For 7 years, VW software thwarted pollution regulations [Updated]


Recommended Posts

Oh. Brother....VW is in huge trouble in the US. 

It seems they had their diesel emissions system programmed to pass emissions standards when attached to testing gear, but once it was disconnected they were spewing at 40x the legal standards to get better performance. 

Their stock nosedive after it went public, and they're now subject to monsterous fines - in the $billions.

http://m.phys.org/news/2015-09-years-vw-software-thwarted-pollution.html

I don't understand how they could do this without getting caught earlier on. I'm assuming it's software based, as hardware surely a mechanic will pick this up.

im guessing it will just be a fine and nothing else considering all corporations get away with this type of thing

Its all software used to change the characteristics of the Engine while under certain testing conditions (Dyno and so forth). 

Crazy its been going on this long and nobody noticed but yeah, some heads gonna roll and some big fines gonna be levied!

Regulation wise it would be best for the country for all software to be audited for automobiles.  Even F1 code to help insure the code is not giving drives unfair advantages during races, is not setup to bypass safety checks for the drivers sake and meet the strict F1 regulations.  Maybe a secure framework for cars as it has been proven over and over again that the car manufactures do not place security and following the rules as top priorities.

I don't understand how they could do this without getting caught earlier on. I'm assuming it's software based, as hardware surely a mechanic will pick this up.

im guessing it will just be a fine and nothing else considering all corporations get away with this type of thing

 

There are rumors of criminal investigations being prepared in the US and several countries including Germany.

Me, I cannot understand the lack of ethics for the software developers/management

Besides, it is not just 482000 cars in the US, it is 11 millions cars worldwide, in all the brands of the VW groups.

Ultimately, it is not just the fines but the damage to the images of the VW brands that are going to be devastating: Audi and Porsche namely, plus the stock exchange drop that will make German bankers and government very very very unhappy.

So, yes, heads will roll ...

 

Audi are likely already suffering after the massive widespread piston ring issue causing their engines to use too much oil. Putting that right as well as this new software issue is going to cost Volkswagen Audi Group (I can't abbreviate that because the swear filter gets it!) billions of dollars worldwide.

I'd avoid VW and Audi cars from now on, and that's a shame, because I love them.

wow that was fast.... personally I always thought something felt odd about the VW TDI but thought that was just me

wonder who else has been doing this...

because the vw group......what about mercedes/bmw/blah blah blah.......they all use similar parts......seems more likely others will be involved....

Possibly, but the article specifically mentions that the BMW X5 passed, so perhaps not.

 

WVU tested three cars in real-world conditions— a 2012 VW Jetta, a 2013 VW Passat and a BMW X5 SUV. The BMW passed, but the university found significantly higher emissions from the Volkswagens, according to the EPA.

for once it's not something about GM in the USA on a massive scale..... I bet you everyone is cheating in some way or another be it very small or very large like potentially this

True. VW should have killed a bunch of people like GM and then they'd have only been fined $900 million!

Either way, glad to see the fine is actually a substantial amount and it is causing the company a lot of hurt. Maybe now they'll think twice before doing it again.

Edited by -Razorfold

Dear Volkswagen: This Was Your Biggest Mistake

 

As we previously commented when it comes to justice, there are those companies that have been bailed out by the US Government, and then there is everyone else. Case in point, GM, which last Thursday was fined $900 million for covering up its faulty ignition switches that caused at least 124 deaths and hundreds of injuries.

And then there is Volkswagen, which earlier today took out a record charge of €6.5 billion, one which many think will be insufficient before all it set and done, following its own snafu involving manipulating emissions tests to make its cars appear "cleaner" than they were.

...

Yes, GM killed people, but Volkswagen killed the air!

While one can debate whose crime is greater, it is quite clear that the punitive damages so far are orders of magnitude apart.

Why? This is precisely what Volkswagen executives, many of whom will lose their jobs in the coming days, are scratching their heads over.

We would like to take this opportunity to explain to them "how it is done" in the US.

....

To summarize Volkswagen's biggest mistake: it was not poisoning the environment, it wasn't even getting caught. It was this:

GM%20vs%20VOW_0.jpg

 

Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-22/dear-volkswagen-was-your-biggest-mistake

The CEO is "endlessly sorry". Yeah, sorry they got caught. What slimes.

http://m.phys.org/news/2015-09-vw-ceo-endlessly-tarnishing-brand.html

Surprise! Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn has (been) resigned from the company. I wonder who is going to be the brave, masochist, insane soul who is going to helm the company now and who will have to clean this whole mess.

Let's be blunt: trust in any of the VW group brands is gone: I am sure people who have VW cars are wondering if they are even going to sell them; suspicions is going high for all the other car manufacturers, since one cheated, what if the other cheated

The image of the German engineering excellence is tainted; $18B of company value is now thin air, German bankers and hedge fund managers are likely ###### because VW stocks were so reliable for their profits and some Forbes journalists have a sad diet of crows http://www.forbes.com/sites/kbrauer/2015/08/31/volkswagen-creatively-countering-its-carbon-footprint/

 

 

I'd love to resign with a package like that....

http://fortune.com/2015/09/23/ceo-volkswagen-pension/

Winterkorn is due a pension of approximately $32 million.  He may also get a large severance package to go along with the payout depending on what the board decides.

  • Like 1

I'd love to resign with a package like that....

http://fortune.com/2015/09/23/ceo-volkswagen-pension/

Winterkorn is due a pension of approximately $32 million.  He may also get a large severance package to go along with the payout depending on what the board decides.

“As CEO I accept responsibility for the irregularities that have been found in diesel engines and have therefore requested the supervisory board to agree on terminating my function as CEO,” said Winterkorn. “I am doing this in the interests of the company even though I am not aware of any wrongdoing on my part.”

Bloomberg reported that he was Germany’s second 
Basically he quit to say "it's not my fault, show me teh monies!"

Found that on autoblog.com http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/30/vw-diesel-fix-would-have-cost-335-per-vehicle/

Since the Volkswagen diesel kerfuffle began, Bosch, the world's largest auto supplier, has been hooked up to a bullhorn trying to make sure everyone knows its side of the story. Bosch supplied VW with the engine management testing software, including delivery and metering modules, that VW then used to skirt emissions laws in the US. Bosch told VW in 2007 that it was illegal to use the software in cars it planned to sell yet VW did it anyway, according to reports coming out in German newspapers Bild am Sonntag and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

That first warning came two years after VW started developing the small-displacement diesel, around the time that the two men pushing its development, then-brand chief Wolfgang Bernhard and engineer Rudolf Krebs, were telling their superiors that the engine needed AdBlue urea injection to pass US emissions. VW cost controllers wouldn't approve the AdBlue solution because it would add 300 euros ($335 US) to the cost of the vehicle. Bernhard and Krebs left the same year that Bosch advised VW about the software, two years before the engine went into production.

That's when things get cloudy. A report in Automotive News says that when Martin Winterkorn took over in 2007 as head of the VW Group and brand, he asked Ulrich Hackenberg and Wolfgang Hatz to keep working on the engine, and "[the] engine then ended up in VW Group diesels" with that problematic software still intact. No one has yet pointed any fingers at this latter chain of command, but like a game of Clue, right now they're the professors in the library holding the candlesticks.

Warnings didn't only come from the supplier: Frankfurter says VW's initial investigation has found that an engineer issued thesame caution to the company in 2011. Neither Bosch nor VW would comment on the reports.

$335 x 482000 = $ 161,470,000 of profit compared to a fine that is going to be at least 10 times the value. Since when managers and cost controllers fail that hard at basic substraction????

This is one of the main reasons I always look for  a mechanic garage, and not a main dealer with the latest diagnostic machines first, I usually only go to tier 2 once my local mechanic admits defeat and the car in question NEEDS to be hooked up to diagnostics
(In my case, it was usually a faulty lamda sensor on my Omega)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!