Recommended Posts

 Benchmark your browsers online with JetStream

JetStream is a JavaScript benchmark suite focused on the most advanced web applications.Bigger scores are better.

 

Here is my results

PS For better results disable your addons and extentions.I didn't because I wanted to see their performances in real situations

 

 

Untitled-.jpg

Edited by EliasV
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1299586-benchmark-your-browsers-online/
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, raid0 said:

Ok, laptop 73.409 (Core i3 1st gen, ssd, Wifi) and Multimedia PC 144.06 (Core i5 3rd gen, ssd, powerline). My ISP is 30D/10U.

 

All using chrome and all in sync (extensions also).

That means except how well a browser is made by its developers,hardware thing is very important (as it should be)

Somehow I find it hard to believe the TOR browser is the best of the lot, being based on an older version of Firefox. Must be something to do with the special plugins the browser uses.

browserscores.png

2 hours ago, Buttus said:

i got 24.145 on my galaxy s5 in chrome...   LOL

Interesting.  Got a 28.184 on my LG G2 in Chrome.  Isn't the G2 older than the S5?

 

Edit:  Disregard ... got a 23.449 (noticed afterwards it was making three runs)

 

3 hours ago, Gary7 said:

Some of the results may be influenced by the speed of your internet connection.

Source?  I do not think any of the scores are influenced by your connection.  I read over the in-depth analysis and couldn't see anything referring to internet speeds affecting scores.

Edited by jjkusaf
Correction
41 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Interesting.  Got a 28.184 on my LG G2 in Chrome.  Isn't the G2 older than the S5?

 

Edit:  Disregard ... got a 23.449 (noticed afterwards it was making three runs)

 

Source?  I do not think any of the scores are influenced by your connection.  I read over the in-depth analysis and couldn't see anything referring to internet speeds affecting scores.

No source. He is incorrect. These are JS tests which are strictly hardware and browser based. 

  • Like 2
43 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Interesting.  Got a 28.184 on my LG G2 in Chrome.  Isn't the G2 older than the S5?

 

Edit:  Disregard ... got a 23.449 (noticed afterwards it was making three runs)

 

Source?  I do not think any of the scores are influenced by your connection.  I read over the in-depth analysis and couldn't see anything referring to internet speeds affecting scores.

I do not need a source for my opinion, If the test is to determine the speed of a Browser then the tests to be totally accurate would have to be run on the same equipment.

17 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I do not need a source for my opinion, If the test is to determine the speed of a Browser then the tests to be totally accurate would have to be run on the same equipment.

What you stated did not come off as your "opinion" ... it came off as factual like you had some inside knowledge...which is why I inquired.  If it was your opinion it should have been preceded by ... in my opinion "Some of the results may be influenced by the speed of your internet connection."

 

It is the speed of the browser on YOUR equipment.  You can load up Firefox, IE, Chrome, etc...and run the test(s) to see which scores higher on your equipment.  My Chrome scores will be different on my notebook vs my desktop ... because well the desktop is more powerful.

 

Anyway ... still have no idea why you think the speed of your internet has influence ... which is why I was asking for a source.

 

Edit.  Also just did a test.  Once the page loads ... you can disconnect your internet ... hit the "Start Test" button ... and it'll go through and do all the test without an internet connection.  So no...internet connection doesn't matter.

Edited by jjkusaf

170.68


Chrome 64-bit, Windows 10 Insider (Fast Ring), Lenovo Y510P (i7-4700MQ, 16-GB DDR) 4 tabs open.....Pandora, Neowin, JetStream (obviously), and Google Hangouts, lol. My phone gets a 0......(because I don't have one anymore)

 

Edit: Closed the Hangouts tab, got a 162.01 on a second run. Ummm......?

Edited by Obi-Wan Kenobi
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Well I've done a grand total of nothing, and it now clocks between 2010mhz and 1995mhz (stock is 1710mhz) and hovers around 80c, warmer than it used to, but tolerable clocks seem to have returned. Thanks for all the advice on this thread. Will review the evidence and make a choice.
    • Audacious 4.6.1 by Razvan Serea Audacious is a lightweight, open-source audio player that emphasizes simplicity, performance, and sound quality. Designed for Linux, Windows, and macOS, it supports a wide range of audio formats, internet radio streaming, and playlist management. Users can customize the interface with Winamp-style skins or modern themes, making it flexible for different preferences. Audacious also includes an equalizer, advanced audio effects, and a plugin system for extending functionality. Its low resource usage makes it especially suitable for older computers or users who value efficiency without sacrificing playback quality. Audacious key features: High audio quality – delivers clean, gapless playback with minimal distortion. Wide format support – plays MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC, WAV, WMA, and more. Internet radio streaming – supports Shoutcast, Icecast, and other online streams. Winamp skin support – classic, nostalgic look for users who prefer the old-school style. Modern GTK-based interface – clean, simple UI with a more modern feel. Customizable themes – change appearance through skins and themes. Advanced playlist management – organize, save, and edit playlists with ease. Equalizer – fine-tune audio output with a built-in graphical equalizer. Audio effects – built-in DSP options like crossfade, replay gain, and more. Plugin system – extend functionality with additional components. File metadata support – displays and organizes music based on tags. Drag-and-drop support – quickly add songs or playlists. Global hotkey support – control playback without switching windows. Bit-perfect output modes – bypass system mixers for pure audio output. ReplayGain support – normalizes track loudness automatically. Cue sheet support – play entire albums from a single audio file with .cue. MPRIS2 integration – integrates with Linux desktop environments for media controls. Advanced resampling options – adjust playback quality with different resampler settings. Gapless playback – seamless transition between tracks encoded properly. Crossfade plugin – blend one song into the next smoothly. Last.fm scrobbling plugin – track listening history online. Remote control support – control Audacious via command-line or scripts. Lyrics plugin – display song lyrics if available. Alarm / timer plugin – start or stop playback at set times. SOX resampler plugin – high-quality resampling for audiophiles. Spectrum analyzer / visualization plugins – visual feedback while playing music. Headphone crossfeed effect – simulates speaker listening for headphones. Customizable buffer size – tweak latency and playback smoothness. Audacious 4.6.1 changelog: Use XDG cache dir to store temporary files (#1817) Accept embedded lyrics in more cases (#1818) Bump .so and plugin ABI versions retrospectively (#1819) Include Georgian translation (#1820) Fix build on systems using musl instead of glibc (#1823) Download: Audacious 4.6.1 | 48.2 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable Audacious 4.6.1 | 69.8 MB View: Audacious Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I really wonder if this has to do with the built in VPN or "private DNS" of browsers that trip up legal requirements like cookie consent and Cloudflare (to avoid all the botnet attacks we get). And BTW some botnets still manage to get past Cloudflare, we are constantly having to tweak it to block malicious traffic that ultimately cause a DDoS.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!