Conflict detection attempts Windows DHCP Server


Recommended Posts

I am confused about the "Conflict detection attempts" feature in a Windows DHCP Server. I wanted to set this to a higher value than 1, Say for example 4 or 5. This would wait 5 pings before assigning a client device a spare IP. This should stop all 99.99% of IP Conflicts appearing on Windows Client Devices. Is this right? As its pretty certain after 5 pings that address is free.

However I was told that this number is the number of Rouge DHCP Servers that are allowed on the network so it has to be set at 1 and that if it detected 1 (or more) DHCP servers on the network it shuts itself down.

Which is correct?

Well for starters something not answering ping does not mean its not there on that IP, its firewall might just prevent answering ping.

What windows dhcp server are you using 2k8r2, 2012, 2016?

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd183587(v=ws.10).aspx

I have never seen any sort of setting that detection of another dhcp server it would shut it self down, this seems like a self defeating sort of feature - if detect rouge dhcp server, shut yourself down and allow just the rouge?  That doesn't seem like a good idea.

  On 20/11/2015 at 15:02, BudMan said:

Well for starters something not answering ping does not mean its not there on that IP, its firewall might just prevent answering ping.

What windows dhcp server are you using 2k8r2, 2012, 2016?

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd183587(v=ws.10).aspx

I have never seen any sort of setting that detection of another dhcp server it would shut it self down, this seems like a self defeating sort of feature - if detect rouge dhcp server, shut yourself down and allow just the rouge?  That doesn't seem like a good idea.

Yeah sorry, I meant normal LAN stuff that does allow DHCP. Firewall isnt the issue is, More ping latency. So hence I set I would have set it to 4 or 5 rather than one. 2012 server.

setting it higher than 3 could cause for lots of issues in delays in getting a lease.  Many hosts that do dhcp have firewalls and do not answer ping..  Windows built in firewall blocks pings for example out of the gate, it might allow from same segment..  But many dhcp servers are not directly on the same segment, you use a relay/helper say on the switch to forward the dhcp request to the dhcp server.

Many clients and servers also check that nothing answers an arp for that IP, if they show that IP in use they would send back a decline for that lease to the dhcp server.  This was back in the NT4 days, like sp 2 or something when they added that dhcpdecline feature from the rfc 1541 I do believe.

To be honest duplicate IPs handed out by dhcp server is very rare these days, normally its statics where this happens because of lack of good IP management.  Or misconfiguration of dhcp servers where you have more than 1 using, etc..  Most clients wont even accept a lease for a IP they find as duplicate.  I can not recall the last time I have seen a dupe IP issue with dhcp servers.

So for example here is a sniff of dhcp transaction.  Notice right after the discover that arps are sent, server asking hey anyone have this IP 192.168.3.101...  If nothing back it sends the offer, then the request and then you see the ack, you also see right after the ack the client sends out a ARP saying hey anyone got this 192.168.3.101 address.  If the client got something back, it should then send a decline to the dhcp server and then ask for another IP.  The decline would say hey, I don't like that address since something else seems to have it.  And then do another discover process after the dhcp server should of marked that IP as bad.

dhcpprocess.thumb.png.9c2ca0a8c9a988cb35

To be honest you shouldn't even have to send out pings, like I mentioned many devices might not even answer that - but have never seen anything not answer ARP..  Even with a firewall.

If you may have guessed dhcp is one of my fun protocols ;)  Just like dns...  If your having problems with dupes -- be more than happy to track down the reason with you.

 

Edited by BudMan

Are your different DHCP servers have different scopes?

Besides a router issue I can  see both servers trying to give an IP address that is the same. One handshakes and gives it an IP address while the other DHCP server thinks it's free and reports a conflict as it is already assigned.

In addition I believe you can set your servers to use DHCP assigned to a SID during it's lease too which could stop conflicts as one hand (DHCP server) doesn't know what the other is doing. Set different scope ranges for each box and try to assign to MAC or SID during a lease. So let's say someone shut's down his or her pc before the lease is up? The system comes back and does another DHCP broadcast when the LAN is initialized. The SID is recognized and the previous IP address is assigned. That would cut this down.

  On 20/11/2015 at 15:02, BudMan said:

Well for starters something not answering ping does not mean its not there on that IP, its firewall might just prevent answering ping.

What windows dhcp server are you using 2k8r2, 2012, 2016?

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd183587(v=ws.10).aspx

I have never seen any sort of setting that detection of another dhcp server it would shut it self down, this seems like a self defeating sort of feature - if detect rouge dhcp server, shut yourself down and allow just the rouge?  That doesn't seem like a good idea.

2000 and 2003 did from what I remember, vaguely remember them shutting down when dhcp was handed out by gateway. I haven't really played with multiple dhcp severs on 2008, but 2012 does have a load balancing feature. 

I don't recall that, but sure its  possible - not like MS doesn't do some really stupid ###### all the time..  Now I could see if dhcp server was set to non authoritative and it saw an authoritative dhcp server, maybe.. But you would normally always have your dhcp set for authoritative..  Otherwise you can have issues with devices that come from other networks and have other leases switching to your network.

Not exactly sure what John T is after here, to be honest I would just leave it at 0, it should arp and the client should arp as well looking for devices that already have that IP..  Having it "ping' is just going to slow down the handing out of leases.  Ping would be useful if the dhcp server is not on the same layer 2 as the clients, ie you relay/helper to get to your dhcp server.  Since his arp is not going to get an answer if he is on a different l2 segment.  You should be ok since the client should detect and send back decline..  But if you have lots of different devices/os'es on our network - its possible some dhcp clients don't do proper checking or use of decline, etc.

Without a better understanding of the specific network, how dhcp is deployed in the network - the issue being seen..  To just answer the generic question, if you want to use that feature and have your dhcp server ping - 1 should be enough..  I sure and the hell would not go above say 3 or your going to have issues I would think with waiting for that to come back before the offer is sent.

LOL! DHCP servers don't shut down, they just don't hand out the IP address because another DHCP server has answered the broadcast. 

If you have multiple DHCP servers on your network, you can do a 70\30 or 80\20 scope split, which then you'd use the delay option on one of the servers.

I remember the down arrow on the 03 server when a linksys was handing out addresses.  Or maybe it was 00.  I don't remember the details, I remember the troubleshooting. 

Edited by sc302
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, he identified a whole lot of wasteful spending of US taxpayer money. What's wrong with that? Nothing, unless you had your fingers in the pie of course.
    • How to reduce the annoying Liquid Glass effects on iOS 26 by Aditya Tiwari Apple announced Liquid Glass at WWDC 2025 in all of its glory. It's a new glass-inspired design language from the iPhone-maker making its way to most of its software platforms, including iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS 26, tvOS 26, and watchOS 26. Apple markets Liquid Glass as a new translucent material that "behaves like glass in the real world. Its color is informed by surrounding content and intelligently adapts between light and dark environments." The Cupertino giant isn't wrong. The new glass-inspired design does bring a fresh coat of paint and some beautiful visuals to the iPhone and other Apple-made devices. However, as the dust from the mega arrival settles, people are starting to realize the current drawbacks of having too much glass on their device. There have been reports of users, including those at Neowin, experiencing readability issues, background separation issues, and trouble focusing on the content displayed on the screen due to its transparent nature. While these are small nuances on Apple's part that can be fixed without much hassle, it's degrading the initial experience of what the company calls its biggest visual upgrade since iOS 7. That said, there are some workarounds built into iOS 26 that will help you tone down the shortcomings. If you're running the iOS 25 Developer Beta 1 on your supported iPhone model, you can follow these steps to make things a little better: Go to the Settings app on your iPhone. Scroll down and tap on Accessibility > Display & Text Size. Next, you'll find two toggle options: Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast. When you enable the Reduce Transparency toggle button, iOS 26 can "improve contrast by reducing transparency and blurs on some backgrounds to increase legibility." The other toggle, Increase Contrast, does what its name suggests. It can "increase color contrast between app foreground and background colors." Enabling each of these toggle buttons individually or simultaneously will have different effects on your iPhone's user interface. Control Center is being criticized for the extra transparency, making the UI look cluttered and difficult to focus. Here, the Reduce Transparency button adds a darker background to make the Control Center UI elements stand out. Liquid Glass transparency issues are also prevalent in the Notification Center and the navigation controls of various apps. In the image above, see how the text of the navigation buttons has become unreadable or hard to focus on with certain backgrounds. It's challenging to determine what can trigger such behavior, as one can have countless color combinations on their device. In the image below, this is how these buttons look when both Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast are enabled. It's still a hit or miss depending on what colors you are dealing with. Part of the blame also goes to the fact that iOS 26 is still an early beta, and the change doesn't render as intended every time. You can also notice the difference in the look and feel of the Control Center when reduced transparency is turned on. On a side note, you can add the Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast buttons in the Control Center for quicker access. That said, let's wait to see what changes Apple will implement as it continues to gather feedback through the beta program. Hopefully, the software will become more stable when the first public beta of iOS 26 arrives sometime in July. Interested users can try out the latest iPhone update through the developer beta program, noting that early builds might come with unexpected bugs and issues.
    • Austin residents rally against Tesla's robotaxi launch by Hamid Ganji Tesla's plan to launch its robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, has sparked protests in the city. While the EV maker targets June 22 as the launch date, local residents are raising their voices against the plan due to political disagreements and safety concerns. As reported by CNBC, public safety advocates and political protesters are organizing protests against Tesla's robotaxi launch in Austin. Members of the Dawn Project, Tesla Takedown, and Resist Austin have cited safety issues with Tesla's automated driving systems. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's involvement in Donald Trump's administration and his work in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has prompted another group of people to join the Austin protests against Tesla. To show Austin citizens the safety problems of Tesla's self-driving system, The Dawn Project brought a Tesla Model Y to the protest, equipped with the company's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software (version 13.2.9). In the demonstration, the Model Y with FSD software reportedly zoomed past a school bus with a stop sign held out and ran over a child-sized mannequin placed in front of the car. The FSD package includes automatic lane-keeping, steering, and parking. It is unclear to what extent this test was conducted under standard conditions or what Tesla's defense is. However, multiple cases of Tesla FSD software malfunction in the past have resulted in collisions or severe accidents, according to data collected by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Interestingly, The Dawn Project CEO Dan O'Dowd is the CEO of another company that sells embedded safety and security solutions to carmakers like Ford and Toyota. It remains to be seen whether Tesla could launch a robotaxi service in Austin despite the residents' protests. Earlier this week, Elon Musk demonstrated the new version of Tesla's FSD software in a post on X. Musk's decisions on DOGE fuel public backlash against Tesla. While Musk left the Trump administration after a beef with the president, he's still a target of public criticism, which directly imapcts Tesla. As a result, the slow sales have even caused Tesla to sell its Cybertruck with 0 percent APR to boost sales.
    • I'm sure Denmark would stand to lose a lot if US consumers stopped buying Danish products, whether that's Lurpak butter or hi-fi equipment.
    • JD Vance will be the next President. Who've the Democrats got? Harris again? lol....
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      LagFighterZ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      5i3zi1 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      5i3zi1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      julien02 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      546
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      229
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      166
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      119
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      91
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!