The Windows Enthusiast vs Everyone else.


Recommended Posts

A person recently pointed out a word Paul Thurrott used to describe everyone who is loves to run and install the latest and greatest version windows on their machine or on their test machine. They love to install the new build of Windows 10 Anniversary addition (or a new version of Windows) he calls them “Windows Enthusiasts”.

 

Windows Enthusiasts are a good portion of users on this site. So who isn’t a Windows Enthusiast? Everyone else.

 

It’s an important distinction to make. When people say, “People should cash in on the Windows 10 upgrade… It’s Free!!!!!!  it’s much better than windows 7 INSTALL IT!!!!!!!!!! IT'S AWESOME!!!!!!!”.

 

They say this because for them they love to install latest and greatest and want to see everyone do the same. (Sure some people have to install it  because they need to program for or test against it while developing applications)

 

I Personally I have windows 10 running on All but 2 of my 9 machines.

 

Then again, I’m an Enthusiasts, who, because I do computer repair have to be running the latest and greatest so I can help people with their machines.

 

But my mom, my Dad, my sister, my friends and every non Enthusiast I know, really doesn’t care. Now this isn’t to say all of them aren’t going to install windows 10 on purpose or by accident and not love it. Some might some won't.

 

But they might also like what they have and take stability and “it just works” over the latest and greatest.

 

So just remember while you love to dive into the latest and greatest you are the minority.

 

I am a Windows Enthusiast but I only run the insider builds in a VM. I like my main machine to be stable. It is the same reason I run the current channels for Office 365 and Visual Studio :yes:

 

I used to have multiple machines but now I just stick with two laptops, one for Windows and one for Linux. I used to prefer my Linux systems over Windows but with Windows 10 and Visual Studio 2015 I find myself using Windows more and more. It is stable, looks pretty good, has lots of nice little window management tweaks and is easy to manage. Then again I mostly use "portable apps" rather than installed versions of the same thing. I love self-contained programs that sit in my C:\bin directory and don't make a mess in AppData, Roaming, Registry, etc. Backing them up, using multiple versions of the same program, etc. is so simple this way. Actually the only programs I have installed are Office, Visual Studio, Chrome and WinRAR :) Everything else is in C:\bin nice and tidy. 

 

installedapps.png

1 minute ago, adrynalyne said:

So what does that make me?

 

I have a laptop on the latest Insider, and workstation with 1511, and a home computer running OS X and who knows what version of 10.

Enthusiast, just for the fact you have any machine running the latest insider build.

 

Just now, warwagon said:

Enthusiast, just for the fact you have any machine running the latest insider build.

 

And if my reasoning is because I am a developer and need to see how my applications work with it? My laptop is strictly for development.

6 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

And if my reasoning is because I am a developer and need to see how my applications work with it? My laptop is strictly for development.

well, the only reason I haven't tried full time Linux, is because I don't think they have a gotoassist client. Though i'm sure I Could run it in a VM.

 

Ok, so there are Enthusiasts (which i'm still going to say are a good protion of the people here)

People who need to run it for testing

People who need to run for other reasons

Everyone else.

13 minutes ago, warwagon said:

well, the only reason I haven't tried full time Linux, is because I don't think they have a gotoassist client. Though i'm sure I Could run it in a VM.

 

Ok, so there are Enthusiasts (which i'm still going to say are a good protion of the people here)

People who need to run it for testing

People who need to run for other reasons

Everyone else.

Your first post also had a kind of catagory for people who were running Windows but happy with 7 or 8, and found no compelling reason to upgrade to 10. These people would also most likely not object to upgrading to 10 if someone pointed out the free upgrade is about to expire. Not enthusiats at all but they like Windows.

 

Then there are Windows 7 and 8 users who argue passionately for the virtues of 7 or 8 and dislike 10 who are obviously "Windows Enthusiasts"

 

46 minutes ago, satysin said:

I am a Windows Enthusiast but I only run the insider builds in a VM. I like my main machine to be stable. It is the same reason I run the current channels for Office 365 and Visual Studio :yes:

 

I used to have multiple machines but now I just stick with two laptops, one for Windows and one for Linux. I used to prefer my Linux systems over Windows but with Windows 10 and Visual Studio 2015 I find myself using Windows more and more. It is stable, looks pretty good, has lots of nice little window management tweaks and is easy to manage. Then again I mostly use "portable apps" rather than installed versions of the same thing. I love self-contained programs that sit in my C:\bin directory and don't make a mess in AppData, Roaming, Registry, etc. Backing them up, using multiple versions of the same program, etc. is so simple this way. Actually the only programs I have installed are Office, Visual Studio, Chrome and WinRAR :) Everything else is in C:\bin nice and tidy. 

 

installedapps.png

Somewhat unrelated. I HATE WITH ALL MY GUTS having to install 10 .net frameworks and 10 c++ redestributable 11.111.111  then 11.111.111.0.1, How hard is it for then to have an incluse package ? 

Mind you I know nothing about frameworks and C++ so be kind :p

4 minutes ago, Stoffel said:

I don't get the point of the OP.

1. Its in "General Discussion" and so doesn't need a point.

 

2. He is trying to put forward the hypothesis that a website designed for Windows Enthusiasts is actually visited by Windows Enthusiasts and can be proven by looking at anecdotal mentions of installations of pre-release versions of Windows 10 and everyone else running Windows is actually sharing their cat pictures on Facebook instead of visiting Neowin.

 

Just now, DevTech said:

1. Its in "General Discussion" and so doesn't need a point.

 

2. He is trying to put forward the hypothesis that a website designed for Windows Enthusiasts is actually visited by Windows Enthusiasts and can be proven by looking at anecdotal mentions of installations of pre-release versions of Windows 10 and everyone else running Windows is actually sharing their cat pictures on Facebook instead of visiting Neowin.

 

Uh, we here at Neowin do the same as those people on Facebook. The only difference is the OS: :unsure: 

 

 

20 minutes ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Somewhat unrelated. I HATE WITH ALL MY GUTS having to install 10 .net frameworks and 10 c++ redestributable 11.111.111  then 11.111.111.0.1, How hard is it for then to have an incluse package ? 

Mind you I know nothing about frameworks and C++ so be kind :p

The latest .NET Framework is included with Windows 10 and auto updates with Windows Update. Same with C++ redist.

 

It should be this simple:

 

http://getdotnet.azurewebsites.net/

 

Sometimes it becomes this:

 

http://getdotnet.azurewebsites.net/target-dotnet-platforms.html

 

 

It is not Microsoft's fault if developers of software make dependencies on specific versions of either package, but it can easily happen when the pressures of actually shipping software forces a "temporary" version specific code. And then software hits EOL and it's cheaper to include an old redist than update the code. Etc.

 

Your frustration is actually a "Good Thing (TM)" since it is a testament to the richness and diversity and longevity of the Windows Ecosystem. It is mind blowing amazing that all this stuff runs so well on so many computers for so long a time in a fast changing tech world.

 

For .NET, installing 3.5 and 4.6.x covers 99%

 

For C++ redist, the developer is suposed to include it, but the latest security update of the redist for 2008, 2010, 2013 and 2015 covers most of the scenarios.

 

If you actually run into this issue a lot, then you are installing a vast array of software and getting full advantage of the WIndows Ecosystem!

 

(I think people on MDL have some nice bundle packages of all the redist installs if you want to pre-pollute a fresh Windows install with years of accumulated crustyness/garbage on the first day.)

 

For the future, the Windows 10 UWP App deployment has an option to include all the dependencies in the App package much like a "portable" install would work but it remains to be seen if developers will see an advantage to bloating up their code like that.

 

 

 

I would probably call myself a Windows enthusiast because I'm interested in how it develops. I'm a strong believer in where PowerShell is going. However I haven't run an insider build since Windows 10 was released though.

 

But then I'd also call myself a GNU/Linux enthusiast. :)

 

This has a tendency to confuse people.

1 hour ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Somewhat unrelated. I HATE WITH ALL MY GUTS having to install 10 .net frameworks and 10 c++ redestributable 11.111.111  then 11.111.111.0.1, How hard is it for then to have an incluse package ? 

Mind you I know nothing about frameworks and C++ so be kind :p

I don't know anything about the .NET stuff but the C++ redistributables are just one set for each major release of Visual Studio, so you have a 32-bit and 64-bit version for 2012, 2013 and 2015. 

2 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

So what does that make me?

 

I have a laptop on the latest Insider, a workstation with 1511, and a home computer running OS X and who knows what version of 10.

a tech slut :D like everyone on here

55 minutes ago, DevTech said:

For the future, the Windows 10 UWP App deployment has an option to include all the dependencies in the App package much like a "portable" install would work but it remains to be seen if developers will see an advantage to bloating up their code like that.

So...here is a question ... and forgive me if it sounds ignorant.  I'm not a programmer, though I've been working on an Android app for (well it seems) forever.  Aside from this little Android app and some old school HTML...the most I've done is: 
10 Print "Hello"

20 End

 

Anyway, so you pointed out that UWP Apps will include "all" dependencies in the package.  Now, would I be wrong in saying that this could cause increase in program sizes and potentially security concerns?  

 

For example...two separate UWP apps require some .NET 4.6 dependency.  The user has .NET 4.6 installed the "traditional" way.  Now, with the UWP App ... are you saying that in addition to the traditional .NET 4.6 install ... that the UWP will include their own .NET 4.6 dependencies ... instead of utilizing the ones already on the machine...thus increasing some "bloat"?  Couldn't this potentially cause security issues as well?  Say that a severe exploit was discovered in 4.6, Microsoft patches it ... but wouldn't it be up to the individual developer to ensure their UWP Apps gets patched with their own .NET 4.6 dependencies?  So instead of Microsoft patching the exploit rendering your w32 programs "good to go" ... you also have to wait for the developers to release the patch for their Apps ... until then they are vulnerable to whatever .NET exploit was uncovered and already patched by MS?  I understand that UWP is sandboxed ... but just pretend the exploit causes some kind of personal data leakage and not system compromise.  

 

Just curious and sorry if it doesn't make sense.  Just trying to get a better idea of how these included dependencies work from a security + size standpoint.

 

 

Regarding the topic.  I vote@vcfanas the Windows Enthusiast for May 2016.  Got Windows '95 running on an XBox. :)

 

1 minute ago, Gary7 said:

Why do you need 9 machines?? I like Windows 10 and have used every release of Windows along with Linux for a tad but 9 Machines,,:wacko:

It's actually very easy to accumulate rigs

I have 5 pc's (8 if you count the ones I salvaged) all in working order, 2 laptops, 6 tablets 4 current gen smartphones, 4 old gen (8 total) 5 consoles....

 

They all add up over the years, and before you know it...............

  • Like 2

If you do break fix you're probably better off running the same old crap they are.  "It just works" isn't a Windows specific phenomena, which really seems to be the core of your argument.  Computing, Windows or not, doesn't stand still.  There are users and then there is everyone else.

2 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

So...here is a question ... and forgive me if it sounds ignorant.  I'm not a programmer, though I've been working on an Android app for (well it seems) forever.  Aside from this little Android app and some old school HTML...the most I've done is: 
10 Print "Hello"

20 End

 

Anyway, so you pointed out that UWP Apps will include "all" dependencies in the package.  Now, would I be wrong in saying that this could cause increase in program sizes and potentially security concerns?  

 

For example...two separate UWP apps require some .NET 4.6 dependency.  The user has the traditional install of .NET 4.6 which some of their w32 programs use.  Now, with the UWP App ... are you saying that in addition to the traditional .NET 4.6 install ... that the UWP will include their own .NET 4.6 dependencies ... instead of utilizing the ones already on the machine...increasing "bloat"?  Couldn't this potentially cause security issues as well?  Say that a severe exploit was discovered in 4.6, Microsoft patches it ... but wouldn't it be up to the individual developers to ensure their UWP Apps get patched?  I understand that UWP is sandboxed ... but just pretend the exploit causes some kind of personal data leakage and not system compromise.

 

Just curious and sorry if it doesn't make sense.

 

 

Regarding the topic.  I vote@vcfanas the Windows Enthusiast for May 2016.  Got Windows '95 running on an XBox. :)

 

1. It is optional.

 

2. UWP does not use the standard .NET framework but instead a subset that is part of the UWP programming model partly due to the sandbox, partly due to battery life efficiency and partly due to a "clean break" philosophy that motivated incorporating part of .NET and WPF/XAML into the Windows API. And a new difference is that all Windows 10 UWP programs (I'm not sure about the Javascript ones) go through a backend Visual C++ Native Complier to generate efficient machine code which removes some runtime and reflection capabilities etc.

 

3. If a developer decides to include 3rd party code including Microsoft's into his/her app then the security becomes the developer's responsibility.

 

4. As a minor note, all of the breaches of user data on the internet come from completely brain dead programming on the part of big name corporations that are completely irresponsible. It comes from a silly pre-digital age mindset that views security as a "castle wall" that needs defending. Good security is all about encryption. Let the hackers have your 60 million  user database if they want to waste their time building a Quantum Computer and running it for a million years to break your encryption. This is so basic that I am blown away every time I hear about a massive breach by yet another well known internet site. It just keeps happenning like a sad song in a deadbeat piano bar because the encryption key broke on that piano years ago and they just play their music without it.

 

 

16 minutes ago, The Evil Overlord said:

It's actually very easy to accumulate rigs

I have 5 pc's (8 if you count the ones I salvaged) all in working order, 2 laptops, 6 tablets 4 current gen smartphones, 4 old gen (8 total) 5 consoles....

 

They all add up over the years, and before you know it...............

Also, any "Evil Overlord" needs lots of minions...

 

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!