Asus H61M-K motherboard for casual gaming...


Recommended Posts

I'm looking to replace the motherboard in my computer (currently Asus P8P67) for this one (reason is because I want to put the PC into an mATX case, but the board I have now is an ATX form factor):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/H61M-K-Motherboard-Socket-Micro-Intel/dp/B00F0WY7AM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1455461216&sr=8-1&keywords=asus+socket+1155+matx

 

Will this board suffice for the following:

Corsair Carbide Air 240 Case

Intel Core i7-2600K

8GB (2x 4GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 RAM

GeForce GTX 580

Corsair Hydro H50 CPU Water cooler

1x Samsung EVO 850 SSD

2x 1TB WD 7,200RPM HDDs

1x 2TB WD 7,200RPM HDDs

 

The main difference I think is the chipset. The board I have now is the P67 chipset, but the board I linked is a H61 chipset. I'm not a competitive gamer and I don't get to play as much as I used to. I also don't plan on performing any overclocking, or using advanced features. I just want the gear I have, with this motherboard and case and to be able to play games as I do now.

 

Will this board do what I need?

Edited by Daedroth

It will work.  However, you'll lose your SATA 6Gb/s ports and USB 3.0 ports with the H61.  The SATA might not be a big deal ... but your front USB ports on the case will not be connected (though you could install a 3.0 add on PCIx card)  Something like this (please note I've never used this product)

@jjkusafThanks for the reply.

Using the Samsung EVO 850 SSD...will that suffer from being connected at a slower SATA connection?

As for USB...I don't utilise USB 3.0 at the moment, and to be honest, USB transfers are few and far between for me anyway.

Sorry, in your original post you said Evo 250...which I never heard of but figured it may have been an older Samsung drive.

 

Yes, the 850 will max out the SATA port on the board you're looking at.  The 850 pushes around ~540MB/sec where SATA II only does 300ish.

 

Now, if you'll notice that drop in speed ... I dunno...maybe.   /shrug

 

As with the USB 3.0, you could install an add-on card that gives you SATAIII ... especially if you notice that drop in speed.

5 minutes ago, Daedroth said:

The Intel 2600K is not specifically listed in the list of supported CPUs, so now I'm not too sure on what to do! https://www.asus.com/uk/Motherboards/H61MK/HelpDesk_CPU/

ahhh...how embarrassing.  Good catch.  The TDP rating of the 2600k is too high for that mobo (95w) ... which is why only lower TDP rated processors are listed.  

 

Sorry, I made a rookie mistake and just glanced "3rd/2nd generation Core i7/i5/i3/Pentium processors in the LGA1155 package " without looking at the compatibility list.  

 

:(

 

Maybe this one?  http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-LGA1155-u-ATX-Motherboard-Intel/dp/B009US9DCO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1455465423&sr=8-1&keywords=MSI+H61M-P31

As with the ASUS you listed earlier ... you'll lose the SATAIII and USB 3.0 ... but you'll only have one PCIx1 (for one addon card...like a USB 3.0 add on or SATAIII add on).  Your CPU is listed though https://us.msi.com/product/motherboard/support/H61M-P31W8.html#support-cpu

 

You can also browse this PCPartpicker link which will list which motherboards are compatabile with the 2600K.  It is a bit hard now since it is a bit old and most motherboards for that "era" are discontinued. :(

https://pcpartpicker.com/parts/motherboard/?compatible_with=intel-cpu-bx80623i72600k

On 2/14/2016 at 11:05 AM, jjkusaf said:

Maybe this one?  http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-LGA1155-u-ATX-Motherboard-Intel/dp/B009US9DCO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1455465423&sr=8-1&keywords=MSI+H61M-P31

As with the ASUS you listed earlier ... you'll lose the SATAIII and USB 3.0 ... but you'll only have one PCIx1 (for one addon card...like a USB 3.0 add on or SATAIII add on).  Your CPU is listed though https://us.msi.com/product/motherboard/support/H61M-P31W8.html#support-cpu

 

You can also browse this PCPartpicker link which will list which motherboards are compatabile with the 2600K.  It is a bit hard now since it is a bit old and most motherboards for that "era" are discontinued. :(

https://pcpartpicker.com/parts/motherboard/?compatible_with=intel-cpu-bx80623i72600k

That is a flaw with mATX (as a whole) - too few PCIe x1 slots (usually one).

 

I went mATX myself (MSI H81-E33) and while I didn't lose any SATA ports (I have four - two each of SATA 6.0gB and SATA 3.0gB), that single PCIe x1 slot was a possible problem (the Recon3D Fata1ity Professional also has an Intel HD Audio mode which is supported by OSes that are not Windows - such as Linux), most onboard-audio chipsets have their issues outside of Windows, if not IN Windows.  I lucked out that the onboard audio DOES work outside of Windows (and in Linux distributions in particular) - so the Fata1ity is back on the shelf.

6 minutes ago, BinaryData said:

Whats nice about the Samsung SSDs is the ability to nearly double speeds with their drive boosting technology.

 

I'm not a particular fan about ASUS, why are you specifically picking them, if you don't mind me asking?

Talking about RAPID mode?  Yea, I guess...especially on benchmarks.  In real world performance I honestly cannot tell the difference.  My Samsung feels just as snappy with RAPID off as it does with it on.

 

Better question is what do you have against ASUS?  They are one of the top 3 motherboard manufactures out there.  I personally do not have a problem (or an allegiance to a particular brand...look at my sig block) with any motherboard manufacture.  

20 minutes ago, BinaryData said:

Whats nice about the Samsung SSDs is the ability to nearly double speeds with their drive boosting technology.

 

I'm not a particular fan about ASUS, why are you specifically picking them, if you don't mind me asking?

Asus has really made a name for themselves, they've become the Mercedes Benz in the hardware world, and sometimes overpricing their products because of the name. I do like their products, I have a few, however, I also find Gigabyte, MSI, and AsRock, to be just as good, while being more competitive in pricing.

11 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Talking about RAPID mode?  Yea, I guess...especially on benchmarks.  In real world performance I honestly cannot tell the difference.  My Samsung feels just as snappy with RAPID off as it does with it on.

 

Better question is what do you have against ASUS?  They are one of the top 3 motherboard manufactures out there.  I personally do not have a problem (or an allegiance to a particular brand...look at my sig block) with any motherboard manufacture.  

 

1 minute ago, JHBrown said:

Asus has really made a name for themselves, they've become the Mercedes Benz in the hardware world, and sometimes overpricing their products because of the name. I do like their products, I have a few, however, I also find Gigabyte, MSI, and AsRock, to be just as good, while being more competitive in pricing.

I've owned several ASUS products, none of them have made it past a year of use, except my DVD Drive, and I use that maybe ONCE a year?

 

I've owned several of their motherboards, two were LGA775 boards, the other was an 1150. The first two ASUS boards were their ROG brand. Both boards, after about 6 months started having temperature regulation issues, about the 9 month mark my PC would start to over heat. At the 1 year, the boards were fried, the second I hit the power button, it'd freak out. I swapped it out for a Gigabyte board, it's been around 3 years, and still running strong. I've refreshed the paste every year. The third board was recent. Dead SATAIII ports, drives not showing up at all, my favorite one is the BIOS problem. Would lock up trying to change BIOS settings, at one point I got locked out completely.

 

Like I've said previously, I've had massive headaches with ASUS. You say they're the beamers of the PC world, but I look at them like a Datsun. Which is a reject wannabe truck. The same goes for Intel/AMD, I've always liked AMD but both times I owned an AMD Processor, it's been fried. Intel has been the winning chip for me, little more expensive, but they work. Same with NVidia vs ATI. I always buy EVGA NVidia cards. Hell, I hate my 9800GTX+ for ages, when the 500s came out, tht's when I upgraded. That's how awesome it was. I don't do any sort of over clocking, I do leave my PCs online nearly 24/7, once or twice a week I reboot them. I clean their fans and replace them every 2 years. I keep the cases clean and free of dust. I take everything out at least once a year and use an air compressor to blow the dust out. Yes I hold the fan blade so it doesn't move, I'm not an idgit. :p

2 minutes ago, BinaryData said:

 

I've owned several ASUS products, none of them have made it past a year of use, except my DVD Drive, and I use that maybe ONCE a year?

 

I've owned several of their motherboards, two were LGA775 boards, the other was an 1150. The first two ASUS boards were their ROG brand. Both boards, after about 6 months started having temperature regulation issues, about the 9 month mark my PC would start to over heat. At the 1 year, the boards were fried, the second I hit the power button, it'd freak out. I swapped it out for a Gigabyte board, it's been around 3 years, and still running strong. I've refreshed the paste every year. The third board was recent. Dead SATAIII ports, drives not showing up at all, my favorite one is the BIOS problem. Would lock up trying to change BIOS settings, at one point I got locked out completely.

 

Like I've said previously, I've had massive headaches with ASUS. You say they're the beamers of the PC world, but I look at them like a Datsun. Which is a reject wannabe truck. The same goes for Intel/AMD, I've always liked AMD but both times I owned an AMD Processor, it's been fried. Intel has been the winning chip for me, little more expensive, but they work. Same with NVidia vs ATI. I always buy EVGA NVidia cards. Hell, I hate my 9800GTX+ for ages, when the 500s came out, tht's when I upgraded. That's how awesome it was. I don't do any sort of over clocking, I do leave my PCs online nearly 24/7, once or twice a week I reboot them. I clean their fans and replace them every 2 years. I keep the cases clean and free of dust. I take everything out at least once a year and use an air compressor to blow the dust out. Yes I hold the fan blade so it doesn't move, I'm not an idgit. :p

Good stuff. However, my reference to the Mercedes Benz was more about, there are other brands that offer the same performance, similar features, without the Asus badge and Asus price that comes along with it.

4 minutes ago, BinaryData said:

 

I've owned several ASUS products, none of them have made it past a year of use, except my DVD Drive, and I use that maybe ONCE a year?

 

I've owned several of their motherboards, two were LGA775 boards, the other was an 1150. The first two ASUS boards were their ROG brand. Both boards, after about 6 months started having temperature regulation issues, about the 9 month mark my PC would start to over heat. At the 1 year, the boards were fried, the second I hit the power button, it'd freak out. I swapped it out for a Gigabyte board, it's been around 3 years, and still running strong. I've refreshed the paste every year. The third board was recent. Dead SATAIII ports, drives not showing up at all, my favorite one is the BIOS problem. Would lock up trying to change BIOS settings, at one point I got locked out completely.

 

Like I've said previously, I've had massive headaches with ASUS. You say they're the beamers of the PC world, but I look at them like a Datsun. Which is a reject wannabe truck. The same goes for Intel/AMD, I've always liked AMD but both times I owned an AMD Processor, it's been fried. Intel has been the winning chip for me, little more expensive, but they work. Same with NVidia vs ATI. I always buy EVGA NVidia cards. Hell, I hate my 9800GTX+ for ages, when the 500s came out, tht's when I upgraded. That's how awesome it was. I don't do any sort of over clocking, I do leave my PCs online nearly 24/7, once or twice a week I reboot them. I clean their fans and replace them every 2 years. I keep the cases clean and free of dust. I take everything out at least once a year and use an air compressor to blow the dust out. Yes I hold the fan blade so it doesn't move, I'm not an idgit. :p

ahh ok.  On the flipside I've never had a motherboard fail...except for an Abit but that was because the PSU failed taking the mobo with it.  I've had no issues with the motherboards I've owned ... ASUS, ASrock, MSI and Gigabyte (and I think I owned an AOpen at one time).  

 

Though I will normally stick with ASUS for my main system.  I gave my old ASUS Rampage Formula II w/ a Xeon 3110 to a friend and it is still going strong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!