Windows 10 Constantly Crashing - Critical Process Died


Recommended Posts

I'm having this weird issue where I keep getting BSOD for Critical_Process_Died, and its almost making me want to stop using windows 10 and go back to 7.

 

I think it has something to do with the Microsoft Driver Enumerator. Most of the time a HAS STOPPED WORKING window will pop up a micro second before the blue screen saying Microsoft Driver Enumerator has stopped working.

 

I'm not sure what this is, or why its all of a sudden causing these issues.  windows 10 used to be fine.

 

Windows 10 ran fine for months, then last month or sometime this started, and once it starts it constantly happens, I'm lucky if i can even scan my pc before it BSOD again.

i've ran sfc /scannow and it came up fine

 

i thought it was a driver issue, due to using driver booster installing weird drivers. So i reformatted reinstalled windows 10, only installed drivers the OEM posted for my hardware, and all was fine for a week until tonight.

 

I ran a memory test i case it was a ram issue, and all is fine.

 

I can't seem to find any info online about this, or even about the process that keeps crashing.


this guy is having the same problem as well, and Microsoft doesnt seem to be able to help
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-performance/microft-driver-enumerator-has-stopped-working/43e41105-8353-4ac9-91bb-c18e0f50ef3d

 

On Mon 1/18/2016 6:42:01 AM GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\011816-5750-01.dmp
uptime: 00:11:03
This was probably caused by the following module: ntkrnlmp.exe (nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x0)
Bugcheck code: 0xEF (0xFFFFE000D24F7840, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
Error: CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED
Bug check description: This indicates that a critical system process died.
There is a possibility this problem was caused by a virus or other malware.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.

 

On Mon 1/18/2016 6:42:01 AM GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\Windows\memory.dmp
uptime: 00:11:03
This was probably caused by the following module: ntdll.sys (ntdll!NtTerminateProcess+0x14)
Bugcheck code: 0xEF (0xFFFFE000D24F7840, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
Error: CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED
Bug check description: This indicates that a critical system process died.
There is a possibility this problem was caused by a virus or other malware.
A third party driver was identified as the probable root cause of this system error. It is suggested you look for an update for the following driver: ntdll.sys .
Google query: ntdll.sys CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED

 

On Mon 1/18/2016 6:30:16 AM GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\011816-5718-01.dmp
uptime: 00:11:27
This was probably caused by the following module: ntkrnlmp.exe (nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x0)
Bugcheck code: 0xEF (0xFFFFE0007B975840, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
Error: CRITICAL_PROCESS_DIED
Bug check description: This indicates that a critical system process died.
There is a possibility this problem was caused by a virus or other malware.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.

 

This will constantly happen over and over.
I really don't want to go back to windows 7, but i can't keep dealingwith this.

How can i discover whats causing the issue?
Nothing has changed on my system since yesterday and today.

thanks

 

 

 

Edited by blank

This guy over here has been helping me

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-hardware/constant-bsod-after-being-on-windows-10-for-a/b29a5a3b-d681-43cf-b44c-0905b2ad8eba?tm=1453118152073&auth=1

 

turns out my Mobo was way out of date,  I thought it was updated, but i was using a version from like 2013 or something.

or it could be another issue.

 

we'll see how this goes :D

 

7 hours ago, Jared- said:

"Nothing has changed on my system since yesterday and today"

 

Ok...what's changed, because obviously what you've done is causing your machine to fall over. 

 

 

thats the thing. Nothing changes, it just starts happening after a few days.

 

I used windows 10 from august til december when this issue started happening, so its the weirdest thing. Obviously i'd know if i did something new that triggered it.

thats what makes it confusing.

 

For example, for the past few days it was working good. Came home, turned on PC, started copying picture from iphone to PC and it started to happen, and once it starts it doesnt stop. But im sure this guy over at the microsoft forums will help me figure it out, if it starts again (recent reformatted and clean installed windows 10 again). Last time it started i was tryin to copy data to a USB drive. which made me think it was kinda USB related.

 

  • 5 weeks later...

If anyone comes to this topic with the same issue, i think i have resolved it.

 

Turns out that this Microsoft Driver Enumerator file is not legit, and is a trojan, virus, or something that no modern anti malware, anti virus seems to be able to detect. 

it installs to the system32 folder and is called msde.exe

 

The confusing thing for me was that it didn't start to cause any negative symptoms, or any at all for a week or longer after being created, which Is why i couldn't think of what i did or installed that'd cause it.

 

I had my suspicions on this file since i couldn't find a single thing about "Microsoft Driver Enumerator" online, other than a few people who were having the same issue. Then upon a clean install i noticed that file wasn't in the system32 folder, in which i then monitored the directory and installed my normal applications til i discovered which one was installing the file.

 

Not sure if you can delete the file and then be okay, i just did a clean install. so far 2-3 weeks have passed since this install of windows and all is good.

 

so if anyone is coming here because of "Microsoft Driver Enumerator ", know that its not a legit file.

 

btw, microsoft support is horrible.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!