Recommended Posts

Yesterday I've stumbled across µMatrix, some extension by one of the two main µBlock developers which basically is a very fine-grained NoScript with "just enough" ad-blocking support. While NoScript works 2-dimensional (allow/deny script x everywhere or nowhere), µMatrix adds a per-site switch:

Screenshot_2015-07-29_12.46.54.thumb.PNG

As you might see, it even blocks ads if you want it to. Rather nice. Bonus improvement: On Windows, replacing NoScript by µMatrix frees 400 MiB of RAM. I have no clue why.

:blush:

 

I never used any other type of extension like this before.

I have had to disable it for youtube and plex so far, they would just break. So I suppose it is doing good and if that is the default, its good news.

I never used any other type of extension like this before.

I have had to disable it for youtube and plex so far, they would just break. So I suppose it is doing good and if that is the default, its good news.

Pretty much the main problem with apps like this they ALWAYS break more than they fix and for them to "work" you either disable it or set it to be so permissive it's just wasting space 

Gave up on junk apps like this a long time ago, only one I use is an ad blocker as long as it allows whitelisting 

Well, yes, you should set up your permissions once. The thing with µMatrix is that you don't just have the choice to allow YouTube scripts but to explicitly decide on which sites you want to enable them. Yes, by default it works like NoScript in the whitelist mode, but the blacklist mode is just two clicks away.

  • 2 weeks later...

I just removed uBlock and installed this and it seemed like Facebook didn't work when I enabled it. Also, how does all the square blocks work? What do they do when I click on them? What would I do if I wanted the maximum protection?

uMatrix and uBlock are an epic combo.

So here's how it works, side shows all the sites that are being connected to by that page. Dark Green is the site itself, of a site that is explicitly allowed in your list. Light Green is implicit, normally subdomains. Dark Red is explicitly blocked, light red is again implicitly blocked, which is *normally* any domain that isn't a subdomain of your current site, or otherwise explicitly allowed.

Now the small blocks beside it are for elements on the page that are allowed or blocked. By default iFrames are blocked, images are allowed except on Explicitly blocked domains, and the rest just follows the allowed/blocked domains.

It stores yous allowed/blocked on a session basis, and forgets it after you close the browser. If you want it to remember, or do more fancy stuff, then go into the options --> My rules.

Anything 'matrix-off' is just that, uMatrix is off. After that the pattern is as followes:

Site you are on - Site being connected to - Content - Allow/Block/Inherit

So the default -- * * * block -- is what blocks all domains that aren't the current site you are on, where as * * image allow is what allows all images to load regardless of domain (unless explicitly blocked).

Some of the ones I have in my personal file are ones like - * ajax.googleapis.com * allow, and * code.jquery.com * allow. For obvious reasons.

You can also copy your working list over to the perm list from there.

 

The other handy thing is the blocks based on the hosts file. Now personally I run a modified MVPS hosts file, so I block stuff at that level across any browser. But there are additional hosts files there, which means a lot can be blocked that might get through between my normal updates. This can be super handy when clicking on a link to a random site. If it's blocked outright, I look up why.. normally it's for good reason.. Sometimes it's just tracking/advertising, and I allow it for that session.

There are also a bunch of Privacy settings, but I don't bother with them myself.

  • Like 2

I just removed uBlock and installed this and it seemed like Facebook didn't work when I enabled it.

You should allow Facebook to use *.facebook.com scripts/frames/XHRs then. Although I'm pretty much sure that it's overall a good idea to block Facebook. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!