• 0

Warming up: simple .exe file


Question

Hey guys, I haven't programmed in VB in over a decade and I know a ton has changed. So I'll keep it simple.

 

I still play a game Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter (GRAW) which came out in 2005.

 

I use a mod for the game named Brettzies Weapons pack 6.0 for GRAW (2005) and then GRAW2 (2007) brettzies weapon pack is 3.02. 

 

Here's the path to the required .bat file C:\Program Files (x86)\Ubisoft\Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter and C:\Program Files (x86)\Ubisoft\Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2

 

I hope what I want to do is simple. I know days of old a "shell" command would be used to start a program or in today's terms: an application. I'd like to create a simple application that will run the file "bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.bat" which will do this;

file: bp_weapons_pack_v6.0..bat 

graw.exe -o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml  (the -o tells GRAW.exe to run the modified .xml file "context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml

 

can one start a program from an xml file? the .bat file tells GRAW.exe to read/use the bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml and it will incorporate the weapon models into GRAW to play the game.

 

Q: What syntax in today's VB (express) is/are used to start external applications? my old mind remembers to create a string

 

Maybe.. DIM GRAW As String or Integer....

 

then I recall faintly Shell calls. Does this -> still apply in shell calls?

 

Q: Why Do I want to do this? because I hate having to open the folder and dbl-click the .bat file everytime I want to use it. that and I'd like to pin the new .exe file/shortcut to my taskbar and start it from my taskbar.

 

I think it might be a simple task but with me, nothing is EVER easy sometimes. :D (yeah, I find that life is easier when I can laugh at myself).

 

Regards,

Chrisj1968

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1303492-warming-up-simple-exe-file/
Share on other sites

23 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

ok, the game (modded) runs from the .bat file which tells GRAW which .xml file to use. a lot like switches in games of old like (halflife.exe -devmode -god...)

 

so it has to be something I can execute.. I can't pin a .bat file to my taskbar.. I tried.

  • 0
10 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

...

 

 

 

Process.Start("<filename>", "<arguments>")

 

So

 

Process.Start("graw.exe", "-o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml")

 

You can find a full example on the MSDN web site about the Process class here:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process(v=vs.110).aspx?cs-save-lang=1&cs-lang=vb#code-snippet-3

  • 0
Just now, virtorio said:

Process.Start("<filename>", "<arguments>")

 

So

 

Process.Start("graw.exe", "-o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml")

 

You can find a full example on the MSDN web site about the Process class here:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process(v=vs.110).aspx?cs-save-lang=1&cs-lang=vb#code-snippet-3

that's MUCH simpler than the old days!  Virtorio, if you're ever in the Reno Area, hit me up, the family and I will treat you to Dinner on me.

  • 0
9 minutes ago, virtorio said:

Process.Start("<filename>", "<arguments>")

 

So

 

Process.Start("graw.exe", "-o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml")

 

You can find a full example on the MSDN web site about the Process class here:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process(v=vs.110).aspx?cs-save-lang=1&cs-lang=vb#code-snippet-3

Didn't even think about this.

  • 0
2 minutes ago, BinaryData said:

Didn't even think about this.

no worries. you've always have been cool about helping people around here. I'm getting a win32 error in VB but I'm determined to get this working. it compiles fine, I'm missing something so I'll read that link Vitorio gave me.

  • 0
17 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

no worries. you've always have been cool about helping people around here. I'm getting a win32 error in VB but I'm determined to get this working. it compiles fine, I'm missing something so I'll read that link Vitorio gave me.

Feel free to post details about the error here. If the output executable is not placed in the games install folder, you will need to provide the full path to the executable, e.g:

 

Process.Start("C:\Program Files (x86)\Ubisoft\Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter\graw.exe", "-o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml")

 

Depending on how the game looks for files you may need to set the "working directory" to the games install folder, for which there is an easy way and a slightly more difficult way.

  • 0
2 minutes ago, virtorio said:

Feel free to post details about the error here. If the output executable is not placed in the games install folder, you will need to provide the full path to the executable, e.g:

 

Process.Start("C:\Program Files (x86)\Ubisoft\Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter\graw.exe", "-o context_bp_weapons_pack_v6.0.xml")

 

Depending on how the game looks for files you may also set the "working directory" to the games install folder, for which there is an easy way and a slightly more difficult way.

I figured it out. If I created the app to use a button click, I had a ton of work to do and waste. So  I put the code on the form1.form and it boots automatically. I tried to put an Exit in there but it gave me an error.

 

I'm taking baby steps here but it works. I need to create an icon for it. here's the code. I'm relearning to put in comments for easier reading of code reading. good programmers, I remember live by it.

 

App_code.png

Now to pretty it up. I'll give it an Icon and possibly look into adding a check box to run modded or unmodded later

  • 0
13 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

I figured it out. If I created the app to use a button click, I had a ton of work to do and waste. So  I put the code on the form1.form and it boots automatically. I tried to put an Exit in there but it gave me an error.

 

I'm taking baby steps here but it works. I need to create an icon for it. here's the code. I'm relearning to put in comments for easier reading of code reading. good programmers, I remember live by it.

 

App_code.png

Now to pretty it up. I'll give it an Icon and possibly look into adding a check box to run modded or unmodded later

Could do an if statement with a check box, if box = check then blah blah else run blah blah. OR just a simple window "Normal Mode: Run!" below it would be "Modded Mode: Run!" and it would run the modded version. I haven't touched vb.net since 2007. I'm learning more of C++ but that's slow going.

  • 0

You don't need to create a program at all. 

Quote
  1. Create a shortcut to your batch file.
  2. Get into shortcut property and change target to something like: cmd.exe /C "path-to-your-batch".
  3. Simply drag your new shortcut to the taskbar. It should now be pinnable.
    http://superuser.com/questions/100249/how-to-pin-either-a-shortcut-or-a-batch-file-to-the-new-windows-7-8-and-10-task

 

 

  • 0
2 hours ago, Andre S. said:

You don't need to create a program at all. 

 

I believe you. I want to get back into programming. so I figured a simple .exe would be a good start. I haven't touched VB since around VB 4 (my age is showing right?). But I Downloaded VB Express 2015 last night and fired it up. I used to teach myself how to create simple databases. Created one that I could catalog all my DVD's in the late 1990's. 

  • 0
9 hours ago, BinaryData said:

Could do an if statement with a check box, if box = check then blah blah else run blah blah. OR just a simple window "Normal Mode: Run!" below it would be "Modded Mode: Run!" and it would run the modded version. I haven't touched vb.net since 2007. I'm learning more of C++ but that's slow going.

Geez, I didn't mean to fry your brain in the middle of learning C++. I might have to learn that language instead. I've heard it's extremely powerful, more so than VB.

  • 0
34 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

Geez, I didn't mean to fry your brain in the middle of learning C++. I might have to learn that language instead. I've heard it's extremely powerful, more so than VB.

It depends what's meant by powerful. Both languages have a different purpose. In a broad sence you could say that Ii you need to do low level or system programming, or you want to manage memory yourself, C++ will most likely be better for the job. For other types of applications, the .NET framework provides a rich set of libraries that allow you to write more with less code. This is however a very broad comparison. There is much more to take into consideration, more than I know about :) 

  • 0
Just now, Raphaël G. said:

It depends what's meant by powerful. Both languages have a different purpose. In a broad sence you could say that Ii you need to do low level or system programming, or you want to manage memory yourself, C++ will most likely be better for the job. For other types of applications, the .NET framework provides a rich set of libraries that allow you to write more with less code. This is however a very broad comparison. There is much more to take into consideration, more than I know about :) 

Agreed.

 

@chrisj1968

I've found that C++ is oriented towards more complex and large projects, while VB.Net has been better suited for smaller scale applications. Each language can be used for large or small, all depends on the project. We'll take creating a game for instance. Let's look at World of Warcraft. Yes, it can be developed in VB .Net, but will that suit it best? Probably not. That's where C++ or Assembly comes into play. You could look at Photoshop as another example. I've always found VB .Net to be the perfect tool creation language. It's easy, and straight to the point, while C++ you have to monkey with UI code, perfecting that, and THEN getting your core code in place.

  • 0

Question: I just had an epiphany. while on simple programming, I have a daughter who is on the PC too long. my idea, why can't I create an app that allows me to establish a set time of use, an hour or two and then loggoff automatically. have it run in the background and automatically logoff.

 

what would be a best route approach to this? I'd like to use a simplified way by using the system time feature within Windows 10.

  • 0
12 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

Question: I just had an epiphany. while on simple programming, I have a daughter who is on the PC too long. my idea, why can't I create an app that allows me to establish a set time of use, an hour or two and then loggoff automatically. have it run in the background and automatically logoff.

 

what would be a best route approach to this? I'd like to use a simplified way by using the system time feature within Windows 10.

Setup Family Safety. No need to reinvent the wheel.

  • 0
14 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

Question: I just had an epiphany. while on simple programming, I have a daughter who is on the PC too long. my idea, why can't I create an app that allows me to establish a set time of use, an hour or two and then loggoff automatically. have it run in the background and automatically logoff.

 

what would be a best route approach to this? I'd like to use a simplified way by using the system time feature within Windows 10.

http://digiparent.weebly.com/

 

This is free and does just that.

  • 0
9 hours ago, chrisj1968 said:

Geez, I didn't mean to fry your brain in the middle of learning C++. I might have to learn that language instead. I've heard it's extremely powerful, more so than VB.

Unless you intend to become a professional programmer in a field that uses C++ extensively (and there are fewer of those than you might think), don't waste your time. I'm not sure what your intentions are but you can write basically anything in VB.Net. Including operating systems and AAA games. If you spend a very long time writing VB you might find that it's somewhat verbose, that most code samples for .NET libraries are in C#, that it's hard to find other highly competent VB programmers to help you online; and that there are lots of really cool languages you could learn to help you become a better programmer (like Haskell, Clojure, Assembly, etc); at which point you might want to learn something else - but probably not C++.

 

Quote

I've found that C++ is oriented towards more complex and large projects, while VB.Net has been better suited for smaller scale applications.

Because of ...? VB.Net is basically a clone of C# with slightly different syntax and some language-specific namespaces and functions to make it easier for beginners and familiar to VB6 programmers. It's statically and quite strongly typed, has namespaces, first-class OOP support and ok FP support, generics, it's supported by ReSharper, it compiles quickly, it produces assemblies that can be easily consumed by any CLI language and turned into NuGet packages for painless inclusion in other projects. C++ actually lacks several of these traits (it has no notion of assemblies and isn't amenable to nice package management like NuGet/Fake, its compilation times are a huge problem on large projects, header file management is pure tedium and doesn't exist in any other language but C, tooling support was far off what you get with Visual Studio/ReSharper for C# and VB last time I checked). I personally found it a huge pain to work on large C++ projects and I had that unfortunate experience at several different companies; this along with many other flaws of the language ultimately drove me towards more productive technologies.

 

I would certainly never write a large project in C++; I might write some parts where I really need something only C++ can give me - placement new, intrinsics, really good codegen - but that's unlikely to be more than 5% of the code.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!