Will Apple ever Ship OS X on an iPad?


Recommended Posts

Hey Mac Lovers,

I am a huge fan of the OSX operating system and find it more useful than iOS for my needs. iOS is doing rather well for the amount of time it existed as opposed to OSX.

Since, MS revealed Surface Book and Surface Pro 4, I am seriously considering a Windows device for an upgrade to my iPad Air. iPad Pro looks awesome but it doesn't come with OSX, hence my drive to find the perfect solution.

Essentially, I actually like and agree with MS where a tablet and laptop can function as one. When I do office work, I prefer a laptop like device and when I do painting or drawing, I prefer a tablet with a pen. iPad Pro w/ Smart Keyboard and MS Surface line fits that bill just perfectly.

As a Mac User, I am used to some of the flexibility OSX has to offer but it isn't available on an iPad -_-

Will iPad ever support OS X? Or perhaps an iOS upgrade that actually makes it possible to run OSX Apps? That would be cool!

What are your thoughts?

I don't believe so. OS X isn't designed with touch in mind. Apple has made it almost a marketing point saying they have two dedicated OSes. One for touch mobile devices, the other for traditional computers. What's more likely is that each iteration of iOS will introduce OS X features, but I doubt we'll ever see full fledged OS X on an iDevice.

I agree that it wouldn't be a good experience since it's not touch friendly.  Though you could argue that Windows on a Surface isn't exactly the best experience with pure touch.  When you pair a keyboard and mouse/touchpad with it, then it makes a lot more sense.

Who knows.  That probably is the next logical step for Apple to explore.  It would come in at a higher price point than a traditional iPad, but less than a Macbook.  The comparison of it to a Surface would then make more sense, though the Surface would still be the more convenient device.

It's a shame though. I'd love it if I was able to use OS X on an iPad Pro once a Magic  keyboard & trackpad is connected. The touch input from the display could simply be disabled at that point. There'd be lots of messy problems to solve before that could happen though lest you get a fairly compromised package. I'm not sure Microsoft has actually done so.

I hope not, tbh.

Every time I've tried a desktop OS on a tablet/touch screen it's been a horrific experience. But in 10/15 years? Who knows. I highly doubt we'll be using devices with the current form factors then, so maybe we'll see one hybrid which is actually usable.

Every hybrid I've used has been more "worst of both worlds" rather than the best of both.

But in 10/15 years? Who knows.

You have never heard of the Microsoft Surface? They are really popular and run full Windows.

I have a Nexus 7 and it's OK for content consumption and controlling my Cromecast but like my next tablet to be bigger and have a keyboard so can do real work on it. I am waiting to see what Surface alternatives come out that are more reasonable in price.

 

You have never heard of the Microsoft Surface? They are really popular and run full Windows.

I have a Nexus 7 and it's OK for content consumption and controlling my Cromecast but like my next tablet to be bigger and have a keyboard so can do real work on it. I am waiting to see what Surface alternatives come out that are more reasonable in price.

 

I've used a surface, and I actually have a little Windows 10 tablet, but I just feel that trying to poke things that are still designed for a mouse is tricky (no matter how optimised the OS is, the vast majority of apps won't be).

I very much doubt it, iOS is way more locked down than OS X is, and that's a benefit for Apple. Having OS X would either require them to allow normal OS X apps, or block them and have a even more limited selection of apps.

Basically what happened with Windows RT.

Apple has shown no interest in opening up iOS, that's a much bigger indicator than having a touch interface or whatever (Look at how Windows 10 handles touch compared to Windows 8, there's a difference)

I don't believe so. OS X isn't designed with touch in mind. Apple has made it almost a marketing point saying they have two dedicated OSes. One for touch mobile devices, the other for traditional computers. What's more likely is that each iteration of iOS will introduce OS X features, but I doubt we'll ever see full fledged OS X on an iDevice.

Yes but slowly but surely these 2 OSes are looking more and more alike with each version. I remember how they said that there will never be a stylus and now we have one in the iPad pro. Give it another 5 years they will have to conform to whatever their user base wants. You can only keep remaking the same product over and over again until the competition takes in your ideas on their hardware/OS. Once that happens they have to change to keep up with the competition. My prediction will be that we get a touch screen MBP that can detach and flip around just like the surface book and includes a pen. This hardware will run OSX and will have the ability to run iOS apps through some kind of built in hyper-visor or some coding change.

so....  a Modbook?

Yep, thats the way things are headed. I would be bold enough to say we will eventually get iPhones in the next 10 years or so that can be plugged into say a thunderbolt display and become a full fledged Mac. The whole point of Apple is to simplify things for their users. Slimming it down as far as it goes would be to do it to one device. I think Microsoft did get that right with their new phone however its about 15 years too late to ever get any real market share. I think apple on the other hand could easily take this idea and run with it to make a huge impact because they already have the user base and apps to do it.

IMO Apple doesn't have much of an excuse for not offering OS X on an ipad, the surface as well as the many convertibles out there prove that point by easily running full desktop windows, some with minimal hardware like the Asus transformer or the Acer convertibles.

Nope, because they want to keep everyone happy. They want to keep their desktop and laptop customers happy and they want to keep their iPad customers happy. Its why they have happy customers.

A MacPad is quite possible - or have we forgotten about LaunchPad?  LaunchPad dates back to SnowLeopard, and supports touch - which the "Hack" community discovered (by accident) quite early.  There's a ton of overlap between LaunchPad and the default OS X interface (just as there is between the Windows 10 Control Panel and PC Settings).  It is precisely due to LaunchPad that I have wondered about the lack of touch-screen iMacs and MacBooks - don't assume that because Apple has NOT done something that it can't - how long did Apple keep OS X on x86 under wraps?

Besides, there IS the Modbook - which is actually based on a MacBook with hardware mods, and dual-boots (legally) OS X and Windows 10.  http://www.modbook.com/

It's based on the MacBook to specifically deal with the Apple EULA (which restricts OS X to Apple hardware) - despite that we in the "hack" community having pointed out that the EULA is, at best, a legal stall, and means exactly squat from a technical standpoint.

If you really want a more capable device then you're better off waiting for the iPad Pro and seeing how iOS matures or maybe investigating the Surface Pro 4/Surface Book - a lot of positive reviews have come back regarding it and because it is crapware free right out of the box the experience should be a lot better than through a third party.

 

I've used a surface, and I actually have a little Windows 10 tablet, but I just feel that trying to poke things that are still designed for a mouse is tricky (no matter how optimised the OS is, the vast majority of apps won't be).

 

What are you talking about? The Surface keyboard has a mouse pointer built-in so no need to be raising your hands or getting fingerprints on your screen... You only need touch screens really on tablets (but full Windows doesn't work well on small tablets) and phones.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem isn't with Epic, it's with the platform holders like Steam and Nintendo, they should be a lot more strict in their review process.
    • Hello, Installed here without issue. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search by Paul Hill Microsoft has released Visual Studio Code 1.125, its latest weekly release. This week, the company has focused on discovering and installing extra language models via the Marketplace; searching the web and securely browsing over remote connections without leaving VS Code; choosing how long VS Code waits before installing extension updates; and delivering managed Copilot settings through existing device management tooling. In older versions of VS Code, extensions could contribute their own model providers, but to find these extensions, you needed the right tags to search for in the Extension view. Now, the Language Models editor gives you an Install Model Providers button that opens the Extensions view, which is filtered to extensions that contribute model providers, making it easier to find and install them. Once you install a provider, its model will appear in the model picker. If you use the integrated browser much, you can now look up information without leaving VS Code by typing a query into the integrated browser’s address bar. It will use your configured search engine, the same way a standalone browser does. You can use workbench.browser.searchEngine to pick a search engine. When the browser is opened in a remote workspace, it's now possible to proxy HTTP(S) traffic via the remote connection. This allows you to connect to any ports or services that can only be accessed from the remote machine. If you read our coverage from two weeks ago about VS Code 1.123, you might have seen that extension updates have a two-hour delay as a safety measure. In this update, Microsoft is giving you the ability to configure the time of the delay. You can find it under extensions.autoUpdateDelay. Finally, with this update, admins can deliver managed GitHub Copilot settings through native device management (MDM) channels on Windows and macOS, in addition to account-based enterprise settings files. Settings delivered via MDM appear as policy-enforced in VS Code and can’t be overridden locally. Future updates will extend the supported policy keys across Copilot surfaces. You can download the update from the Visual Studio Code website now.
    • "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!