Oculus Rift available for preorder for $599.99, shipping in March


Recommended Posts

The cost doesn't need justified in the sense that it is expensive tech and worth what it sells for. It's about how justifiable the end user feels putting out that kind of money on a fledgling experience.

 

I don't see the point in comparing VR to phones/other gadgets/PC parts, etc. Many people who can afford it may simply wage that the first adopter risk isn't worth it at the current entry price. Smartphones are pricey but we use them daily 365 days a year so the brain can justify the expense for the use we get out of them. Same goes for integral and expensive PC components like graphics cards. All games need it on your PC, not just one type/one experience (which VR caters for ~ it's a unique experience that requires unique titles).

 

Not everyone will feel that for VR till it matures in development, and when that starts to happen prices will be lower anyway.

Here's an interesting quote:

Quote

Luckey: Gamers are not known to be the most affluent population of people. If something’s even $600, it doesn’t matter how good it is, how great of an experience it is — if they just can’t afford it, then it really might as well not exist. We’re going for the mainstream, but time will tell what the market is.

That's from an interview with All Things D in 2013.

  • Like 1

People make mistakes all the time. This mistake is gonna cost the though...

i would rathet spend $600 on new monitor, video card or other important stuff.the new tech is not worth my $600 us. I will wait the wearable 3d to become mainstream (if)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 hours ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

People make mistakes all the time. This mistake is gonna cost the though...

i would rathet spend $600 on new monitor, video card or other important stuff.the new tech is not worth my $600 us. I will wait the wearable 3d to become mainstream (if)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

1 hour ago, DirtyLarry said:

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

fair enough.  i was just pointing out that the higher entry price vs similar (though inferior) tech might have an effect on the speed of adoption and eventual market share.

3 minutes ago, E.worm Jimmy said:

fair enough.  i was just pointing out that the higher entry price vs similar (though inferior) tech might have an effect on the speed of adoption and eventual market share.

Ohhh, was your first line referring to Oculus and not consumers? The "people make mistakes all the time. This mistake is going to cost them though?" I thought you were referring to consumers, that is why I opened like I did. If you are talking about Oculus themselves, it makes a lot more sense.
I still do not really agree though. It is new consumer tech. New tech is expensive. The PS3 when it first released was also $600 iirc. It hurt them initially, but once the price dropped and it was more reasonable for everyone else, they wound up being okay after several years. I think it could be the same thing here. Honestly I am not sure price is going to be the deciding factor on if VR is successful or not, I think whether it is a big enough shift in how we experience games that everyone needs it is more important. And only time will tell there. Support by developers is going to be one of the biggest deciding factors. You can have all of the technology in the world, if developers do not make media for it, it will eventually fail.
I have very high hopes for VR myself. I hope they wind up panning out, but will not be completely surprised if they do not.

2 hours ago, DirtyLarry said:

You make it sound life or death. LOL What is it going to cost people besides $600?
I am not downplaying the value of money, it took me over 24 hours to decide to get it because of the price, but everything I have read points to this is the next phase of gaming. The one and only thing I can see getting in the way is if I am somehow sensitive to it. If I am, I sell it on eBay for a $100 loss and be done with it.
If I am not sensitive and I get to enjoy it, I will get to check out Virtual F**cking Reality. This has been a dream of mine since I first saw The Lawnmower man when I was 17 in 1992.

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.


EXACTLY :)

 




 

 

Amazon Canada accidentally leaked a price for the PlayStation VR and it's not good.  The price they listed before pulling it was $1,125.35 CAD which is about $800 USD.

The price has since been pulled and Sony has come out to say: “This was an error by Amazon, we haven’t announced price for PlayStation VR.”

 

If this turns out to be true though then I can't see how VR is going to be anything but a tiny fringe this year or this console generation.  I hope it's just flat out wrong or maybe it's the price of a bundle that includes the actual PS4 ($350) + PlayStation Camera ($60) + VR Headset ($400)... maybe even PlayStation Move controllers and/or game(s) as well.

 

It's not looking good for VR this year right now though that's for sure.

 

Source

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Asmodai said:

The issue is it was repeatedly pitched as a "mainstream" device.  The people who keep saying what did you expect from new tech must not have been paying much attention to what Palmer Luckey has been saying up until the price was announced.  He's repeatedly talked about how the Rift was going to be a "mainstream" device.  He stated that the commercial version would be similar in price to the DK2, I don't think people would have blinked about a jump from $350 to $400 but $600 is a HUGE jump. He used $600 specifically as an example of an absurd price that "might as well not exist".

 

If he had sold from the get go as an enthusiast device there wouldn't be an issue.  "Mainstream" gamers don't spend $600 on GPUs and your GPU is used by just about every game you play not just a specific subset.  He made people believe he was going to bring VR "to the masses" and then he releases a product that's clearly targeting only high end gaming enthusiasts.  Even people with expensive gaming rigs are surprised the headset costs so much based off of his prior comments.  Many of them, while willing to spend more than that on GPUs, Monitors, etc. don't want to invest that much on something that may well flop and die as a fad.  Especially when they were led to believe it would cost about half what it does.

Your right. I have not paid any attention at all to what he was saying. I knew it was introduced via a Kickstarter campaign a couple of years back. Now I know it is almost available. I did not follow anything in between. So I guess anyone that did pay attention can be upset. I did not pay attention, so I am not upset. So it comes down to perspective. Mine is different than yours. I was not following, I really do not see the big deal. Since you were following, it is a big deal.

And make no mistake about it, I feel it is expensive, I never said it was not, however I am still going to take the plunge.

I am not wrong. Neither are you. We just have different perspectives.

7 minutes ago, DirtyLarry said:

Your right. I have not paid any attention at all to what he was saying. I knew it was introduced via a Kickstarter campaign a couple of years back. Now I know it is almost available. I did not follow anything in between. So I guess anyone that did pay attention can be upset. I did not pay attention, so I am not upset. So it comes down to perspective. Mine is different than yours. I was not following, I really do not see the big deal. Since you were following, it is a big deal.

And make no mistake about it, I feel it is expensive, I never said it was not, however I am still going to take the plunge.

I am not wrong. Neither are you. We just have different perspectives.

I've been following this from the very beginning.  I came VERY close to backing the initial kickstarter and while I ultimately decided not to I have friends who did.  I've been to events where the hardware was demoed, played with the kits my friends received, etc.

 

Pretty much everyone I know who has been following this from the start were unpleasantly surprised by the price.  That's not because they were naive but because he outright said things like that quote above which states his opinion that a $600 device "might as well not exist".  He didn't just say that or things like it once, or a handful of times but over and over and over to those who were listening.  That was the meat of their entire PR thrust.  So yeah if you were paying attention you're almost certainly upset right now I mean seriously how do you say a $600 device "might as well not exist" and then launch your product at $599.99... Seriously?

 

Now the internet is full of the people who were paying attention and I would say are rightfully upset about the price being told how they shouldn't be by people who haven't been paying attention at all.  How TVs and Monitors and GPUs cost more than that or Thurstmaster HOTAS setups or whatever as if it was entirely unreasonable to expect a price lower than.  Well people didn't expect that because they just picked some low number out of fantasy land, they expected a low number because the developer told us it would be low.  Now this isn't directed at you in particular DirtyLarry, I think your quote above pretty much nails it on the head.  This is a public forum though so anyone can read it and so my intent here is just to inform those who haven't been paying attention why exactly the people who have been are so upset.  If you're personally willing to spend that much that's great, there is nothing wrong with that.  There seem to be a lot of people out there however who don't seem to even be trying to grasp the perspective of those of us who have actually been paying attention all along though.

 

It's also a domino effect.  Prior to that release price there was a HUGE amount of excitement about this being a big year for VR.  If Rift isn't Mainstream like Luckey had claimed and is indeed just "enthusiest" or niche or whatever you want to call it then it isn't going to have a user base large enough to sustain quality developers.  Small user base = small development budgets and so even if you have the money to buy the hardware you're likely not going to get a ton of high quality experiences... instead you're likely to get VR tacked on to older games and R&D/Proof of concept projects which effectively makes the Rift CV1 (CV = Consumer Version) just DK3 (Developers Kit 3).  Again this wouldn't be so bad and would be perfectly understandable for a new tech if he hadn't spend so much effort making people believe they were developing a much cheaper device that would thereby create a much larger user base and attract much higher games budgets.

 

 

28 minutes ago, Asmodai said:

<Snipped>

No I absolutely can see why people who were following it would be upset. I am not happy about the price either, and do realize it is a risk. I say a few posts above developers are going to make or break it ultimately, and if no one owns it, developers will not create for it, so it is definitely a concern I have. FTR there is a slight chance I am going to back out completely and not pick it up at all. Only time will tell that.
I get it though, especially after you explain it.
I am just hoping the paradigm shift is enough to keep it going, but maybe not.
I take risks with technology. Hell, I own a 3DTV and have not used the 3D in over 2 years. Fortunately I am in a position to do so, so I guess you can say on one hand there is ignorance in bliss. On the other hand, I do want it to be successful and realize you need early adopters to make that happen, so I am taking the gamble (probably). Will see if it pays off.

 Wow the pricing speculation has gone nuts on these things.  I hope they're way, way off.

 

First the Rift launches at $599

Then Amazon Canada pulls a listing of PlayStation VR at $800

and the latest news from Taiwan is that the HTC Vive could be as much as $1500.

Source

 

I'm hoping the PlayStation VR and HTC Vive rumors are just plain false but if both do turn out to be true then I can't see how VR is going to be anything major any time soon.  They're not going to get enough sales at those prices to make a market large enough for any serious development efforts to turn a profit.  They'll be relegated to just an extremely tiny niche of hardware enthusiasts and prototype/side-projects for developers.  I've personally used VR and I like the tech but I'm concerned they may very well have priced it right out of the market.  I wasn't sure the general public would have bought in even at say a $400 price point... at these prices it seems to me more likely than ever it will just die as a fad like 3D TV.  Again those last two were just rumors though and I'm really hoping they're WAY, WAY, off.  I don't think Sony has announced when PS VR preorders will start but I guess we'll get the real HTC Vive cost by Feb. 29th when they start taking preorders.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!