Recommended Posts

Unused RAM is wasted RAM.

But what about other processes needing large amounts of RAM? Using an internet browser is nice when I'm doing some computationally expensive task that takes at least few minutes...

I remember trying to compile WebKit some time ago, at least 2 years ago (so some of this information may not be 100% accurate, I'm recalling it from memory). With "make -j 4," the various gcc/ld instances used 90%+ of available RAM (8 GB) at various stages. Couldn't compile with debug symbols because the final WebKit library would have been over 4 GB, which was an issue with embedded debug symbols in a PE executable. I could have theoretically run 8 parallel instances efficiently, because of hyperthreading, but couldn't in reality because I didn't have enough physical RAM. WebKit, on such a system, takes some hours to compile from nothing.

And then there's people who run many VMs, render 3D graphics, transcode/render video data, and countless other tasks that use a considerable portion of RAM (and, in these cases, for good reason). Running these tasks is generally non-interactive, and yet at the same time, can account for a large portion of resource utilization. I know when I am working on a large C++ codebase, upwards of 20% of the time can be spent simply compiling.

Why, in such a case, should I want a browser like Chrome? A browser is a piece of software that shouldn't demand much resources, when compared to these other tasks...

  • Like 2

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

My comment wasn't meant to be taken as gospel truth ;)

I'm just not a fan of it.

  • Like 1

Gross.

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

I use IE11 as a secondary and my primary is waterfox. I only use IE when WF doesn't load a site properly, or when the system I happen to be using at the time is too slow for WF/FF/CH

 

 

 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!, why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Caching and sometimes just wasting. I've been playing with some of the new Chrome ram changes and they are looking good. 2 tabs only had 100mb usage.

594807-arton2903.jpg?modified_at=1199024

 

I miss that Netscape. Still my favorite browser ever. 4x series. I started with Netscape 3 though. Netscape was awesome.

IE was absolutely useless back then, and I didn't even switch to IE till IE 6.5, which was finally at least usable.

AOL ######ed Netscape up way too much.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Exactly. It doesn't make sense. It's weird actually.

What is Google's objective?  Ultimately everything Google does has a single purpose. To put your eyeballs in front of an advertisement.

And the person most likely to view and respond to an ad is "Joe Average" so anyone that responds in a Neowin forum or even visits Neowin is NOT Joe Average.  Google is NOT making anything for us. If we find it useful, it's an accident.

A game has to run well on your computer. Photoshop has to run well on your computer. 3DS Max has to run well on your computer. But Joe Average is not running any of those things.

He just has a browser. So it's kind of a law of digital evolution that the single thing Joe Average uses will expand to fill up all available time and space so there will be some tiny extra chance Joe will see One More Ad.

 

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

Agreed, but at least with more ram, you can cope. I tolerate Chrome because their development tools rock.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

 

If you don't like reading about RAM then don't click on a title with the word RAM/Memory etc in it.

Closing a thread because you don't like the topic has got to be the ultimate in subjectivity!

And unused RAM is NOT pointless. It gives you ZERO latency to acquire a large block of RAM such as for example when I do a session restore on 1,000 browser tabs...

 

Is that why Google has been working to optimize ram usage, because its not a problem? Just because you are not paying attention doesn't mean it's not a real issue.


It doesn't mean that it's a problem, they're just changing the way it handles certain tasks to make it use less. It's mostly the prerendering feature coupled with the ways that the browser restores tab sessions that cause it's high memory use, issues which are design based rather than an inherent problem. All they're doing is setting it up to unload unused tabs from memory, and stop restoring tabs in left to right order when restoring a browsing session. That's not so much an issue with the browser leaking memory, but one of design. I have 3 tabs currently open and my memory usage is at 37%. Even opening 30 odd tabs (all of which were rendered and loaded into memory) only caused my memory usage to jump to 61%. You're being overly dramatic.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 


BF4 loads a lot of its assets into video ram. Not really a good argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!