Fix : Windows 10 accessing network drives : Password incorrect


Recommended Posts

Yes, I was wondering WTF was going on with windows 10...the usual 'user name and password only' would not work as it did in previous windows versions. Well some of the previous versions anyway. Windows 10 does indeed need the computername/username combo in the user box for GUI shares. Thanks Guys for clearing this up. I was sitting here hitting the pipe and thinking WTF and then turned to google and found this blog, completely forgetting my training about good practices to use the combo\combo technique when dealing with remote shares/logins etc. Not sure why windows 10 requires this but all that matters is that we know NOW how it works...trying to understand 'why' is something i am not sure even Microsoft knows. LOL

Edited by C.H. Tech Man

Yes, I was wondering WTF was going on with windows 10...the usual 'user name and password only' would not work as it did in previous windows versions. Well some of the previous versions anyway. Windows 10 does indeed need the computername/username combo in the user box for GUI shares. Thanks Guys for clearing this up. I was sitting here hitting the pipe and thinking WTF and then turned to google and found this blog, completely forgetting my training about good practices to use the combo\combo technique when dealing with remote shares/logins etc. Not sure why windows 10 requires this but all that matters is that we know NOW how it works...trying to understand 'why' is something i am not sure even Microsoft knows. LOL

Well it doesn't, but sometimes it does... but usually it doesn't. there is somethign special about the cases where it does. 

homegroups.. Yeah that could throw a wrench into it.. Who said anything about homegroups?? OP sure didn't make any mention of it -- but since windows like to fire it up with really asking you if you want it..  That could mess up fire sharing for sure.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

You are the best +warwagon. I was also wondering WTF was going on but once I tried your solution, it worked perfectly. But I discovered the problem only arises when the first Win10 machine is logged into a microsoft account and trying to access the network shares of another Win10 machine. The Win10 machine that is logged into a microsoft account can access the network share of my Win7 machine with just the straight username/password but trying to access the Win10 machine requires your solution. If the first Win10 machine is logged in using a local account instead of the microsoft account, then it can access the Win10 and the Win7 machine with just the username/password with no need for your solution.

I'm reading this, and all the posts. It doesn't make sense why people would have issues. Even if you use the same username, which I do for all of my VMs, i.e. vmubu / winadmin. I've never had this problem, occasionally I have issues with devices being shown on the network, specifically my laptop, but that's just some settings that need to be changed.

 

Oh well.

31 minutes ago, Jared- said:

So if you're working on a domain joined machine, and you want to authenticate using a local account, how would you go about it?

 

 

.\username

 

You didn't think I'd have an answer to your question did you ;) 

28 minutes ago, Jared- said:

On a local machine that'd work, but what if I was on a remote machine wanting to authenticate using a local account?

 

^^

Are you sure about that? I'll give you a pro tip ;) 

 

Spoiler

it works remote and local

 

I can use .\ to authenticate to a remote machine using a local account that's living on the remote machine? 

 

I would've thought using .\ would tell Windows to try and authenticate using a local account that's living on my machine?

 

Cool! You learn something new every day ;) 

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, Jared- said:

I can use .\ to authenticate to a remote machine using a local account that's living on the remote machine? 

 

 100% you can.

 

I would've thought using .\ would tell Windows to try and authenticate using a local account that's living on my machine?

What do you think it does when you're not on a domain then? .\ makes It authenticate exactly the same as if you weren't on a domain.

On 9/20/2015, 8:36:39, BudMan said:

And is NOT required if box your authing to is not a member of a domain..  As you clearly see from multiple examples sending BS as domain\computername still auths since the machine can only check its local account base.  Yes if your going to auth to a member of a AD machine, then you would have to specify which you want to use its account or domain account or you could run into problems.

Normally if your on AD, then your machines would both be members and you wouldn't have to get a popup since your domain account have been given permissions by the admin of the domain.

This is correct, it only matters if you're on a domain (so you need to specify DOMAIN\UserX), otherwise you can use WHATEVER\UserX and it'll connect just fine.

 

If you've got HomeGroup Sharing turned on is the only other thing I can think of that would mess with Auth (and even then I'm not 100% sure it does change anything)

homegroup sharing woudln't have any issues.. I take it these users are using MS accounts vs local..  Which changes everything..  Really need to clarify if your talking apples or oranges...   This is EXACTLY how FUD gets started and spreads... Someone thinks they found a solution, when really does not even apply..

 

Waiting for someone to say they need to be in the same workgroup ;)

For home use with Microsoft logins (whatever you call it) you know you can use credential manage to manage connections, right? So say I connect to my NAS and it's named fileserver I can go to credential manager under that account (the MS account) and add in the network address (fileserver) and then the username and password, that way if I want to have a login script to map drives or browse to fileserver I don't need to type a password in under that account.

 

I think I might be a bit off-topic though, but it's an option that might help.

7 hours ago, Packet1009 said:

posting here just to agree with everything that BudMan says (he's doing the Lord's work in keeping you lot on the straight and narrow)
 

Are you just blindly saying that without technically knowing what he is saying? Because it seems so.

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, Packet1009 said:

posting here just to agree with everything that BudMan says (he's doing the Lord's work in keeping you lot on the straight and narrow)
 

LOL! Yeah and I wouldn't take half of the advice he spits out sometimes too...

 

*sigh* and here we go again...

 

i am not aware of any posts of his where his advice has been incorrect - however, i do not follow every dashed thing he posts.

 

 

in this case, however, he's spot on - specifying a workgroup is absolutely pointless and unnecessary.


 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!