• 0

Why WordPress codebase is so horrible?


Question

From the user's perspective, Wordpress is hands down the best CMS out there. The UI, the menu organization, ability to toggle friendly permalinks on the fly and plethora of plugins makes it quite good.

But it's codebase is horrible. More I look at its code, all I see is sphagetti mess. I'm not sure how anyone would be ok with such a mess. Here's an example of the type of nightmare I'm talking about:

Source: https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/blob/master/wp-activate.php

/**
 * Loads styles specific to this page.
 *
 * @since MU
 */
function wpmu_activate_stylesheet() {
    ?>
    <style type="text/css">
        form { margin-top: 2em; }
        #submit, #key { width: 90%; font-size: 24px; }
        #language { margin-top: .5em; }
        .error { background: #f66; }
        span.h3 { padding: 0 8px; font-size: 1.3em; font-weight: bold; }
    </style>
    <?php
}
add_action( 'wp_head', 'wpmu_activate_stylesheet' );
get_header( 'wp-activate' );
?>

<div id="signup-content" class="widecolumn">
    <div class="wp-activate-container">
    <?php if ( empty($_GET['key']) && empty($_POST['key']) ) { ?>

        <h2><?php _e('Activation Key Required') ?></h2>
        <form name="activateform" id="activateform" method="post" action="<?php echo network_site_url('wp-activate.php'); ?>">
            <p>
                <label for="key"><?php _e('Activation Key:') ?></label>
                <br /><input type="text" name="key" id="key" value="" size="50" />
            </p>
            <p class="submit">
                <input id="submit" type="submit" name="Submit" class="submit" value="<?php esc_attr_e('Activate') ?>" />
            </p>
        </form>

    <?php } else {
        $key = !empty($_GET['key']) ? $_GET['key'] : $_POST['key'];
        $result = wpmu_activate_signup( $key );
        if ( is_wp_error($result) ) {
            if ( 'already_active' == $result->get_error_code() || 'blog_taken' == $result->get_error_code() ) {
                $signup = $result->get_error_data();
                ?>
                <h2><?php _e('Your account is now active!'); ?></h2>
                <?php
                echo '<p class="lead-in">';
                if ( $signup->domain . $signup->path == '' ) {
                    printf( __('Your account has been activated. You may now <a href="%1$s">log in</a> to the site using your chosen username of &#8220;%2$s&#8221;. Please check your email inbox at %3$s for your password and login instructions. If you do not receive an email, please check your junk or spam folder. If you still do not receive an email within an hour, you can <a href="%4$s">reset your password</a>.'), network_site_url( 'wp-login.php', 'login' ), $signup->user_login, $signup->user_email, wp_lostpassword_url() );
                } else {
                    printf( __('Your site at <a href="%1$s">%2$s</a> is active. You may now log in to your site using your chosen username of &#8220;%3$s&#8221;. Please check your email inbox at %4$s for your password and login instructions. If you do not receive an email, please check your junk or spam folder. If you still do not receive an email within an hour, you can <a href="%5$s">reset your password</a>.'), 'http://' . $signup->domain, $signup->domain, $signup->user_login, $signup->user_email, wp_lostpassword_url() );
                }
                echo '</p>';
            } else {
                ?>
                <h2><?php _e('An error occurred during the activation'); ?></h2>
                <?php
                echo '<p>'.$result->get_error_message().'</p>';
            }
        } else {
            $url = isset( $result['blog_id'] ) ? get_blogaddress_by_id( (int) $result['blog_id'] ) : '';
            $user = get_userdata( (int) $result['user_id'] );
            ?>
            <h2><?php _e('Your account is now active!'); ?></h2>

            <div id="signup-welcome">
                <p><span class="h3"><?php _e('Username:'); ?></span> <?php echo $user->user_login ?></p>
                <p><span class="h3"><?php _e('Password:'); ?></span> <?php echo $result['password']; ?></p>
            </div>

            <?php if ( $url && $url != network_home_url( '', 'http' ) ) :
                switch_to_blog( (int) $result['blog_id'] ); 
                $login_url = wp_login_url(); 
                restore_current_blog(); 
                ?>
                <p class="view"><?php printf( __( 'Your account is now activated. <a href="%1$s">View your site</a> or <a href="%2$s">Log in</a>' ), $url, esc_url( $login_url ) ); ?></p>
            <?php else: ?>
                <p class="view"><?php printf( __('Your account is now activated. <a href="%1$s">Log in</a> or go back to the <a href="%2$s">homepage</a>.' ), network_site_url('wp-login.php', 'login'), network_home_url() ); ?></p>
            <?php endif;
        }
    }
    ?>
    </div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var key_input = document.getElementById('key');
    key_input && key_input.focus();
</script>
<?php get_footer( 'wp-activate' );

 

Whether you are making your own software or contributing to another one, wouldn't you want other's codes to be more readable and well organized?

Can you tell me why it's an acceptable practice in the Wordpress community?

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Wordpress wants to be everything for everyone every time. You can imagine how that tends to work out.

The code structure itself that you posted above isn't that bad. At least it's indented properly. Could use a LOT more comments though.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Because 80% of all Wordpress "developers" share these "qualities":

  • They have between 3 to 6 months of experience and use titles like "Senior Web Developer Developers with vast experience" (freelancing websites are full of them)
  • Concepts like MVC, OOP, separation between logic and presentation, etc. are beyond their understanding and can't understand anything more complicated than "echo 'Hello World'; "
  • Laziness...why build a proper web app or website when you can just throw in some free plugins and themes and call it a website?

 

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:02, john_alex said:

Because 80% of all Wordpress "developers" share these "qualities":

  • They have between 3 to 6 months of experience and use titles like "Senior Web Developer Developers with vast experience" (freelancing websites are full of them)
  • Concepts like MVC, OOP, separation between logic and presentation, etc. are beyond their understanding and can't understand anything more complicated than "echo 'Hello World'; "
  • Laziness...why build a proper web app or website when you can just throw in some free plugins and themes and call it a website?

 

He is talking about the CMS code base, not a garbage site built with it.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:03, adrynalyne said:

He is talking about the CMS code base, not a garbage site built with it.

And that poor excuse of a codebase is not garbage?

I understand that fixing this would  require a full rewrite but they're not even trying.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:05, john_alex said:

And that poor excuse of a codebase is not garbage?

I understand that fixing this would  require a full rewrite but they're not even trying.

I didn't say it wasn't. However, going on about web developers with building proper web apps and just tossing in plugins for features is not what he was talking about. You two were discussing different things.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:07, adrynalyne said:

I didn't say it wasn't. However, going on about web developers with building proper web apps and just tossing in plugins for features is not what he was talking about. You two were discussing different things.

At the risk of sounding snarky, there is a simple economy available here - both questions actually have the same answer

Answer: It's PHP.

 

  • 0
  On 09/11/2015 at 05:08, _Alexander said:

Well ... it is definitely hard to read that considering it is a mix of frontend and backend code...

Using a function that contains frontend and backend code is not the end of the world. Visually, it's a good practice to separate the backend code from the front-end. If they at least used the heredoc syntax to separate the front-end from the backend logic or concatenate strings, etc, It would be much easier to dissect what the heck is going on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Underwhelming update. Same as 12,13,14,15. Then M3E ain't showing up until Q3
    • Smart Launcher seems a better option right now.
    • Mistral AI's new 'Magistral' models bring traceable, faster AI reasoning by Paul Hill One of Europe’s leading AI companies, Mistral, has announced the availability of its Magistral reasoning model. It comes in two versions: there is the open-source Magistral Small (24B parameters) and the enterprise-focused Magistral Medium. Magistral has been designed to better handle domain-specific tasks such as law, finance, and engineering. It shows users the model’s thought processes so that it’s more transparent, and it supports multilingual reasoning to perform better when tasked with answering non-English queries. Key features and performance Mistral compared its new models against DeepSeek R1 in various benchmarks. Ones that stood out were its results on AIME2024, which assesses reasoning capabilities. Magistral Medium scored 73.6% (90% with majority voting @64) while Small scored 70.7% (83.3% respectively). If you’ve used DeepSeek R1, you’ll have seen it thinking before answering. Magistral now does this too and can do it across multiple languages, including English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Arabic, Russian, and Simplified Chinese. Interestingly, there’s also a Flash Answers mode that speeds up the thinking for 10x faster responses compared to competitors. Real-world applications and availability Thanks to the expertise Magistral has been trained on, organizations across multiple fields, including legal research, financial forecasting, and regulated industries, may be able to turn to Magistral for more reliable answers. Its traceable reasoning also makes it ideal in regulated fields for compliance and auditability. Magistral Small, the open-source model, is available under an Apache 2.0 license via Hugging Face. Magistral Medium is accessible through Mistral's Le Chat and via API on La Plateforme. It’ll also be arriving soon on Amazon SageMaker, IBM WatsonX, Azure AI, and Google Cloud Marketplace. The easiest way for readers to try it out is on Mistral's Le Chat platform; just head to chat.mistral.ai to get started. Source: Mistral
    • Didn't know this thanks, useful.
    • I had to check your comment history to see what you were referring to here. One word... Wow! I asked him myself. LOL
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      elsa777 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      elsa777 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      K Dorman earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      rshit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Reacting Well
      Alan- earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      272
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      207
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      201
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      139
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!