Budget build for friend


Recommended Posts

Building custom computer for a friend. Here's the list I've made so far...

https://pcpartpicker.com/user/luke31500/saved/#view=RkgdnQ

 

Still need to find an OS. I've been looking for a decently priced, not sketchy, copy of win 10.

PLEASE DO NOT BE GENTLE. :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1303584-budget-build-for-friend/
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, FlailingCamper said:

Building custom computer for a friend. Here's the list I've made so far...

https://pcpartpicker.com/user/luke31500/saved/#view=RkgdnQ

 

Still need to find an OS. I've been looking for a decently priced, not sketchy, copy of win 10.

PLEASE DO NOT BE GENTLE. :|

In how much of a hurry is he? Current gen cards at 100$ (RX 460) and 150$ (RX 470) are on their way and they'll likely beat anything from the previous gen in price/performance.

7 minutes ago, slamfire92 said:

Pentium g4400 trades blows with 6300 and its less than $60

 

How so, it looks like it is about 1/2 the speed - http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Pentium+G4400+%40+3.30GHz

 

Could be the synthetic benchmark however. Personally I'd go intel over amd anyday

3 minutes ago, xendrome said:

How so, it looks like it is about 1/2 the speed - http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Pentium+G4400+%40+3.30GHz

I just went by this. Sorry if cpuboss isn't reputable.http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Pentium-G4400-vs-AMD-FX-6300

 

Going Intel would open the door for him to upgrade to an i series chip down the road. If you go AMD, he can still upgrade, but still a flawed, underperforming architecture. Wait for Zen if you want AMD.

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a z170 MB $100

https://pcpartpicker.com/product/Fn7CmG/gigabyte-motherboard-gaz170hd3

 

and a 950 gfx card $112

https://pcpartpicker.com/product/XrVBD3/msi-video-card-gtx950gaming2g

 

850 EVO 250GB SSD $90

https://pcpartpicker.com/product/3kL7YJ/samsung-internal-hard-drive-mz75e250bam

 

 

I'm @ $619. Swapped out your Amd stuff for Intel, changed to a 950 and got a Samsung 250GB 850 Evo instead.

 

I prefer to buy AMD, but until Zen materializes and begins to actually compete, I can't in good conscience steer anyone to them at this point. Intel is just better right now.

 

Edited by slamfire92
1 hour ago, slamfire92 said:

Pentium g4400 trades blows with 6300 and its less than $60

And with the board you've linked the combos are about the same price and I'm not sure DDR4 support and 1 M.2 slot are worth it on a tight budget. There are cheaper boards I suspect, but I still wouldn't go with a dual-core due to my usage. OP does need to answer some questions before we can further narrow it down.

Edited by Luc2k
14 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

And with the board you've linked the combo's are about the same price and I'm not sure DDR4 support and 1 M.2 slot are worth it on a tight budget. There are cheaper boards I suspect, but I still wouldn't go with a dual-core due to my usage. OP does need to answer some questions before we can further narrow it down.

I am because if it were me, I'd want to have a meaningful upgrade path on the same hardware. Muticore will become more important with DX12 and Intel is strong in both multi-threaded while being much better at single-threaded tasks.

 

That processor for me is a "foot in the door" with decent enough performance that will allow him to upgrade to a MUCH better CPU in the future. If he goes with AMD, he's stuck with DDR3 (which is a wash price-wise with the DDR4 I spec'd) and he's still going to have a weak CPU with only weak CPU's to upgrade to later.

 

Again, AMD is a no-go for me till Zen shows up. My current system as well as the last two I built were AMD, btw. I've got an i5, 8GB DDR4 and a Z170 MB sitting on ice till I can afford the rest of the components though.

 

Edited by slamfire92
3 hours ago, BinaryData said:

Ok, so Windows 10 is technically still "free" until the end of July, from what I've read. I could probably help you out with getting a legitimate OS. Once you get the system built, hit me up. I'll toss you one of my unused Windows 7 Keys.

He's using Linux... Irrelevant..

6 hours ago, slamfire92 said:

I am because if it were me, I'd want to have a meaningful upgrade path on the same hardware. Muticore will become more important with DX12 and Intel is strong in both multi-threaded while being much better at single-threaded tasks.

 

That processor for me is a "foot in the door" with decent enough performance that will allow him to upgrade to a MUCH better CPU in the future. If he goes with AMD, he's stuck with DDR3 (which is a wash price-wise with the DDR4 I spec'd) and he's still going to have a weak CPU with only weak CPU's to upgrade to later.

 

Again, AMD is a no-go for me till Zen shows up. My current system as well as the last two I built were AMD, btw. I've got an i5, 8GB DDR4 and a Z170 MB sitting on ice till I can afford the rest of the components though.

 

I'll give you the upgrade path if he wants to buy right now, but, while Intel may be good at multi-threading, in the current match-up, Pentium's  2 cores aren't going to beat the FX's 6 in programs that use them.

 

If he really wants to future proof, it would be better to wait and see what Zen brings as it is a major shift. Also, AMD uses fewer sockets for longer than Intel and the CPUs are priced more aggressively unlike, say a i5 K, which gets a measly 10% off over its lifetime outside of deals (where I live at any rate). Of course, the lower end Zen won't come at launch so that's a potential issue. The differences between DDR3 and DDR4 are meaningless in most scenarios so get whatever the board supports.

 

I'm curios, why did up you buy parts and why aren't you using them since you have the base. Was it some amazing deal, and do you need the old PC fully for something else?

Edited by Luc2k

I'd consider the a 6350, or even one of the 9XXX series if your budget allows,

(it's a lot of bang for your buck, regardless of which camp anyone belongs to (<amd or intel>) real time usage matters more than some benchmark figure imo)

I agree with an upgrade to the GPU a 9XX will be better unless gaming is a secondary concern,  for everything else the 7 will suffice

(possible upgrade needed to the PSU if you do build around a 9 series amd)

12 hours ago, Luc2k said:

I'll give you the upgrade path if he wants to buy right now, but, while Intel may be good at multi-threading, in the current match-up, Pentium's  2 cores aren't going to beat the FX's 6 in programs that use them.

 

If he really wants to future proof, it would be better to wait and see what Zen brings as it is a major shift. Also, AMD uses fewer sockets for longer than Intel and the CPUs are priced more aggressively unlike, say a i5 K, which gets a measly 10% off over its lifetime outside of deals (where I live at any rate). Of course, the lower end Zen won't come at launch so that's a potential issue. The differences between DDR3 and DDR4 are meaningless in most scenarios so get whatever the board supports.

 

I'm curios, why did up you buy parts and why aren't you using them since you have the base. Was it some amazing deal, and do you need the old PC fully for something else?

From what I've read, most applications are single/dual core oriented currently. DX12 is going to change things up on the gaming side, but unless you're going to be using high-level rendering software, compiling programs maybe photoshop, I doubt the extra cores on the AMD will matter much. Intel cpus also perform more instructions per clock, so thats a plus with the Pentium and he'll benefit even more from that when he moves up to an i5 or i7. Its true, they hold they're value and aren't cheap, but they're top dog atm. Intel/Nvidia love to milk the #1 spot for all they can get. Look @ Nvidia's $1200 gfx card. That MSRP is the biggest "F U cause we can!" ever.

 

As for why I'm sitting on my stuff....I want to build completely new this time. My PSU is over 4yrs old and I don't like my current case much. Want to buy a Corsair H60 cooler, a new PSU and waiting for a better third party RX480. Why AMD for gfx? Although I play PC games, my main form of gaming is old-school emulation. Adaptive refresh "Freesync" allows the emulated games to run smoother due to the odd refresh rates of certain arcade games used. Not paying the Nvidia tax for a gpu and then get nailed again as Gsync monitors cost more than Freesync compatible ones. Additionally, The Arcade emulator "MAME" is very Single-threaded and as mentioned, Intel cpus execute more instructions per clock, making them the better option. Higan a SNES emulator prefers Intel as well.

 

I'd have preferred AMD, but simply got tired of waiting on a better CPU. If Zen turns out to be what it claims, I'll be building another PC. Need a new HTPC anyway :)

 

 

 

Edited by slamfire92
6 hours ago, slamfire92 said:

From what I've read, most applications are single/dual core oriented currently. DX12 is going to change things up on the gaming side, but unless you're going to be using high-level rendering software, compiling programs maybe photoshop, I doubt the extra cores on the AMD will matter much. Intel cpus also perform more instructions per clock, so thats a plus with the Pentium and he'll benefit even more from that when he moves up to an i5 or i7. Its true, they hold they're value and aren't cheap, but they're top dog atm. Intel/Nvidia love to milk the #1 spot for all they can get. Look @ Nvidia's $1200 gfx card. That MSRP is the biggest "F U cause we can!" ever.

While that is true about single applications, I'm running quite a few at the same time (not necessarily multiple games though). Anyway, since the OP hasn't come back, there's not much else left to say about it.

6 hours ago, slamfire92 said:

As for why I'm sitting on my stuff....I want to build completely new this time. My PSU is over 4yrs old and I don't like my current case much. Want to buy a Corsair H60 cooler, a new PSU and waiting for a better third party RX480.

Suspected as much, although it's not something I would do. I prefer getting everything at once and have it operational because buying ahead of time could mean that I paid more just to have something sitting in a box (shorter warranty as well). Of course there are exceptions (deals, availability, Brexit :)), but that is my general approach.

1 hour ago, Luc2k said:

While that is true about single applications, I'm running quite a few at the same time (not necessarily multiple games though). Anyway, since the OP hasn't come back, there's not much else left to say about it.

Suspected as much, although it's not something I would do. I prefer getting everything at once and have it operational because buying ahead of time could mean that I paid more just to have something sitting in a box (shorter warranty as well). Of course there are exceptions (deals, availability, Brexit :)), but that is my general approach.

I would've preferred to buy it all at once, but funds haven't permitted. If I hadn't started buying parts, I'd never commit. It won't be but a couple of months till I'm ready, though :)

 

On ‎21‎/‎07‎/‎2016 at 11:40 PM, FlailingCamper said:

Building custom computer for a friend. Here's the list I've made so far...

https://pcpartpicker.com/user/luke31500/saved/#view=RkgdnQ

 

Still need to find an OS. I've been looking for a decently priced, not sketchy, copy of win 10.

PLEASE DO NOT BE GENTLE. :|

Well, what is the computer gonna be used for?

As you can see many here debate assuming your friend will be gaming. But we need more info then just a budget number.

1. Is gaming a goal here?

2. What resolutions are we talking about and what games?

3. Are you looking to get the best for a certain budget now or can you upgrade later?

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!