Odd noises when steering car and stopping


Recommended Posts

Well, I cant figure out what is up... I even had mechanics look at it and change parts and none of them fixed it yet (different mechanics)

 

I have a 2008 Pontiac Grand Prix. When I come to a stop going down a hill when I get almost completely stopped there is a pop noise and you can feel it, it feels like its coming from the front drivers side wheel. 

 

I took it to different mechanics three times for that issue, each of them said they "fixed" it... well what they did was this

 

* First replaced a control arm linkage, nope still doing it

* Replaced a sawy bar and bushings because it was cracked... figured it had to be that since it cracked... nope still doing it

* Replaced another linkage... still doing it

 

well the popping noise is getting louder, and now with it when I turn to the right, and only to the right I get a whirl whirl whirl noise as the wheel turns... and no it's not the steering pump because that was replaced also and the noise is still there... almost like a light jacket fabric rubbing together type of noise...

 

well ontop of this it's starting to feel like I am having suspension issues also when I go over a bump it feels like something is moving that shouldnt... it might all be tied together (all the issues) i duno

 

I got rear ended over a year ago when I was at a complete stop, they rebuilt my rear suspension completely but didn't do the front because they claimed it wasn't damaged...

 

not sure if something was and it's now just showing or what...

 

Also replaced both front rotors, didn't help..... (was getting very bad vibration when slowing at high speed, rotors were warped)

 

new brake pads... didn't help (old pads wore too much)

 

anyone have any ideas what ot look for? I was thinking either a wheel hub is bad or the struts or strut mount is bad... but of course the mechanics claim it couldn't be that.... (not sure why not, they changed most of the other parts already)

Jack up the car and start looking at different things. 

 

inner + outer tie rod ends

 

ball joint

 

cv joint

I was going to say CV joint. (Constant Velocity) I have changed a few of these in my time and they do "pop" when they start going bad. Look at the cv joint itself and you'll see a protective rubber accordion like boot that keeps the grease inside, once these tear or otherwise fail, it let's dirt,dust,water, etc in and eventually cause failure.

 

mule610_cv_boot_162.jpg

  • Like 1

Jack up the car and start looking at different things.

inner + outer tie rod ends

ball joint

cv joint <-very possible cause of popping sound.

I was just going to mention the possibility of a warn out cv joint also, OP, does it sound similar to this?

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2c1nxR7aq1o

Jack up the car and start looking at different things. 

 

inner + outer tie rod ends

 

ball joint

 

cv joint

 

This... 

 

If nothing helps, check the motor mount ... make sure nothing is broken...  I had that happen in Taurus I had, years ago...  had the engine banging the hood due the broken mount.

http://www.harborfreight.com/25-ton-aluminum-racing-floor-jack-with-rapidpump-62309.html

http://www.harborfreight.com/3-ton-aluminum-jack-stands-61627.html

 

If not send it back in to get it fixed being that they didn't fix the issue in the first place (request your money back).

http://www.harborfreight.com/25-ton-aluminum-racing-floor-jack-with-rapidpump-62309.html

http://www.harborfreight.com/3-ton-aluminum-jack-stands-61627.html

 

If not send it back in to get it fixed being that they didn't fix the issue in the first place (request your money back).

 

Well the parts that they replaced did need replaced so asking for money back isnt' going to help, they just didn't fix the issue I asked about... the links were cracking and so was the sway bar

 

yeah, I have jacks I just don't have them where I am right now, but thanks for the links

Well the parts that they replaced did need replaced so asking for money back isnt' going to help, they just didn't fix the issue I asked about... the links were cracking and so was the sway bar

 

yeah, I have jacks I just don't have them where I am right now, but thanks for the links

If you brought it in for a noise in the front end and they replace something unrelated to fixing the noise, well they didn't fix it (regardless if it needed to be replaced or not)...you are paying them for their expertise in being able to properly diagnose and repair the issue not their guess work.

  • Like 1

If you brought it in for a noise in the front end and they replace something unrelated to fixing the noise, well they didn't fix it (regardless if it needed to be replaced or not)...you are paying them for their expertise in being able to properly diagnose and repair the issue not their guess work.

 

Well the shops around me are blah at best... guess I'm use to it... when multiple independent shops and one dealer can't figure it out it drives me nuts... you'd think they'd test drive a car after a fix to see if it fixed it... but either they don't or they aren't listening...

Well the shops around me are blah at best... guess I'm use to it... when multiple independent shops and one dealer can't figure it out it drives me nuts... you'd think they'd test drive a car after a fix to see if it fixed it... but either they don't or they aren't listening...

I know the feeling...the dealer we are going to right now simply thinks the light comes on and that the brakes are not an issue..

 

Stupid people...if the brakes or something in the brake system wasn't an issue the stupid light wouldn't come on.  They replaced the abs module, so unless the module is broken again, the issue is still there and it is another sensor that they are over looking.  I swear if it doesn't beep or have a big neon sign pointing to the issue they can't properly diagnose or troubleshoot it.

While I agree with most, it does sound a lot like CV joints, having it seem by multiple machanics already they should have spotted that pretty quickly as they looked at/changed the drop links.

 

It might be more of an issue with the top mounts on the suspension strut bearing. Normally, the suspension takes a lot of the weight of the car as inertia forces down on front wheels. As the suspension takes the weight, they move around a bit with the bearing, the same happens as you move your steering wheel. Typically you can feel the car pop and judder at low speeds turning and sometimes as you stop and pulling off.

 

Unfortunately, there isn't an easy way to do a visual check as they tend to be well up into the wheel arch. However, removal of the strut unit is usually very easy for inspection and you'll almost always be able to see damage to bearing being split open or you may even find the spring has snapped/cracked already as well. Should take only about half hour to remove and inspect and replace back on the car for inspection and can be done at home with basic tools. I wouldn't advise replacing the strut springs or bearing unless you have the correct tools because they hold a lot of energy. Also, sometimes it's cheaper to just replace the strut/spring and bearing in one go from a junk yard. Just keep in mind that it's also recommended that you replace both sides at the same time. Never had an issue doing that myself, just get the tracking done after a week when they've settled down.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!