Test your AV with a sample .js javascript file. Will your AV let you run it?


Recommended Posts

After the news story on the front page about New ransomware variant coded entirely on Javascript, exploits macros

 

I decided to do a test.

 

The EICAR anti-malware test file was developed by the European Institute for EICAR. The EICAR test file is a legitimate DOS program that is detected as malware by anti-virus software. When the test file runs successfully (if it is not detected and blocked), it prints the message "EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!".

X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Pasted it into notepad and saved it as hello.js

 

Then double clicked on Hello.js on the desktop and got this prompt

 

Capture.JPG.b767027a7445b81bac9ca6acc16d

 

So try it yourself and post your result of your Antivirus.

 

if it runs you should see a Microsoft JScript Compilation error

 

 

 

 

I imagine most AV software wouldn't care, as it's clearly not malicious code that's going to trigger any of their heuristic scanning. There's not going to be any signatures that match such a simple and harmless script either. This is basically a useless test.

  On 21/06/2016 at 18:26, DaveLegg said:

I imagine most AV software wouldn't care, as it's clearly not malicious code that's going to trigger any of their heuristic scanning. There's not going to be any signatures that match such a simple and harmless script either. This is basically a useless test.

Expand  

Because the AV is relying on it's signatures to detect what's going to run inside the .js file, as a good rule of thumb an AV should stop and prompt you if you are sure you want to run the JS file.

A good AV will not detect this file as malicious. The file is NOT malicious, so any prompts are false positives, which confuse users and affect productivity in the workplace.

 

This thread should be deleted to avoid confusion.

 

  On 21/06/2016 at 18:45, er0n said:

A good AV will not detect this file as malicious. The file is NOT malicious, so any prompts are false positives, which confuse users and affect productivity in the workplace.

 

This thread should be deleted to avoid confusion.

Expand  

I kind of like the fact that my AV "Secureaplus" prompts me about any js file, period.  If the AV you've described hasn't gotten the definition file yet, it allows it to run,. When are regular users needing to run js files on the desktop?

  On 21/06/2016 at 18:51, warwagon said:

 

I kind of like the fact that my AV "Secureaplus" prompts me about any js file, period.  If the AV you've described hasn't gotten the definition file yet, it allows it to run,. When are regular users needing to run js files on the desktop?

Expand  

That's not the point.

 

MOST people aren't security-savvy enough to know whether they should allow the file to run or not. Most scripts will be legitimate so the user will have to approve them in order to do what they want. They end up with alert-fatigue and will probably just approve everything.

 

MOST AVs have the ability to configure detection prompts for scripts or even unknown files.

 

Your posts suggests that your hello world script is a legitimate test for the effectiveness of an AV. Which it is certainly not!

 

Edit: And if you're convinced that users don't need to run these scripts, just disable the ability to execute them in Windows https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee198684.aspx

  On 21/06/2016 at 18:50, er0n said:

Don't waste your time!

 

Expand  

I actually decided to use the eicar test text instead and see what would happen. That was always caught as soon as I saved it as a .js file.

  On 21/06/2016 at 20:04, purrcher said:

I actually decided to use the eicar test text instead and see what would happen. That was always caught as soon as I saved it as a .js file.

Expand  

Great! Good job!

  On 21/06/2016 at 20:04, purrcher said:

I actually decided to use the eicar test text instead and see what would happen. That was always caught as soon as I saved it as a .js file.

Expand  

http://www.eicar.org/download/eicar.com.txt

  On 21/06/2016 at 20:09, xendrome said:
Expand  

basically. What I did was I opened Notepad++ and pasted the sniped from http://www.eicar.org/86-0-Intended-use.html and then tried saving it as a ,js file.

This is well known by all antivirus products, and is nothing new. Of course they're going to catch it! If they didn't, then I'd be worried! Therefore, this thread is like a midget without an index finger....short and pointless.

Running Kaspersky Total Security, and the moment I save the file, it disappears, no error, but I tried it three times with explorer open in the background and it seems kaspsersky deleted it right away.

ClamAV on Linux picks it up.  If I recall correctly though, the EICAR test file should get picked up by just about any antivirus regardless of what you name it or what extension you give it, as long as that string of text is the first line of the file.

Screenshot from 2016-06-23 21:53:20.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They always have. This just updates what's included out of the box during the initial install.
    • So basically their prebuilding it into the ISOs?
    • Microsoft shares Defender anti-virus update for new Windows 11/10 ISOs by Sayan Sen Following the one for Lumma last month, Microsoft has also published a new Defender update for Windows 11/10/Server installation images this month. This update package is necessary as a Windows installation image may contain old, outdated anti-malware definitions and software binaries. Aside from better security, these updates can also provide improved performance benefits in some cases. When a new Windows installation is set up, there may be a temporary security risk due to outdated Microsoft Defender protection in the OS installation images. This happens because the antimalware software included in these images might not be up to date. Thus Microsoft says that these updated definitions essentially help close this protection gap. Microsoft delivered the latest security definitions for Windows images via security intelligence update version 1.431.54.0. The Defender package version is also the same. It applies to Windows 11, Windows 10 (Enterprise, Pro, and Home editions), Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2019, and Windows Server 2016. Microsoft writes: From Microsoft's security bulletin, we learn that the security intelligence update version 1.431.54.0 was released this past week adds threat detections for various backdoor exploits, trojans, among others. For those wondering, the latest intelligence update is version 1.431.155.0 at the time of writing.
    • “In other news about OneDrive frustration, Microsoft recently locked out a user who was attempting to move a bunch of important data from old hard drives to OneDrive.” - It was probably CSMA..
    • Just what I needed! An extremely expensive pair of sunglasses that I will lose and cannot use indoors. My life will be complete. I trust Meta AI watching my entire life happen. It's going to be the best ever!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      SekTheFirst earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      zayanhani earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      HarryTaylor earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      651
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      233
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      226
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      140
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      139
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!