• 0

Quick query regarding pointer to struct and heapalloc in C++...


Question

Got a quick C++ question here, tl;dr version is: Got a struct with some objects, creating a new array of objects, using heapalloc (which I thought would be similar to initialising them all manually, I can access/change VarB and VarC but whatever I try to do with VarA causes exception nightmare)

Long version: I've got a struct;

typedef struct ThreadSocketData
{
	list<SOCKET*> VarA;
	unsigned int VarB;
	unsigned int VarC;
} THREADSOCKETDATA, *PTHREADSOCKETDATA;

I'm allocating it as a global and in a function as;

PTHREADSOCKETDATA *pDataArrays;
...
pDataArrays = new PTHREADSOCKETDATA[2];
...
pDataArrays[i] = (PTHREADSOCKETDATA)HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof(THREADSOCKETDATA));

Then I try to use it like so;

pDataArrays[1]->VarB = 5;
cout << pDataArrays[1]->VarB << endl; //works fine
SOCKET *ASocket = new SOCKET;
*ASocket = 5;
pDataArrays[0]->VarA.push_back(ASocket); //exception crazy

I've tried created it alternatively and like so and it seems to work fine;

pDataArrays = new PTHREADSOCKETDATA[2];
pDataArrays[0] = new THREADSOCKETDATA;
pDataArrays[1] = new THREADSOCKETDATA;
pDataArrays[0]->VarC = 5;
pDataArrays[0]->VarB = 4;
pDataArrays[0]->VarA.begin();
SOCKET *ASocket = new SOCKET;
*ASocket = 18;
pDataArrays[0]->VarA.push_back(ASocket);

So why does the second way work but the first doesn't fully work? Surely using heapalloc would have the same effect as manually allocating it all?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Operator new calls constructors, malloc/HeapAlloc don't. My guess is that in your first example, VarA is uninitialized because its constructor hasn't run, so you cannot use it.

This would all be moot if you were using C++ idioms rather than mixing C idioms in there. In C++ you use new and delete, not malloc, unless you're implementing an allocator or something. Actually, scratch that, in modern C++ you don't even write new and delete, you use smart pointers and containers (see for instance http://fr.slideshare.net/sermp/without-new-and-delete ). In your example if you replace all the C-style arrays with std::vector, and all the raw pointers with smart pointers, every constructor and destructor is guaranteed to run exactly when it should and you shouldn't be leaking anything or accessing uninitialized state.

Also, as a matter of style you don't need to write typedef struct MyType {} MYTYPE in C++, just struct MYTYPE {}, and you'd probably want to avoid SCREAMINGCAPS for all your type names if you don't want your code to look like 9-year olds having an internet argument.

  • 0

This is my first program with threading (not done it before) so I've been modifying the sample MSDN code which had it all in caps, not my idea of naming but good idea, I'll change that.

I don't think I can use smart pointers for this though? The pDataArray {i} is sent by reference to thread {i} although I want to be able to manipulate it from within the main thread therefore I left the heapalloc code as it was provided by MS, so if I remove all the heapalloc/heapfree and just use normal new/delete and pass that in CreateThread() it will work?

  • 0
  On 28/10/2015 at 21:08, Andre S. said:

Do you really need to use the Win32 function CreateThread rather than standard C++ threads

Well the problem is I'm making this program across 3 different types of PCs, my home PC has visual studio 2015 so std::thread is fine, I already use it to get the number of CPUs, another has visual studio 2013 and I'm not sure if it fully has std::thread or only parts of it? And the other has visual studio 2010, which doesn't have any std::thread support at all :(.

Using std::thread I can then pass it smart pointers or references to objects I manually new/delete and access them from the thread and main program? Also is there a std:: replacement for Createevent/Resetevent/Setevent/Waitformultipleobjects?

  • 0

VS2015 Community Edition is free ;)

Yes you can pass any object to an std::thread, look at the documentation. For a ManualResetEvent or AutoResetEvent you could implement that pretty straightforwardly with std::condition_variable and std::mutex, there are examples online.

 

  • 0
  On 28/10/2015 at 21:24, n_K said:

Well the problem is I'm making this program across 3 different types of PCs, my home PC has visual studio 2015 so std::thread is fine, I already use it to get the number of CPUs, another has visual studio 2013 and I'm not sure if it fully has std::thread or only parts of it? And the other has visual studio 2010, which doesn't have any std::thread support at all :(.

Using std::thread I can then pass it smart pointers or references to objects I manually new/delete and access them from the thread and main program? Also is there a std:: replacement for Createevent/Resetevent/Setevent/Waitformultipleobjects?

Like everyone says - VS2015 freebie - no need to be complicated

But you never said what sort of code you are making. If it's anything connected with Device drivers then the std stuff is out the window...

  • 0

I've got VS 2015 community on this pc which is fine - it's my PC. The other two PCs are not mine, they're in an educational establishment, I'm not administrator so I can't just install VS 2015 on them and why I have to put up with using 2010 and 2013 also.

I'll see if I can get a portable mingw working on the other PCs and see what happens if I chuck the code at that instead of using 2010 and 2013!

Nope not drivers, just testing out threads and winsock and the like. I've not looked into drivers, can MS drivers use multiple threads (even if not using std::thread threads)? Can Linux modules use threads (using std::thread)?

Thanks!

  • 0

It's a bad idea to mix allocation techniques like that unless you know what you're doing and it's for a good reason. In particular, STL data structures (such as list) only get initialised properly if you use the built-in new() operator to allocate them.

You might be able to get around it by calling new() on VarA after allocating the structure with malloc().

static const int ARRAY_SIZE = 20
THREADSOCKETDATA* myArray = malloc(ARRAY_SIZE * sizeof(THREADSOCKETDATA));

for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
    myArray[i].VarA = new list<SOCKET*>;
    
// clean up    
free(myArray);

I wouldn't recommend it though.

For efficiency purposes, I'd also allocate the entire array as a contiguous block of memory, rather than making multiple heap allocations for each individual structure.

  • 0
  On 29/10/2015 at 15:39, n_K said:

I've got VS 2015 community on this pc which is fine - it's my PC. The other two PCs are not mine, they're in an educational establishment, I'm not administrator so I can't just install VS 2015 on them and why I have to put up with using 2010 and 2013 also.

I'll see if I can get a portable mingw working on the other PCs and see what happens if I chuck the code at that instead of using 2010 and 2013!

Nope not drivers, just testing out threads and winsock and the like. I've not looked into drivers, can MS drivers use multiple threads (even if not using std::thread threads)? Can Linux modules use threads (using std::thread)?

Thanks!

Threads are easy to make. After that it can get interesting. There is a reason why just about every GUI system is limited to single-threaded.

If you are doing a real device driver for hardware then you have interrupts in which you need to store whatever you need within 30 millisecs and then Queue up worker threads to do the real processing which are also time limited so you then can have long running threads to process stuff as a background service. You need to be very aware of which variables are atomic and which data structures can get clobbered by your interrupt code, your DPC code, your worker thread etc. The killer is multi-core because it's so fast. It can look like impossible things happen like only 1/2 of a store to memory etc but then it turns out that compiler operation wasn't atomic...

The solution most people use is locks. After you do some device driver stuff, you learn to strike a more delicate balance. So learn what's atomic and every O/S has O/S API calls for safe atomic updates I think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plenty of info (benchmarks etc) out there about how turning off e-cores can increase performance in certain workloads. Which tells me that Microsoft or Intel can’t get this mess of cores sorted out. At work we have this lab and someone was testing (TrueNas performance testing) ESXi on a white box setup that had a 13700K in it and ESXi would purple screen every time until they turned off ecores.
    • I've been using OneDrive for photos and documents since Windows 8.1 came out and it's been the best way to keep a backup of what I have. I also use GoogleDrive on my phone with Android 15 to back up my phone. Over the past 12 years, I've seen people losing data on their PC or phone because they don't use cloud services. Even though I warn them to use them. Especially those who make money working on their PC with thousands of files. A 1TB cloud service is extremely cheap these days and there's no reason for you not to use one. I've seen people losing valuable data on their phone because they don't use GoogleDrive on their phone and this is much more common than on a PC. On Windows, I've seen people having hardware problems with their HD and SSD and losing all their data just because they refused to use OneDrive, which offered the backup option. There's still an external SSD as a second copy to be used together with your OneDrive. Bitlocker is completely safe, you will only have problems with it if you use bad programs that mess with the integrity of Windows. Your iPhone and Android also have encryption and if you mess with the system gears it can bug and you can lose your data too. Windows 11 is perfect if used correctly. But people are stupid enough to buy a brand new car, open the engine and start messing with it until it stops working, and then go to the car manufacturer to complain that it stopped working just because the user messed up the engine.
    • Hey it's not my fault a politician's team made a tech blunder; a significant one at that, is it?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      mevinyavin earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      rozermack875 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      oneworldtechnologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      matthiew went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Enthusiast
      Motoman26 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      684
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      266
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      196
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!