Oculus Rift available for preorder for $599.99, shipping in March


Recommended Posts

I mentioned this in the other post about the free version for Kickstarter backers but yeah, that's pricey.  It's about $100 more than I was expecting and significantly more expensive than $349 DK2.  Maybe they'll sell an unbundled version without the Xbox One controller and games for less for people who already have Xbox One controllers and don't care about those specific games.  Anyway if this is around what the HTC Vive and PS VR cost then VR is probably DOA this round...  maybe the Oculus Rift 2 will be more affordable in a year or two?

7 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

I mentioned this in the other post about the free version for Kickstarter backers but yeah, that's pricey.  It's about $100 more than I was expecting and significantly more expensive than $349 DK2.  Maybe they'll sell an unbundled version without the Xbox One controller and games for less for people who already have Xbox One controllers and don't care about those specific games.  Anyway if this is around what the HTC Vive and PS VR cost then VR is probably DOA this round...  maybe the Oculus Rift 2 will be more affordable in a year or two?

I have no doubt the technology is worth it, but for me it would involve also upgrading my PC on top. I have an aging GTX 580.

Just now, Audioboxer said:

I have no doubt the technology is worth it, but for me it would involve also upgrading my PC on top. I have an aging GTX 580.

I'm not saying I think they are including a huge markup or anything.  I suspect they're selling them for very near cost (maybe even a slight loss) but I just think $599 is way out of the range most people are willing to pay.  Heck I think $599 is out of the range most would pay even if it didn't require any sort of PC upgrade.  It's really a hard sell for people who haven't gotten a chance to try it so they're going to have to set up kiosks or something to try to convince people to spend this much.

 

I was hoping the PS VR would come in at around $250 for the headset only and $300 bundled with the camera and a demo game.  That seemed reasonably in line with DK2 pricing but based off of this pricing that's probably a pipe dream.  I suspect it will be less than the Rift but probably closer to $499 then.  If they did manage to get it out for around $300 though that would be huge because that would make the total price of a new PS4 and PS VR about the same as the Rift (excluding the PC required to run it.)

2 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

I'm not saying I think they are including a huge markup or anything.  I suspect they're selling them for very near cost (maybe even a slight loss) but I just think $599 is way out of the range most people are willing to pay.  Heck I think $599 is out of the range most would pay even if it didn't require any sort of PC upgrade.  It's really a hard sell for people who haven't gotten a chance to try it so they're going to have to set up kiosks or something to try to convince people to spend this much.

 

I was hoping the PS VR would come in at around $250 for the headset only and $300 bundled with the camera and a demo game.  That seemed reasonably in line with DK2 pricing but based off of this pricing that's probably a pipe dream.  I suspect it will be less than the Rift but probably closer to $499 then.  If they did manage to get it out for around $300 though that would be huge because that would make the total price of a new PS4 and PS VR about the same as the Rift (excluding the PC required to run it.)

It's not as powerful as the occulus and Sony can afford to take a little hit to be made up via software sales. This has to be sold at some sort of profit, or around break even. I'm hoping $349 tops for Sony, but $299 would be ideal.

 

Either way this will take a little pressure off of Sony, and sadly might make them go $399 which is too much IMO.

Damn. Damn. I thought there would be no doubts at all I would be in with VR on Day 1, but now I have some doubts. I absolutely would need to build a new PC to get on board, and if I am going to build a new PC specifically with VR in mind, I would make sure it handles it extremely well and did not just meet the minimum specs, so for me, to get on board is going to cost realistically around $2250 give or take.

So for once in the past 10 years, I think I am probably going to sit Day 1 out and get in on it a bit later on...

Unless I can convince work there is a possibility we can utilize VR down the road, which actually is not as far fetched as it may initially sound.

Edited by DirtyLarry

Yeah I'm out, that's far too expensive unless they put the high price up there for a limited time due to a shortfall in production.

 

I've purchased a DK2 kit from them, it would be more ideal if they offered a discount (don't expect to get it free like the Kickstarters), but some reduction in that large retail price would be appreciated.

 

I'm sure they'll be some early adopters but I can see this frighten VR games companies as it'll be even more niche than they expected...

1 minute ago, imachip said:

Yeah I'm out, that's far too expensive unless they put the high price up there for a limited time due to a shortfall in production.

 

I've purchased a DK2 kit from them, it would be more ideal if they offered a discount (don't expect to get it free like the Kickstarters), but some reduction in that large retail price would be appreciated.

 

I'm sure they'll be some early adopters but I can see this frighten VR games companies as it'll be even more niche than they expected...

If Sony can come in a decent bit lower then you wouldn't need to worry much. Console titles would scale to perform much better on a PC quite easily and porting costs wouldn't be much.

 

I still think this will sell quite well at this price, there's enough well off PC gamers to throw their cash at it :p Considering the most involved PC gamers probably have rigs worth thousands as it is.

8 minutes ago, Audioboxer said:

It's not as powerful as the occulus and Sony can afford to take a little hit to be made up via software sales. This has to be sold at some sort of profit, or around break even. I'm hoping $349 tops for Sony, but $299 would be ideal.

The PlayStation VR headset is not that different from the Rift headset in power.  The Rift has a 2160x1200 OLED display that targets 90Hz.  The PlayStation VR has a 1920x1080 OLED display that targets 120Hz (but supports 90Hz as well, this was added late in development to help devs port 90Hz Rift games to the PlayStation VR).

 

The big difference between the Rift and PlayStation VR isn't how powerful the headsets are, it's how powerful the device that drives them is.  The PC driving the Rift is significantly more powerful than the PS4 driving the PlayStation VR... this shouldn't effect headset price though.  Additionally the PS VR has a splitter box that processes the signal produced by the PS4 for the headset and converts it to something presentable on the TV at the same time.  That's something Oculus doesn't have to do at all and does effect the cost of the PS VR.

 

Sony overall is struggling financially, they can't afford to take hardly any loss at all as a company.  Oculus is owned by Facebook now who is far more financially capable of absorbing loss than Sony is.  I'd agree with you if Oculus was independent, as a little start-up they couldn't afford to take a heavy hardware loss but Facebook/Oculus is an entirely different beast.

10 minutes ago, imachip said:

Yeah I'm out, that's far too expensive unless they put the high price up there for a limited time due to a shortfall in production.

 

I've purchased a DK2 kit from them, it would be more ideal if they offered a discount (don't expect to get it free like the Kickstarters), but some reduction in that large retail price would be appreciated.

 

I'm sure they'll be some early adopters but I can see this frighten VR games companies as it'll be even more niche than they expected...

I don't think it would be a horrible idea if they let DK2 owners "trade in" their DK2 for something like $200 credit toward the Consumer Rift.  Just out of curiosity would you, as a DK2 owner, take advantage of something like that or is that a no go for you.

14 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

The PlayStation VR headset is not that different from the Rift headset in power.  The Rift has a 2160x1200 OLED display that targets 90Hz.  The PlayStation VR has a 1920x1080 OLED display that targets 120Hz (but supports 90Hz as well, this was added late in development to help devs port 90Hz Rift games to the PlayStation VR).

 

The big difference between the Rift and PlayStation VR isn't how powerful the headsets are, it's how powerful the device that drives them is.  The PC driving the Rift is significantly more powerful than the PS4 driving the PlayStation VR... this shouldn't effect headset price though.  Additionally the PS VR has a splitter box that processes the signal produced by the PS4 for the headset and converts it to something presentable on the TV at the same time.  That's something Oculus doesn't have to do at all and does effect the cost of the PS VR.

 

Sony overall is struggling financially, they can't afford to take hardly any loss at all as a company.  Oculus is owned by Facebook now who is far more financially capable of absorbing loss than Sony is.  I'd agree with you if Oculus was independent, as a little start-up they couldn't afford to take a heavy hardware loss but Facebook/Oculus is an entirely different beast.

From this pricing through it's clear Occulus/FB didn't want to take a loss, even if they hypothetically could.

 

Sony's finances have been much better as of late, I still think people think we're in the PS3 era. The Playstation branch anyway, IIRC it's been in the black since 2014. If the PS branch is allowed to act independently then I don't see why they wouldn't take a small loss on the hardware, if the PS4 and software sales are still as crazy as they are. I'm not talking $899 PS3 to $499 type of loss, like $10~50 if it means hitting a much preferred <=$349 price point.

 

Although with PSVR you're going to need the camera and move controllers, so whatever price point Sony put the headset at, it's not going to be cheap overall. It's just going to be suicide if they go near this pricing, as why get the poorer experience if there's not much in it?

I own the DK2 and VR experience is quite fun in all kinds of areas. However, I don't see myself shelling out $600 bucks as a gift just yet :P... 

 

The graphics are still not that good. The images appear grainy and needs major improvement.

 

If the graphics were true 1080p or 4K... I can easily shell out $600 bucks but just not yet.

6 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

I don't think it would be a horrible idea if they let DK2 owners "trade in" their DK2 for something like $200 credit toward the Consumer Rift.  Just out of curiosity would you, as a DK2 owner, take advantage of something like that or is that a no go for you.

Yes I would, as the DK2 becomes essentially obsolete.  If you're developing games for the rift (not me personally but their purpose), you would want to ensure that they work with consumer grade hardware.  I would of thought some sort of offer to current owners would be a 'no brainer' as you'd want to encourage further development of software titles to entice consumers to buy.

Palmer is getting some flak over this

 

4Rf03aB.jpg

I guess they're only shipping out of warehouses in the US, and not shipping units from global warehouses to help other countries. Pricey!

 

On the note of pricing, really wondering how much Vive is going to cost now. Isn't it even more high end?

3 minutes ago, Audioboxer said:

On the note of pricing, really wondering how much Vive is going to cost now. Isn't it even more high end?

Not as far as the image.  Both are 2160x1200 OLED displays targeting 90Hz.  The biggest hardware difference is in the way they detect player motion/positioning.  Oculus uses a camera, sort of (but not exactly) like PlayStation VR.  Vive uses towers and sensors in a more advanced mechanic that would work with multiple headsets using a single set of towers as well as towers all throughout the house allowing you to move around more.  I personally don't think it has much advantage for home use but it's really cool tech and I could totally see it being adopted for gaming centers like how we have paintball or laser tag now.... just with VR. 

 

The other big difference is of course API.  Oculus has their own and Vive is using SteamVR.  If this stuff takes off you can expect other companies besides HTC to release SteamVR headsets (like maybe LG, Asus, etc.) as the technology actually belongs to Valve not HTC.  HTC is just making the first device much like they made the first Google Nexus device for Android.

6 hours ago, Audioboxer said:

Palmer is getting some flak over this

 

I guess they're only shipping out of warehouses in the US, and not shipping units from global warehouses to help other countries. Pricey!

 

On the note of pricing, really wondering how much Vive is going to cost now. Isn't it even more high end?

 

Confirmed at over $1,100 including shipping to Australia :laugh: Then since it's over $1,000 tax free threshold add another 10% at customs. DOA gimmic atm here.

12 hours ago, Vandalsquad said:

 

Confirmed at over $1,100 including shipping to Australia :laugh: Then since it's over $1,000 tax free threshold add another 10% at customs. DOA gimmic atm here.

Ouch.

 

I don't think VR is a gimmick, but these prices are hard to swallow for something that is impressive technically, but far from proven in how rich and impressive the games will ultimately end up being.

 

I want to buy into VR, but I really don't want to be an early adopter at these prices.

After giving it some more thought, I am in. I need a new PC anyway. I really want to experience Adr1ft. I believe I will place my preorder later today, it is now saying expected ship date is June. That gives me 5 months to build a new PC, so I will wait until the first week of June to get all my new components. Will put aside $400 a month the next 5 months and be fine.

  • Like 2
21 hours ago, Audioboxer said:

From this pricing through it's clear Occulus/FB didn't want to take a loss, even if they hypothetically could.

That's not what the Oculus CEO says:

 

 

21 hours ago, Audioboxer said:

 

Sony's finances have been much better as of late, I still think people think we're in the PS3 era. The Playstation branch anyway, IIRC it's been in the black since 2014. If the PS branch is allowed to act independently then I don't see why they wouldn't take a small loss on the hardware, if the PS4 and software sales are still as crazy as they are. I'm not talking $899 PS3 to $499 type of loss, like $10~50 if it means hitting a much preferred <=$349 price point.

I'm not saying they can't take any loss at all.  I'm saying they are less able to absorb a loss than Facebook.  Also the PlayStation branch isn't allowed to act independently because they're losing so much money in other areas they need to take the profit from the PlayStation branch to shore up those loses.  Sony is NOT doing well overall.  They fairly recently sold off their PC business.  Their mobile phone/tablet business is struggling and many alanlysts say they should spin off.  Their camera's and camera optics division is doing well but that's based primarily on the fact they're used by Apple so if Apple ever switches suppliers they're likely in serious trouble there as well.  Their movie and music businesses aren't doing so well either.  PlayStation (and the Apple dependent camera sensors) is pretty much the only part of them that is doing well and if it wasn't for the fact that other divisions were using the PlayStation profit to stay afloat they very well may have gone bankrupt by now.  No one is saying the PlayStation division isn't doing well, but it doesn't get to keep it's profit all to itself as Sony as a whole IS struggling and needs it to say afloat.  PlayStation is doing well but they can't afford to take a huge cut in PlayStation division profit or they won't have enough to shore up their other divisions.

 

 

21 hours ago, Audioboxer said:

 

Although with PSVR you're going to need the camera and move controllers, so whatever price point Sony put the headset at, it's not going to be cheap overall. It's just going to be suicide if they go near this pricing, as why get the poorer experience if there's not much in it?

I don't think you're going to need the Move controllers for PSVR any more than you need the Oculus Touch for the Oculus Rift.  Certain types of games will need them but many won't.  I have no plans to buy the Move controllers out of the gate and doubt they'll be bundled.  The main games I'm looking forward to playing don't require them and just use the gamepad instead (EVE: Valkyrie, DriveClub and/or Gran Turismo Sport, etc.)  I also already have the PlayStation Camera and a gamepad comes with the console so Sony can have a headset only package for PlayStation VR that Oculus doesn't have as people don't already have the camera for it (though they could make a cheaper package without the Xbox One controller and games.)

 

I don't claim to be representative of the PlayStation community but for me personally If the PS VR is $400+ it's DOA.  If it's <$300 then it's a day 1 buy for me.  That $300-$400 range is the gut check area where I'm not sure about.  I have a six figure income though which I doubt most gamers have so I assume I'm likely willing to pay more than the average PS gamer.  Plus I have friends with Oculus Dev kits and have actually used VR so I'm pretty sold on it conseptually at least.  I recognize it's a hard sell for people who haven't experienced it because you can't just show someone pictures or a youtube video and have them really understand what it's like.  It's something that REALLY needs to be experienced.  Whenever PlayStation VR launches Sony is going to need to have demo units for people to try in all the Best Buy's and GameStops in the U.S.

1 hour ago, Audioboxer said:

Ouch.

 

I don't think VR is a gimmick, but these prices are hard to swallow for something that is impressive technically, but far from proven in how rich and impressive the games will ultimately end up being.

 

I want to buy into VR, but I really don't want to be an early adopter at these prices.

Yeah at 600 I'd get a hell of a lot more out of upgrading my computer and monitor, heh.

Here's another thing to keep in mind.  The reason Palmer Luckey didn't want to have a console tie-in is because he wants to iterate the tech faster than the console lifecycle.  In other words he wants to release a Rift v2 before the PS5 and Xbox Two come out and not be tied to a 5-10 year product lifecycle.  So odds are good that there will be a Rift v2 in two years or so and as with most PC gamer tech it's a good bet that games that come out after that won't support the older hardware anymore.

 

So you're $600 investment in VR may very well become obsolete in 2 years or so when the next version comes out.  I'd be much more willing to may $600 if I KNEW it would be good for 5+ years but by their own admission they intend to iterate quickly.  Now it's not like the games that come out for the Rift v1 are going to stop working when the Rift v2 comes out and I'm sure smaller devs and indies will continue to target v1 even after the v2 but the premier VR titles (I hesitate to say AAA because I don't think the user base will be large enough for there to be any truly AAA titles) are likely to target the latest and greatest hardware.

There's an interesting story on eurogamer with some quotes from Palmer about the price (including the tweet I already embedded above)

They seem to be sourced largely from Reddit but I can't go directly to the source right now as Reddit is blocked where I work.

 

Some interesting quotes though:

 

First about the bundle's effect on the price:

Quote

The Xbox controller costs us almost nothing to bundle, and people can easily resell it for profit,

...

A lot of people wish we would sell a bundle without 'useless extras' like high-end audio, a carrying case, the bundled games, etc, but those just don't significantly impact the cost.

Then he goes on to try to justify the cost:

Quote

It is expensive, but for the $599 you spend, you get a lot more than spending $599 on pretty much any other consumer electronics devices - phones that cost $599 cost a fraction of that to make, same with mid-range TVs that cost $599. There are a lot of mainstream devices in that price-range, so as you have said, our failing was in communication, not just price.

This completely ignores the fact that when you buy a phone or a mid-range TV you KNOW you're going to use it a lot.  They're not new technologies whose future is uncertain.  TVs in particular will likely be used for many years.  Phones maybe not so much as people do tend to upgrade them fairly often but in the U.S. at least the majority of them are not bought outright.  Historically they've been subsidized by the carrier for around $200 up front and while that practice is going away now it's being replaced by what is effectively a 0% interest 2 year loan.  So again the majority of people aren't just dropping $599 all at once for a cell phone and they are pretty darn certain it's going to get a great deal of use... the Rift not so much.  Also the $600 TV and Smart Phone is the core device not just an IO device.  They don't require at $1000+ PC to drive them as the Rift does.  Maybe the Rift IS a great deal at $600 but these comparisons he's making are absurd.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!