OS X -> macOS  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think OS X should be renamed "macOS" to make it more in line with Apple's other OS names?

    • Yes
      24
    • No
      26


Recommended Posts

Apple now has: iOS, watchOS, and tvOS. That leaves OS X, which now runs only on the desktops and laptops. So, do you think a rename is in order, likely to "macOS?"

I think it should be, for three reasons: as noted, OS X is back to only running on the Mac platform. Second, it would harken back to the classic System software, which was known as Mac OS from 1997 on. And lastly, using a lowercase "m" at the beginning would keep the consistency with the other OS that Apple offers.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1272136-should-os-x-be-renamed/
Share on other sites

What OS should the iMac run then? iOS or macOS? ;)

It does have Mac in the name...

There would be a bit of ambiguity, though, but I think the iMac has been around long enough most people wouldn't be too confused.

No, the OS hasn't changed.  When they finally get around to OS 11.0, then it'll be a good time to consider it. A name change now is just silly, straight out of the Microsoft Change-A-Name-A-Day department.

yet they change it only 3 years ago from mac os x to just os x....    :(

 

edit:  why the hell are my post not merging together??

 

Yeah maybe when it goes from X to XI they will rename to macOS 11 or something.

Something I have been thinking about is will Apple continue to push two primary OS platforms for much longer? I mean tvOS and watchOS are there own thing, almost firmware rather than an OS. But iOS is starting to do more and more what OS X does, it is still a long way off but in 3 or 5 years? Who knows. Perhaps OS X will never make it to XI. Perhaps the next big change will be when Apple works out how it wants to do things in regards to merging touch and OS X.

  • Like 1

Yeah maybe when it goes from X to XI they will rename to macOS 11 or something.

Something I have been thinking about is will Apple continue to push two primary OS platforms for much longer? I mean tvOS and watchOS are there own thing, almost firmware rather than an OS. But iOS is starting to do more and more what OS X does, it is still a long way off but in 3 or 5 years? Who knows. Perhaps OS X will never make it to XI. Perhaps the next big change will be when Apple works out how it wants to do things in regards to merging touch and OS X.

The iPad Pro could possibly be the start of bring iOS to the Mac, or OS X to the iPad, depending on how you look at things. Some have suggested the iPad Pro may eventually replace the MacBook Air, which I think is possible. But none of this will be happening anytime soon.

  • 2 weeks later...

OMG! I was literally thinking the exact same thing!

I vote yes! That way, the names will be consistent: macOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS.

I don't really mind too much if Apple sticks with OS X though, either...

It's easier to create branding for a new product (iOS, watchOS, etc) than it is to rename an existing product and established brand (sure, they dropped the "Mac" from "Mac OS X" a few years ago, but OS X is the recognisable part). The amount of work involved to rename it for Apple (from references in the OS to documentation to marketing materials) and third party developers wouldn't be worth it. 

  • 3 weeks later...

What they need is a Macbook Pro Class chassis keyboard for the iPad Pro which should be an optional. Then it can consider changing the name for the better. Apple is incredibly crap when it comes to accessory and recently all the latest product design is moving backward with nothing mind blowing. The design team is not good anymore.

I think they missed their chance with 10.11. It would have been the perfect time to start calling it macOS 11, or Mac OS 11, without introducing mass confusion about naming inconsistency.

The OS X brand isn't actually very strong, I don't think. If you asked most Mac users what OS they use, they might say "Mac OS" or OS X" (pronouncing the X, instead of calling it 10), or even just say "I dunno, but it's not Windows." The branding isn't important, because it's contained within the hardware. This makes two points:

  1. It doesn't actually matter what they call it, because 98% of Mac users don't care.
  2. It's silly for them to hold on to the OS X brand, because the 2% that do care are the same Apple users who are annoyed by the inconsistency.

I think they missed their chance with 10.11. It would have been the perfect time to start calling it macOS 11, or Mac OS 11, without introducing mass confusion about naming inconsistency.

It would probably still be macOS v10.11 in that case.

. . .why, whats wrong with just OS X.  As a Mac user since 1987 really cannot see a reason for anything other than OS X. . .:)

Naming consistency across the board as clearly explained in the first pos. On top of that nobody said there's anything particularly wrong. Except for the fact most people call it OS Ex instead of OS Ten.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung messages is still alive and well. They reversed that and decided to our more effort into it.
    • I think every American should have a course in a 'dry sense of humour' at school; and perhaps 'using sarcasm in jest' oh, and also 'the use or irony in humour'.
    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!