Huge issue with Virtual Machines


Recommended Posts

Let me start off by giving the specs of my iMac, and what's been done to it recently.  It's a Late 2013 21.5" 2.9GHz i5 w/ 8GB DDR3 & 1GB NVIDIA GeForce GT750M, OS 10.11.1 - Purchased in Late 2013.  It was running ridiculously slow, bluetooth and USB devices were disappearing, and my WLAN would randomly disconnect... so I brought it into Apple (I'm still under AppleCare). The genius tech agreed there was a huge issue, so he replaced the logic board, hard drive, and WLAN/Bluetooth card.

This issue has existed before all of the hardware replacement, and I'm really not sure what to do, as I build VM's and test them before I deploy them for work.

If i start a VMware, VirtualBox or Parallels VM, the VMOS and the Host OS will run well for about 15-20 minutes.  After that 15-20 minute mark, things go absolutely haywire.  The host OS stops responding, opening an application such as Safari or terminal can take 35 minutes or more, and quitting VMWare does NOT solve the problem.  Even without the VM running, the OS will respond like this.  Restarting the machine does not fix the issue either.  I booted up a Linux VM (which I had built over a year ago) in VMware Fusion, to test a package change.  I let it sit, at the login prompt, and I did absolutely nothing with it, as I had to jump on a conference call.  I came back about half an hour later... Mac OS wouldn't do anything, and I attempted to restart.  I timed it... my iMac took 73 minutes to restart.  The system was still unbearably slow after the reboot.  Only after rebooting AGAIN and resetting the PRAM would my system function properly.

My Mac mini server doesn't do this.  Neither does my MacBook Air.  My wife's iMac DOES.  I can't believe that there's a hardware issue with both of our iMacs, especially considering that Apple replaced essentially everything in mine.  I should include that my Wife's iMac is a Late 2013 2.7GHz i5 - but this was purchased brand new in July of this year.

Also... here's the specs on the VM that I ran:

SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP3, 73GB Virtual Disk Drive, 1024MB RAM assigned, 1 CPU Core.

Edited by giantsnyy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1277304-huge-issue-with-virtual-machines/
Share on other sites

I used to run Windows VM's (multiple of them at the same time ) on an old MacBook Pro from 2008 with a 5400 rpm drive. It was slow, but not unusable slow. Something is definitely not working right here.

If I recall, those are low end iMacs that use laptop components to be stylishly thin.

So super slow to start with and then super slow to run a VM.

Yet, the performance you describe is beyond slow and mostly kicks in after a time period. This points to overheating attempting to run stuff beyond the design target of the original crap hardware. I suspect the i7 model would run fine since Apple would have expected people to use the i7 for more things.

Apple uses a bunch of design trade-offs that is almost always the exact opposite of what I would do and so I don't own any Apple products but at the same time it is just as valid for those trade-offs to make more sense for other people.

In this case everything you describe points to a design trade-off where they silently keep increasing the throttle down on the computer until heat dissipation matches their design target. That way there is no annoying fan noise and customers can admire the thin iMac profile while waiting for the software to slowly complete. For the main customer base they depend on, this is completely the correct approach since CPU load will always be intermittent.

If my hypothesis is correct it might be hard to diagnose since it is "by design" - Maybe the unit can be turned on with the back cover removed? Or cold air can be blown into the intake vents?

The 5400rpm drive cannot be the cause of that kind of slow down by simple math. Unless both of your iMacs have developed horrible drive fragmentation from some sort of common use-case scenario.

 

 

DevTech... so does my Mac mini.  My iMac is a 2.9GHz quad core i5, with 8GB DDR3.  My mini, is a 2.5Ghz dual core i5 with 4GB ddr3 and can run OS X server and one VM without issue, in an even smaller enclosure.

I actually neglected to mention one thing...

My computer came with 10.9 as it's initial OS.  My mini runs 10.9 server.  This VM issue started once I installed Yosemite.  Prior to that, the system ran without issue.

DevTech... so does my Mac mini.  My iMac is a 2.9GHz quad core i5, with 8GB DDR3.  My mini, is a 2.5Ghz dual core i5 with 4GB ddr3 and can run OS X server and one VM without issue, in an even smaller enclosure.

I actually neglected to mention one thing...

My computer came with 10.9 as it's initial OS.  My mini runs 10.9 server.  This VM issue started once I installed Yosemite.  Prior to that, the system ran without issue.

"so does my Mac mini." - well do you hear any fan noise from any of the machines? If they generate a lot of noise (like they should) under load, then my idea is no good.

Ok well then - I think your mini comparison provided the data to identify the issue - it appears to be an Apple bug.

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/6646604

https://communities.vmware.com/thread/493294

You can work around it by opening Terminal, and running the following command:

   sudo nvram boot-args=debug=0x10

Then, restart your Mac.  Fusion should then perform normally.

 

Tried that too... a long time ago.  Didn't work.  Apparently it only fixes older iMac models.

I mean... it does something.  Linux (as long as it's command-line only) & MP-RAS VM's are great now.  Windows... still brings my system to a halt.

 

If you skim through the discussion, it also applies to your model.

So you seem to have new data suggesting a graphics issue. Which version of Windows are you running?

Any version after XP uses DirectX Ver 9 as part of the basic window rendering and 3D virtualization usually requires special specific enables in each VM product. For example in Virtual Box you have to check mark a box to enable 3D during Guest device driver install.

Also in the basic settings under Video Card you will want to max out the Video RAM slider

 

 

So you seem to have new data suggesting a graphics issue. Which version of Windows are you running?

Depends on what I need to test.  Never any client OS's... just server types.  Currently, it's mostly Windows Server 2008R2 and 2012R2, but I vary between those and 2003R2 and 2016 Tech Preview 3

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!