Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a quick question. I will be building a PC for my brother and I have a question on the amount of DDR4 RAM sticks I should go with. Should I go with 2 or 4? Is it recommended to have all 4 slots filled?

Also, what speed should they be? Would DDR4-3200 be fine, or is the minimum enough?

 

The basic specs would be:

Asus Maximus VIII Hero

i7-6700K or i5-6600K

Still need to chose an M.2

 

Many thanks!

 

 

 

choosing appropriate RAM these days doesnt matter like it used to. DDR4 is super fast, timings are always really high, but they dont matter with Intel CPUs like they used to either.

 

as for slots - doesnt matter either. If you find that 4x8GB is cheaper than 2x16GB, go for it.

7 minutes ago, conna said:

I would go with two 16 or 8 GB sticks. Later you can fill the remaining 2 slots with matching memory when he can afford it. 

I never found a use for using all 4 slots. Some of the 3rd party CPU coolers covers up a slot...

I would always go for 2 modules if possible, give you room to upgrade with just buying 2 extra modules in the future rather than having to rip out and chuck all 4 just to get an upgrade.

2x8GB would be my recomendation for a modern system.

 

DDR4-3200 is about as low as you want to go, as much as DDR4 is very fast its also got higher latencys than DDR3, so you need to be about 2666 to get any improvement and above 3000 for anything significant.

Many thanks for your feedback!

 

The PC will mainly be used for gaming with a 24'' Full HD Monitor. I was thinking about getting him 16GB in 2x 8GB, as that way later he can simply add another 2x 8GB if he needs more, instead of replacing the 4 sticks with new ones. There is also no plan to overclock, except for what the Mainboard does automatically.

 

I think in that case I will then go with 2x 8GB sticks. I had the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB DDR4-3200 marked down. The slower sticks are 2€ less, so it won't be about the price.

I wanted to get an aftermarket cooler, something silent. Probably BeQuiet or Noctua. I have a Noctual myself and had problems with my RAM sticks having high dissipators, so I will see if I can get with some that are lower profile.

5 minutes ago, Odom said:

Many thanks for your feedback!

 

The PC will mainly be used for gaming with a 24'' Full HD Monitor. I was thinking about getting him 16GB in 2x 8GB, as that way later he can simply add another 2x 8GB if he needs more, instead of replacing the 4 sticks with new ones. There is also no plan to overclock, except for what the Mainboard does automatically.

 

I think in that case I will then go with 2x 8GB sticks. I had the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB DDR4-3200 marked down. The slower sticks are 2€ less, so it won't be about the price.

I wanted to get an aftermarket cooler, something silent. Probably BeQuiet or Noctua. I have a Noctual myself and had problems with my RAM sticks having high dissipators, so I will see if I can get with some that are lower profile.

You could also look into a closed loop water cooler.  The radiator can mount to one of the exhaust fan locations and then the CPU will only have a small heatplate mounted to it.  You won't need to worry about the RAM getting in the way then.  I've been using the Corsair ones for several years and they're great.  Cools really well and nice and silent.

I've been thinking about those for a very long time (even for my own machine), but was never really convinced. When it comes to noise, I can never find a consensus in the reviews. Some say it is silent, others say that compared to the high-quality Noctua coolers they are not so quiet, so I am always torn in deciding for one or not. I love the look of the Corsair ones, though :)

 

I was looking at the Be Quiet Dark Base 900 to put everything in, and it does have multiple locations to fit radiators of all sizes.

Quote

How many DDR4 sticks should I go with?

 

 

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

 

 

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

that is the worst suggestion I've heard in a long time :laugh:

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

Whenever you have to ask how many, the answer must always be in a multiple of two when required...all others the answer is 5 even when the question does not pertain to the number 5  (eg. what do you like for breakfast? 5...what do you want to do today? 5...the server is down, what happened? 5)


 So to be on the safe side, you need 100 sticks of DDR4 memory. 

42 ... 42 is always the answer.  42 sticks of RAM.  42 is why the server is down.

 

I would, for the most part, always suggest 2 sticks of RAM (like 2x8GB) ... gives you room in the future to expand.  I also think for the most part 2 higher capacity chips will be cheaper than four lower capacity ones.

 

2 hours ago, Odom said:

I've been thinking about those for a very long time (even for my own machine), but was never really convinced. When it comes to noise, I can never find a consensus in the reviews. Some say it is silent, others say that compared to the high-quality Noctua coolers they are not so quiet, so I am always torn in deciding for one or not. I love the look of the Corsair ones, though :)

 

I was looking at the Be Quiet Dark Base 900 to put everything in, and it does have multiple locations to fit radiators of all sizes.

I will say water coolers are nice ... sure saves bloody knuckles when you get to get into the case (like changing out memory)...plus you don't have to worry if this or that fits with the cooler...etc.  Saves some headache.  Personally, I would never put another tower cooler in my PC....feels so roomy around the mobo without one.  Just my opinion though. :) 

While 42 is a very nice number , it is an answer to everything in a fictitious book. It isn't an answer to everything here. The answer has to be prime, something that goes everything nicely, that fits like a glove or in a glove, it needs to open and accepting but also firm and doesn't take crap, it also has to be confirming. 42 can never do any of that.

1 hour ago, jjkusaf said:

 

 

I will say water coolers are nice ... sure saves bloody knuckles when you get to get into the case (like changing out memory)...plus you don't have to worry if this or that fits with the cooler...etc.  Saves some headache.  Personally, I would never put another tower cooler in my PC....feels so roomy around the mobo without one.  Just my opinion though. :) 

Same here, got an H60 on sale, couldn't believe how dead simple it was to install and how much more room I have inside my case, also very quiet even when maxing the cpu.

 

No more air cooling for me.

Cool, I'll look into water cooling then. Always wanted to have one of those, guess now the time is as good as any to give it a go.

 

And thanks again for all the tips on the RAM. I'm sure I won't be able to fit 42 into the Hero mobo, but I'll try putting in 5 (Y)

17 hours ago, Odom said:

Cool, I'll look into water cooling then. Always wanted to have one of those, guess now the time is as good as any to give it a go.

 

And thanks again for all the tips on the RAM. I'm sure I won't be able to fit 42 into the Hero mobo, but I'll try putting in 5 (Y)

The water is the way to go - quiet, leaves lots of space and clamps the CPU temps rock solid which is hard to explain but there is a qualitative difference that seals the deal for me.

 

You can increase the efficiency by reversing the fans on a typical mounting so that the fans blow into the case. That way, cool air enters the radiator. You end up with more hot air inside the case but a single fan of almost any sort blowing on the motherboard handles that easily and the net gain is significant.

 

For RAM, it is a myth that modern mobos don't have issues. The cautious approach would be to buy RAM actually tested by ASUS for that motherboard. You will find the list on their website.

 

From the dawn of time, non-server mobos have always had a harder time driving 4 slots over 2 slots so definitely start with 2 maxed out.

 

The speed of the RAM does not matter an any way so get the best price. It is completely backwards to say the reason for this is because the RAM is fast. It is because the RAM is insanely SLOW compared to the speed of the CPU. Modern CPU's use a large amount of full speed Cache RAM on the CPU chip to work around this vast speed difference. That is why even doubling the RAM speed would yield only a 20% improvement at best and in the range you have available the performance difference might be 2% which is not worth a single penny extra when compared to spending money on More RAM instead.

 

 

What DevTech said about RAM compatibility is absolutely essential.  On my ASUS mobo (skylake cpu) the G.Skill RAM couldn't overclock properly (frequent blue screens) but the Corsair RAM was perfect... so I returned the G.Skill and kept the Corsair kits -- yeah, I had ordered 2 kits as to keep the best set.

 

I got a Fractal Designs silent case; my rig is basically ASUS (mobo, nic, bluetooth) + Corsair (psu, ram) + Sandisk (ssd) + WD (hdd).  It's a beauty, runs quiet and cool, is insanely upgradeable, and will last me 2-4 yrs.

Thanks a lot, that is exactly what I am aiming for too, getting a quiet PC, as my brother will have the PC in the living room.

 

Regarding the water cooling, I was always unsure about it, not because of the water cooling efficiency, but because I always ended up reading somewhere that the two fans for the radiator would do as much noise (if not more) than a regular air cooled heatsink. But this time I'll go for a water cooling solution as you all suggested.

 

In respect to the RAM, I don't really care about the speed, as I do not plan on doing any overclocking, apart from what the motherboard does by itself. I just wanted to know the best recommended speed for regular use. From many reviews I read it seems that the speed is only important when you do overclocking or want to get higher numbers in benchmarks. I'll take the suggestion and check the ASUS compatibility list and choose a nice set.

 

Thank you very much for all your feedback, it is really appreciated!!!

6 hours ago, DevTech said:

The water is the way to go - quiet, leaves lots of space and clamps the CPU temps rock solid which is hard to explain but there is a qualitative difference that seals the deal for me.

 

You can increase the efficiency by reversing the fans on a typical mounting so that the fans blow into the case. That way, cool air enters the radiator. You end up with more hot air inside the case but a single fan of almost any sort blowing on the motherboard handles that easily and the net gain is significant.

 

 

Regarding your comment on the fans for the radiator, the case will already have two fans at the front sucking air in, plus another one at the back pushing it out. If the two radiator fans are also blowing air inwards, won't that be a bit too much?

Would it not make more sense having them blowing the air upwards (it would be mounted at the top of the BeQuiet Dark Base 900 case), so that the hot air will be expunged? This way there will be two fans blowing cool air inwards over the motherboard, and the other three pushing warm air from the inside to the outside.

 

Im doing a upgrade myself in the next couple weeks and im going for 4x8GB G-Skill Trident-Z 3200MHz modules. It fills up the slots but they have been reviewed by numous places as being the best bang for budget ram. 

As for water cooling - I have a Corsair H-100 and its great. Water coolers are generally loud when you first boot up the PC as the fans spin up, but then go whisper quiet and the water cooling itself is barely even audible. 

Great, I'm already sold on a water cooling solution :)  I was planning on going with Corsair and choosing on of their solutions. Always heard a lot and good about them. Plus I'm a Corsair fan.

 

I will have a look at those RAM sticks as well. I was thinking about 16GB as I don't hink more are needed for now. I haven't had a game or application yet that filled up my 16GB completely.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
    • Did you not understand the concern of the article and/or what on-prem means?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!