Recommendations for new routers


Recommended Posts

Hi All

I am in the lucky situation that I finally will get a good/fast (100 Mbit/s) Internet connection in my summerhouse. Since I have my NAS at home, and I don't want to move back and forth between the two places I am thinking about getting new routers, to replace the standard ones that comes with the Internet connections. 

What I am looking for is a router which has the capability of creating a site-2-site VPN connection, with a reasonable bandwidth to allow streaming of 1080p movies. I don't mind paying for a quality product, but I am not keen on a yearly subscription/maintenance fee.

Please let me know about your experiences, recommendations and ideas.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1270544-recommendations-for-new-routers/
Share on other sites

cisco 5505

sonicwall tz205 tz215 tz105 - features/speed (probably want a 215, I would ebay it or look for refurbished to save you some monies) 

netgear nighthawk (has vpn support, I have not used it as I only need vpn in a business environment).

pfsense now has appliance they are selling that is $299  If you wanted dedicated firewall/router this is great option that is for sure.  And has aes-ni for your vpn performance.

https://www.pfsense.org/products/product-family.html#sg-2220

http://store.pfsense.org/SG-2220/

 

 

Nope they are now tied to Cyberoam and they are cheats, liars and litigators.... they wanted to pay me 600 bucks to give one of thier UTMs a 10/10 and I declined so they threatened me with legal crap. Plus one of thier reps that sent me a freind request on FB had an abnormal amount of baby pics on his page. scary amount. Too much shady people at both sophos and cyberoam. DO NOT TRUST.

cisco 5505

sonicwall tz205 tz215 tz105 - features/speed (probably want a 215, I would ebay it or look for refurbished to save you some monies) 

netgear nighthawk (has vpn support, I have not used it as I only need vpn in a business environment).

Those Sonicwall models are all EOL or going to be EOL soon. Look at TZ-300,TZ-400,TZ-500

Hello,

 

I would recommend MikroTik CCR-1009, the passively cooled version. I am using them for a similar situation, the software is very easy to use with many examples of site to site VPN configurations on the wiki. The hardware and software is designed for ISPs primarily but also works great for residential use.

 

 

Overkill, yes. Cheap yes.

TonyJr

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!