Recommended Posts

Harebrained Schemes is pleased to announce their return to Kickstarter this Fall to partner with Backers in co-funding the creation of BATTLETECH. Jordan Weisman, the creator of BattleTech and MechWarrior, is back with the first turn-based BattleTech game for PC in over two decades. Steeped in the feudal political intrigue of the BattleTech universe, the game will feature an open-ended Mercenaries-style campaign that blends RPG ‘Mech and MechWarrior management with modern turn-based tactics.

Source 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

No clans... booo!

I mean, I'll probably play the hell out of it. but I'll be sad with no Mad Cat or Behemoth besides the clan invasion is the best time of BT universe. I need my Jade Falcons. Guess I'll have to wait for the sequel :/

Personally I'm glad they started at the beginning.  If you start with clans, especially if the players have access to clan tech then you're pretty much done.  If they start with "classic" tech you can make an entire game of just that and then introduce Star League tech later or maybe even as extra rare mission rewards and such.

The clans can come later as an expansion pack/DLC or even a sequel and I'd be fine with that personally.  Of course I started on BattleTech playing the original miniature game in grade school with Technical Readout 3025 so I'd hate for all the stuff I know to be obsolete garbage as it would be if Clans and even Star League tech were there from the start... so perhaps I'm biased. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597062662
Share on other sites

meh, pre clan is boring.

also, no Jade Falcons....

And well the IS did pretty well for itself after the initial invasion. and all the cool mechs come post clan warfare, hopefully they manage the same deal as the guys who make MWO though allowing them to bring back the "redesigned" forgotten mechs. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063404
Share on other sites

Also one of the few TR's I had(well I may probably still have it somewhere...) was the I dunno.. 3055 or something I think , which included the Behemoth.. I love the Behemoth...

I'll wait and see for this game anyway though. I have yet to see a really good Battletech game played as a strategy game on computer. there's been some "decent" ones, but no greats, unlike the Mechwarrior games, that have mostly all been great. I'm thinking that BT is best on a table. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063414
Share on other sites

And well the IS did pretty well for itself after the initial invasion. and all the cool mechs come post clan warfare, hopefully they manage the same deal as the guys who make MWO though allowing them to bring back the "redesigned" forgotten mechs. 

You know I had no idea the whole "redesigned" forgotten mechs thing happened (apparently they're called "unseen" in the community now).  I haven't played the game since the early 90's and all that happened after I stopped paying attention (apparently there was a lawsuit in '94).  I can't even imagine BattleTech without the Rifleman, Archer, Warhammer, Marauder, Battlemaster, etc.  These are the defining mechs of my BattleTech experience.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063480
Share on other sites

Stage 2 Stretch Goal has been reached.  The single player story campaign in now in.  The next few goals just refine it and then on to Stage 3, the Expanded Mercenary Campaign where the game becomes open ended with procedural missions and such.  THAT's what I'm hoping for (I personally couldn't care less about Stage 4 which is PvP multiplayer)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063836
Share on other sites

Wait so if this is pre clan, it doesnt have Timber Wolf? Please correct me if I am wrong.

ROFL, no.

I had to look it up but Timber Wolf is apparently a Clan Omimech (one I knew as the Mad Cat from when I played).

There are no Omimech's of any kind in 3025.  No ER or pulse versions of energy weapons, no ultra or LB versions of auto cannons, no ferro-fiberous armor or endo-steel internal structure, no double heat sinks or XL engines, no gauss rifles, no thunder or swarm versions of LRMs, no streak versions of SRMs, etc. etc.

If they don't have the so called "unseen" though I'm not sure what's in the game.  The "unseen" list seems to constitute just about every pre-clan mech I remember and most of the ones that came in the original 3025 technical readout.  Atlas is in, woot! /s

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063900
Share on other sites

Here's a handy link I found:

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Inner_Sphere_'Mechs

Just look at the 3025 list minus the 3025 "revised" list (those are "unseen")  Apparently they augmented the massive loss of mechs by making lower tech versions of the 2750 Mechs in the revised edition.  For those that don't know 2750 mechs are actually higher tech and came along later (the 2750 technical readout was published years after the 3025 where BattleTech began and before 3050 which introduced the clans.) 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063924
Share on other sites

ROFL, no.

I had to look it up but Timber Wolf is apparently a Clan Omimech (one I knew as the Mad Cat from when I played).

There are no Omimech's of any kind in 3025.  No ER or pulse versions of energy weapons, no ultra or LB versions of auto cannons, no ferro-fiberous armor or endo-steel internal structure, no double heat sinks or XL engines, no gauss rifles, no thunder or swarm versions of LRMs, no streak versions of SRMs, etc. etc.

If they don't have the so called "unseen" though I'm not sure what's in the game.  The "unseen" list seems to constitute just about every pre-clan mech I remember and most of the ones that came in the original 3025 technical readout.  Atlas is in, woot! /s

 

Geez, then what do they fight with then, sticks and stones?

I still find this interesting and will probably back it just because I like these things a lot.

Edit: nm, saw your link. Reading it now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063942
Share on other sites

 

Geez, then what do they fight with then, sticks and stones?

In the original game there was only one version of each kind of weapon (no ER or pulse or Ultra varients of things).

You still had large, medium, and small lasers for energy weapons as well as the PPC and flamer.

You had autocannon 2, 5, 10, and 20 as well as the machinegun (primarily for anti-infantry) for projectile weapons.

For missiles you had SRM 2, 4, and 6 as well as LRM 5, 10, 15, and 20.

Believe it or not but that was enough to make quite a diverse set of mechs (and vehicles), rofl.

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063966
Share on other sites

In the original game there was only one version of each kind of weapon (no ER or pulse or Ultra varients of things).

You still had large, medium, and small lasers for energy weapons as well as the PPC and flamer.

You had autocannon 2, 5, 10, and 20 as well as the machinegun (primarily for anti-infantry) for projectile weapons.

For missiles you had SRM 2, 4, and 6 as well as LRM 5, 10, 15, and 20.

Believe it or not but that was enough to make quite a diverse set of mechs (and vehicles), rofl.

 

 

That's good to know. I also discovered this: http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Apple_Computers_Interstellar

My strategy will be to use these futuristic Apple products in my Mech. According to this article, we now know why Apple is hoarding cash. They want to purchase an entire planet.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597063974
Share on other sites

I was so excited for this then I saw 'turn based' :(
I cant stand turn based games :(

 

If you can't stand turn based this is definitely not the game for you.  That's a key selling point for others (myself included).

As an interesting bit of turn-base vs. realtime trivia though I think the first BattleTech computer game was a turn-based game called BattleTech: The Crescent Hawk's Inception (that's the first one I played anyway).  It was made by a little company called Westwood Associates at the time and it's sequel was a REALTIME game called BattleTech: The Crescent Hawk's Revenge.  The Crescent Hawk's Revenge served as a prototype for what would later become Dune II and in turn lead to the Command & Conquer series.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597064012
Share on other sites

I'm going to shamelessly bump this because it's slowing down, and I REALLY want to see what the goals are for Stage 3, the Expanded Mercenary Campaign! 

Currently it's funded to $1.6mil, $1.85 unlocks the Expanded Merc Campaign, $2.5 unlocks PvP Multiplayer \o/ Come on people, go forth and pledge!

While you are at it, also hit up the weekly goals. This week it's post images of your BT Collection on Twitter with #myBTstuff and #BATTLETECH the more we get, the more special content is unlocked, like e-novellas, and my personal goal of the Natasha Kerensky cameo in the Campaign. You can also help that along by liking the announcement on FB, Sharing it, Retweeting, liking their FB Page, and following their twitter.

Now stop sitting around having a Smoke and get it done!

BATTLETECH-12.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597079698
Share on other sites

While you are at it, also hit up the weekly goals. This week it's post images of your BT Collection on Twitter with #myBTstuff and #BATTLETECH the more we get, the more special content is unlocked, like e-novellas, and

my personal goal of the Natasha Kerensky cameo in the Campaign

. You can also help that along by liking the announcement on FB, Sharing it, Retweeting, liking their FB Page, and following their twitter.


 

Man after my own heart.  I do take some consolation on the fact that 32 points is "Add the Black Widows, including Mechwarriors, as an enemy unit you can fight in the skirmish game."  Natasha Kerensky of course being the leader of the Black Windows so she'll already be in the skirmish game at 32 points (we're currently at 24).  56 points gets her into the campaign as well though.  Personally I don't care much for Stage 4, the e-books, or the twitch goals but I REALLY, REALLY want Stage 3.  I can't wait to see what the sub-goals are for Stage 3 as well and getting all the famous units from the backer missions into the skirmish game and cameos into the campaign would be great as well.  Being the OP of this thread I backed on day 1 myself but it's nice to see someone else who seems to be almost as excited as I am!

I backed and enjoyed the Shadowrun games but my biggest complaint was that it's a set story that ends instead of a more open chance to run a groups of shadowrunners.  Stage 3 seems to directly address that issue in this game.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597079736
Share on other sites

Agreed, the idea of an endless campaign is really the big thing that draws me. What I'm wanting to see is a mix between random single mission contracts, some small multi-mission ones, and some larger mini-campaigns.. Ideally where you actions have an effect not just on your standings after, but toward the rest of the mission group as well. Like, for example I go in and do a surgical strike, kill the one target, get out.. I go down path A, where as I spray and pray kill everything on the map, I get a second path, with different outcomes and effects. But we shall see, in about $250k.. That and hopefully the missions are truly diverse.. I play Eve Online a fair bit and one thing that drives me nuts about the missions are they are cut and dry. Did them once you did them a thousand times. Needs more random.

Also, I want proper "bad" missions. Where you go in, and you are ######ed. There is no way to win, it's you getting reamed like it or not. MechWarrior II Mercs had one or two like that for campaign reasons, but I wouldn't mind it in the extended. Cause lets face it, no one wins all the time. Not even the Wolf's Dragoons. Also would reinforce the idea that you don't want to send in all your best all the time.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597079894
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

12 Hours to go, if you want to get in on it \o/

PvP Multiplayer has been unlocked, all funds now go to making the game more polished, and updates after the initial release, including plans for a co-op mode.

BATTLETECH-16.jpg

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/webeharebrained/battletech/ 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597116176
Share on other sites

Well, Battletech has always been a PvP game. From the tabletop on up. So ya, I think the made the right choice.

But this is nothign like the tabletop. this is more like (as they state) the previous PC "RTS" game. PvP never really worked for these types of games. Coop could. 

personally I wouldn't play either coop or PVP though. if the make a proper fully 3D beautiful 3D models on a hexagonal 3D board battletech PC PvP game, then I'd play PVP witht he classic battletech rules. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1266702-battletech/#findComment-597116470
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!