Recommended Posts

Unused RAM is wasted RAM.

But what about other processes needing large amounts of RAM? Using an internet browser is nice when I'm doing some computationally expensive task that takes at least few minutes...

I remember trying to compile WebKit some time ago, at least 2 years ago (so some of this information may not be 100% accurate, I'm recalling it from memory). With "make -j 4," the various gcc/ld instances used 90%+ of available RAM (8 GB) at various stages. Couldn't compile with debug symbols because the final WebKit library would have been over 4 GB, which was an issue with embedded debug symbols in a PE executable. I could have theoretically run 8 parallel instances efficiently, because of hyperthreading, but couldn't in reality because I didn't have enough physical RAM. WebKit, on such a system, takes some hours to compile from nothing.

And then there's people who run many VMs, render 3D graphics, transcode/render video data, and countless other tasks that use a considerable portion of RAM (and, in these cases, for good reason). Running these tasks is generally non-interactive, and yet at the same time, can account for a large portion of resource utilization. I know when I am working on a large C++ codebase, upwards of 20% of the time can be spent simply compiling.

Why, in such a case, should I want a browser like Chrome? A browser is a piece of software that shouldn't demand much resources, when compared to these other tasks...

  • Like 2

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

My comment wasn't meant to be taken as gospel truth ;)

I'm just not a fan of it.

  • Like 1

Gross.

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

I use IE11 as a secondary and my primary is waterfox. I only use IE when WF doesn't load a site properly, or when the system I happen to be using at the time is too slow for WF/FF/CH

 

 

 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!, why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Caching and sometimes just wasting. I've been playing with some of the new Chrome ram changes and they are looking good. 2 tabs only had 100mb usage.

594807-arton2903.jpg?modified_at=1199024

 

I miss that Netscape. Still my favorite browser ever. 4x series. I started with Netscape 3 though. Netscape was awesome.

IE was absolutely useless back then, and I didn't even switch to IE till IE 6.5, which was finally at least usable.

AOL ######ed Netscape up way too much.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Exactly. It doesn't make sense. It's weird actually.

What is Google's objective?  Ultimately everything Google does has a single purpose. To put your eyeballs in front of an advertisement.

And the person most likely to view and respond to an ad is "Joe Average" so anyone that responds in a Neowin forum or even visits Neowin is NOT Joe Average.  Google is NOT making anything for us. If we find it useful, it's an accident.

A game has to run well on your computer. Photoshop has to run well on your computer. 3DS Max has to run well on your computer. But Joe Average is not running any of those things.

He just has a browser. So it's kind of a law of digital evolution that the single thing Joe Average uses will expand to fill up all available time and space so there will be some tiny extra chance Joe will see One More Ad.

 

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

Agreed, but at least with more ram, you can cope. I tolerate Chrome because their development tools rock.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

 

If you don't like reading about RAM then don't click on a title with the word RAM/Memory etc in it.

Closing a thread because you don't like the topic has got to be the ultimate in subjectivity!

And unused RAM is NOT pointless. It gives you ZERO latency to acquire a large block of RAM such as for example when I do a session restore on 1,000 browser tabs...

 

Is that why Google has been working to optimize ram usage, because its not a problem? Just because you are not paying attention doesn't mean it's not a real issue.


It doesn't mean that it's a problem, they're just changing the way it handles certain tasks to make it use less. It's mostly the prerendering feature coupled with the ways that the browser restores tab sessions that cause it's high memory use, issues which are design based rather than an inherent problem. All they're doing is setting it up to unload unused tabs from memory, and stop restoring tabs in left to right order when restoring a browsing session. That's not so much an issue with the browser leaking memory, but one of design. I have 3 tabs currently open and my memory usage is at 37%. Even opening 30 odd tabs (all of which were rendered and loaded into memory) only caused my memory usage to jump to 61%. You're being overly dramatic.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 


BF4 loads a lot of its assets into video ram. Not really a good argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!