Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've searched the web but can't find a topic similar enough nor a forum exactly tailored to this topic, so I hope it is OK to ask here.

 

Early this morning I was looking at furniture on Sears regular and Outlet websites.  I came back later to see an email that was time stamped 6:01am from Sears with the subject "? We've got a surprise! Thanks for looking

Welcome, and may I say, well done for taking the time to post correctly.

As for the email, I have no idea on how they could do that without any input from you.

Was the information you recieved in almost exact relation to what you were browsing?

Were you signed into a browser at the time?

UPDATE

 

I know I posted only minutes ago, but I just zoomed in to look closer at the incredibly fine print at the bottom of the Sears spam email.  (I just got fitted for multifocal lenses and it is a bear getting used to focusing on small type right now).  Anyhow, here is the privacy disclosure link to the company that seems to be proudly responsible for this apparent email stealing technology (I hope the link is OK to post as it is general and freely available):

 

http://privacy.criteoemail.com/us/privacy-policy.html

 

 

I don't know how they could extract my email from just the related cookies but I assume there may be a way it is encoded into other tracking info from sites where I may have stored my email address or communicated through a web form.  This is scary.  I'm afraid to use their opt-out button.  Will research further.

 

Any experience or opinions with this BS?  Thanks!

Welcome, and may I say, well done for taking the time to post correctly.

As for the email, I have no idea on how they could do that without any input from you.

Was the information you recieved in almost exact relation to what you were browsing?

Were you signed into a browser at the time?

Hi, thanks for the reply.  I've also updated my post which probably explains 'what' is happening, but not 'how'.

 

It appears to be a fairly legitimate looking spam email from Sears, and it includes an inset sofa image, one that I was looking at.  In of itself the ad inset is not surprising, though the email "knowledge" is, and scary as well.  As I tried to describe, this is an email address that is not linked to any type of Gmail or similar cross-linking or social site/plugin/etc.  I was using IE and do have Google as my home page, and do have a Gmail address that may have been logged in (I don't always log out of Gmail, it is just a throwaway account) but at any rate they emailed my primary paid email address that is not linked to anything like what you suggest.

Does your browser support/have do not track enabled? If not it's possible it could have been extracted from a tracking cookie.

Thanks for the reply.  This is a new install on a "write zeroed" HDD, so I am still tweaking everything.  I started immediately with AV and anti malware running constant protection.  I just went into IE options and set 3rd party cookies to 'Prompt' so I can see what comes up.  Unfortunately I had them enabled before this.  AFAIK, "do not track" in IE is only accomplished by restricting cookies.  I could certainly be wrong.

Does your browser support/have do not track enabled? If not it's possible it could have been extracted from a tracking cookie.

DNT is a bit of a useless feature since the whole ignoring IE's option debacle and not many sites even paying attention to it anyway.

Get noscript and disable scripts from running on sites that could things like this, although they'd still know that you looked at items (cookies) they wouldn't get anything like google analytics, and you can browse in private mode to bypass that too.

I get these from newegg or Amazon at times. I'll be browsing. And a few hours later I'll get an email with things similar to what I was browsing.

I get it in my Facebook stream all the time. I'm thinking about writing a program to auto-clear cookies from my caches after each browser closing.

The only plausible explanation I can think of if you weren't logged in is that they already have a browser fingerprint record of your computer (See: https://amiunique.org/ or https://panopticlick.eff.org/

 

Since you said it was a "new W7 installation" rather than a new PC, I'm assuming you just reformatted, in which case your browser fingerprint wouldn't really change as far as I know.

  • Like 1

The only plausible explanation I can think of if you weren't logged in is that they already have a browser fingerprint record of your computer (See: https://amiunique.org/ or https://panopticlick.eff.org/

 

Since you said it was a "new W7 installation" rather than a new PC, I'm assuming you just reformatted, in which case your browser fingerprint wouldn't really change as far as I know.

Thank you, that seems plausible.  I believe that XP installs used to look at unique features like hardware MAC addresses, and saved a code that was generated from all of that data, which became the basis for approving a reinstall on the same machine.  I experimented with that in the early 2000's by necessity, changing out failed hardware devices and reformatting, and never had it fail to certify the copy of XP automatically.  They might have programmed some wiggle room into it.

 

Yes, it was a clean re-installation of W7 Pro on an existing machine, as I recently fell victim to a ransomeware attack.  I cleaned up the virus and restored my files from backups but to be safe felt it was worth the extra effort to reformat and reinstall.  Now I am paranoid about security since I don't even know how I got the ransomware in the first place.  I don't open unknown files or browse seedy sites.  Thanks again for the idea and links about unique browser detection.

Do you have a common name/email?

Have you been into a store? and maybe used their Wifi? Then gone home and used your Wifi? AdvertisingID....

Install Ghostery, Its amazing how many calls to third party API's Trackers and Beacons you get stopped

 

I highly recommend this to anyone.

 

https://www.ghostery.com/en/

 

Its a strange scary old world we live in. 

The only plausible explanation I can think of if you weren't logged in is that they already have a browser fingerprint record of your computer (See: https://amiunique.org/ or https://panopticlick.eff.org/

 

Since you said it was a "new W7 installation" rather than a new PC, I'm assuming you just reformatted, in which case your browser fingerprint wouldn't really change as far as I know.

That's a bit of nonsense really, if it's a fresh install the fingerprint data will show: timezone, IE version, screen resolution, additional software installed (none), language, cookies (none) - what you're trying to say is that the owner of a large domain can take that information and match it up to one user, well no, there will be at a bare minimum 10,000 visitors to the site with the exact same configuration and therefore 'browser fingerprint'.

The most likely scenario is the site was logged into or something from a third party site, then the cookie with/without javascript was used to get finer details and the background email system fired off an email to the account holder.

Do you have a common name/email?

Have you been into a store? and maybe used their Wifi? Then gone home and used your Wifi? AdvertisingID....

Install Ghostery, Its amazing how many calls to third party API's Trackers and Beacons you get stopped

 

I highly recommend this to anyone.

 

https://www.ghostery.com/en/

 

Its a strange scary old world we live in. 

Not common, no.  I don't use public wifi, at least I haven't in a long time.  Thanks for the link, I'll check Ghostery out.

That's a bit of nonsense really, if it's a fresh install the fingerprint data will show: timezone, IE version, screen resolution, additional software installed (none), language, cookies (none) - what you're trying to say is that the owner of a large domain can take that information and match it up to one user, well no, there will be at a bare minimum 10,000 visitors to the site with the exact same configuration and therefore 'browser fingerprint'.

The most likely scenario is the site was logged into or something from a third party site, then the cookie with/without javascript was used to get finer details and the background email system fired off an email to the account holder.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but did you visit the sites I linked? Even if you do a clean install, you're highly likely going to install all the same plugins/software and configure everything the same way. OP did say that it was a "one week old installation" so he would already have everything installed.

I get it in my Facebook stream all the time. I'm thinking about writing a program to auto-clear cookies from my caches after each browser closing.

Why?  All 3 major browsers Firefox, Chrome and even IE have this option already built in.

 

Here is settings in firefox that allow you to clear you cookies when you close your browser, delete them on close, etc.  Both chrome and IE also have settings like this - just showing firefox because that is browser I use 99% of the time.

 

post-14624-0-03497100-1437430261.png

Why?  All 3 major browsers Firefox, Chrome and even IE have this option already built in.

 

Here is settings in firefox that allow you to clear you cookies when you close your browser, delete them on close, etc.  Both chrome and IE also have settings like this - just showing firefox because that is browser I use 99% of the time.

 

attachicon.gifclearcookies.png

You know, I'm one of those standard guppies when it comes to browsers. It works, so I don't mess with it. I never knew FF had this option. Now, to find it on Chrome!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!