• 0

Why WordPress codebase is so horrible?


Question

From the user's perspective, Wordpress is hands down the best CMS out there. The UI, the menu organization, ability to toggle friendly permalinks on the fly and plethora of plugins makes it quite good.

But it's codebase is horrible. More I look at its code, all I see is sphagetti mess. I'm not sure how anyone would be ok with such a mess. Here's an example of the type of nightmare I'm talking about:

Source: https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/blob/master/wp-activate.php

/**
 * Loads styles specific to this page.
 *
 * @since MU
 */
function wpmu_activate_stylesheet() {
    ?>
    <style type="text/css">
        form { margin-top: 2em; }
        #submit, #key { width: 90%; font-size: 24px; }
        #language { margin-top: .5em; }
        .error { background: #f66; }
        span.h3 { padding: 0 8px; font-size: 1.3em; font-weight: bold; }
    </style>
    <?php
}
add_action( 'wp_head', 'wpmu_activate_stylesheet' );
get_header( 'wp-activate' );
?>

<div id="signup-content" class="widecolumn">
    <div class="wp-activate-container">
    <?php if ( empty($_GET['key']) && empty($_POST['key']) ) { ?>

        <h2><?php _e('Activation Key Required') ?></h2>
        <form name="activateform" id="activateform" method="post" action="<?php echo network_site_url('wp-activate.php'); ?>">
            <p>
                <label for="key"><?php _e('Activation Key:') ?></label>
                <br /><input type="text" name="key" id="key" value="" size="50" />
            </p>
            <p class="submit">
                <input id="submit" type="submit" name="Submit" class="submit" value="<?php esc_attr_e('Activate') ?>" />
            </p>
        </form>

    <?php } else {
        $key = !empty($_GET['key']) ? $_GET['key'] : $_POST['key'];
        $result = wpmu_activate_signup( $key );
        if ( is_wp_error($result) ) {
            if ( 'already_active' == $result->get_error_code() || 'blog_taken' == $result->get_error_code() ) {
                $signup = $result->get_error_data();
                ?>
                <h2><?php _e('Your account is now active!'); ?></h2>
                <?php
                echo '<p class="lead-in">';
                if ( $signup->domain . $signup->path == '' ) {
                    printf( __('Your account has been activated. You may now <a href="%1$s">log in</a> to the site using your chosen username of &#8220;%2$s&#8221;. Please check your email inbox at %3$s for your password and login instructions. If you do not receive an email, please check your junk or spam folder. If you still do not receive an email within an hour, you can <a href="%4$s">reset your password</a>.'), network_site_url( 'wp-login.php', 'login' ), $signup->user_login, $signup->user_email, wp_lostpassword_url() );
                } else {
                    printf( __('Your site at <a href="%1$s">%2$s</a> is active. You may now log in to your site using your chosen username of &#8220;%3$s&#8221;. Please check your email inbox at %4$s for your password and login instructions. If you do not receive an email, please check your junk or spam folder. If you still do not receive an email within an hour, you can <a href="%5$s">reset your password</a>.'), 'http://' . $signup->domain, $signup->domain, $signup->user_login, $signup->user_email, wp_lostpassword_url() );
                }
                echo '</p>';
            } else {
                ?>
                <h2><?php _e('An error occurred during the activation'); ?></h2>
                <?php
                echo '<p>'.$result->get_error_message().'</p>';
            }
        } else {
            $url = isset( $result['blog_id'] ) ? get_blogaddress_by_id( (int) $result['blog_id'] ) : '';
            $user = get_userdata( (int) $result['user_id'] );
            ?>
            <h2><?php _e('Your account is now active!'); ?></h2>

            <div id="signup-welcome">
                <p><span class="h3"><?php _e('Username:'); ?></span> <?php echo $user->user_login ?></p>
                <p><span class="h3"><?php _e('Password:'); ?></span> <?php echo $result['password']; ?></p>
            </div>

            <?php if ( $url && $url != network_home_url( '', 'http' ) ) :
                switch_to_blog( (int) $result['blog_id'] ); 
                $login_url = wp_login_url(); 
                restore_current_blog(); 
                ?>
                <p class="view"><?php printf( __( 'Your account is now activated. <a href="%1$s">View your site</a> or <a href="%2$s">Log in</a>' ), $url, esc_url( $login_url ) ); ?></p>
            <?php else: ?>
                <p class="view"><?php printf( __('Your account is now activated. <a href="%1$s">Log in</a> or go back to the <a href="%2$s">homepage</a>.' ), network_site_url('wp-login.php', 'login'), network_home_url() ); ?></p>
            <?php endif;
        }
    }
    ?>
    </div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var key_input = document.getElementById('key');
    key_input && key_input.focus();
</script>
<?php get_footer( 'wp-activate' );

 

Whether you are making your own software or contributing to another one, wouldn't you want other's codes to be more readable and well organized?

Can you tell me why it's an acceptable practice in the Wordpress community?

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Wordpress wants to be everything for everyone every time. You can imagine how that tends to work out.

The code structure itself that you posted above isn't that bad. At least it's indented properly. Could use a LOT more comments though.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Because 80% of all Wordpress "developers" share these "qualities":

  • They have between 3 to 6 months of experience and use titles like "Senior Web Developer Developers with vast experience" (freelancing websites are full of them)
  • Concepts like MVC, OOP, separation between logic and presentation, etc. are beyond their understanding and can't understand anything more complicated than "echo 'Hello World'; "
  • Laziness...why build a proper web app or website when you can just throw in some free plugins and themes and call it a website?

 

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:02, john_alex said:

Because 80% of all Wordpress "developers" share these "qualities":

  • They have between 3 to 6 months of experience and use titles like "Senior Web Developer Developers with vast experience" (freelancing websites are full of them)
  • Concepts like MVC, OOP, separation between logic and presentation, etc. are beyond their understanding and can't understand anything more complicated than "echo 'Hello World'; "
  • Laziness...why build a proper web app or website when you can just throw in some free plugins and themes and call it a website?

 

He is talking about the CMS code base, not a garbage site built with it.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:03, adrynalyne said:

He is talking about the CMS code base, not a garbage site built with it.

And that poor excuse of a codebase is not garbage?

I understand that fixing this would  require a full rewrite but they're not even trying.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:05, john_alex said:

And that poor excuse of a codebase is not garbage?

I understand that fixing this would  require a full rewrite but they're not even trying.

I didn't say it wasn't. However, going on about web developers with building proper web apps and just tossing in plugins for features is not what he was talking about. You two were discussing different things.

  • 0
  On 06/11/2015 at 15:07, adrynalyne said:

I didn't say it wasn't. However, going on about web developers with building proper web apps and just tossing in plugins for features is not what he was talking about. You two were discussing different things.

At the risk of sounding snarky, there is a simple economy available here - both questions actually have the same answer

Answer: It's PHP.

 

  • 0
  On 09/11/2015 at 05:08, _Alexander said:

Well ... it is definitely hard to read that considering it is a mix of frontend and backend code...

Using a function that contains frontend and backend code is not the end of the world. Visually, it's a good practice to separate the backend code from the front-end. If they at least used the heredoc syntax to separate the front-end from the backend logic or concatenate strings, etc, It would be much easier to dissect what the heck is going on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think they needed to simplify their product lines, having such a range of devices is confusing at best, and yes, I think it's also worth dropping those old line names. So I think it's good for them in the long run, and I bet they found that in their research too. Ask a random consumer which of their products would have been the premium one, and unless they knew Dell products intimately, I doubt they would know. Though I think they could have simplified it further.. "Pro Max Plus", what the hell is going on there?!
    • Wrong again. Electric vehicles are more reliable than gasoline vehicles because they have fewer points of failure. On average, they last 50% longer. Its your right to be incorrect and my right to correct you.
    • Hello, I am using a Hitron CODA56 cable modem with Comcast Xfinity's 1200 Mbps service.  No issues noted.  I had looked at the Motorola and Netgear options for a cable modem, but neither was available for purchase at the time I upgraded my cable connection. There are multiple models in the Netgear Nighthawk X10 line-up.  I am guessing you have either the the Netgear Nighthawk X10 AD7000 model (R8900) or the Netgear Nighthawk X10 AD7200 model (R9000) model, is that correct?  Both of these only have one gigabit WAN (internet) ports for connection to the modem, all of the remaining ports for the LAN side of things are gigabit Ethernet ports.  The 10GbE port on the devices is meant for connection to local NAS storage.  I suppose you could connect the desktop computer directly to it, although it would still be limited by the gigabit connection between the cable modem and the Netgear residential gateway broadband router. I would suggest looking for a residential gateway broadband router from a company like Asus, Netgear, TP-Link or maybe even Ubiquiti, depending upon budget, that has 2.5Gbps (or faster) WAN and LAN ports.  That would allow you to make full use of the 1.2Gbps connection from your ISP as well as have some room for future growth, speed-wise. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky      
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Marites earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      runge100 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      runge100 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      jfam earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      TheRingmaster earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      183
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      134
    5. 5
      Xenon
      119
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!