Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a quick question. I will be building a PC for my brother and I have a question on the amount of DDR4 RAM sticks I should go with. Should I go with 2 or 4? Is it recommended to have all 4 slots filled?

Also, what speed should they be? Would DDR4-3200 be fine, or is the minimum enough?

 

The basic specs would be:

Asus Maximus VIII Hero

i7-6700K or i5-6600K

Still need to chose an M.2

 

Many thanks!

 

 

 

choosing appropriate RAM these days doesnt matter like it used to. DDR4 is super fast, timings are always really high, but they dont matter with Intel CPUs like they used to either.

 

as for slots - doesnt matter either. If you find that 4x8GB is cheaper than 2x16GB, go for it.

7 minutes ago, conna said:

I would go with two 16 or 8 GB sticks. Later you can fill the remaining 2 slots with matching memory when he can afford it. 

I never found a use for using all 4 slots. Some of the 3rd party CPU coolers covers up a slot...

I would always go for 2 modules if possible, give you room to upgrade with just buying 2 extra modules in the future rather than having to rip out and chuck all 4 just to get an upgrade.

2x8GB would be my recomendation for a modern system.

 

DDR4-3200 is about as low as you want to go, as much as DDR4 is very fast its also got higher latencys than DDR3, so you need to be about 2666 to get any improvement and above 3000 for anything significant.

Many thanks for your feedback!

 

The PC will mainly be used for gaming with a 24'' Full HD Monitor. I was thinking about getting him 16GB in 2x 8GB, as that way later he can simply add another 2x 8GB if he needs more, instead of replacing the 4 sticks with new ones. There is also no plan to overclock, except for what the Mainboard does automatically.

 

I think in that case I will then go with 2x 8GB sticks. I had the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB DDR4-3200 marked down. The slower sticks are 2€ less, so it won't be about the price.

I wanted to get an aftermarket cooler, something silent. Probably BeQuiet or Noctua. I have a Noctual myself and had problems with my RAM sticks having high dissipators, so I will see if I can get with some that are lower profile.

5 minutes ago, Odom said:

Many thanks for your feedback!

 

The PC will mainly be used for gaming with a 24'' Full HD Monitor. I was thinking about getting him 16GB in 2x 8GB, as that way later he can simply add another 2x 8GB if he needs more, instead of replacing the 4 sticks with new ones. There is also no plan to overclock, except for what the Mainboard does automatically.

 

I think in that case I will then go with 2x 8GB sticks. I had the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB DDR4-3200 marked down. The slower sticks are 2€ less, so it won't be about the price.

I wanted to get an aftermarket cooler, something silent. Probably BeQuiet or Noctua. I have a Noctual myself and had problems with my RAM sticks having high dissipators, so I will see if I can get with some that are lower profile.

You could also look into a closed loop water cooler.  The radiator can mount to one of the exhaust fan locations and then the CPU will only have a small heatplate mounted to it.  You won't need to worry about the RAM getting in the way then.  I've been using the Corsair ones for several years and they're great.  Cools really well and nice and silent.

I've been thinking about those for a very long time (even for my own machine), but was never really convinced. When it comes to noise, I can never find a consensus in the reviews. Some say it is silent, others say that compared to the high-quality Noctua coolers they are not so quiet, so I am always torn in deciding for one or not. I love the look of the Corsair ones, though :)

 

I was looking at the Be Quiet Dark Base 900 to put everything in, and it does have multiple locations to fit radiators of all sizes.

Quote

How many DDR4 sticks should I go with?

 

 

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

 

 

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

that is the worst suggestion I've heard in a long time :laugh:

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

42 ... 42 is always the answer.  42 sticks of RAM.  42 is why the server is down.

 

I would, for the most part, always suggest 2 sticks of RAM (like 2x8GB) ... gives you room in the future to expand.  I also think for the most part 2 higher capacity chips will be cheaper than four lower capacity ones.

 

2 hours ago, Odom said:

I've been thinking about those for a very long time (even for my own machine), but was never really convinced. When it comes to noise, I can never find a consensus in the reviews. Some say it is silent, others say that compared to the high-quality Noctua coolers they are not so quiet, so I am always torn in deciding for one or not. I love the look of the Corsair ones, though :)

 

I was looking at the Be Quiet Dark Base 900 to put everything in, and it does have multiple locations to fit radiators of all sizes.

I will say water coolers are nice ... sure saves bloody knuckles when you get to get into the case (like changing out memory)...plus you don't have to worry if this or that fits with the cooler...etc.  Saves some headache.  Personally, I would never put another tower cooler in my PC....feels so roomy around the mobo without one.  Just my opinion though. :) 

While 42 is a very nice number , it is an answer to everything in a fictitious book. It isn't an answer to everything here. The answer has to be prime, something that goes everything nicely, that fits like a glove or in a glove, it needs to open and accepting but also firm and doesn't take crap, it also has to be confirming. 42 can never do any of that.

1 hour ago, jjkusaf said:

 

 

I will say water coolers are nice ... sure saves bloody knuckles when you get to get into the case (like changing out memory)...plus you don't have to worry if this or that fits with the cooler...etc.  Saves some headache.  Personally, I would never put another tower cooler in my PC....feels so roomy around the mobo without one.  Just my opinion though. :) 

Same here, got an H60 on sale, couldn't believe how dead simple it was to install and how much more room I have inside my case, also very quiet even when maxing the cpu.

 

No more air cooling for me.

Cool, I'll look into water cooling then. Always wanted to have one of those, guess now the time is as good as any to give it a go.

 

And thanks again for all the tips on the RAM. I'm sure I won't be able to fit 42 into the Hero mobo, but I'll try putting in 5 (Y)

17 hours ago, Odom said:

Cool, I'll look into water cooling then. Always wanted to have one of those, guess now the time is as good as any to give it a go.

 

And thanks again for all the tips on the RAM. I'm sure I won't be able to fit 42 into the Hero mobo, but I'll try putting in 5 (Y)

The water is the way to go - quiet, leaves lots of space and clamps the CPU temps rock solid which is hard to explain but there is a qualitative difference that seals the deal for me.

 

You can increase the efficiency by reversing the fans on a typical mounting so that the fans blow into the case. That way, cool air enters the radiator. You end up with more hot air inside the case but a single fan of almost any sort blowing on the motherboard handles that easily and the net gain is significant.

 

For RAM, it is a myth that modern mobos don't have issues. The cautious approach would be to buy RAM actually tested by ASUS for that motherboard. You will find the list on their website.

 

From the dawn of time, non-server mobos have always had a harder time driving 4 slots over 2 slots so definitely start with 2 maxed out.

 

The speed of the RAM does not matter an any way so get the best price. It is completely backwards to say the reason for this is because the RAM is fast. It is because the RAM is insanely SLOW compared to the speed of the CPU. Modern CPU's use a large amount of full speed Cache RAM on the CPU chip to work around this vast speed difference. That is why even doubling the RAM speed would yield only a 20% improvement at best and in the range you have available the performance difference might be 2% which is not worth a single penny extra when compared to spending money on More RAM instead.

 

 

What DevTech said about RAM compatibility is absolutely essential.  On my ASUS mobo (skylake cpu) the G.Skill RAM couldn't overclock properly (frequent blue screens) but the Corsair RAM was perfect... so I returned the G.Skill and kept the Corsair kits -- yeah, I had ordered 2 kits as to keep the best set.

 

I got a Fractal Designs silent case; my rig is basically ASUS (mobo, nic, bluetooth) + Corsair (psu, ram) + Sandisk (ssd) + WD (hdd).  It's a beauty, runs quiet and cool, is insanely upgradeable, and will last me 2-4 yrs.

Thanks a lot, that is exactly what I am aiming for too, getting a quiet PC, as my brother will have the PC in the living room.

 

Regarding the water cooling, I was always unsure about it, not because of the water cooling efficiency, but because I always ended up reading somewhere that the two fans for the radiator would do as much noise (if not more) than a regular air cooled heatsink. But this time I'll go for a water cooling solution as you all suggested.

 

In respect to the RAM, I don't really care about the speed, as I do not plan on doing any overclocking, apart from what the motherboard does by itself. I just wanted to know the best recommended speed for regular use. From many reviews I read it seems that the speed is only important when you do overclocking or want to get higher numbers in benchmarks. I'll take the suggestion and check the ASUS compatibility list and choose a nice set.

 

Thank you very much for all your feedback, it is really appreciated!!!

6 hours ago, DevTech said:

The water is the way to go - quiet, leaves lots of space and clamps the CPU temps rock solid which is hard to explain but there is a qualitative difference that seals the deal for me.

 

You can increase the efficiency by reversing the fans on a typical mounting so that the fans blow into the case. That way, cool air enters the radiator. You end up with more hot air inside the case but a single fan of almost any sort blowing on the motherboard handles that easily and the net gain is significant.

 

 

Regarding your comment on the fans for the radiator, the case will already have two fans at the front sucking air in, plus another one at the back pushing it out. If the two radiator fans are also blowing air inwards, won't that be a bit too much?

Would it not make more sense having them blowing the air upwards (it would be mounted at the top of the BeQuiet Dark Base 900 case), so that the hot air will be expunged? This way there will be two fans blowing cool air inwards over the motherboard, and the other three pushing warm air from the inside to the outside.

 

Im doing a upgrade myself in the next couple weeks and im going for 4x8GB G-Skill Trident-Z 3200MHz modules. It fills up the slots but they have been reviewed by numous places as being the best bang for budget ram. 

As for water cooling - I have a Corsair H-100 and its great. Water coolers are generally loud when you first boot up the PC as the fans spin up, but then go whisper quiet and the water cooling itself is barely even audible. 

Great, I'm already sold on a water cooling solution :)  I was planning on going with Corsair and choosing on of their solutions. Always heard a lot and good about them. Plus I'm a Corsair fan.

 

I will have a look at those RAM sticks as well. I was thinking about 16GB as I don't hink more are needed for now. I haven't had a game or application yet that filled up my 16GB completely.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!