Oculus Rift available for preorder for $599.99, shipping in March


Recommended Posts

The cost doesn't need justified in the sense that it is expensive tech and worth what it sells for. It's about how justifiable the end user feels putting out that kind of money on a fledgling experience.

 

I don't see the point in comparing VR to phones/other gadgets/PC parts, etc. Many people who can afford it may simply wage that the first adopter risk isn't worth it at the current entry price. Smartphones are pricey but we use them daily 365 days a year so the brain can justify the expense for the use we get out of them. Same goes for integral and expensive PC components like graphics cards. All games need it on your PC, not just one type/one experience (which VR caters for ~ it's a unique experience that requires unique titles).

 

Not everyone will feel that for VR till it matures in development, and when that starts to happen prices will be lower anyway.

Here's an interesting quote:

Quote

Luckey: Gamers are not known to be the most affluent population of people. If something’s even $600, it doesn’t matter how good it is, how great of an experience it is — if they just can’t afford it, then it really might as well not exist. We’re going for the mainstream, but time will tell what the market is.

That's from an interview with All Things D in 2013.

  • Like 1

People make mistakes all the time. This mistake is gonna cost the though...

i would rathet spend $600 on new monitor, video card or other important stuff.the new tech is not worth my $600 us. I will wait the wearable 3d to become mainstream (if)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 hours ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

People make mistakes all the time. This mistake is gonna cost the though...

i would rathet spend $600 on new monitor, video card or other important stuff.the new tech is not worth my $600 us. I will wait the wearable 3d to become mainstream (if)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

1 hour ago, DirtyLarry said:

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

fair enough.  i was just pointing out that the higher entry price vs similar (though inferior) tech might have an effect on the speed of adoption and eventual market share.

3 minutes ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

fair enough.  i was just pointing out that the higher entry price vs similar (though inferior) tech might have an effect on the speed of adoption and eventual market share.

Ohhh, was your first line referring to Oculus and not consumers? The "people make mistakes all the time. This mistake is going to cost them though?" I thought you were referring to consumers, that is why I opened like I did. If you are talking about Oculus themselves, it makes a lot more sense.
I still do not really agree though. It is new consumer tech. New tech is expensive. The PS3 when it first released was also $600 iirc. It hurt them initially, but once the price dropped and it was more reasonable for everyone else, they wound up being okay after several years. I think it could be the same thing here. Honestly I am not sure price is going to be the deciding factor on if VR is successful or not, I think whether it is a big enough shift in how we experience games that everyone needs it is more important. And only time will tell there. Support by developers is going to be one of the biggest deciding factors. You can have all of the technology in the world, if developers do not make media for it, it will eventually fail.
I have very high hopes for VR myself. I hope they wind up panning out, but will not be completely surprised if they do not.

2 hours ago, DirtyLarry said:

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.


EXACTLY :)

 




 

 

Amazon Canada accidentally leaked a price for the PlayStation VR and it's not good.  The price they listed before pulling it was $1,125.35 CAD which is about $800 USD.

The price has since been pulled and Sony has come out to say: “This was an error by Amazon, we haven’t announced price for PlayStation VR.”

 

If this turns out to be true though then I can't see how VR is going to be anything but a tiny fringe this year or this console generation.  I hope it's just flat out wrong or maybe it's the price of a bundle that includes the actual PS4 ($350) + PlayStation Camera ($60) + VR Headset ($400)... maybe even PlayStation Move controllers and/or game(s) as well.

 

It's not looking good for VR this year right now though that's for sure.

 

Source

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Asmodai said:

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.

Your right. I have not paid any attention at all to what he was saying. I knew it was introduced via a Kickstarter campaign a couple of years back. Now I know it is almost available. I did not follow anything in between. So I guess anyone that did pay attention can be upset. I did not pay attention, so I am not upset. So it comes down to perspective. Mine is different than yours. I was not following, I really do not see the big deal. Since you were following, it is a big deal.

And make no mistake about it, I feel it is expensive, I never said it was not, however I am still going to take the plunge.

I am not wrong. Neither are you. We just have different perspectives.

7 minutes ago, DirtyLarry said:

Your right. I have not paid any attention at all to what he was saying. I knew it was introduced via a Kickstarter campaign a couple of years back. Now I know it is almost available. I did not follow anything in between. So I guess anyone that did pay attention can be upset. I did not pay attention, so I am not upset. So it comes down to perspective. Mine is different than yours. I was not following, I really do not see the big deal. Since you were following, it is a big deal.

And make no mistake about it, I feel it is expensive, I never said it was not, however I am still going to take the plunge.

I am not wrong. Neither are you. We just have different perspectives.

I've been following this from the very beginning.  I came VERY close to backing the initial kickstarter and while I ultimately decided not to I have friends who did.  I've been to events where the hardware was demoed, played with the kits my friends received, etc.

 

Pretty much everyone I know who has been following this from the start were unpleasantly surprised by the price.  That's not because they were naive but because he outright said things like that quote above which states his opinion that a $600 device "might as well not exist".  He didn't just say that or things like it once, or a handful of times but over and over and over to those who were listening.  That was the meat of their entire PR thrust.  So yeah if you were paying attention you're almost certainly upset right now I mean seriously how do you say a $600 device "might as well not exist" and then launch your product at $599.99... Seriously?

 

Now the internet is full of the people who were paying attention and I would say are rightfully upset about the price being told how they shouldn't be by people who haven't been paying attention at all.  How TVs and Monitors and GPUs cost more than that or Thurstmaster HOTAS setups or whatever as if it was entirely unreasonable to expect a price lower than.  Well people didn't expect that because they just picked some low number out of fantasy land, they expected a low number because the developer told us it would be low.  Now this isn't directed at you in particular DirtyLarry, I think your quote above pretty much nails it on the head.  This is a public forum though so anyone can read it and so my intent here is just to inform those who haven't been paying attention why exactly the people who have been are so upset.  If you're personally willing to spend that much that's great, there is nothing wrong with that.  There seem to be a lot of people out there however who don't seem to even be trying to grasp the perspective of those of us who have actually been paying attention all along though.

 

It's also a domino effect.  Prior to that release price there was a HUGE amount of excitement about this being a big year for VR.  If Rift isn't Mainstream like Luckey had claimed and is indeed just "enthusiest" or niche or whatever you want to call it then it isn't going to have a user base large enough to sustain quality developers.  Small user base = small development budgets and so even if you have the money to buy the hardware you're likely not going to get a ton of high quality experiences... instead you're likely to get VR tacked on to older games and R&D/Proof of concept projects which effectively makes the Rift CV1 (CV = Consumer Version) just DK3 (Developers Kit 3).  Again this wouldn't be so bad and would be perfectly understandable for a new tech if he hadn't spend so much effort making people believe they were developing a much cheaper device that would thereby create a much larger user base and attract much higher games budgets.

 

 

28 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

<Snipped>

No I absolutely can see why people who were following it would be upset. I am not happy about the price either, and do realize it is a risk. I say a few posts above developers are going to make or break it ultimately, and if no one owns it, developers will not create for it, so it is definitely a concern I have. FTR there is a slight chance I am going to back out completely and not pick it up at all. Only time will tell that.
I get it though, especially after you explain it.
I am just hoping the paradigm shift is enough to keep it going, but maybe not.
I take risks with technology. Hell, I own a 3DTV and have not used the 3D in over 2 years. Fortunately I am in a position to do so, so I guess you can say on one hand there is ignorance in bliss. On the other hand, I do want it to be successful and realize you need early adopters to make that happen, so I am taking the gamble (probably). Will see if it pays off.

 Wow the pricing speculation has gone nuts on these things.  I hope they're way, way off.

 

First the Rift launches at $599

Then Amazon Canada pulls a listing of PlayStation VR at $800

and the latest news from Taiwan is that the HTC Vive could be as much as $1500.

Source

 

I'm hoping the PlayStation VR and HTC Vive rumors are just plain false but if both do turn out to be true then I can't see how VR is going to be anything major any time soon.  They're not going to get enough sales at those prices to make a market large enough for any serious development efforts to turn a profit.  They'll be relegated to just an extremely tiny niche of hardware enthusiasts and prototype/side-projects for developers.  I've personally used VR and I like the tech but I'm concerned they may very well have priced it right out of the market.  I wasn't sure the general public would have bought in even at say a $400 price point... at these prices it seems to me more likely than ever it will just die as a fad like 3D TV.  Again those last two were just rumors though and I'm really hoping they're WAY, WAY, off.  I don't think Sony has announced when PS VR preorders will start but I guess we'll get the real HTC Vive cost by Feb. 29th when they start taking preorders.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!