Recommended Posts

Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to phrase this in Google ... so I failed at figuring it out on my own.  Here is my plan:

 

Currently I have Windows 7 on my desktop.  I plan on buying another Samsung Pro 512 (same SSD my Windows 7 is on).  I'm going to clone my Windows 7 install to that drive and upgrade it to Windows 10 and then disconnect the "old" Windows 7 drive.  After a month or so...once I'm confident that everything is good to go ... I'm going to reconnect and format the "old" Windows 7 drive which will leave me a clean SSD.

 

What I would like to do ... is use that drive to create a RAID 0 ... but without reinstalling Windows 10.  Soooo....my question is ... is this possible?

 

Samsung Pro 512 - Windows 10  --->

Samsung Pro 512 - blank 

-->

2x Samsung Pros in RAID 0 = Windows 10 (without reinstall)

 

Or would it be best to clone the Windows 7 drive to my older OCZ SSD (which is currently blank) ... install Windows 10 ... make sure it works ... create a RAID 0 out of the two Samsung drives and then clone the OCZ to the newly created RAID 0.

 

Does that make sense?

 

I'm not very familiar with working with RAID in Windows (only Linux/FreeBSD/non-OS drives in Windows).

Firstly please don't use RAID 0, if one drive fails then the whole thing fails.

 

If you must do this then make an image of the hard drive, configure the RAID and then clone the image back to the RAID. You may need to use a tool such as Paragon Hard Disk Manager to inject the RAID drivers into the WIndows installation.

I'm pretty sure you'll need to take an image backup, create raid 0 partition using the two drives and then restore you image to the new raid 0 partition.

 

Don't think there is anyway just to add a drive and enable raid 0 without doing a restore of backup/image or full reinstall of windows.

  • Like 2
  On 12/04/2016 at 14:27, Tomo said:

Firstly please don't use RAID 0, if one drive fails then the whole thing fails.

 

If you must do this then make an image of the hard drive, configure the RAID and then clone the image back to the RAID. You may need to use a tool such as Paragon Hard Disk Manager to inject the RAID drivers into the WIndows installation.

Expand  

Thanks for the suggestion.  Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm not particularly worried about drive failures ... I keep everything backed up daily on my freenas and/or the cloud.  I just do not want to go through the whole process of reinstalling all my programs right now ... but obviously will if one of the SSDs failed in RAID 0.

 

So...what you and joemailey are saying is I should use the OCZ as the "staging" drive...not the Samsung(s)?

  On 12/04/2016 at 14:38, jjkusaf said:

Thanks for the suggestion.  Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm not particularly worried about drive failures ... I keep everything backed up daily on my freenas and/or the cloud.  I just do not want to go through the whole process of reinstalling all my programs right now ... but obviously will if one of the SSDs failed in RAID 0.

 

So...what you and joemailey are saying is I should use the OCZ as the "staging" drive...not the Samsung(s)?

Expand  

Yes make an image of the current installation onto the OCZ, set up the two Samsungs as RAID 0 and then clone the image back to the RAID 0.

 

To be honest it would probably be quicker just to re-install Windows 10.

  On 12/04/2016 at 14:27, Tomo said:

Firstly please don't use RAID 0, if one drive fails then the whole thing fails.

Expand  

What happens if he wants more speed than a single SSD can offer? 

 

I have two SSDs in RAID 0 and it's great.  Who cares if it dies, I'm enjoying 1 GB/s transfer speeds.  I have everything I need backed up so it's no big deal if it dies.

 

 

  • Like 3
  On 12/04/2016 at 14:43, Open Minded said:

What happens if he wants more speed than a single SSD can offer? 

 

I have two SSDs in RAID 0 and it's great.  Who cares if it dies, I'm enjoying 1 GB/s transfer speeds.  I have everything I need backed up so it's no big deal if it dies.

 

 

Expand  

Just warning him of the potential consequences, it's up to you if you want to run RAID 0. Just make sure you have an adequate backup of all your data and be prepared to start from scratch if one of them fails.

  On 12/04/2016 at 14:42, Tomo said:

Yes make an image of the current installation onto the OCZ, set up the two Samsungs as RAID 0 and then clone the image back to the RAID 0.

 

To be honest it would probably be quicker just to re-install Windows 10.

Expand  

yea...I've thought about it ... but I've also thought about reinstalling all the programs/games :( ... which would take a very long time.  I'll have to uninstall a few things just to get the Win7 install to fit onto the smaller OCZ drive.

 

  On 12/04/2016 at 14:43, Open Minded said:

What happens if he wants more speed than a single SSD can offer? 

 

I have two SSDs in RAID 0 and it's great.  Who cares if it dies, I'm enjoying 1 GB/s transfer speeds.  I have everything I need backed up so it's no big deal if it dies.

Expand  

yea...that is what I'm wanting to achieve ... more speed w/o having to invest in a new mobo with NVMe. :)  Great advice though by Tomo ... to ensure that data is backed up frequently just incase one SSD fails...such advice should be given to everyone regardless of how their system is setup.

 

So...my new plan ....

 

Clone the current Win7 Samsung to the OCZ.  Disconnect the Samsung and upgrade the OCZ to Windows 10.  After a few weeks...ensuring Windows 10 is working properly....create a RAID 0 with the two Samsungs.  Clone the OCZ drive w/ Windows 10 over to the newly created Samsung RAID 0.  Win?  Surely there is something I have to do prior to the cloning so that Windows 10 knows that it is now on a RAID?

The RAID drive will look and act like a physical drive to Windows 10, providing it has the RAID drivers. As I mentioned in my first post you may need to use a tool to inject the RAID drivers into the installation, I know Paragon is capable of this using it's P2P Adjust OS function.

  • Like 2
  On 12/04/2016 at 14:24, jjkusaf said:

Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to phrase this in Google ... so I failed at figuring it out on my own.  Here is my plan:

 

Currently I have Windows 7 on my desktop.  I plan on buying another Samsung Pro 512 (same SSD my Windows 7 is on).  I'm going to clone my Windows 7 install to that drive and upgrade it to Windows 10 and then disconnect the "old" Windows 7 drive.  After a month or so...once I'm confident that everything is good to go ... I'm going to reconnect and format the "old" Windows 7 drive which will leave me a clean SSD.

 

What I would like to do ... is use that drive to create a RAID 0 ... but without reinstalling Windows 10.  Soooo....my question is ... is this possible?

 

Samsung Pro 512 - Windows 10  --->

Samsung Pro 512 - blank 

-->

2x Samsung Pros in RAID 0 = Windows 10 (without reinstall)

 

Or would it be best to clone the Windows 7 drive to my older OCZ SSD (which is currently blank) ... install Windows 10 ... make sure it works ... create a RAID 0 out of the two Samsung drives and then clone the OCZ to the newly created RAID 0.

 

Does that make sense?

 

I'm not very familiar with working with RAID in Windows (only Linux/FreeBSD/non-OS drives in Windows).

Expand  

If I were you, I wouldn't bother, seriously.

 

SSDs don't benefit from RAID 0 in the same way as HDDs do. Things will get a faster, yes, but not by a huge notable margin. SSDs are already insanely fast (the Samsung Pro 512 already maxes out SATA III bandwidth). Synthetic tests will surely show benefits, but you probably won't even notice a real-world difference.

 

There are mostly downsides to it. The biggest one: you literally double the risk of data loss. If one drive fails, you're effed, and recovering data from a broken SSD is a lot harder (& expensive) than from a broken HDD.

 

Also a very big deal: It's impossible on many RAID controllers to get TRIM to work, especially on on-board RAID controllers. If you're lucky to have one that can make it work, you need to pull a bunch of tricks to make the command to through from the OS. If you don't know what that means, forget about it altogether. 

 

 

 

 

Moving up from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is the best performance boost you can give your system. It's an OS designed to optimize SSDs and multi-core CPUs and it just runs beautifully on modern hardware. Don't listen to the idiots here who are stuck in the past.

  • Like 3
  On 12/04/2016 at 14:43, Open Minded said:

What happens if he wants more speed than a single SSD can offer? 

 

I have two SSDs in RAID 0 and it's great.  Who cares if it dies, I'm enjoying 1 GB/s transfer speeds.  I have everything I need backed up so it's no big deal if it dies.

 

 

Expand  

You get those fast transfers speeds between the two SSDs, but you'll still be bottlenecked when transferring to some other form of slower media.

 

I had two SSDs in RAID 0 for a while, and it was pretty much just a niche thing.  Besides benchmarks, it wasn't really good for anything.  I had the RAID array break a few times from updating firmware on the mobo and SSDs, which was sort of annoying.  In the end, it was just more economical to buy one large capacity SSD and simplify the entire system.  Less wiring, less configs, less risk, etc.

  On 12/04/2016 at 15:09, bluesman86 said:

If I were you, I wouldn't bother, seriously.

 

SSDs don't benefit from RAID 0 in the same way as HDDs do. Things will get a little bit faster, yes, but not by a huge margin. SSDs are already insanely fast (the Samsung Pro 512 already maxes out SATA III bandwidth). Synthetic tests will surely show benefits, but you probably won't even notice a real-world difference.

 

There are mostly downsides to it. The biggest one: you literally double the risk of data loss. If one drive fails, you're effed, and recovering data from a broken SSD is a lot harder (& expensive) than from a broken HDD.

 

Also a very big deal: It's impossible on many RAID controllers to get TRIM to work, especially on on-board RAID controllers. If you're lucky to have one that can make it work, you need to pull a bunch of tricks to make the command to through from the OS. If you don't know what that means, forget about it altogether. 

 

 

 

 

Moving up from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is the best performance boost you can give your system. It's an OS designed to optimize SSDs and multi-core CPUs and it just runs beautifully on modern hardware. Don't listen to the idiots here who are stuck in the past.

Expand  

Thanks.  After looking at benchmarks across various tech sites (I should have done this prior to asking the question) ... I've decided to forgo the RAID 0 plan.  Aside from the synthetic benchmarks .... "real world" gains were minimal and probably not worth the potential "pain" as you and others have pointed out.

 

New plan.  Clone existing Win 7 Samsung SSD to the new Samsung SSD.  Disconnect "old" Samsung and upgrade the new Samsung to Windows 10.  After a few weeks ... ensuring everything works ... wipe the "old" Samsung and use it as a new storage/program destination.  

 

Thanks everyone...and sorry for wasting your time.  (Y)  Mods...if you wish you can lock this thread.

  On 12/04/2016 at 15:09, bluesman86 said:

Moving up from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is the best performance boost you can give your system.

Expand  

I'm going to disagree with you, and this post has nothing to do with "bashing" Windows 10, as it is a fast OS. With that, I've ran Windows 7, and Windows 10, on the same Samsung 950 Pro SSD, and the performance difference is not there to the naked eye. Maybe on benchmarks Windows 10 is faster, however, the average Joe will not notice a huge speed bump, if any at all, on an already fast system. Lastly, moving from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is not the best performance boost you can give your system. That honor goes to many other hardware upgrades available out there. Again, Windows 10 is a fast OS, but I believe you are stretching it with the comment I quoted above.

  On 12/04/2016 at 15:40, JHBrown said:

I'm going to disagree with you, and this post has nothing to do with "bashing" Windows 10, as it is a fast OS. With that, I've ran Windows 7, and Windows 10, on the same Samsung 950 Pro SSD, and the performance difference is not there to the naked eye. Maybe on benchmarks Windows 10 is faster, however, the average Joe will not notice a huge speed bump, if any at all, on an already fast system. Lastly, moving from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is not the best performance boost you can give your system. That honor goes to many other hardware upgrades available out there. Again, Windows 10 is a fast OS, but I believe you are stretching it with the comment I quoted above.

Expand  

I'm going to disagree with you. 

 

I moved my wife back to Windows 7 and her performance is notably slower than 10. 

  On 12/04/2016 at 16:25, adrynalyne said:

I'm going to disagree with you. 

 

I moved my wife back to Windows 7 and her performance is notably slower than 10. 

Expand  

What are her hardware specs. Noticed where I mentioned an already fast system? Here's what I run, and there is no speed difference between the two OS's:

 

  • i7 5820K
  • 32GB DDR4(8GB x 4)
  • 512GB Samsung 950 Pro(OS)/1TB Samsung 850 Pro(Storage)
  • GTX 980TI

On that system Windows 10 ran just as fast as Windows 7.

 

 

  On 12/04/2016 at 15:40, JHBrown said:

I'm going to disagree with you, and this post has nothing to do with "bashing" Windows 10, as it is a fast OS. With that, I've ran Windows 7, and Windows 10, on the same Samsung 950 Pro SSD, and the performance difference is not there to the naked eye. Maybe on benchmarks Windows 10 is faster, however, the average Joe will not notice a huge speed bump, if any at all, on an already fast system. Lastly, moving from Windows 7 to Windows 10 is not the best performance boost you can give your system. That honor goes to many other hardware upgrades available out there. Again, Windows 10 is a fast OS, but I believe you are stretching it with the comment I quoted above.

Expand  

Benchmarks say otherwise. 10 IS faster. 

  On 12/04/2016 at 16:48, JHBrown said:

What are her hardware specs. Noticed where I mentioned an already fast system? Here's what I run, and there is no speed difference between the two OS's:

 

  • i7 5820K
  • 32GB DDR4(8GB x 4)
  • 512GB Samsung 950 Pro(OS)/1TB Samsung 850 Pro(Storage)
  • GTX 980TI

On that system Windows 10 ran just as fast as Windows 7.

 

 

Expand  

So what you are saying is, there is no performance difference because your hardware is recent? 

How about everyone else who does not have such recent hardware?

 

 

She has:

 

i7-2670QM

16GB DDR3

AMD something or another GPU

Samsung 840 Evo SSD

 

 

 

  On 12/04/2016 at 17:40, adrynalyne said:

So what you are saying is, there is no performance difference because your hardware is recent? 

How about everyone else who does not have such recent hardware?

Expand  

1. That's exactly what my original post said.

2. Buy new hardware

 

Please read my original post to @bluesman86. I was simply pointing out that an upgrade to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give your system. We all know an SSD takes that honor, and depending on the rest of your system, you may not even notice a huge performance difference. Like in my case. I'm not into benchmark numbers as that other member pointed out above, I care out the speed I notice in day-to-day activities on my computer.

  On 12/04/2016 at 17:54, JHBrown said:

1. That's exactly what my original post said.

2. Buy new hardware

 

Please read my original post to @bluesman86. I was simply pointing out that an upgrade to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give your system. We all know an SSD takes that honor, and depending on the rest of your system, you may not even notice a huge speed difference. Like in my case. I'm not into benchmark numbers as that other member pointed out above, I care out the speed I notice in day-to-day activities on my computer.

Expand  

How much does hardware cost vs Windows 10 upgrade in regards to performance?

 

Think outside the box a little. He didn't say fastest. He said best.

 

Also, OP has an SSD.

  On 12/04/2016 at 17:54, JHBrown said:

1. That's exactly what my original post said.

2. Buy new hardware

 

Please read my original post to @bluesman86. I was simply pointing out that an upgrade to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give your system. We all know an SSD takes that honor, and depending on the rest of your system, you may not even notice a huge speed difference. Like in my case. I'm not into benchmark numbers as that other member pointed out above, I care out the speed I notice in day-to-day activities on my computer.

Expand  

Well, then you are wrong. Numbers don't lie, 10 is faster whether you want to admit it or not. You might not see a huge difference, but there is a difference and numbers can back that up.

  On 12/04/2016 at 17:55, adrynalyne said:

How much does hardware cost vs Windows 10 upgrade in regards to performance?

 

Think outside the box a little. He didn't say fastest. He said best.

Expand  

Correct, he said best, however, an OS upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give a system. An $80 SSD is a better investment, versus a free upgrade to Windows 10. Of course that is my personal opinion @adrynalyne, and my different opportunity cost.:) If someone were to come to me for a performance issue on an older system, I would recommend hardware changes, versus upgrading to Windows 10.:yes:

  On 12/04/2016 at 18:01, JHBrown said:

Correct, he said best, however, an OS upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give a system. An $80 SSD is a better investment, versus a free upgrade to Windows 10. Of course that is my personal opinion @adrynalyne, and my different opportunity cost.:) If someone were to come to me for a performance issue on an older system, I would recommend hardware changes, versus upgrading to Windows 10.:yes:

Expand  

Your point is moot, we already have SSDs in this case.

  • Like 2
  On 12/04/2016 at 18:03, adrynalyne said:

Your point is moot, we already have SSDs in this case.

Expand  

Back to my original post, a change from Windows 7, to Windows 10, is not the best performance boost you can give your system.:)

  On 12/04/2016 at 15:02, jjkusaf said:

yea...I've thought about it ... but I've also thought about reinstalling all the programs/games :( ... which would take a very long time.  I'll have to uninstall a few things just to get the Win7 install to fit onto the smaller OCZ drive.

 

yea...that is what I'm wanting to achieve ... more speed w/o having to invest in a new mobo with NVMe. :)  Great advice though by Tomo ... to ensure that data is backed up frequently just incase one SSD fails...such advice should be given to everyone regardless of how their system is setup.

 

So...my new plan ....

 

Clone the current Win7 Samsung to the OCZ.  Disconnect the Samsung and upgrade the OCZ to Windows 10.  After a few weeks...ensuring Windows 10 is working properly....create a RAID 0 with the two Samsungs.  Clone the OCZ drive w/ Windows 10 over to the newly created Samsung RAID 0.  Win?  Surely there is something I have to do prior to the cloning so that Windows 10 knows that it is now on a RAID?

Expand  

I've seen M.2 PCIe adapters, thought about one of them?  That would also make the data migration easier, in theory.

  On 12/04/2016 at 21:10, Open Minded said:

I've seen M.2 PCIe adapters, thought about one of them?  That would also make the data migration easier, in theory.

Expand  

yea, the Z77 doesn't support booting from NVMe...though I've seen that you can mod the BIOS to do so.  However, I'm not willing to risk bricking the entire system in case I were to screw up. :)

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Teams is a happiness sucking piece of software design to make life horrible for those who use it. I am so glad I only use it once a week.
    • What's wrong with a CPU from 2021? I'm still using laptops with CPU's that came out 2018-2020 ... they run great.
    • It’s encouraging that Intel is still competing, the best they can, in the gpu space.
    • Windows 11 KB5062233/ KB5060843/ KB5062197/ KB5061090 setup, recovery updates released by Sayan Sen This week Microsoft released non-security preview updates for Windows 11 22H2 and 23H2 under KB5060826 as well as for 24H2 under KB5060829. The company also published dynamic updates alongside them. Dynamic updates bring improvements to the Windows Recovery in the form of Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) updates, also called Safe OS updates, as well as to the Setup binaries in the form of Setup updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. These packages include fixes to Setup.exe binaries, SafeOS updates for Windows Recovery Environment, and more. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. Both setup and recovery updates were released. The changelogs are given below. First up we have the Setup updates: Up next, we have the recovery updates: Microsoft notes that the Recovery updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel. The Setup updates, however, need to be downloaded and installed manually. You can avail them on Microsoft's Update Catalog website: KB5062233, KB5060843, KB5062197, and KB5061090.
    • Gaming mouse review: Keychron Lemokey G2 8K Wireless, high performance, light in weight by Robbie Khan Available in the UK and USA, the G2 is a wireless gaming mouse by Lemokey, the customised gaming peripheral arm of Keychron, a brand many readers will know well. I've checked out Keychron keyboards recently, models such as the top-tier Q6 Max, and the bargain priced B6 Pro. I never got the chance to check out the G1, but the G2 seems to put itself firmly in-between competing 8K gaming mice out there whilst coming in at a decent sum under £100/$100. The other benefit is that it uses Keychron Launcher, the web-based software that has been a staple part of Keychron keyboards for a long time now. I rate the launcher highly and have rarely had a problem with it, so it is great to see a robust piece of software being used on an affordable gaming mouse that's not only built well, but performs well, too. As it's a high performance gaming mouse with a flagship PixArt sensor, I will be comparing the G2 directly against my personal mouse, the similarly sized Pulsar Feinmann F01. Both mice are priced wildly differently, so it was interesting to compared several factors between them to see if one bests the other where it matters most, or if it just comes down to individual preferences. Let's check out the specs... Keychron Lemokey G2 SKU G2-A1 Sensor PixArt 3950 IPS 750 MCU Realtek 8762G Connectivity Bluetooth 5.1 / 2.4 GHz / Wired (type-C cable) Polling Rate Up to 8000 Hz (2.4 GHz / wired mode), 125 Hz (Bluetooth mode) Motion Sync Yes Angle Snapping Yes Acceleration 50g Cable Detachable Type-C to C Cable + Type-A to Type-C adapter Dongle Micro USB-A dongle Main switches Huano Micro Switch Switch lifespan 80 Million Clicks Battery 300 mAh Battery life 60 Hours (Under 1000Hz) 35 Hours (1000-4000Hz) 20 Hours (4000-8000Hz) Skates Teflon / PTFE Lift Off Distance 0.7 / 1.0 / 2.0 mm Material (Body and Grip) ABS Dimensions 118mm / 62.6mm / 38.2mm Tracks on glass (min. 4 mm thickness) Yes (max 1000Hz report rate) Weight 52 ± 3 g Colours Black / White Price £73.99 / $69.99 Fit and finish Made of all ABS, it certainly doesn't feel anywhere near as nice as the F01, but then again it's priced much lower, so no complaints there. To me it feels more like a previous generation Endgame/Zowie mouse, before they started to use the more grippy textured finish. It's a fine finish but how long that lasts only time will tell. With the Endgame mice I always found that the side buttons would go shiny first, and I suspect the exact same to apply here with the G2, since the size and shape of them is similar, as is the material quality. Speaking of side buttons, my personal preference is flat and large buttons, the long and pointed ones like those on the G2 shown above and GAMIAC PX71 at the bottom always felt a bit awkward to me for naturally resting a thumb on, whereas the large surface area of the ones found on the Feinmann and others like it feel more ergonomic and comfortable for long usage sessions. Pulsar Feinmann F01 (ergo shape) Lemokey G2 (ambidextrous shape) Under my 19cm hand, the G2 feels comfortable and stable for both claw and palm grip styles, though my usual style is a hybrid approach. I like to pinch a mouse with a thumb and ring finger, then articulate forward or backward movement with them to adapt to different play-styles. Both mice have a sloping back hump that works brilliantly for this and i had no problem getting comfortable with the G2 here. The underside of the G2 hides a cool feature I wish more more mice makers adopted, can you spot what it is in the photo below? That little flap at the bottom to store the USB dongle, it's convenient, especially for gamers who travel with their mice or laptop gamers. The skates applied are PTFE and cover three zones on the underside, sadly I forgot to take a photo of them before swapping them out to my preferred skates, the Wallhack Pro UWMP yellow dots. I found no problem with glide resistance on the stock skates, though find dots glide nicer overall and these yellow dots slide around like butter. Lemokey states 52g for the weight, give or take 3g, so my scales measure up perfectly here. It's not as lightweight as the Feinmann which currently is 45g, but it's still considered super-light and honestly, under the hand, this weight difference on dot skates is hard to tell apart. Gripping the G2 hard on both sides shows no obvious issues with flexing, so the internal construction is also up to scratch and exactly what i would expect in this price range. The differences start to be noticed when you are using the G2 as a combination mouse, both in gaming and desktop use. The wheel is thinner than the one on the Feinmann and other gaming mice with fat wheels. I much prefer a nice wide wheel, the diameter is also much larger as can be seen with the overhead photo above. The button tops also have a distinct difference in feel when actuating the switches. there is more of a hollow feel to the G2's tops, as well as slightly more travel post-click. the Huano switches feel and sound excellent, though, but I think the ABS contact surface on the outside could have been slightly more distinct in feel. Here is a demo of how the main switches sound, you can also hear the switch tops clap if you pay attention: Likewise the side buttons have extra play after the switches actuate, something the Feinmann and others in the higher price category don't tend to have. Features & software Aside from the usual features that all gaming mice support these days, such as Motion Sync, lift off distance and Macro, the big feature with the G2 is that is uses Keychron Launcher, the web-browser based software. All changes are stored directly onto the on-board memory, here is what the sections within it look like: I found no bugs with the implementation here, and unlike other Keychron wireless devices I have used with Launcher in the past, the G2 connects and can be customised in it over both wired and wireless. Just be aware that the firmware update option when connected via wireless will only check the dongle's firmware. To check the G2's firmware, a USB cable will need to be connected. Performance Whether on the desktop in Windows or in games, the cursor and motion performance is excellent, though this is to be expected from all modern gaming mice, regardless of price. The higher priced mice tend to have better use of high quality materials, and implementation of software and physical features. I'm currently pacing through nine games, all mixed genre, and in each of them I had no troubles quickly getting comfortable with the G2. If you're used to an Endgame XM2we sized mouse, then this will be just as familiar to you. The convenience of the DPI button at the top of the mouse instead of underside makes instant switching simpler, although the button can be remapped to do something else for those who don't care about DPI toggling. Here is a demo of the G2 playing Doom: The Dark Ages: The sensor tracking performance at 8K was perfect, aside from the few moments my physical movement on the mousepad slowed down causing some drops in the Razer mouse tracking measurement graph below: A consistent 7900-8000Hz polling was observed, though keep in mind that using such high polling rates will impact CPU performance whilst gaming. How much this affects framerates will boil down to the CPU you have. On my i7 12700KF there was no change whilst gaming, but during the measurement above I did observe 13% CPU package utilisation. In practice, though, I saw no performance difference playing at 8K versus 2K or even 1K. Battery life will drastically be impacted at 8K polling rates for obvious reasons, and whilst many prefer 4K, there is a growing trend to just stick to 2K which feels the safe middle ground of great battery performance, whilst still being suitably responsive on paper for even the most fast-paced of gaming sessions. Conclusion The Lemokey G2 has proven to be a rather excellent mouse, not just for gaming, but general use, too. Though being excellent doesn't give it any special status, as there are equally excellent mice out there that cost the same, less and even more. A buying decision will come down to individual needs, do you value the use of a browser-based software tool like Keychron Launcher? If so, then this is right up your street. Do you want something lightweight but also supports the gaming features and feel in the hand as more expensive mice? Maybe the G2 will satisfy. It's not totally perfect, nothing ever is, the thumb buttons could have been a bit wider, and the switch caps have more travel after clicking than what I am comfortable with, but otherwise this is a great mouse with features that rival the competition. The sensors on gaming mice these days isn't a key selling factor any more either, since even entry level gaming mice are capable of precision tracking and speed that was only possible on the top-tier models of the past, like many things in tech now, the point of diminishing returns has been reached, and brands have to work harder at giving us consumers a unique selling point to attract interest. I believe the G2 has at least one USP (Keychron Launcher), it also helps that it's a very comfortable mouse to use for all-day sessions.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      icecreamconesleeves earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Shahmir Shoaib earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      564
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      189
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      185
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      113
    5. 5
      Xenon
      109
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!