Purchasing a set of used RAM modules from ebay; need advice and opinions


Recommended Posts

I'm looking to purchase a set of 4 x 2 GB used RAM modules. I've narrowed my search down to three choices. All three seem to be trustworthy, although the third one is from a very new seller. Need your opinions and advice to make the final decision.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/111822478903?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT (Quite cheap at $40, but is asking for $30 shipping cost to Armenia)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/370992336069?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT ($13.6 shipping)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/191744244183?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT (The seller has a very short track record; seems reliable though. $7.52 shipping)

P.S.

There is one more option with free shipping, but the problem is that this same item is listed under two different sellers. Seems kind of suspicious.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/251913458812?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

http://www.ebay.com/itm/252165103305?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Edited by eddman

Go with the 3rd link

He has sold 26 items with 100% positive reviews - that is good enough for me.

Those last 2 are questionable - maybe they used the same pic - but still - avoid.

 

I would go with what he said.

I don't trust eBay at all, can't you find a similar deal on Amazon or Newegg? 

EDIT: Scratch all that. In search results it said they do ship to Armenia, but that's not the case on the product page.

Newegg does not ship to Armenia and although I thought the same for amazon, apparently they do ship some of the items here.

This is the only proper item I could find:

http://www.amazon.com/KOMPUTERBAY-PC2-6300-PC2-6400-Desktop-Semiconductors/dp/B00GXI9YC8/ref=sr_1_4?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1448659929&sr=1-4&refinements=p_n_feature_five_browse-bin%3A677427011%2Cp_n_feature_four_browse-bin%3A14329121%2Cp_n_shipping_option-bin%3A3242350011

I've never heard of Komputerbay before. It has a 4.5 star rating from 86 reviews though. Any thoughts?

My only reservation with buying a new set from amazon instead of used from ebay is that the sellers on ebay usually test their items before shipping, but that's not the case with new items and I might get a lemon, although I would certainly like to get a new item over a used one. Is my reasoning wrong?

Edited by eddman

Why is there this annoying editing time limit.

Anyway, I chatted with the amazon help and it seems they do ship it to Armenia but at a bit higher price; $69 instead of $54.

The same question; I've never heard of Komputerbay before. The item has a 4.5 star rating from 86 reviews though. Any thoughts?

My only reservation with buying a new set from amazon instead of used from ebay is that the sellers on ebay usually test their items before shipping, but that's not the case with new items and I might get a lemon, although I would certainly like to get a new item over a used one. Is my reasoning wrong?

On 11/27/2015, 4:37:56, eddman said:

Why is there this annoying editing time limit.

Anyway, I chatted with the amazon help and it seems they do ship it to Armenia but at a bit higher price; $69 instead of $54.

The same question; I've never heard of Komputerbay before. The item has a 4.5 star rating from 86 reviews though. Any thoughts?

My only reservation with buying a new set from amazon instead of used from ebay is that the sellers on ebay usually test their items before shipping, but that's not the case with new items and I might get a lemon, although I would certainly like to get a new item over a used one. Is my reasoning wrong?


Yes

 

In fact - that is the most backward reasoning I have ever heard.... ever..

 

25 minutes ago, T3X4S said:


Yes

 

In fact - that is the most backward reasoning I have ever heard.... ever..

 

You could've at least elaborated instead of just throwing "it's backwards", not to mention you didn't even help with the choices, but that's fine.

 

When I'm buying an item from thousands of KMs away, which makes returning it more of a hassle and also quite costly, I'd rather buy a cheaper, tested used one than a more expensive, untested new one. Maybe you thought I'm one of those people who always prefer used over new. It's actually quite the opposite, but this is a special case. Besides, I'm upgrading an 8 years old PC here, so buying new stuff for it isn't a priority.

 

It's doesn't matter now. I already bought a set from an ebay seller in Germany, and it's new, and it ended up just $5 more expensive than the used ones from other sellers. I was rather surprised with the price + shipping cost.

 

At least returning it would be easier and far cheaper.

OK - I'll explain it like this - all things being equal, which items have a higher chance of being defective ?  new or used ?

Since old RAM is just as good as new RAM (used doesnt take away from performance) you still have to include the very idea of the seller might be selling because its a little flaky.

The manufacturer has QC, and will not sell something if it doesnt pass inspection.

I do not think manufacturers test every stick of RAM, they probably pull samples that have passed all other forms of QC - but - your chances of getting good RAM are better if new.  Granted, if the seller has a great rep, and sells RAM all the time - I'd buy it if I couldnt get new.

When I was working on someone else's computer that needed RAM and was old, I would go to an electronics discount store - shuffle through trays of RAM sticks, and grab some - probably still working years later.

If you are concerned about the chance of bad RAM due to you living where you are, your chances are better with new RAM as opposed to RAM from some seller.

Your best bet is RAM that you can run memtest on - but that isnt option here.

Thats all I was saying



But good find on the Germany stuff !

 

11 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

OK - I'll explain it like this - all things being equal, which items have a higher chance of being defective ?  new or used ?

Since old RAM is just as good as new RAM (used doesnt take away from performance) you still have to include the very idea of the seller might be selling because its a little flaky.

The manufacturer has QC, and will not sell something if it doesnt pass inspection.

I do not think manufacturers test every stick of RAM, they probably pull samples that have passed all other forms of QC - but - your chances of getting good RAM are better if new.  Granted, if the seller has a great rep, and sells RAM all the time - I'd buy it if I couldnt get new.

When I was working on someone else's computer that needed RAM and was old, I would go to an electronics discount store - shuffle through trays of RAM sticks, and grab some - probably still working years later.

If you are concerned about the chance of bad RAM due to you living where you are, your chances are better with new RAM as opposed to RAM from some seller.

Your best bet is RAM that you can run memtest on - but that isnt option here.

Thats all I was saying

I understand. Some of these sellers on ebay might even be lying when they mention that they've tested the sticks themselves, with memtest, etc. but given their very high ratings, I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they did actually run a test, then the item should be fine.

 

As for new RAM, yes, they most probably run tests on them before packaging them, but there is always a chance of getting a bad one; a VERY slim chance, but still.

 

I do agree that new is almost always better than old; that's also what my father always says, although he usually follows with a "if you can afford it".

1 minute ago, eddman said:

I understand. Some of these sellers on ebay might even be lying when they mention that they've tested the sticks themselves, with memtest, etc. but given their very high rates, I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they did actually run a test, then the item should be fine.

 

As for new RAM, yes, they most probably run tests on them before packaging them, but there is always a chance of getting a bad one; a VERY slim chance, but still.

 

I do agree that new is almost always better than old; that's also what my father always says, although he usually follows with a "if you can afford it".


Yep - my dad's little quotes are great - but really only pertain to someone with his finances... things like "If you cant afford to replace it - you couldn't afford it in the 1st place"  LOL

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!