on Steam Total War: WARHAMMER III – $8.99 on Steam Sons Of The Forest – $8.99 on Steam Assassin's Creed Origins – $8.99 on Steam Risk of Rain 2 – $8.24 on Steam Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 – $7.49 on Steam Call of Duty: Modern Warfare® II – $6.99 on Steam CONTROL Ultimate Edition – $5.99 on Steam Dead Space – $5.99 on Steam The Quarry – $5.99 on Steam RV There Yet? – $5.59 on Steam Euro Truck Simulator 2 – $4.99 on Steam Terraria – $4.99 on Steam PEAK – $4.95 on Steam Detroit: Become Human – $3.99 on Steam Far Cry 3 – $3.99 on Steam A Plague Tale: Innocence – $3.99 on Steam The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – $3.99 on Steam Assetto Corsa Competizione – $3.99 on Steam PAYDAY 2 – $2.99 on Steam Wreckfest – $2.99 on Steam Rain World – $2.49 on Steam Watch_Dogs 2 – $2.49 on Steam Planet Zoo – $2.24 on Steam Bendy and the Dark Revival – $1.99 on Steam CARRION – $1.99 on Steam The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth – $1.49 on Steam Plague Inc: Evolved – $1.49 on Steam Don't Starve Together – $1.49 on Steam Metro 2033 Redux – $0.99 on Steam Hotline Miami – $0.99 on Steam RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 Complete Edition – $0 on Epic Store Voidwrought – $0 on Epic Store DRM-free Specials The GOG store is in the middle of its own summer sale. Here are some highlights from the DRM-free store: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 - $39.99 on GOG Hollow Knight: Silksong - $14.99 on GOG Resident Evil Bundle - $12.49 on GOG Tomb Raider I-III Remastered Starring Lara Croft - $11.99 on GOG Alpha Protocol - $9.99 on GOG Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines™ - $9.99 on GOG Fallout: New Vegas Ultimate Edition - $9.99 on GOG Disco Elysium - The Final Cut - $9.99 on GOG Dino Crisis Bundle - $8.49 on GOG Cold Fear - $8.25 on GOG Star Trek: Armada II - $7.49 on GOG Star Trek: Starfleet Command III - $7.49 on GOG Warhammer: Dark Omen - $7.49 on GOG Hollow Knight - $7.49 on GOG Mortal Kombat Trilogy - $6.49 on GOG Soldier of Fortune: Platinum Edition - $6.49 on GOG Heroes of Might and Magic 3: Complete - $4.99 on GOG SWAT 4: Gold Edition - $4.99 on GOG RollerCoaster Tycoon 2: Triple Thrill Pack - $4.99 on GOG Stranglehold - $4.99 on GOG ANSTOSS 3: Der Fußballmanager - $4.79 on GOG Firewatch - $3.99 on GOG Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom - $2.99 on GOG Myst Masterpiece Edition - $2.99 on GOG Settlers 3: Ultimate Collection - $2.49 on GOG World in Conflict: Complete Edition - $2.49 on GOG Keep in mind that availability and pricing for some deals could vary depending on the region. That's it for our pick of this weekend's PC game deals, and hopefully, some of you have enough self-restraint not to keep adding to your ever-growing backlogs. As always, there are an enormous number of other deals ready and waiting all over the interwebs, as well as on services you may already subscribe to if you comb through them, so keep your eyes open for those, and have a great weekend.
    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!