Recommended Posts

Unused RAM is wasted RAM.

But what about other processes needing large amounts of RAM? Using an internet browser is nice when I'm doing some computationally expensive task that takes at least few minutes...

I remember trying to compile WebKit some time ago, at least 2 years ago (so some of this information may not be 100% accurate, I'm recalling it from memory). With "make -j 4," the various gcc/ld instances used 90%+ of available RAM (8 GB) at various stages. Couldn't compile with debug symbols because the final WebKit library would have been over 4 GB, which was an issue with embedded debug symbols in a PE executable. I could have theoretically run 8 parallel instances efficiently, because of hyperthreading, but couldn't in reality because I didn't have enough physical RAM. WebKit, on such a system, takes some hours to compile from nothing.

And then there's people who run many VMs, render 3D graphics, transcode/render video data, and countless other tasks that use a considerable portion of RAM (and, in these cases, for good reason). Running these tasks is generally non-interactive, and yet at the same time, can account for a large portion of resource utilization. I know when I am working on a large C++ codebase, upwards of 20% of the time can be spent simply compiling.

Why, in such a case, should I want a browser like Chrome? A browser is a piece of software that shouldn't demand much resources, when compared to these other tasks...

  • Like 2

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

My comment wasn't meant to be taken as gospel truth ;)

I'm just not a fan of it.

  • Like 1

Gross.

I feel I have to come to her defence here adrynalyne, I use IE11 as my main browser also, I have no issues with it (probably because I have no add ons or extensions attached to it)I have firefox as a backup, but I honestly don't remember the last time it was launched

I use IE11 as a secondary and my primary is waterfox. I only use IE when WF doesn't load a site properly, or when the system I happen to be using at the time is too slow for WF/FF/CH

 

 

 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!, why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Caching and sometimes just wasting. I've been playing with some of the new Chrome ram changes and they are looking good. 2 tabs only had 100mb usage.

594807-arton2903.jpg?modified_at=1199024

 

I miss that Netscape. Still my favorite browser ever. 4x series. I started with Netscape 3 though. Netscape was awesome.

IE was absolutely useless back then, and I didn't even switch to IE till IE 6.5, which was finally at least usable.

AOL ######ed Netscape up way too much.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 

Exactly. It doesn't make sense. It's weird actually.

What is Google's objective?  Ultimately everything Google does has a single purpose. To put your eyeballs in front of an advertisement.

And the person most likely to view and respond to an ad is "Joe Average" so anyone that responds in a Neowin forum or even visits Neowin is NOT Joe Average.  Google is NOT making anything for us. If we find it useful, it's an accident.

A game has to run well on your computer. Photoshop has to run well on your computer. 3DS Max has to run well on your computer. But Joe Average is not running any of those things.

He just has a browser. So it's kind of a law of digital evolution that the single thing Joe Average uses will expand to fill up all available time and space so there will be some tiny extra chance Joe will see One More Ad.

 

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

...read the thread next time.

The whole unused ram chestnut is only relevant if the only app you are running is your browser and you want free ram If you have limited ram, the thread is very relevant especially if you multitask.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

I think the issue of bad programming also deserves attention even if you have tons of RAM.

 

Agreed, but at least with more ram, you can cope. I tolerate Chrome because their development tools rock.

beating a dead horse here....learn to use search. Unused ram is pointless, we all know that, and agree to move along. I suggest you do the same.....although, I remember my hardcore netscape days as well. Just let them R.I.P. and go on with life, please......I don't need more headaches reading these threads over and over again, as a matter of fact, I vote this one closed/resolved just to get it off the island.

 

If you don't like reading about RAM then don't click on a title with the word RAM/Memory etc in it.

Closing a thread because you don't like the topic has got to be the ultimate in subjectivity!

And unused RAM is NOT pointless. It gives you ZERO latency to acquire a large block of RAM such as for example when I do a session restore on 1,000 browser tabs...

 

Is that why Google has been working to optimize ram usage, because its not a problem? Just because you are not paying attention doesn't mean it's not a real issue.


It doesn't mean that it's a problem, they're just changing the way it handles certain tasks to make it use less. It's mostly the prerendering feature coupled with the ways that the browser restores tab sessions that cause it's high memory use, issues which are design based rather than an inherent problem. All they're doing is setting it up to unload unused tabs from memory, and stop restoring tabs in left to right order when restoring a browsing session. That's not so much an issue with the browser leaking memory, but one of design. I have 3 tabs currently open and my memory usage is at 37%. Even opening 30 odd tabs (all of which were rendered and loaded into memory) only caused my memory usage to jump to 61%. You're being overly dramatic.

I don't know guys but while I do get what some of you are saying about Chrome and its RAM usage, don't you think that a browser that uses almost 1GB of RAM is a little too much? That is ridiculous and unacceptable. Battlefield 4 is a very complicated graphical game and it uses 1.6 GB of RAM!!!!!!...but that's acceptable considering what the game is and does, but a browser? why is a browser needing so much RAM for? To do what? 


BF4 loads a lot of its assets into video ram. Not really a good argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!