Fix : Windows 10 accessing network drives : Password incorrect


Recommended Posts

Yes, I was wondering WTF was going on with windows 10...the usual 'user name and password only' would not work as it did in previous windows versions. Well some of the previous versions anyway. Windows 10 does indeed need the computername/username combo in the user box for GUI shares. Thanks Guys for clearing this up. I was sitting here hitting the pipe and thinking WTF and then turned to google and found this blog, completely forgetting my training about good practices to use the combo\combo technique when dealing with remote shares/logins etc. Not sure why windows 10 requires this but all that matters is that we know NOW how it works...trying to understand 'why' is something i am not sure even Microsoft knows. LOL

Edited by C.H. Tech Man

Yes, I was wondering WTF was going on with windows 10...the usual 'user name and password only' would not work as it did in previous windows versions. Well some of the previous versions anyway. Windows 10 does indeed need the computername/username combo in the user box for GUI shares. Thanks Guys for clearing this up. I was sitting here hitting the pipe and thinking WTF and then turned to google and found this blog, completely forgetting my training about good practices to use the combo\combo technique when dealing with remote shares/logins etc. Not sure why windows 10 requires this but all that matters is that we know NOW how it works...trying to understand 'why' is something i am not sure even Microsoft knows. LOL

Well it doesn't, but sometimes it does... but usually it doesn't. there is somethign special about the cases where it does. 

homegroups.. Yeah that could throw a wrench into it.. Who said anything about homegroups?? OP sure didn't make any mention of it -- but since windows like to fire it up with really asking you if you want it..  That could mess up fire sharing for sure.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

You are the best +warwagon. I was also wondering WTF was going on but once I tried your solution, it worked perfectly. But I discovered the problem only arises when the first Win10 machine is logged into a microsoft account and trying to access the network shares of another Win10 machine. The Win10 machine that is logged into a microsoft account can access the network share of my Win7 machine with just the straight username/password but trying to access the Win10 machine requires your solution. If the first Win10 machine is logged in using a local account instead of the microsoft account, then it can access the Win10 and the Win7 machine with just the username/password with no need for your solution.

I'm reading this, and all the posts. It doesn't make sense why people would have issues. Even if you use the same username, which I do for all of my VMs, i.e. vmubu / winadmin. I've never had this problem, occasionally I have issues with devices being shown on the network, specifically my laptop, but that's just some settings that need to be changed.

 

Oh well.

31 minutes ago, Jared- said:

So if you're working on a domain joined machine, and you want to authenticate using a local account, how would you go about it?

 

 

.\username

 

You didn't think I'd have an answer to your question did you ;) 

28 minutes ago, Jared- said:

On a local machine that'd work, but what if I was on a remote machine wanting to authenticate using a local account?

 

^^

Are you sure about that? I'll give you a pro tip ;) 

 

Spoiler

it works remote and local

 

I can use .\ to authenticate to a remote machine using a local account that's living on the remote machine? 

 

I would've thought using .\ would tell Windows to try and authenticate using a local account that's living on my machine?

 

Cool! You learn something new every day ;) 

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, Jared- said:

I can use .\ to authenticate to a remote machine using a local account that's living on the remote machine? 

 

 100% you can.

 

I would've thought using .\ would tell Windows to try and authenticate using a local account that's living on my machine?

What do you think it does when you're not on a domain then? .\ makes It authenticate exactly the same as if you weren't on a domain.

On 9/20/2015, 8:36:39, BudMan said:

And is NOT required if box your authing to is not a member of a domain..  As you clearly see from multiple examples sending BS as domain\computername still auths since the machine can only check its local account base.  Yes if your going to auth to a member of a AD machine, then you would have to specify which you want to use its account or domain account or you could run into problems.

Normally if your on AD, then your machines would both be members and you wouldn't have to get a popup since your domain account have been given permissions by the admin of the domain.

This is correct, it only matters if you're on a domain (so you need to specify DOMAIN\UserX), otherwise you can use WHATEVER\UserX and it'll connect just fine.

 

If you've got HomeGroup Sharing turned on is the only other thing I can think of that would mess with Auth (and even then I'm not 100% sure it does change anything)

homegroup sharing woudln't have any issues.. I take it these users are using MS accounts vs local..  Which changes everything..  Really need to clarify if your talking apples or oranges...   This is EXACTLY how FUD gets started and spreads... Someone thinks they found a solution, when really does not even apply..

 

Waiting for someone to say they need to be in the same workgroup ;)

For home use with Microsoft logins (whatever you call it) you know you can use credential manage to manage connections, right? So say I connect to my NAS and it's named fileserver I can go to credential manager under that account (the MS account) and add in the network address (fileserver) and then the username and password, that way if I want to have a login script to map drives or browse to fileserver I don't need to type a password in under that account.

 

I think I might be a bit off-topic though, but it's an option that might help.

7 hours ago, Packet1009 said:

posting here just to agree with everything that BudMan says (he's doing the Lord's work in keeping you lot on the straight and narrow)
 

Are you just blindly saying that without technically knowing what he is saying? Because it seems so.

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, Packet1009 said:

posting here just to agree with everything that BudMan says (he's doing the Lord's work in keeping you lot on the straight and narrow)
 

LOL! Yeah and I wouldn't take half of the advice he spits out sometimes too...

 

*sigh* and here we go again...

 

i am not aware of any posts of his where his advice has been incorrect - however, i do not follow every dashed thing he posts.

 

 

in this case, however, he's spot on - specifying a workgroup is absolutely pointless and unnecessary.


 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
    • Russia invaded Crimea, so not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying that the E.U is like what the USSR was? What is wrong with wanting control over your own country? i bet Trump would not stand by and allow Canada to control the U.S.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!