Will Apple ever Ship OS X on an iPad?


Recommended Posts

Hey Mac Lovers,

I am a huge fan of the OSX operating system and find it more useful than iOS for my needs. iOS is doing rather well for the amount of time it existed as opposed to OSX.

Since, MS revealed Surface Book and Surface Pro 4, I am seriously considering a Windows device for an upgrade to my iPad Air. iPad Pro looks awesome but it doesn't come with OSX, hence my drive to find the perfect solution.

Essentially, I actually like and agree with MS where a tablet and laptop can function as one. When I do office work, I prefer a laptop like device and when I do painting or drawing, I prefer a tablet with a pen. iPad Pro w/ Smart Keyboard and MS Surface line fits that bill just perfectly.

As a Mac User, I am used to some of the flexibility OSX has to offer but it isn't available on an iPad -_-

Will iPad ever support OS X? Or perhaps an iOS upgrade that actually makes it possible to run OSX Apps? That would be cool!

What are your thoughts?

I don't believe so. OS X isn't designed with touch in mind. Apple has made it almost a marketing point saying they have two dedicated OSes. One for touch mobile devices, the other for traditional computers. What's more likely is that each iteration of iOS will introduce OS X features, but I doubt we'll ever see full fledged OS X on an iDevice.

I agree that it wouldn't be a good experience since it's not touch friendly.  Though you could argue that Windows on a Surface isn't exactly the best experience with pure touch.  When you pair a keyboard and mouse/touchpad with it, then it makes a lot more sense.

Who knows.  That probably is the next logical step for Apple to explore.  It would come in at a higher price point than a traditional iPad, but less than a Macbook.  The comparison of it to a Surface would then make more sense, though the Surface would still be the more convenient device.

It's a shame though. I'd love it if I was able to use OS X on an iPad Pro once a Magic  keyboard & trackpad is connected. The touch input from the display could simply be disabled at that point. There'd be lots of messy problems to solve before that could happen though lest you get a fairly compromised package. I'm not sure Microsoft has actually done so.

I hope not, tbh.

Every time I've tried a desktop OS on a tablet/touch screen it's been a horrific experience. But in 10/15 years? Who knows. I highly doubt we'll be using devices with the current form factors then, so maybe we'll see one hybrid which is actually usable.

Every hybrid I've used has been more "worst of both worlds" rather than the best of both.

But in 10/15 years? Who knows.

You have never heard of the Microsoft Surface? They are really popular and run full Windows.

I have a Nexus 7 and it's OK for content consumption and controlling my Cromecast but like my next tablet to be bigger and have a keyboard so can do real work on it. I am waiting to see what Surface alternatives come out that are more reasonable in price.

 

You have never heard of the Microsoft Surface? They are really popular and run full Windows.

I have a Nexus 7 and it's OK for content consumption and controlling my Cromecast but like my next tablet to be bigger and have a keyboard so can do real work on it. I am waiting to see what Surface alternatives come out that are more reasonable in price.

 

I've used a surface, and I actually have a little Windows 10 tablet, but I just feel that trying to poke things that are still designed for a mouse is tricky (no matter how optimised the OS is, the vast majority of apps won't be).

I very much doubt it, iOS is way more locked down than OS X is, and that's a benefit for Apple. Having OS X would either require them to allow normal OS X apps, or block them and have a even more limited selection of apps.

Basically what happened with Windows RT.

Apple has shown no interest in opening up iOS, that's a much bigger indicator than having a touch interface or whatever (Look at how Windows 10 handles touch compared to Windows 8, there's a difference)

I don't believe so. OS X isn't designed with touch in mind. Apple has made it almost a marketing point saying they have two dedicated OSes. One for touch mobile devices, the other for traditional computers. What's more likely is that each iteration of iOS will introduce OS X features, but I doubt we'll ever see full fledged OS X on an iDevice.

Yes but slowly but surely these 2 OSes are looking more and more alike with each version. I remember how they said that there will never be a stylus and now we have one in the iPad pro. Give it another 5 years they will have to conform to whatever their user base wants. You can only keep remaking the same product over and over again until the competition takes in your ideas on their hardware/OS. Once that happens they have to change to keep up with the competition. My prediction will be that we get a touch screen MBP that can detach and flip around just like the surface book and includes a pen. This hardware will run OSX and will have the ability to run iOS apps through some kind of built in hyper-visor or some coding change.

so....  a Modbook?

Yep, thats the way things are headed. I would be bold enough to say we will eventually get iPhones in the next 10 years or so that can be plugged into say a thunderbolt display and become a full fledged Mac. The whole point of Apple is to simplify things for their users. Slimming it down as far as it goes would be to do it to one device. I think Microsoft did get that right with their new phone however its about 15 years too late to ever get any real market share. I think apple on the other hand could easily take this idea and run with it to make a huge impact because they already have the user base and apps to do it.

IMO Apple doesn't have much of an excuse for not offering OS X on an ipad, the surface as well as the many convertibles out there prove that point by easily running full desktop windows, some with minimal hardware like the Asus transformer or the Acer convertibles.

Nope, because they want to keep everyone happy. They want to keep their desktop and laptop customers happy and they want to keep their iPad customers happy. Its why they have happy customers.

A MacPad is quite possible - or have we forgotten about LaunchPad?  LaunchPad dates back to SnowLeopard, and supports touch - which the "Hack" community discovered (by accident) quite early.  There's a ton of overlap between LaunchPad and the default OS X interface (just as there is between the Windows 10 Control Panel and PC Settings).  It is precisely due to LaunchPad that I have wondered about the lack of touch-screen iMacs and MacBooks - don't assume that because Apple has NOT done something that it can't - how long did Apple keep OS X on x86 under wraps?

Besides, there IS the Modbook - which is actually based on a MacBook with hardware mods, and dual-boots (legally) OS X and Windows 10.  http://www.modbook.com/

It's based on the MacBook to specifically deal with the Apple EULA (which restricts OS X to Apple hardware) - despite that we in the "hack" community having pointed out that the EULA is, at best, a legal stall, and means exactly squat from a technical standpoint.

If you really want a more capable device then you're better off waiting for the iPad Pro and seeing how iOS matures or maybe investigating the Surface Pro 4/Surface Book - a lot of positive reviews have come back regarding it and because it is crapware free right out of the box the experience should be a lot better than through a third party.

 

I've used a surface, and I actually have a little Windows 10 tablet, but I just feel that trying to poke things that are still designed for a mouse is tricky (no matter how optimised the OS is, the vast majority of apps won't be).

 

What are you talking about? The Surface keyboard has a mouse pointer built-in so no need to be raising your hands or getting fingerprints on your screen... You only need touch screens really on tablets (but full Windows doesn't work well on small tablets) and phones.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!